2018-12-28 15:25:28 +00:00
|
|
|
|
This is gprof.info, produced by makeinfo version 6.4 from gprof.texi.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
This file documents the gprof profiler of the GNU system.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2018-12-28 15:25:28 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Copyright (C) 1988-2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
|
|
|
|
|
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or
|
|
|
|
|
any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no
|
|
|
|
|
Invariant Sections, with no Front-Cover Texts, and with no Back-Cover
|
|
|
|
|
Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled "GNU
|
|
|
|
|
Free Documentation License".
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
INFO-DIR-SECTION Software development
|
|
|
|
|
START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY
|
|
|
|
|
* gprof: (gprof). Profiling your program's execution
|
|
|
|
|
END-INFO-DIR-ENTRY
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
File: gprof.info, Node: Top, Next: Introduction, Up: (dir)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profiling a Program: Where Does It Spend Its Time?
|
|
|
|
|
**************************************************
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
This manual describes the GNU profiler, 'gprof', and how you can use it
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
to determine which parts of a program are taking most of the execution
|
|
|
|
|
time. We assume that you know how to write, compile, and execute
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
programs. GNU 'gprof' was written by Jay Fenlason.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2018-12-28 15:25:28 +00:00
|
|
|
|
This manual is for 'gprof' (GNU Binutils) version 2.30.90.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This document is distributed under the terms of the GNU Free
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Documentation License version 1.3. A copy of the license is included in
|
|
|
|
|
the section entitled "GNU Free Documentation License".
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Menu:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Introduction:: What profiling means, and why it is useful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Compiling:: How to compile your program for profiling.
|
|
|
|
|
* Executing:: Executing your program to generate profile data
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
* Invoking:: How to run 'gprof', and its options
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
* Output:: Interpreting 'gprof''s output
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Inaccuracy:: Potential problems you should be aware of
|
|
|
|
|
* How do I?:: Answers to common questions
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
* Incompatibilities:: (between GNU 'gprof' and Unix 'gprof'.)
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
* Details:: Details of how profiling is done
|
|
|
|
|
* GNU Free Documentation License:: GNU Free Documentation License
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
File: gprof.info, Node: Introduction, Next: Compiling, Prev: Top, Up: Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Introduction to Profiling
|
|
|
|
|
***************************
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profiling allows you to learn where your program spent its time and
|
|
|
|
|
which functions called which other functions while it was executing.
|
|
|
|
|
This information can show you which pieces of your program are slower
|
|
|
|
|
than you expected, and might be candidates for rewriting to make your
|
|
|
|
|
program execute faster. It can also tell you which functions are being
|
|
|
|
|
called more or less often than you expected. This may help you spot
|
|
|
|
|
bugs that had otherwise been unnoticed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since the profiler uses information collected during the actual
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
execution of your program, it can be used on programs that are too large
|
|
|
|
|
or too complex to analyze by reading the source. However, how your
|
|
|
|
|
program is run will affect the information that shows up in the profile
|
|
|
|
|
data. If you don't use some feature of your program while it is being
|
|
|
|
|
profiled, no profile information will be generated for that feature.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profiling has several steps:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* You must compile and link your program with profiling enabled.
|
|
|
|
|
*Note Compiling a Program for Profiling: Compiling.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* You must execute your program to generate a profile data file.
|
|
|
|
|
*Note Executing the Program: Executing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
* You must run 'gprof' to analyze the profile data. *Note 'gprof'
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Command Summary: Invoking.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The next three chapters explain these steps in greater detail.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Several forms of output are available from the analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "flat profile" shows how much time your program spent in each
|
|
|
|
|
function, and how many times that function was called. If you simply
|
|
|
|
|
want to know which functions burn most of the cycles, it is stated
|
|
|
|
|
concisely here. *Note The Flat Profile: Flat Profile.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
The "call graph" shows, for each function, which functions called it,
|
|
|
|
|
which other functions it called, and how many times. There is also an
|
|
|
|
|
estimate of how much time was spent in the subroutines of each function.
|
|
|
|
|
This can suggest places where you might try to eliminate function calls
|
|
|
|
|
that use a lot of time. *Note The Call Graph: Call Graph.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "annotated source" listing is a copy of the program's source
|
|
|
|
|
code, labeled with the number of times each line of the program was
|
|
|
|
|
executed. *Note The Annotated Source Listing: Annotated Source.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To better understand how profiling works, you may wish to read a
|
|
|
|
|
description of its implementation. *Note Implementation of Profiling:
|
|
|
|
|
Implementation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
File: gprof.info, Node: Compiling, Next: Executing, Prev: Introduction, Up: Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 Compiling a Program for Profiling
|
|
|
|
|
***********************************
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The first step in generating profile information for your program is to
|
|
|
|
|
compile and link it with profiling enabled.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
To compile a source file for profiling, specify the '-pg' option when
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
you run the compiler. (This is in addition to the options you normally
|
|
|
|
|
use.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
To link the program for profiling, if you use a compiler such as 'cc'
|
|
|
|
|
to do the linking, simply specify '-pg' in addition to your usual
|
|
|
|
|
options. The same option, '-pg', alters either compilation or linking
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
to do what is necessary for profiling. Here are examples:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cc -g -c myprog.c utils.c -pg
|
|
|
|
|
cc -o myprog myprog.o utils.o -pg
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
The '-pg' option also works with a command that both compiles and
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
links:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cc -o myprog myprog.c utils.c -g -pg
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Note: The '-pg' option must be part of your compilation options as
|
|
|
|
|
well as your link options. If it is not then no call-graph data will be
|
|
|
|
|
gathered and when you run 'gprof' you will get an error message like
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
this:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gprof: gmon.out file is missing call-graph data
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
If you add the '-Q' switch to suppress the printing of the call graph
|
|
|
|
|
data you will still be able to see the time samples:
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flat profile:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds.
|
|
|
|
|
% cumulative self self total
|
|
|
|
|
time seconds seconds calls Ts/call Ts/call name
|
|
|
|
|
44.12 0.07 0.07 zazLoop
|
|
|
|
|
35.29 0.14 0.06 main
|
|
|
|
|
20.59 0.17 0.04 bazMillion
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
If you run the linker 'ld' directly instead of through a compiler
|
|
|
|
|
such as 'cc', you may have to specify a profiling startup file 'gcrt0.o'
|
|
|
|
|
as the first input file instead of the usual startup file 'crt0.o'. In
|
|
|
|
|
addition, you would probably want to specify the profiling C library,
|
|
|
|
|
'libc_p.a', by writing '-lc_p' instead of the usual '-lc'. This is not
|
|
|
|
|
absolutely necessary, but doing this gives you number-of-calls
|
|
|
|
|
information for standard library functions such as 'read' and 'open'.
|
|
|
|
|
For example:
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ld -o myprog /lib/gcrt0.o myprog.o utils.o -lc_p
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are running the program on a system which supports shared
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
libraries you may run into problems with the profiling support code in a
|
|
|
|
|
shared library being called before that library has been fully
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
initialised. This is usually detected by the program encountering a
|
|
|
|
|
segmentation fault as soon as it is run. The solution is to link
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
against a static version of the library containing the profiling support
|
|
|
|
|
code, which for 'gcc' users can be done via the '-static' or
|
|
|
|
|
'-static-libgcc' command line option. For example:
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gcc -g -pg -static-libgcc myprog.c utils.c -o myprog
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
If you compile only some of the modules of the program with '-pg',
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
you can still profile the program, but you won't get complete
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
information about the modules that were compiled without '-pg'. The
|
|
|
|
|
only information you get for the functions in those modules is the total
|
|
|
|
|
time spent in them; there is no record of how many times they were
|
|
|
|
|
called, or from where. This will not affect the flat profile (except
|
|
|
|
|
that the 'calls' field for the functions will be blank), but will
|
|
|
|
|
greatly reduce the usefulness of the call graph.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you wish to perform line-by-line profiling you should use the
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'gcov' tool instead of 'gprof'. See that tool's manual or info pages
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
for more details of how to do this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Note, older versions of 'gcc' produce line-by-line profiling
|
|
|
|
|
information that works with 'gprof' rather than 'gcov' so there is still
|
|
|
|
|
support for displaying this kind of information in 'gprof'. *Note
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Line-by-line Profiling: Line-by-line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
It also worth noting that 'gcc' implements a '-finstrument-functions'
|
|
|
|
|
command line option which will insert calls to special user supplied
|
|
|
|
|
instrumentation routines at the entry and exit of every function in
|
|
|
|
|
their program. This can be used to implement an alternative profiling
|
|
|
|
|
scheme.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
File: gprof.info, Node: Executing, Next: Invoking, Prev: Compiling, Up: Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 Executing the Program
|
|
|
|
|
***********************
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once the program is compiled for profiling, you must run it in order to
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
generate the information that 'gprof' needs. Simply run the program as
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
usual, using the normal arguments, file names, etc. The program should
|
|
|
|
|
run normally, producing the same output as usual. It will, however, run
|
|
|
|
|
somewhat slower than normal because of the time spent collecting and
|
|
|
|
|
writing the profile data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The way you run the program--the arguments and input that you give
|
|
|
|
|
it--may have a dramatic effect on what the profile information shows.
