mirror of
https://github.com/sheumann/hush.git
synced 2025-02-05 21:30:50 +00:00
Revert duplicate patch.
I don't know why patch decided to apply this even though it was already in the tree. I thought the other hunks failed because they were totally unrelated leakage from Bernhard's tree (which they are; was the a reason for bundling them in with this fix? Do they have something to do with the GCC 2.95 fix? I suspect they prevent me from backporting this patch to 1.2.2 because the header consolidation into libbb.h hadn't been done yet, and no I'm not fixing it up: if that's the case then this patch won't be in 1.2.2 due to extraneous changes bundled with it that prevent a clean backport without rolling a new patch).
This commit is contained in:
parent
20cc6d567f
commit
577905f1e4
@ -83,14 +83,6 @@
|
|||||||
# endif
|
# endif
|
||||||
#endif
|
#endif
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* gcc-2.95 had no va_copy but only __va_copy. */
|
|
||||||
#if !__GNUC_PREREQ (3,0)
|
|
||||||
# include <stdarg.h>
|
|
||||||
# if !defined va_copy && defined __va_copy
|
|
||||||
# define va_copy(d,s) __va_copy((d),(s))
|
|
||||||
# endif
|
|
||||||
#endif
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* ---- Endian Detection ------------------------------------ */
|
/* ---- Endian Detection ------------------------------------ */
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#if (defined __digital__ && defined __unix__)
|
#if (defined __digital__ && defined __unix__)
|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user