From 757361f9f58e120ddb9855fa0f50e12b921c37f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Denis Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 08:26:47 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] hush: fix "... pattern) cmd;; esac" case

---
 shell/hush.c       |  6 ++++--
 shell/hush_doc.txt | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/shell/hush.c b/shell/hush.c
index db608018c..47cdf6f02 100644
--- a/shell/hush.c
+++ b/shell/hush.c
@@ -2986,7 +2986,9 @@ static int done_word(o_string *word, struct p_context *ctx)
 		}
 #if HAS_KEYWORDS
 #if ENABLE_HUSH_CASE
-		if (ctx->ctx_dsemicolon) {
+		if (ctx->ctx_dsemicolon
+		 && strcmp(word->data, "esac") != 0 /* not "... pattern) cmd;; esac" */
+		) {
 			/* already done when ctx_dsemicolon was set to 1: */
 			/* ctx->ctx_res_w = RES_MATCH; */
 			ctx->ctx_dsemicolon = 0;
@@ -3112,7 +3114,7 @@ static void done_pipe(struct p_context *ctx, pipe_style type)
 	if (not_null IF_HAS_KEYWORDS(|| ctx->ctx_res_w != RES_NONE)) {
 		struct pipe *new_p;
 		debug_printf_parse("done_pipe: adding new pipe: "
-				" not_null:%d ctx->ctx_res_w:%d\n",
+				"not_null:%d ctx->ctx_res_w:%d\n",
 				not_null, ctx->ctx_res_w);
 		new_p = new_pipe();
 		ctx->pipe->next = new_p;
diff --git a/shell/hush_doc.txt b/shell/hush_doc.txt
index ec5dd00f2..b2fd24426 100644
--- a/shell/hush_doc.txt
+++ b/shell/hush_doc.txt
@@ -72,10 +72,32 @@ Dummy trailing pipes with no commands are artifacts of imperfect
 parsing algorithm - done_pipe() appends new pipe struct beforehand
 and last one ends up empty and unused.
 
+"for" and "case" statements (ab)use progs[] to keep their data
+instead of argv vector progs[] usually do. "for" keyword is forcing
+pipe termination after first word, which makes hush see
+"for v in..." as "for v; in...". "case" keyword does the same.
+Other judiciuosly placed hacks make hush see
+"case word in a) cmd1;; b) cmd2;; esac" as if it was
+"case word; match a; cmd; match b; cmd2; esac"
+("match" is a fictitious keyword here):
+
+"case word in a) cmd1;; b) cmd2; esac" -
+pipe 0 res_word=NONE followup=1 SEQ
+ prog 0 group {}:
+  pipe 0 res_word=CASE followup=SEQ prog[0] 'word'
+  pipe 1 res_word=MATCH followup=SEQ prog[0] 'a'
+  pipe 2 res_word=CASEI followup=SEQ prog[0] 'cmd1'
+  pipe 3 res_word=MATCH followup=SEQ prog[0] 'b'
+  pipe 4 res_word=CASEI followup=SEQ prog[0] 'cmd2'
+  pipe 5 res_word=CASEI followup=SEQ prog[0] 'cmd3'
+  pipe 6 res_word=ESAC followup=SEQ
+  pipe 7 res_word=NONE followup=(null)
+pipe 1 res_word=NONE followup=1 SEQ
+
 
 2008-01
 
-	This is how hush runs commands:
+	Command execution
 
 /* callsite: process_command_subs */
 generate_stream_from_list(struct pipe *head) - handles `cmds`