|
|
|
|
|
The profile data will describe the parts of the program that were
|
|
|
|
|
activated for the particular input you use. For example, if the first
|
|
|
|
|
command you give to your program is to quit, the profile data will show
|
|
|
|
|
the time used in initialization and in cleanup, but not much else.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your program will write the profile data into a file called
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'gmon.out' just before exiting. If there is already a file called
|
|
|
|
|
'gmon.out', its contents are overwritten. There is currently no way to
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
tell the program to write the profile data under a different name, but
|
|
|
|
|
you can rename the file afterwards if you are concerned that it may be
|
|
|
|
|
overwritten.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
In order to write the 'gmon.out' file properly, your program must
|
|
|
|
|
exit normally: by returning from 'main' or by calling 'exit'. Calling
|
|
|
|
|
the low-level function '_exit' does not write the profile data, and
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
neither does abnormal termination due to an unhandled signal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
The 'gmon.out' file is written in the program's _current working
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
directory_ at the time it exits. This means that if your program calls
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'chdir', the 'gmon.out' file will be left in the last directory your
|
|
|
|
|
program 'chdir''d to. If you don't have permission to write in this
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
directory, the file is not written, and you will get an error message.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Older versions of the GNU profiling library may also write a file
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
called 'bb.out'. This file, if present, contains an human-readable
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
listing of the basic-block execution counts. Unfortunately, the
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
appearance of a human-readable 'bb.out' means the basic-block counts
|
|
|
|
|
didn't get written into 'gmon.out'. The Perl script 'bbconv.pl',
|
|
|
|
|
included with the 'gprof' source distribution, will convert a 'bb.out'
|
|
|
|
|
file into a format readable by 'gprof'. Invoke it like this:
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bbconv.pl < bb.out > BH-DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
This translates the information in 'bb.out' into a form that 'gprof'
|
|
|
|
|
can understand. But you still need to tell 'gprof' about the existence
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
of this translated information. To do that, include BB-DATA on the
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'gprof' command line, _along with 'gmon.out'_, like this:
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gprof OPTIONS EXECUTABLE-FILE gmon.out BB-DATA [YET-MORE-PROFILE-DATA-FILES...] [> OUTFILE]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
File: gprof.info, Node: Invoking, Next: Output, Prev: Executing, Up: Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
4 'gprof' Command Summary
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
*************************
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
After you have a profile data file 'gmon.out', you can run 'gprof' to
|
|
|
|
|
interpret the information in it. The 'gprof' program prints a flat
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
profile and a call graph on standard output. Typically you would
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
redirect the output of 'gprof' into a file with '>'.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
You run 'gprof' like this:
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gprof OPTIONS [EXECUTABLE-FILE [PROFILE-DATA-FILES...]] [> OUTFILE]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here square-brackets indicate optional arguments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
If you omit the executable file name, the file 'a.out' is used. If
|
|
|
|
|
you give no profile data file name, the file 'gmon.out' is used. If any
|
|
|
|
|
file is not in the proper format, or if the profile data file does not
|
|
|
|
|
appear to belong to the executable file, an error message is printed.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can give more than one profile data file by entering all their
|
|
|
|
|
names after the executable file name; then the statistics in all the
|
|
|
|
|
data files are summed together.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The order of these options does not matter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Menu:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
* Output Options:: Controlling 'gprof''s output style
|
|
|
|
|
* Analysis Options:: Controlling how 'gprof' analyzes its data
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
* Miscellaneous Options::
|
|
|
|
|
* Deprecated Options:: Options you no longer need to use, but which
|
|
|
|
|
have been retained for compatibility
|
|
|
|
|
* Symspecs:: Specifying functions to include or exclude
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
File: gprof.info, Node: Output Options, Next: Analysis Options, Up: Invoking
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 Output Options
|
|
|
|
|
==================
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
These options specify which of several output formats 'gprof' should
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
produce.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Many of these options take an optional "symspec" to specify functions
|
|
|
|
|
to be included or excluded. These options can be specified multiple
|
|
|
|
|
times, with different symspecs, to include or exclude sets of symbols.
|
|
|
|
|
*Note Symspecs: Symspecs.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Specifying any of these options overrides the default ('-p -q'),
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
which prints a flat profile and call graph analysis for all functions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'-A[SYMSPEC]'
|
|
|
|
|
'--annotated-source[=SYMSPEC]'
|
|
|
|
|
The '-A' option causes 'gprof' to print annotated source code. If
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
SYMSPEC is specified, print output only for matching symbols.
|
|
|
|
|
*Note The Annotated Source Listing: Annotated Source.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'-b'
|
|
|
|
|
'--brief'
|
|
|
|
|
If the '-b' option is given, 'gprof' doesn't print the verbose
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
blurbs that try to explain the meaning of all of the fields in the
|
|
|
|
|
tables. This is useful if you intend to print out the output, or
|
|
|
|
|
are tired of seeing the blurbs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'-C[SYMSPEC]'
|
|
|
|
|
'--exec-counts[=SYMSPEC]'
|
|
|
|
|
The '-C' option causes 'gprof' to print a tally of functions and
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
the number of times each was called. If SYMSPEC is specified,
|
|
|
|
|
print tally only for matching symbols.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the profile data file contains basic-block count records,
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
specifying the '-l' option, along with '-C', will cause basic-block
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
execution counts to be tallied and displayed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'-i'
|
|
|
|
|
'--file-info'
|
|
|
|
|
The '-i' option causes 'gprof' to display summary information about
|
|
|
|
|
the profile data file(s) and then exit. The number of histogram,
|
|
|
|
|
call graph, and basic-block count records is displayed.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'-I DIRS'
|
|
|
|
|
'--directory-path=DIRS'
|
|
|
|
|
The '-I' option specifies a list of search directories in which to
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
find source files. Environment variable GPROF_PATH can also be
|
|
|
|
|
used to convey this information. Used mostly for annotated source
|
|
|
|
|
output.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'-J[SYMSPEC]'
|
|
|
|
|
'--no-annotated-source[=SYMSPEC]'
|
|
|
|
|
The '-J' option causes 'gprof' not to print annotated source code.
|
|
|
|
|
If SYMSPEC is specified, 'gprof' prints annotated source, but
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
excludes matching symbols.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'-L'
|
|
|
|
|
'--print-path'
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Normally, source filenames are printed with the path component
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
suppressed. The '-L' option causes 'gprof' to print the full
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
pathname of source filenames, which is determined from symbolic
|
|
|
|
|
debugging information in the image file and is relative to the
|
|
|
|
|
directory in which the compiler was invoked.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'-p[SYMSPEC]'
|
|
|
|
|
'--flat-profile[=SYMSPEC]'
|
|
|
|
|
The '-p' option causes 'gprof' to print a flat profile. If SYMSPEC
|
|
|
|
|
is specified, print flat profile only for matching symbols. *Note
|
|
|
|
|
The Flat Profile: Flat Profile.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'-P[SYMSPEC]'
|
|
|
|
|
'--no-flat-profile[=SYMSPEC]'
|
|
|
|
|
The '-P' option causes 'gprof' to suppress printing a flat profile.
|
|
|
|
|
If SYMSPEC is specified, 'gprof' prints a flat profile, but
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
excludes matching symbols.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'-q[SYMSPEC]'
|
|
|
|
|
'--graph[=SYMSPEC]'
|
|
|
|
|
The '-q' option causes 'gprof' to print the call graph analysis.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
If SYMSPEC is specified, print call graph only for matching symbols
|
|
|
|
|
and their children. *Note The Call Graph: Call Graph.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'-Q[SYMSPEC]'
|
|
|
|
|
'--no-graph[=SYMSPEC]'
|
|
|
|
|
The '-Q' option causes 'gprof' to suppress printing the call graph.
|
|
|
|
|
If SYMSPEC is specified, 'gprof' prints a call graph, but excludes
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
matching symbols.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'-t'
|
|
|
|
|
'--table-length=NUM'
|
|
|
|
|
The '-t' option causes the NUM most active source lines in each
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
source file to be listed when source annotation is enabled. The
|
|
|
|
|
default is 10.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'-y'
|
|
|
|
|
'--separate-files'
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
This option affects annotated source output only. Normally,
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'gprof' prints annotated source files to standard-output. If this
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
option is specified, annotated source for a file named
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'path/FILENAME' is generated in the file 'FILENAME-ann'. If the
|
|
|
|
|
underlying file system would truncate 'FILENAME-ann' so that it
|
|
|
|
|
overwrites the original 'FILENAME', 'gprof' generates annotated
|
|
|
|
|
source in the file 'FILENAME.ann' instead (if the original file
|
|
|
|
|
name has an extension, that extension is _replaced_ with '.ann').
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'-Z[SYMSPEC]'
|
|
|
|
|
'--no-exec-counts[=SYMSPEC]'
|
|
|
|
|
The '-Z' option causes 'gprof' not to print a tally of functions
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
and the number of times each was called. If SYMSPEC is specified,
|
|
|
|
|
print tally, but exclude matching symbols.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'-r'
|
|
|
|
|
'--function-ordering'
|
|
|
|
|
The '--function-ordering' option causes 'gprof' to print a
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
suggested function ordering for the program based on profiling
|
|
|
|
|
data. This option suggests an ordering which may improve paging,
|
|
|
|
|
tlb and cache behavior for the program on systems which support
|
|
|
|
|
arbitrary ordering of functions in an executable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The exact details of how to force the linker to place functions in
|
|
|
|
|
a particular order is system dependent and out of the scope of this
|
|
|
|
|
manual.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'-R MAP_FILE'
|
|
|
|
|
'--file-ordering MAP_FILE'
|
|
|
|
|
The '--file-ordering' option causes 'gprof' to print a suggested .o
|
|
|
|
|
link line ordering for the program based on profiling data. This
|
|
|
|
|
option suggests an ordering which may improve paging, tlb and cache
|
|
|
|
|
behavior for the program on systems which do not support arbitrary
|
|
|
|
|
ordering of functions in an executable.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Use of the '-a' argument is highly recommended with this option.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The MAP_FILE argument is a pathname to a file which provides
|
|
|
|
|
function name to object file mappings. The format of the file is
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
similar to the output of the program 'nm'.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c-parse.o:00000000 T yyparse
|
|
|
|
|
c-parse.o:00000004 C yyerrflag
|
|
|
|
|
c-lang.o:00000000 T maybe_objc_method_name
|
|
|
|
|
c-lang.o:00000000 T print_lang_statistics
|
|
|
|
|
c-lang.o:00000000 T recognize_objc_keyword
|
|
|
|
|
c-decl.o:00000000 T print_lang_identifier
|
|
|
|
|
c-decl.o:00000000 T print_lang_type
|
|
|
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To create a MAP_FILE with GNU 'nm', type a command like 'nm
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
--extern-only --defined-only -v --print-file-name program-name'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'-T'
|
|
|
|
|
'--traditional'
|
|
|
|
|
The '-T' option causes 'gprof' to print its output in "traditional"
|
|
|
|
|
BSD style.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'-w WIDTH'
|
|
|
|
|
'--width=WIDTH'
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Sets width of output lines to WIDTH. Currently only used when
|
|
|
|
|
printing the function index at the bottom of the call graph.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'-x'
|
|
|
|
|
'--all-lines'
|
|
|
|
|
This option affects annotated source output only. By default, only
|
|
|
|
|
the lines at the beginning of a basic-block are annotated. If this
|
|
|
|
|
option is specified, every line in a basic-block is annotated by
|
|
|
|
|
repeating the annotation for the first line. This behavior is
|
|
|
|
|
similar to 'tcov''s '-a'.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'--demangle[=STYLE]'
|
|
|
|
|
'--no-demangle'
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
These options control whether C++ symbol names should be demangled
|
|
|
|
|
when printing output. The default is to demangle symbols. The
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'--no-demangle' option may be used to turn off demangling.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Different compilers have different mangling styles. The optional
|
|
|
|
|
demangling style argument can be used to choose an appropriate
|
|
|
|
|
demangling style for your compiler.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
File: gprof.info, Node: Analysis Options, Next: Miscellaneous Options, Prev: Output Options, Up: Invoking
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 Analysis Options
|
|
|
|
|
====================
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'-a'
|
|
|
|
|
'--no-static'
|
|
|
|
|
The '-a' option causes 'gprof' to suppress the printing of
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
statically declared (private) functions. (These are functions
|
|
|
|
|
whose names are not listed as global, and which are not visible
|
|
|
|
|
outside the file/function/block where they were defined.) Time
|
|
|
|
|
spent in these functions, calls to/from them, etc., will all be
|
|
|
|
|
attributed to the function that was loaded directly before it in
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
the executable file. This option affects both the flat profile and
|
|
|
|
|
the call graph.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'-c'
|
|
|
|
|
'--static-call-graph'
|
|
|
|
|
The '-c' option causes the call graph of the program to be
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
augmented by a heuristic which examines the text space of the
|
|
|
|
|
object file and identifies function calls in the binary machine
|
|
|
|
|
code. Since normal call graph records are only generated when
|
|
|
|
|
functions are entered, this option identifies children that could
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
have been called, but never were. Calls to functions that were not
|
|
|
|
|
compiled with profiling enabled are also identified, but only if
|
|
|
|
|
symbol table entries are present for them. Calls to dynamic
|
|
|
|
|
library routines are typically _not_ found by this option. Parents
|
|
|
|
|
or children identified via this heuristic are indicated in the call
|
|
|
|
|
graph with call counts of '0'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'-D'
|
|
|
|
|
'--ignore-non-functions'
|
|
|
|
|
The '-D' option causes 'gprof' to ignore symbols which are not
|
|
|
|
|
known to be functions. This option will give more accurate profile
|
|
|
|
|
data on systems where it is supported (Solaris and HPUX for
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
example).
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'-k FROM/TO'
|
|
|
|
|
The '-k' option allows you to delete from the call graph any arcs
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
from symbols matching symspec FROM to those matching symspec TO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'-l'
|
|
|
|
|
'--line'
|
|
|
|
|
The '-l' option enables line-by-line profiling, which causes
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
histogram hits to be charged to individual source code lines,
|
|
|
|
|
instead of functions. This feature only works with programs
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
compiled by older versions of the 'gcc' compiler. Newer versions
|
|
|
|
|
of 'gcc' are designed to work with the 'gcov' tool instead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the program was compiled with basic-block counting enabled, this
|
|
|
|
|
option will also identify how many times each line of code was
|
|
|
|
|
executed. While line-by-line profiling can help isolate where in a
|
|
|
|
|
large function a program is spending its time, it also
|
|
|
|
|
significantly increases the running time of 'gprof', and magnifies
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
statistical inaccuracies. *Note Statistical Sampling Error:
|
|
|
|
|
Sampling Error.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'--inline-file-names'
|
|
|
|
|
This option causes 'gprof' to print the source file after each
|
|
|
|
|
symbol in both the flat profile and the call graph. The full path
|
|
|
|
|
to the file is printed if used with the '-L' option.
|
2015-08-28 15:32:19 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'-m NUM'
|
|
|
|
|
'--min-count=NUM'
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
This option affects execution count output only. Symbols that are
|
|
|
|
|
executed less than NUM times are suppressed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'-nSYMSPEC'
|
|
|
|
|
'--time=SYMSPEC'
|
|
|
|
|
The '-n' option causes 'gprof', in its call graph analysis, to only
|
|
|
|
|
propagate times for symbols matching SYMSPEC.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'-NSYMSPEC'
|
|
|
|
|
'--no-time=SYMSPEC'
|
|
|
|
|
The '-n' option causes 'gprof', in its call graph analysis, not to
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
propagate times for symbols matching SYMSPEC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'-SFILENAME'
|
|
|
|
|
'--external-symbol-table=FILENAME'
|
|
|
|
|
The '-S' option causes 'gprof' to read an external symbol table
|
|
|
|
|
file, such as '/proc/kallsyms', rather than read the symbol table
|
|
|
|
|
from the given object file (the default is 'a.out'). This is
|
|
|
|
|
useful for profiling kernel modules.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'-z'
|
|
|
|
|
'--display-unused-functions'
|
|
|
|
|
If you give the '-z' option, 'gprof' will mention all functions in
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
the flat profile, even those that were never called, and that had
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
no time spent in them. This is useful in conjunction with the '-c'
|
|
|
|
|
option for discovering which routines were never called.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
File: gprof.info, Node: Miscellaneous Options, Next: Deprecated Options, Prev: Analysis Options, Up: Invoking
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3 Miscellaneous Options
|
|
|
|
|
=========================
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'-d[NUM]'
|
|
|
|
|
'--debug[=NUM]'
|
|
|
|
|
The '-d NUM' option specifies debugging options. If NUM is not
|
|
|
|
|
specified, enable all debugging. *Note Debugging 'gprof':
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Debugging.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'-h'
|
|
|
|
|
'--help'
|
|
|
|
|
The '-h' option prints command line usage.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'-ONAME'
|
|
|
|
|
'--file-format=NAME'
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Selects the format of the profile data files. Recognized formats
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
are 'auto' (the default), 'bsd', '4.4bsd', 'magic', and 'prof' (not
|
|
|
|
|
yet supported).
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'-s'
|
|
|
|
|
'--sum'
|
|
|
|
|
The '-s' option causes 'gprof' to summarize the information in the
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
profile data files it read in, and write out a profile data file
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
called 'gmon.sum', which contains all the information from the
|
|
|
|
|
profile data files that 'gprof' read in. The file 'gmon.sum' may
|
|
|
|
|
be one of the specified input files; the effect of this is to merge
|
|
|
|
|
the data in the other input files into 'gmon.sum'.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Eventually you can run 'gprof' again without '-s' to analyze the
|
|
|
|
|
cumulative data in the file 'gmon.sum'.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'-v'
|
|
|
|
|
'--version'
|
|
|
|
|
The '-v' flag causes 'gprof' to print the current version number,
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
and then exit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
File: gprof.info, Node: Deprecated Options, Next: Symspecs, Prev: Miscellaneous Options, Up: Invoking
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.4 Deprecated Options
|
|
|
|
|
======================
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-09-12 22:14:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
These options have been replaced with newer versions that use symspecs.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'-e FUNCTION_NAME'
|
|
|
|
|
The '-e FUNCTION' option tells 'gprof' to not print information
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
about the function FUNCTION_NAME (and its children...) in the call
|
|
|
|
|
graph. The function will still be listed as a child of any
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
functions that call it, but its index number will be shown as '[not
|
|
|
|
|
printed]'. More than one '-e' option may be given; only one
|
|
|
|
|
FUNCTION_NAME may be indicated with each '-e' option.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'-E FUNCTION_NAME'
|
|
|
|
|
The '-E FUNCTION' option works like the '-e' option, but time spent
|
|
|
|
|
in the function (and children who were not called from anywhere
|
|
|
|
|
else), will not be used to compute the percentages-of-time for the
|
|
|
|
|
call graph. More than one '-E' option may be given; only one
|
|
|
|
|
FUNCTION_NAME may be indicated with each '-E' option.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'-f FUNCTION_NAME'
|
|
|
|
|
The '-f FUNCTION' option causes 'gprof' to limit the call graph to
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
the function FUNCTION_NAME and its children (and their
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
children...). More than one '-f' option may be given; only one
|
|
|
|
|
FUNCTION_NAME may be indicated with each '-f' option.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'-F FUNCTION_NAME'
|
|
|
|
|
The '-F FUNCTION' option works like the '-f' option, but only time
|
|
|
|
|
spent in the function and its children (and their children...) will
|
|
|
|
|
be used to determine total-time and percentages-of-time for the
|
|
|
|
|
call graph. More than one '-F' option may be given; only one
|
|
|
|
|
FUNCTION_NAME may be indicated with each '-F' option. The '-F'
|
|
|
|
|
option overrides the '-E' option.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that only one function can be specified with each '-e', '-E',
|
|
|
|
|
'-f' or '-F' option. To specify more than one function, use multiple
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
options. For example, this command:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gprof -e boring -f foo -f bar myprogram > gprof.output
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lists in the call graph all functions that were reached from either
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'foo' or 'bar' and were not reachable from 'boring'.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
File: gprof.info, Node: Symspecs, Prev: Deprecated Options, Up: Invoking
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5 Symspecs
|
|
|
|
|
============
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Many of the output options allow functions to be included or excluded
|
|
|
|
|
using "symspecs" (symbol specifications), which observe the following
|
|
|
|
|
syntax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
filename_containing_a_dot
|
|
|
|
|
| funcname_not_containing_a_dot
|
|
|
|
|
| linenumber
|
|
|
|
|
| ( [ any_filename ] `:' ( any_funcname | linenumber ) )
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here are some sample symspecs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'main.c'
|
|
|
|
|
Selects everything in file 'main.c'--the dot in the string tells
|
|
|
|
|
'gprof' to interpret the string as a filename, rather than as a
|
|
|
|
|
function name. To select a file whose name does not contain a dot,
|
|
|
|
|
a trailing colon should be specified. For example, 'odd:' is
|
|
|
|
|
interpreted as the file named 'odd'.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'main'
|
|
|
|
|
Selects all functions named 'main'.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that there may be multiple instances of the same function name
|
|
|
|
|
because some of the definitions may be local (i.e., static).
|
|
|
|
|
Unless a function name is unique in a program, you must use the
|
|
|
|
|
colon notation explained below to specify a function from a
|
|
|
|
|
specific source file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sometimes, function names contain dots. In such cases, it is
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
necessary to add a leading colon to the name. For example, ':.mul'
|
|
|
|
|
selects function '.mul'.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In some object file formats, symbols have a leading underscore.
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'gprof' will normally not print these underscores. When you name a
|
|
|
|
|
symbol in a symspec, you should type it exactly as 'gprof' prints
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
it in its output. For example, if the compiler produces a symbol
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'_main' from your 'main' function, 'gprof' still prints it as
|
|
|
|
|
'main' in its output, so you should use 'main' in symspecs.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'main.c:main'
|
|
|
|
|
Selects function 'main' in file 'main.c'.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'main.c:134'
|
|
|
|
|
Selects line 134 in file 'main.c'.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
File: gprof.info, Node: Output, Next: Inaccuracy, Prev: Invoking, Up: Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
5 Interpreting 'gprof''s Output
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
*******************************
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'gprof' can produce several different output styles, the most important
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
of which are described below. The simplest output styles (file
|
|
|
|
|
information, execution count, and function and file ordering) are not
|
|
|
|
|
described here, but are documented with the respective options that
|
|
|
|
|
trigger them. *Note Output Options: Output Options.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Menu:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Flat Profile:: The flat profile shows how much time was spent
|
|
|
|
|
executing directly in each function.
|
|
|
|
|
* Call Graph:: The call graph shows which functions called which
|
|
|
|
|
others, and how much time each function used
|
|
|
|
|
when its subroutine calls are included.
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
* Line-by-line:: 'gprof' can analyze individual source code lines
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
* Annotated Source:: The annotated source listing displays source code
|
|
|
|
|
labeled with execution counts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
File: gprof.info, Node: Flat Profile, Next: Call Graph, Up: Output
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.1 The Flat Profile
|
|
|
|
|
====================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "flat profile" shows the total amount of time your program spent
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
executing each function. Unless the '-z' option is given, functions
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
with no apparent time spent in them, and no apparent calls to them, are
|
|
|
|
|
not mentioned. Note that if a function was not compiled for profiling,
|
|
|
|
|
and didn't run long enough to show up on the program counter histogram,
|
|
|
|
|
it will be indistinguishable from a function that was never called.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is part of a flat profile for a small program:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flat profile:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds.
|
|
|
|
|
% cumulative self self total
|
|
|
|
|
time seconds seconds calls ms/call ms/call name
|
|
|
|
|
33.34 0.02 0.02 7208 0.00 0.00 open
|
|
|
|
|
16.67 0.03 0.01 244 0.04 0.12 offtime
|
|
|
|
|
16.67 0.04 0.01 8 1.25 1.25 memccpy
|
|
|
|
|
16.67 0.05 0.01 7 1.43 1.43 write
|
|
|
|
|
16.67 0.06 0.01 mcount
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.06 0.00 236 0.00 0.00 tzset
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.06 0.00 192 0.00 0.00 tolower
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.06 0.00 47 0.00 0.00 strlen
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.06 0.00 45 0.00 0.00 strchr
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.06 0.00 1 0.00 50.00 main
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.06 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 memcpy
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.06 0.00 1 0.00 10.11 print
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.06 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 profil
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.06 0.00 1 0.00 50.00 report
|
|
|
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The functions are sorted first by decreasing run-time spent in them,
|
|
|
|
|
then by decreasing number of calls, then alphabetically by name. The
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
functions 'mcount' and 'profil' are part of the profiling apparatus and
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
appear in every flat profile; their time gives a measure of the amount
|
|
|
|
|
of overhead due to profiling.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just before the column headers, a statement appears indicating how
|
|
|
|
|
much time each sample counted as. This "sampling period" estimates the
|
|
|
|
|
margin of error in each of the time figures. A time figure that is not
|
|
|
|
|
much larger than this is not reliable. In this example, each sample
|
|
|
|
|
counted as 0.01 seconds, suggesting a 100 Hz sampling rate. The
|
|
|
|
|
program's total execution time was 0.06 seconds, as indicated by the
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'cumulative seconds' field. Since each sample counted for 0.01 seconds,
|
|
|
|
|
this means only six samples were taken during the run. Two of the
|
|
|
|
|
samples occurred while the program was in the 'open' function, as
|
|
|
|
|
indicated by the 'self seconds' field. Each of the other four samples
|
|
|
|
|
occurred one each in 'offtime', 'memccpy', 'write', and 'mcount'. Since
|
|
|
|
|
only six samples were taken, none of these values can be regarded as
|
|
|
|
|
particularly reliable. In another run, the 'self seconds' field for
|
|
|
|
|
'mcount' might well be '0.00' or '0.02'. *Note Statistical Sampling
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Error: Sampling Error, for a complete discussion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
The remaining functions in the listing (those whose 'self seconds'
|
|
|
|
|
field is '0.00') didn't appear in the histogram samples at all.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
However, the call graph indicated that they were called, so therefore
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
they are listed, sorted in decreasing order by the 'calls' field.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Clearly some time was spent executing these functions, but the paucity
|
|
|
|
|
of histogram samples prevents any determination of how much time each
|
|
|
|
|
took.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here is what the fields in each line mean:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'% time'
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
This is the percentage of the total execution time your program
|
|
|
|
|
spent in this function. These should all add up to 100%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'cumulative seconds'
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
This is the cumulative total number of seconds the computer spent
|
|
|
|
|
executing this functions, plus the time spent in all the functions
|
|
|
|
|
above this one in this table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'self seconds'
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
This is the number of seconds accounted for by this function alone.
|
|
|
|
|
The flat profile listing is sorted first by this number.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'calls'
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
This is the total number of times the function was called. If the
|
|
|
|
|
function was never called, or the number of times it was called
|
|
|
|
|
cannot be determined (probably because the function was not
|
|
|
|
|
compiled with profiling enabled), the "calls" field is blank.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'self ms/call'
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
This represents the average number of milliseconds spent in this
|
|
|
|
|
function per call, if this function is profiled. Otherwise, this
|
|
|
|
|
field is blank for this function.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'total ms/call'
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
This represents the average number of milliseconds spent in this
|
|
|
|
|
function and its descendants per call, if this function is
|
|
|
|
|
profiled. Otherwise, this field is blank for this function. This
|
|
|
|
|
is the only field in the flat profile that uses call graph
|
|
|
|
|
analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'name'
|
|
|
|
|
This is the name of the function. The flat profile is sorted by
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
this field alphabetically after the "self seconds" and "calls"
|
|
|
|
|
fields are sorted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
File: gprof.info, Node: Call Graph, Next: Line-by-line, Prev: Flat Profile, Up: Output
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2 The Call Graph
|
|
|
|
|
==================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "call graph" shows how much time was spent in each function and its
|
|
|
|
|
children. From this information, you can find functions that, while
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
they themselves may not have used much time, called other functions that
|
|
|
|
|
did use unusual amounts of time.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here is a sample call from a small program. This call came from the
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
same 'gprof' run as the flat profile example in the previous section.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
granularity: each sample hit covers 2 byte(s) for 20.00% of 0.05 seconds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
index % time self children called name
|
|
|
|
|
<spontaneous>
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 100.0 0.00 0.05 start [1]
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.05 1/1 main [2]
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.00 1/2 on_exit [28]
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.00 1/1 exit [59]
|
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.05 1/1 start [1]
|
|
|
|
|
[2] 100.0 0.00 0.05 1 main [2]
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.05 1/1 report [3]
|
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.05 1/1 main [2]
|
|
|
|
|
[3] 100.0 0.00 0.05 1 report [3]
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.03 8/8 timelocal [6]
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.01 1/1 print [9]
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.01 9/9 fgets [12]
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.00 12/34 strncmp <cycle 1> [40]
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.00 8/8 lookup [20]
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.00 1/1 fopen [21]
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.00 8/8 chewtime [24]
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.00 8/16 skipspace [44]
|
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
[4] 59.8 0.01 0.02 8+472 <cycle 2 as a whole> [4]
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 0.02 244+260 offtime <cycle 2> [7]
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.00 236+1 tzset <cycle 2> [26]
|
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The lines full of dashes divide this table into "entries", one for
|
|
|
|
|
each function. Each entry has one or more lines.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In each entry, the primary line is the one that starts with an index
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
number in square brackets. The end of this line says which function the
|
|
|
|
|
entry is for. The preceding lines in the entry describe the callers of
|
|
|
|
|
this function and the following lines describe its subroutines (also
|
|
|
|
|
called "children" when we speak of the call graph).
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The entries are sorted by time spent in the function and its
|
|
|
|
|
subroutines.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
The internal profiling function 'mcount' (*note The Flat Profile:
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Flat Profile.) is never mentioned in the call graph.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Menu:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Primary:: Details of the primary line's contents.
|
|
|
|
|
* Callers:: Details of caller-lines' contents.
|
|
|
|
|
* Subroutines:: Details of subroutine-lines' contents.
|
|
|
|
|
* Cycles:: When there are cycles of recursion,
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
such as 'a' calls 'b' calls 'a'...
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
File: gprof.info, Node: Primary, Next: Callers, Up: Call Graph
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2.1 The Primary Line
|
|
|
|
|
----------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "primary line" in a call graph entry is the line that describes the
|
|
|
|
|
function which the entry is about and gives the overall statistics for
|
|
|
|
|
this function.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For reference, we repeat the primary line from the entry for function
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'report' in our main example, together with the heading line that shows
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
the names of the fields:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
index % time self children called name
|
|
|
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
|
[3] 100.0 0.00 0.05 1 report [3]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here is what the fields in the primary line mean:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'index'
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Entries are numbered with consecutive integers. Each function
|
|
|
|
|
therefore has an index number, which appears at the beginning of
|
|
|
|
|
its primary line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each cross-reference to a function, as a caller or subroutine of
|
|
|
|
|
another, gives its index number as well as its name. The index
|
|
|
|
|
number guides you if you wish to look for the entry for that
|
|
|
|
|
function.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'% time'
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
This is the percentage of the total time that was spent in this
|
|
|
|
|
function, including time spent in subroutines called from this
|
|
|
|
|
function.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The time spent in this function is counted again for the callers of
|
|
|
|
|
this function. Therefore, adding up these percentages is
|
|
|
|
|
meaningless.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'self'
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
This is the total amount of time spent in this function. This
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
should be identical to the number printed in the 'seconds' field
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
for this function in the flat profile.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'children'
|
|
|
|
|
This is the total amount of time spent in the subroutine calls made
|
|
|
|
|
by this function. This should be equal to the sum of all the
|
|
|
|
|
'self' and 'children' entries of the children listed directly below
|
|
|
|
|
this function.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'called'
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
This is the number of times the function was called.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the function called itself recursively, there are two numbers,
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
separated by a '+'. The first number counts non-recursive calls,
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
and the second counts recursive calls.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
In the example above, the function 'report' was called once from
|
|
|
|
|
'main'.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'name'
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
This is the name of the current function. The index number is
|
|
|
|
|
repeated after it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the function is part of a cycle of recursion, the cycle number
|
|
|
|
|
is printed between the function's name and the index number (*note
|
|
|
|
|
How Mutually Recursive Functions Are Described: Cycles.). For
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
example, if function 'gnurr' is part of cycle number one, and has
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
index number twelve, its primary line would be end like this:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gnurr <cycle 1> [12]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
File: gprof.info, Node: Callers, Next: Subroutines, Prev: Primary, Up: Call Graph
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2.2 Lines for a Function's Callers
|
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
A function's entry has a line for each function it was called by. These
|
|
|
|
|
lines' fields correspond to the fields of the primary line, but their
|
|
|
|
|
meanings are different because of the difference in context.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For reference, we repeat two lines from the entry for the function
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'report', the primary line and one caller-line preceding it, together
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
with the heading line that shows the names of the fields:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
index % time self children called name
|
|
|
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.05 1/1 main [2]
|
|
|
|
|
[3] 100.0 0.00 0.05 1 report [3]
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Here are the meanings of the fields in the caller-line for 'report'
|
|
|
|
|
called from 'main':
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'self'
|
|
|
|
|
An estimate of the amount of time spent in 'report' itself when it
|
|
|
|
|
was called from 'main'.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'children'
|
|
|
|
|
An estimate of the amount of time spent in subroutines of 'report'
|
|
|
|
|
when 'report' was called from 'main'.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
The sum of the 'self' and 'children' fields is an estimate of the
|
|
|
|
|
amount of time spent within calls to 'report' from 'main'.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'called'
|
|
|
|
|
Two numbers: the number of times 'report' was called from 'main',
|
|
|
|
|
followed by the total number of non-recursive calls to 'report'
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
from all its callers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'name and index number'
|
|
|
|
|
The name of the caller of 'report' to which this line applies,
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
followed by the caller's index number.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not all functions have entries in the call graph; some options to
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'gprof' request the omission of certain functions. When a caller
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
has no entry of its own, it still has caller-lines in the entries
|
|
|
|
|
of the functions it calls.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the caller is part of a recursion cycle, the cycle number is
|
|
|
|
|
printed between the name and the index number.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the identity of the callers of a function cannot be determined, a
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
dummy caller-line is printed which has '<spontaneous>' as the "caller's
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
name" and all other fields blank. This can happen for signal handlers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
File: gprof.info, Node: Subroutines, Next: Cycles, Prev: Callers, Up: Call Graph
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2.3 Lines for a Function's Subroutines
|
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A function's entry has a line for each of its subroutines--in other
|
|
|
|
|
words, a line for each other function that it called. These lines'
|
|
|
|
|
fields correspond to the fields of the primary line, but their meanings
|
|
|
|
|
are different because of the difference in context.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For reference, we repeat two lines from the entry for the function
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'main', the primary line and a line for a subroutine, together with the
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
heading line that shows the names of the fields:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
index % time self children called name
|
|
|
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
|
[2] 100.0 0.00 0.05 1 main [2]
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.05 1/1 report [3]
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Here are the meanings of the fields in the subroutine-line for 'main'
|
|
|
|
|
calling 'report':
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'self'
|
|
|
|
|
An estimate of the amount of time spent directly within 'report'
|
|
|
|
|
when 'report' was called from 'main'.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'children'
|
|
|
|
|
An estimate of the amount of time spent in subroutines of 'report'
|
|
|
|
|
when 'report' was called from 'main'.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
The sum of the 'self' and 'children' fields is an estimate of the
|
|
|
|
|
total time spent in calls to 'report' from 'main'.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'called'
|
|
|
|
|
Two numbers, the number of calls to 'report' from 'main' followed
|
|
|
|
|
by the total number of non-recursive calls to 'report'. This ratio
|
|
|
|
|
is used to determine how much of 'report''s 'self' and 'children'
|
|
|
|
|
time gets credited to 'main'. *Note Estimating 'children' Times:
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'name'
|
|
|
|
|
The name of the subroutine of 'main' to which this line applies,
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
followed by the subroutine's index number.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the caller is part of a recursion cycle, the cycle number is
|
|
|
|
|
printed between the name and the index number.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
File: gprof.info, Node: Cycles, Prev: Subroutines, Up: Call Graph
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2.4 How Mutually Recursive Functions Are Described
|
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
The graph may be complicated by the presence of "cycles of recursion" in
|
|
|
|
|
the call graph. A cycle exists if a function calls another function
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
that (directly or indirectly) calls (or appears to call) the original
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
function. For example: if 'a' calls 'b', and 'b' calls 'a', then 'a'
|
|
|
|
|
and 'b' form a cycle.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whenever there are call paths both ways between a pair of functions,
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
they belong to the same cycle. If 'a' and 'b' call each other and 'b'
|
|
|
|
|
and 'c' call each other, all three make one cycle. Note that even if
|
|
|
|
|
'b' only calls 'a' if it was not called from 'a', 'gprof' cannot
|
|
|
|
|
determine this, so 'a' and 'b' are still considered a cycle.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The cycles are numbered with consecutive integers. When a function
|
|
|
|
|
belongs to a cycle, each time the function name appears in the call
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
graph it is followed by '<cycle NUMBER>'.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reason cycles matter is that they make the time values in the
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
call graph paradoxical. The "time spent in children" of 'a' should
|
|
|
|
|
include the time spent in its subroutine 'b' and in 'b''s
|
|
|
|
|
subroutines--but one of 'b''s subroutines is 'a'! How much of 'a''s
|
|
|
|
|
time should be included in the children of 'a', when 'a' is indirectly
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
recursive?
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
The way 'gprof' resolves this paradox is by creating a single entry
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
for the cycle as a whole. The primary line of this entry describes the
|
|
|
|
|
total time spent directly in the functions of the cycle. The
|
|
|
|
|
"subroutines" of the cycle are the individual functions of the cycle,
|
|
|
|
|
and all other functions that were called directly by them. The
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
"callers" of the cycle are the functions, outside the cycle, that called
|
|
|
|
|
functions in the cycle.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here is an example portion of a call graph which shows a cycle
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
containing functions 'a' and 'b'. The cycle was entered by a call to
|
|
|
|
|
'a' from 'main'; both 'a' and 'b' called 'c'.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
index % time self children called name
|
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
1.77 0 1/1 main [2]
|
|
|
|
|
[3] 91.71 1.77 0 1+5 <cycle 1 as a whole> [3]
|
|
|
|
|
1.02 0 3 b <cycle 1> [4]
|
|
|
|
|
0.75 0 2 a <cycle 1> [5]
|
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
3 a <cycle 1> [5]
|
|
|
|
|
[4] 52.85 1.02 0 0 b <cycle 1> [4]
|
|
|
|
|
2 a <cycle 1> [5]
|
|
|
|
|
0 0 3/6 c [6]
|
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
1.77 0 1/1 main [2]
|
|
|
|
|
2 b <cycle 1> [4]
|
|
|
|
|
[5] 38.86 0.75 0 1 a <cycle 1> [5]
|
|
|
|
|
3 b <cycle 1> [4]
|
|
|
|
|
0 0 3/6 c [6]
|
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(The entire call graph for this program contains in addition an entry
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
for 'main', which calls 'a', and an entry for 'c', with callers 'a' and
|
|
|
|
|
'b'.)
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
index % time self children called name
|
|
|
|
|
<spontaneous>
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 100.00 0 1.93 0 start [1]
|
|
|
|
|
0.16 1.77 1/1 main [2]
|
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
0.16 1.77 1/1 start [1]
|
|
|
|
|
[2] 100.00 0.16 1.77 1 main [2]
|
|
|
|
|
1.77 0 1/1 a <cycle 1> [5]
|
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
1.77 0 1/1 main [2]
|
|
|
|
|
[3] 91.71 1.77 0 1+5 <cycle 1 as a whole> [3]
|
|
|
|
|
1.02 0 3 b <cycle 1> [4]
|
|
|
|
|
0.75 0 2 a <cycle 1> [5]
|
|
|
|
|
0 0 6/6 c [6]
|
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
3 a <cycle 1> [5]
|
|
|
|
|
[4] 52.85 1.02 0 0 b <cycle 1> [4]
|
|
|
|
|
2 a <cycle 1> [5]
|
|
|
|
|
0 0 3/6 c [6]
|
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
1.77 0 1/1 main [2]
|
|
|
|
|
2 b <cycle 1> [4]
|
|
|
|
|
[5] 38.86 0.75 0 1 a <cycle 1> [5]
|
|
|
|
|
3 b <cycle 1> [4]
|
|
|
|
|
0 0 3/6 c [6]
|
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
0 0 3/6 b <cycle 1> [4]
|
|
|
|
|
0 0 3/6 a <cycle 1> [5]
|
|
|
|
|
[6] 0.00 0 0 6 c [6]
|
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
The 'self' field of the cycle's primary line is the total time spent
|
|
|
|
|
in all the functions of the cycle. It equals the sum of the 'self'
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
fields for the individual functions in the cycle, found in the entry in
|
|
|
|
|
the subroutine lines for these functions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
The 'children' fields of the cycle's primary line and subroutine
|
|
|
|
|
lines count only subroutines outside the cycle. Even though 'a' calls
|
|
|
|
|
'b', the time spent in those calls to 'b' is not counted in 'a''s
|
|
|
|
|
'children' time. Thus, we do not encounter the problem of what to do
|
|
|
|
|
when the time in those calls to 'b' includes indirect recursive calls
|
|
|
|
|
back to 'a'.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
The 'children' field of a caller-line in the cycle's entry estimates
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
the amount of time spent _in the whole cycle_, and its other
|
|
|
|
|
subroutines, on the times when that caller called a function in the
|
|
|
|
|
cycle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
The 'called' field in the primary line for the cycle has two numbers:
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
first, the number of times functions in the cycle were called by
|
|
|
|
|
functions outside the cycle; second, the number of times they were
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
called by functions in the cycle (including times when a function in the
|
|
|
|
|
cycle calls itself). This is a generalization of the usual split into
|
|
|
|
|
non-recursive and recursive calls.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
The 'called' field of a subroutine-line for a cycle member in the
|
|
|
|
|
cycle's entry says how many time that function was called from functions
|
|
|
|
|
in the cycle. The total of all these is the second number in the
|
|
|
|
|
primary line's 'called' field.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the individual entry for a function in a cycle, the other
|
|
|
|
|
functions in the same cycle can appear as subroutines and as callers.
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
These lines show how many times each function in the cycle called or was
|
|
|
|
|
called from each other function in the cycle. The 'self' and 'children'
|
|
|
|
|
fields in these lines are blank because of the difficulty of defining
|
|
|
|
|
meanings for them when recursion is going on.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
File: gprof.info, Node: Line-by-line, Next: Annotated Source, Prev: Call Graph, Up: Output
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.3 Line-by-line Profiling
|
|
|
|
|
==========================
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'gprof''s '-l' option causes the program to perform "line-by-line"
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
profiling. In this mode, histogram samples are assigned not to
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
functions, but to individual lines of source code. This only works with
|
|
|
|
|
programs compiled with older versions of the 'gcc' compiler. Newer
|
|
|
|
|
versions of 'gcc' use a different program - 'gcov' - to display
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
line-by-line profiling information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
With the older versions of 'gcc' the program usually has to be
|
|
|
|
|
compiled with a '-g' option, in addition to '-pg', in order to generate
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
debugging symbols for tracking source code lines. Note, in much older
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
versions of 'gcc' the program had to be compiled with the '-a' command
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
line option as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The flat profile is the most useful output table in line-by-line
|
|
|
|
|
mode. The call graph isn't as useful as normal, since the current
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
version of 'gprof' does not propagate call graph arcs from source code
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
lines to the enclosing function. The call graph does, however, show
|
|
|
|
|
each line of code that called each function, along with a count.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Here is a section of 'gprof''s output, without line-by-line
|
|
|
|
|
profiling. Note that 'ct_init' accounted for four histogram hits, and
|
|
|
|
|
13327 calls to 'init_block'.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flat profile:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds.
|
|
|
|
|
% cumulative self self total
|
|
|
|
|
time seconds seconds calls us/call us/call name
|
|
|
|
|
30.77 0.13 0.04 6335 6.31 6.31 ct_init
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Call graph (explanation follows)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
granularity: each sample hit covers 4 byte(s) for 7.69% of 0.13 seconds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
index % time self children called name
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.00 1/13496 name_too_long
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.00 40/13496 deflate
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.00 128/13496 deflate_fast
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.00 13327/13496 ct_init
|
|
|
|
|
[7] 0.0 0.00 0.00 13496 init_block
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now let's look at some of 'gprof''s output from the same program run,
|
|
|
|
|
this time with line-by-line profiling enabled. Note that 'ct_init''s
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
four histogram hits are broken down into four lines of source code--one
|
|
|
|
|
hit occurred on each of lines 349, 351, 382 and 385. In the call graph,
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
note how 'ct_init''s 13327 calls to 'init_block' are broken down into
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
one call from line 396, 3071 calls from line 384, 3730 calls from line
|
|
|
|
|
385, and 6525 calls from 387.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flat profile:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds.
|
|
|
|
|
% cumulative self
|
|
|
|
|
time seconds seconds calls name
|
|
|
|
|
7.69 0.10 0.01 ct_init (trees.c:349)
|
|
|
|
|
7.69 0.11 0.01 ct_init (trees.c:351)
|
|
|
|
|
7.69 0.12 0.01 ct_init (trees.c:382)
|
|
|
|
|
7.69 0.13 0.01 ct_init (trees.c:385)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Call graph (explanation follows)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
granularity: each sample hit covers 4 byte(s) for 7.69% of 0.13 seconds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% time self children called name
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.00 1/13496 name_too_long (gzip.c:1440)
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.00 1/13496 deflate (deflate.c:763)
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.00 1/13496 ct_init (trees.c:396)
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.00 2/13496 deflate (deflate.c:727)
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.00 4/13496 deflate (deflate.c:686)
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.00 5/13496 deflate (deflate.c:675)
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.00 12/13496 deflate (deflate.c:679)
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.00 16/13496 deflate (deflate.c:730)
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.00 128/13496 deflate_fast (deflate.c:654)
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.00 3071/13496 ct_init (trees.c:384)
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.00 3730/13496 ct_init (trees.c:385)
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 0.00 6525/13496 ct_init (trees.c:387)
|
|
|
|
|
[6] 0.0 0.00 0.00 13496 init_block (trees.c:408)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
File: gprof.info, Node: Annotated Source, Prev: Line-by-line, Up: Output
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4 The Annotated Source Listing
|
|
|
|
|
================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'gprof''s '-A' option triggers an annotated source listing, which lists
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
the program's source code, each function labeled with the number of
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
times it was called. You may also need to specify the '-I' option, if
|
|
|
|
|
'gprof' can't find the source code files.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
With older versions of 'gcc' compiling with 'gcc ... -g -pg -a'
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
augments your program with basic-block counting code, in addition to
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
function counting code. This enables 'gprof' to determine how many
|
|
|
|
|
times each line of code was executed. With newer versions of 'gcc'
|
|
|
|
|
support for displaying basic-block counts is provided by the 'gcov'
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
program.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For example, consider the following function, taken from gzip, with
|
|
|
|
|
line numbers added:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 ulg updcrc(s, n)
|
|
|
|
|
2 uch *s;
|
|
|
|
|
3 unsigned n;
|
|
|
|
|
4 {
|
|
|
|
|
5 register ulg c;
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
7 static ulg crc = (ulg)0xffffffffL;
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
9 if (s == NULL) {
|
|
|
|
|
10 c = 0xffffffffL;
|
|
|
|
|
11 } else {
|
|
|
|
|
12 c = crc;
|
|
|
|
|
13 if (n) do {
|
|
|
|
|
14 c = crc_32_tab[...];
|
|
|
|
|
15 } while (--n);
|
|
|
|
|
16 }
|
|
|
|
|
17 crc = c;
|
|
|
|
|
18 return c ^ 0xffffffffL;
|
|
|
|
|
19 }
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'updcrc' has at least five basic-blocks. One is the function itself.
|
|
|
|
|
The 'if' statement on line 9 generates two more basic-blocks, one for
|
|
|
|
|
each branch of the 'if'. A fourth basic-block results from the 'if' on
|
|
|
|
|
line 13, and the contents of the 'do' loop form the fifth basic-block.
|
|
|
|
|
The compiler may also generate additional basic-blocks to handle various
|
|
|
|
|
special cases.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A program augmented for basic-block counting can be analyzed with
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'gprof -l -A'. The '-x' option is also helpful, to ensure that each
|
|
|
|
|
line of code is labeled at least once. Here is 'updcrc''s annotated
|
|
|
|
|
source listing for a sample 'gzip' run:
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ulg updcrc(s, n)
|
|
|
|
|
uch *s;
|
|
|
|
|
unsigned n;
|
|
|
|
|
2 ->{
|
|
|
|
|
register ulg c;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static ulg crc = (ulg)0xffffffffL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 -> if (s == NULL) {
|
|
|
|
|
1 -> c = 0xffffffffL;
|
|
|
|
|
1 -> } else {
|
|
|
|
|
1 -> c = crc;
|
|
|
|
|
1 -> if (n) do {
|
|
|
|
|
26312 -> c = crc_32_tab[...];
|
|
|
|
|
26312,1,26311 -> } while (--n);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2 -> crc = c;
|
|
|
|
|
2 -> return c ^ 0xffffffffL;
|
|
|
|
|
2 ->}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In this example, the function was called twice, passing once through
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
each branch of the 'if' statement. The body of the 'do' loop was
|
|
|
|
|
executed a total of 26312 times. Note how the 'while' statement is
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
annotated. It began execution 26312 times, once for each iteration
|
|
|
|
|
through the loop. One of those times (the last time) it exited, while
|
|
|
|
|
it branched back to the beginning of the loop 26311 times.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
File: gprof.info, Node: Inaccuracy, Next: How do I?, Prev: Output, Up: Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
6 Inaccuracy of 'gprof' Output
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
******************************
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Menu:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Sampling Error:: Statistical margins of error
|
|
|
|
|
* Assumptions:: Estimating children times
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
File: gprof.info, Node: Sampling Error, Next: Assumptions, Up: Inaccuracy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1 Statistical Sampling Error
|
|
|
|
|
==============================
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
The run-time figures that 'gprof' gives you are based on a sampling
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
process, so they are subject to statistical inaccuracy. If a function
|
|
|
|
|
runs only a small amount of time, so that on the average the sampling
|
|
|
|
|
process ought to catch that function in the act only once, there is a
|
|
|
|
|
pretty good chance it will actually find that function zero times, or
|
|
|
|
|
twice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By contrast, the number-of-calls and basic-block figures are derived
|
|
|
|
|
by counting, not sampling. They are completely accurate and will not
|
2014-09-12 22:14:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
vary from run to run if your program is deterministic and single
|
|
|
|
|
threaded. In multi-threaded applications, or single threaded
|
|
|
|
|
applications that link with multi-threaded libraries, the counts are
|
|
|
|
|
only deterministic if the counting function is thread-safe. (Note:
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
beware that the mcount counting function in glibc is _not_ thread-safe).
|
|
|
|
|
*Note Implementation of Profiling: Implementation.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "sampling period" that is printed at the beginning of the flat
|
|
|
|
|
profile says how often samples are taken. The rule of thumb is that a
|
|
|
|
|
run-time figure is accurate if it is considerably bigger than the
|
|
|
|
|
sampling period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The actual amount of error can be predicted. For N samples, the
|
|
|
|
|
_expected_ error is the square-root of N. For example, if the sampling
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
period is 0.01 seconds and 'foo''s run-time is 1 second, N is 100
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
samples (1 second/0.01 seconds), sqrt(N) is 10 samples, so the expected
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
error in 'foo''s run-time is 0.1 seconds (10*0.01 seconds), or ten
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
percent of the observed value. Again, if the sampling period is 0.01
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
seconds and 'bar''s run-time is 100 seconds, N is 10000 samples, sqrt(N)
|
|
|
|
|
is 100 samples, so the expected error in 'bar''s run-time is 1 second,
|
|
|
|
|
or one percent of the observed value. It is likely to vary this much
|
|
|
|
|
_on the average_ from one profiling run to the next. (_Sometimes_ it
|
|
|
|
|
will vary more.)
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This does not mean that a small run-time figure is devoid of
|
|
|
|
|
information. If the program's _total_ run-time is large, a small
|
|
|
|
|
run-time for one function does tell you that that function used an
|
|
|
|
|
insignificant fraction of the whole program's time. Usually this means
|
|
|
|
|
it is not worth optimizing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One way to get more accuracy is to give your program more (but
|
|
|
|
|
similar) input data so it will take longer. Another way is to combine
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
the data from several runs, using the '-s' option of 'gprof'. Here is
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
how:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Run your program once.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2. Issue the command 'mv gmon.out gmon.sum'.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Run your program again, the same as before.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
4. Merge the new data in 'gmon.out' into 'gmon.sum' with this command:
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gprof -s EXECUTABLE-FILE gmon.out gmon.sum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Repeat the last two steps as often as you wish.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Analyze the cumulative data using this command:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gprof EXECUTABLE-FILE gmon.sum > OUTPUT-FILE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
File: gprof.info, Node: Assumptions, Prev: Sampling Error, Up: Inaccuracy
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
6.2 Estimating 'children' Times
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
===============================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some of the figures in the call graph are estimates--for example, the
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'children' time values and all the time figures in caller and subroutine
|
|
|
|
|
lines.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is no direct information about these measurements in the
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
profile data itself. Instead, 'gprof' estimates them by making an
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
assumption about your program that might or might not be true.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The assumption made is that the average time spent in each call to
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
any function 'foo' is not correlated with who called 'foo'. If 'foo'
|
|
|
|
|
used 5 seconds in all, and 2/5 of the calls to 'foo' came from 'a', then
|
|
|
|
|
'foo' contributes 2 seconds to 'a''s 'children' time, by assumption.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This assumption is usually true enough, but for some programs it is
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
far from true. Suppose that 'foo' returns very quickly when its
|
|
|
|
|
argument is zero; suppose that 'a' always passes zero as an argument,
|
|
|
|
|
while other callers of 'foo' pass other arguments. In this program, all
|
|
|
|
|
the time spent in 'foo' is in the calls from callers other than 'a'.
|
|
|
|
|
But 'gprof' has no way of knowing this; it will blindly and incorrectly
|
|
|
|
|
charge 2 seconds of time in 'foo' to the children of 'a'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We hope some day to put more complete data into 'gmon.out', so that
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
this assumption is no longer needed, if we can figure out how. For the
|
|
|
|
|
novice, the estimated figures are usually more useful than misleading.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
File: gprof.info, Node: How do I?, Next: Incompatibilities, Prev: Inaccuracy, Up: Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 Answers to Common Questions
|
|
|
|
|
*****************************
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How can I get more exact information about hot spots in my program?
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Looking at the per-line call counts only tells part of the story.
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Because 'gprof' can only report call times and counts by function,
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
the best way to get finer-grained information on where the program
|
|
|
|
|
is spending its time is to re-factor large functions into sequences
|
|
|
|
|
of calls to smaller ones. Beware however that this can introduce
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
artificial hot spots since compiling with '-pg' adds a significant
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
overhead to function calls. An alternative solution is to use a
|
|
|
|
|
non-intrusive profiler, e.g. oprofile.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How do I find which lines in my program were executed the most times?
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use the 'gcov' program.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How do I find which lines in my program called a particular function?
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use 'gprof -l' and lookup the function in the call graph. The
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
callers will be broken down by function and line number.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How do I analyze a program that runs for less than a second?
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Try using a shell script like this one:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for i in `seq 1 100`; do
|
|
|
|
|
fastprog
|
|
|
|
|
mv gmon.out gmon.out.$i
|
|
|
|
|
done
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gprof -s fastprog gmon.out.*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gprof fastprog gmon.sum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If your program is completely deterministic, all the call counts
|
|
|
|
|
will be simple multiples of 100 (i.e., a function called once in
|
|
|
|
|
each run will appear with a call count of 100).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
File: gprof.info, Node: Incompatibilities, Next: Details, Prev: How do I?, Up: Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
8 Incompatibilities with Unix 'gprof'
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
*************************************
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
GNU 'gprof' and Berkeley Unix 'gprof' use the same data file 'gmon.out',
|
|
|
|
|
and provide essentially the same information. But there are a few
|
|
|
|
|
differences.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
* GNU 'gprof' uses a new, generalized file format with support for
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
basic-block execution counts and non-realtime histograms. A magic
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
cookie and version number allows 'gprof' to easily identify new
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
style files. Old BSD-style files can still be read. *Note
|
|
|
|
|
Profiling Data File Format: File Format.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
* For a recursive function, Unix 'gprof' lists the function as a
|
|
|
|
|
parent and as a child, with a 'calls' field that lists the number
|
|
|
|
|
of recursive calls. GNU 'gprof' omits these lines and puts the
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
number of recursive calls in the primary line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
* When a function is suppressed from the call graph with '-e', GNU
|
|
|
|
|
'gprof' still lists it as a subroutine of functions that call it.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
* GNU 'gprof' accepts the '-k' with its argument in the form
|
|
|
|
|
'from/to', instead of 'from to'.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
* In the annotated source listing, if there are multiple basic blocks
|
|
|
|
|
on the same line, GNU 'gprof' prints all of their counts, separated
|
|
|
|
|
by commas.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* The blurbs, field widths, and output formats are different. GNU
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'gprof' prints blurbs after the tables, so that you can see the
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
tables without skipping the blurbs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
File: gprof.info, Node: Details, Next: GNU Free Documentation License, Prev: Incompatibilities, Up: Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 Details of Profiling
|
|
|
|
|
**********************
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Menu:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Implementation:: How a program collects profiling information
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
* File Format:: Format of 'gmon.out' files
|
|
|
|
|
* Internals:: 'gprof''s internal operation
|
|
|
|
|
* Debugging:: Using 'gprof''s '-d' option
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
File: gprof.info, Node: Implementation, Next: File Format, Up: Details
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.1 Implementation of Profiling
|
|
|
|
|
===============================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profiling works by changing how every function in your program is
|
|
|
|
|
compiled so that when it is called, it will stash away some information
|
|
|
|
|
about where it was called from. From this, the profiler can figure out
|
|
|
|
|
what function called it, and can count how many times it was called.
|
|
|
|
|
This change is made by the compiler when your program is compiled with
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
the '-pg' option, which causes every function to call 'mcount' (or
|
|
|
|
|
'_mcount', or '__mcount', depending on the OS and compiler) as one of
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
its first operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
The 'mcount' routine, included in the profiling library, is
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
responsible for recording in an in-memory call graph table both its
|
|
|
|
|
parent routine (the child) and its parent's parent. This is typically
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
done by examining the stack frame to find both the address of the child,
|
|
|
|
|
and the return address in the original parent. Since this is a very
|
|
|
|
|
machine-dependent operation, 'mcount' itself is typically a short
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
assembly-language stub routine that extracts the required information,
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
and then calls '__mcount_internal' (a normal C function) with two
|
|
|
|
|
arguments--'frompc' and 'selfpc'. '__mcount_internal' is responsible
|
|
|
|
|
for maintaining the in-memory call graph, which records 'frompc',
|
|
|
|
|
'selfpc', and the number of times each of these call arcs was traversed.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GCC Version 2 provides a magical function
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
('__builtin_return_address'), which allows a generic 'mcount' function
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
to extract the required information from the stack frame. However, on
|
|
|
|
|
some architectures, most notably the SPARC, using this builtin can be
|
|
|
|
|
very computationally expensive, and an assembly language version of
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'mcount' is used for performance reasons.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number-of-calls information for library routines is collected by
|
|
|
|
|
using a special version of the C library. The programs in it are the
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
same as in the usual C library, but they were compiled with '-pg'. If
|
|
|
|
|
you link your program with 'gcc ... -pg', it automatically uses the
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
profiling version of the library.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Profiling also involves watching your program as it runs, and keeping
|
|
|
|
|
a histogram of where the program counter happens to be every now and
|
|
|
|
|
then. Typically the program counter is looked at around 100 times per
|
|
|
|
|
second of run time, but the exact frequency may vary from system to
|
|
|
|
|
system.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is done is one of two ways. Most UNIX-like operating systems
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
provide a 'profil()' system call, which registers a memory array with
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
the kernel, along with a scale factor that determines how the program's
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
address space maps into the array. Typical scaling values cause every 2
|
|
|
|
|
to 8 bytes of address space to map into a single array slot. On every
|
|
|
|
|
tick of the system clock (assuming the profiled program is running), the
|
|
|
|
|
value of the program counter is examined and the corresponding slot in
|
|
|
|
|
the memory array is incremented. Since this is done in the kernel,
|
|
|
|
|
which had to interrupt the process anyway to handle the clock interrupt,
|
|
|
|
|
very little additional system overhead is required.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
However, some operating systems, most notably Linux 2.0 (and
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
earlier), do not provide a 'profil()' system call. On such a system,
|
|
|
|
|
arrangements are made for the kernel to periodically deliver a signal to
|
|
|
|
|
the process (typically via 'setitimer()'), which then performs the same
|
|
|
|
|
operation of examining the program counter and incrementing a slot in
|
|
|
|
|
the memory array. Since this method requires a signal to be delivered
|
|
|
|
|
to user space every time a sample is taken, it uses considerably more
|
|
|
|
|
overhead than kernel-based profiling. Also, due to the added delay
|
|
|
|
|
required to deliver the signal, this method is less accurate as well.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A special startup routine allocates memory for the histogram and
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
either calls 'profil()' or sets up a clock signal handler. This routine
|
|
|
|
|
('monstartup') can be invoked in several ways. On Linux systems, a
|
|
|
|
|
special profiling startup file 'gcrt0.o', which invokes 'monstartup'
|
|
|
|
|
before 'main', is used instead of the default 'crt0.o'. Use of this
|
|
|
|
|
special startup file is one of the effects of using 'gcc ... -pg' to
|
|
|
|
|
link. On SPARC systems, no special startup files are used. Rather, the
|
|
|
|
|
'mcount' routine, when it is invoked for the first time (typically when
|
|
|
|
|
'main' is called), calls 'monstartup'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the compiler's '-a' option was used, basic-block counting is also
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
enabled. Each object file is then compiled with a static array of
|
|
|
|
|
counts, initially zero. In the executable code, every time a new
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
basic-block begins (i.e., when an 'if' statement appears), an extra
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
instruction is inserted to increment the corresponding count in the
|
|
|
|
|
array. At compile time, a paired array was constructed that recorded
|
|
|
|
|
the starting address of each basic-block. Taken together, the two
|
|
|
|
|
arrays record the starting address of every basic-block, along with the
|
|
|
|
|
number of times it was executed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
The profiling library also includes a function ('mcleanup') which is
|
|
|
|
|
typically registered using 'atexit()' to be called as the program exits,
|
|
|
|
|
and is responsible for writing the file 'gmon.out'. Profiling is turned
|
|
|
|
|
off, various headers are output, and the histogram is written, followed
|
|
|
|
|
by the call-graph arcs and the basic-block counts.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
The output from 'gprof' gives no indication of parts of your program
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
that are limited by I/O or swapping bandwidth. This is because samples
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
of the program counter are taken at fixed intervals of the program's run
|
|
|
|
|
time. Therefore, the time measurements in 'gprof' output say nothing
|
|
|
|
|
about time that your program was not running. For example, a part of
|
|
|
|
|
the program that creates so much data that it cannot all fit in physical
|
|
|
|
|
memory at once may run very slowly due to thrashing, but 'gprof' will
|
|
|
|
|
say it uses little time. On the other hand, sampling by run time has
|
|
|
|
|
the advantage that the amount of load due to other users won't directly
|
|
|
|
|
affect the output you get.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
File: gprof.info, Node: File Format, Next: Internals, Prev: Implementation, Up: Details
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.2 Profiling Data File Format
|
|
|
|
|
==============================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The old BSD-derived file format used for profile data does not contain a
|
|
|
|
|
magic cookie that allows to check whether a data file really is a
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'gprof' file. Furthermore, it does not provide a version number, thus
|
|
|
|
|
rendering changes to the file format almost impossible. GNU 'gprof'
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
uses a new file format that provides these features. For backward
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
compatibility, GNU 'gprof' continues to support the old BSD-derived
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
format, but not all features are supported with it. For example,
|
|
|
|
|
basic-block execution counts cannot be accommodated by the old file
|
|
|
|
|
format.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
The new file format is defined in header file 'gmon_out.h'. It
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
consists of a header containing the magic cookie and a version number,
|
|
|
|
|
as well as some spare bytes available for future extensions. All data
|
|
|
|
|
in a profile data file is in the native format of the target for which
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
the profile was collected. GNU 'gprof' adapts automatically to the
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
byte-order in use.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the new file format, the header is followed by a sequence of
|
|
|
|
|
records. Currently, there are three different record types: histogram
|
|
|
|
|
records, call-graph arc records, and basic-block execution count
|
|
|
|
|
records. Each file can contain any number of each record type. When
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
reading a file, GNU 'gprof' will ensure records of the same type are
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
compatible with each other and compute the union of all records. For
|
|
|
|
|
example, for basic-block execution counts, the union is simply the sum
|
|
|
|
|
of all execution counts for each basic-block.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.2.1 Histogram Records
|
|
|
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Histogram records consist of a header that is followed by an array of
|
|
|
|
|
bins. The header contains the text-segment range that the histogram
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
spans, the size of the histogram in bytes (unlike in the old BSD format,
|
|
|
|
|
this does not include the size of the header), the rate of the profiling
|
|
|
|
|
clock, and the physical dimension that the bin counts represent after
|
|
|
|
|
being scaled by the profiling clock rate. The physical dimension is
|
|
|
|
|
specified in two parts: a long name of up to 15 characters and a single
|
|
|
|
|
character abbreviation. For example, a histogram representing real-time
|
|
|
|
|
would specify the long name as "seconds" and the abbreviation as "s".
|
|
|
|
|
This feature is useful for architectures that support performance
|
|
|
|
|
monitor hardware (which, fortunately, is becoming increasingly common).
|
|
|
|
|
For example, under DEC OSF/1, the "uprofile" command can be used to
|
|
|
|
|
produce a histogram of, say, instruction cache misses. In this case,
|
|
|
|
|
the dimension in the histogram header could be set to "i-cache misses"
|
|
|
|
|
and the abbreviation could be set to "1" (because it is simply a count,
|
|
|
|
|
not a physical dimension). Also, the profiling rate would have to be
|
|
|
|
|
set to 1 in this case.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Histogram bins are 16-bit numbers and each bin represent an equal
|
|
|
|
|
amount of text-space. For example, if the text-segment is one thousand
|
|
|
|
|
bytes long and if there are ten bins in the histogram, each bin
|
|
|
|
|
represents one hundred bytes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.2.2 Call-Graph Records
|
|
|
|
|
------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Call-graph records have a format that is identical to the one used in
|
|
|
|
|
the BSD-derived file format. It consists of an arc in the call graph
|
|
|
|
|
and a count indicating the number of times the arc was traversed during
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
program execution. Arcs are specified by a pair of addresses: the first
|
|
|
|
|
must be within caller's function and the second must be within the
|
|
|
|
|
callee's function. When performing profiling at the function level,
|
|
|
|
|
these addresses can point anywhere within the respective function.
|
|
|
|
|
However, when profiling at the line-level, it is better if the addresses
|
|
|
|
|
are as close to the call-site/entry-point as possible. This will ensure
|
|
|
|
|
that the line-level call-graph is able to identify exactly which line of
|
|
|
|
|
source code performed calls to a function.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.2.3 Basic-Block Execution Count Records
|
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic-block execution count records consist of a header followed by a
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
sequence of address/count pairs. The header simply specifies the length
|
|
|
|
|
of the sequence. In an address/count pair, the address identifies a
|
|
|
|
|
basic-block and the count specifies the number of times that basic-block
|
|
|
|
|
was executed. Any address within the basic-address can be used.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
File: gprof.info, Node: Internals, Next: Debugging, Prev: File Format, Up: Details
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
9.3 'gprof''s Internal Operation
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Like most programs, 'gprof' begins by processing its options. During
|
|
|
|
|
this stage, it may building its symspec list ('sym_ids.c:sym_id_add'),
|
|
|
|
|
if options are specified which use symspecs. 'gprof' maintains a single
|
|
|
|
|
linked list of symspecs, which will eventually get turned into 12 symbol
|
|
|
|
|
tables, organized into six include/exclude pairs--one pair each for the
|
|
|
|
|
flat profile (INCL_FLAT/EXCL_FLAT), the call graph arcs
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
(INCL_ARCS/EXCL_ARCS), printing in the call graph
|
|
|
|
|
(INCL_GRAPH/EXCL_GRAPH), timing propagation in the call graph
|
|
|
|
|
(INCL_TIME/EXCL_TIME), the annotated source listing
|
|
|
|
|
(INCL_ANNO/EXCL_ANNO), and the execution count listing
|
|
|
|
|
(INCL_EXEC/EXCL_EXEC).
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
After option processing, 'gprof' finishes building the symspec list
|
|
|
|
|
by adding all the symspecs in 'default_excluded_list' to the exclude
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
lists EXCL_TIME and EXCL_GRAPH, and if line-by-line profiling is
|
|
|
|
|
specified, EXCL_FLAT as well. These default excludes are not added to
|
|
|
|
|
EXCL_ANNO, EXCL_ARCS, and EXCL_EXEC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Next, the BFD library is called to open the object file, verify that
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
it is an object file, and read its symbol table ('core.c:core_init'),
|
|
|
|
|
using 'bfd_canonicalize_symtab' after mallocing an appropriately sized
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
array of symbols. At this point, function mappings are read (if the
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'--file-ordering' option has been specified), and the core text space is
|
|
|
|
|
read into memory (if the '-c' option was given).
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
'gprof''s own symbol table, an array of Sym structures, is now built.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
This is done in one of two ways, by one of two routines, depending on
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
whether line-by-line profiling ('-l' option) has been enabled. For
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
normal profiling, the BFD canonical symbol table is scanned. For
|
|
|
|
|
line-by-line profiling, every text space address is examined, and a new
|
|
|
|
|
symbol table entry gets created every time the line number changes. In
|
|
|
|
|
either case, two passes are made through the symbol table--one to count
|
|
|
|
|
the size of the symbol table required, and the other to actually read
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
the symbols. In between the two passes, a single array of type 'Sym' is
|
|
|
|
|
created of the appropriate length. Finally, 'symtab.c:symtab_finalize'
|
|
|
|
|
is called to sort the symbol table and remove duplicate entries (entries
|
|
|
|
|
with the same memory address).
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The symbol table must be a contiguous array for two reasons. First,
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
the 'qsort' library function (which sorts an array) will be used to sort
|
|
|
|
|
the symbol table. Also, the symbol lookup routine
|
|
|
|
|
('symtab.c:sym_lookup'), which finds symbols based on memory address,
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
uses a binary search algorithm which requires the symbol table to be a
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
sorted array. Function symbols are indicated with an 'is_func' flag.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Line number symbols have no special flags set. Additionally, a symbol
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
can have an 'is_static' flag to indicate that it is a local symbol.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With the symbol table read, the symspecs can now be translated into
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Syms ('sym_ids.c:sym_id_parse'). Remember that a single symspec can
|
|
|
|
|
match multiple symbols. An array of symbol tables ('syms') is created,
|
|
|
|
|
each entry of which is a symbol table of Syms to be included or excluded
|
|
|
|
|
from a particular listing. The master symbol table and the symspecs are
|
|
|
|
|
examined by nested loops, and every symbol that matches a symspec is
|
|
|
|
|
inserted into the appropriate syms table. This is done twice, once to
|
|
|
|
|
count the size of each required symbol table, and again to build the
|
|
|
|
|
tables, which have been malloced between passes. From now on, to
|
|
|
|
|
determine whether a symbol is on an include or exclude symspec list,
|
|
|
|
|
'gprof' simply uses its standard symbol lookup routine on the
|
|
|
|
|
appropriate table in the 'syms' array.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now the profile data file(s) themselves are read
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
('gmon_io.c:gmon_out_read'), first by checking for a new-style
|
|
|
|
|
'gmon.out' header, then assuming this is an old-style BSD 'gmon.out' if
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
the magic number test failed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
New-style histogram records are read by 'hist.c:hist_read_rec'. For
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
the first histogram record, allocate a memory array to hold all the
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
bins, and read them in. When multiple profile data files (or files with
|
|
|
|
|
multiple histogram records) are read, the memory ranges of each pair of
|
|
|
|
|
histogram records must be either equal, or non-overlapping. For each
|
|
|
|
|
pair of histogram records, the resolution (memory region size divided by
|
|
|
|
|
the number of bins) must be the same. The time unit must be the same
|
|
|
|
|
for all histogram records. If the above containts are met, all
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
histograms for the same memory range are merged.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
As each call graph record is read ('call_graph.c:cg_read_rec'), the
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
parent and child addresses are matched to symbol table entries, and a
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
call graph arc is created by 'cg_arcs.c:arc_add', unless the arc fails a
|
|
|
|
|
symspec check against INCL_ARCS/EXCL_ARCS. As each arc is added, a
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
linked list is maintained of the parent's child arcs, and of the child's
|
|
|
|
|
parent arcs. Both the child's call count and the arc's call count are
|
|
|
|
|
incremented by the record's call count.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Basic-block records are read ('basic_blocks.c:bb_read_rec'), but only
|
|
|
|
|
if line-by-line profiling has been selected. Each basic-block address
|
|
|
|
|
is matched to a corresponding line symbol in the symbol table, and an
|
|
|
|
|
entry made in the symbol's bb_addr and bb_calls arrays. Again, if
|
|
|
|
|
multiple basic-block records are present for the same address, the call
|
|
|
|
|
counts are cumulative.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
A gmon.sum file is dumped, if requested ('gmon_io.c:gmon_out_write').
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If histograms were present in the data files, assign them to symbols
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
('hist.c:hist_assign_samples') by iterating over all the sample bins and
|
|
|
|
|
assigning them to symbols. Since the symbol table is sorted in order of
|
|
|
|
|
ascending memory addresses, we can simple follow along in the symbol
|
|
|
|
|
table as we make our pass over the sample bins. This step includes a
|
|
|
|
|
symspec check against INCL_FLAT/EXCL_FLAT. Depending on the histogram
|
|
|
|
|
scale factor, a sample bin may span multiple symbols, in which case a
|
|
|
|
|
fraction of the sample count is allocated to each symbol, proportional
|
|
|
|
|
to the degree of overlap. This effect is rare for normal profiling, but
|
|
|
|
|
overlaps are more common during line-by-line profiling, and can cause
|
|
|
|
|
each of two adjacent lines to be credited with half a hit, for example.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If call graph data is present, 'cg_arcs.c:cg_assemble' is called.
|
|
|
|
|
First, if '-c' was specified, a machine-dependent routine ('find_call')
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
scans through each symbol's machine code, looking for subroutine call
|
|
|
|
|
instructions, and adding them to the call graph with a zero call count.
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
A topological sort is performed by depth-first numbering all the symbols
|
|
|
|
|
('cg_dfn.c:cg_dfn'), so that children are always numbered less than
|
|
|
|
|
their parents, then making a array of pointers into the symbol table and
|
|
|
|
|
sorting it into numerical order, which is reverse topological order
|
|
|
|
|
(children appear before parents). Cycles are also detected at this
|
|
|
|
|
point, all members of which are assigned the same topological number.
|
|
|
|
|
Two passes are now made through this sorted array of symbol pointers.
|
|
|
|
|
The first pass, from end to beginning (parents to children), computes
|
|
|
|
|
the fraction of child time to propagate to each parent and a print flag.
|
|
|
|
|
The print flag reflects symspec handling of INCL_GRAPH/EXCL_GRAPH, with
|
|
|
|
|
a parent's include or exclude (print or no print) property being
|
|
|
|
|
propagated to its children, unless they themselves explicitly appear in
|
|
|
|
|
INCL_GRAPH or EXCL_GRAPH. A second pass, from beginning to end (children
|
|
|
|
|
to parents) actually propagates the timings along the call graph,
|
|
|
|
|
subject to a check against INCL_TIME/EXCL_TIME. With the print flag,
|
|
|
|
|
fractions, and timings now stored in the symbol structures, the
|
|
|
|
|
topological sort array is now discarded, and a new array of pointers is
|
|
|
|
|
assembled, this time sorted by propagated time.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finally, print the various outputs the user requested, which is now
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
fairly straightforward. The call graph ('cg_print.c:cg_print') and flat
|
|
|
|
|
profile ('hist.c:hist_print') are regurgitations of values already
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
computed. The annotated source listing
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
('basic_blocks.c:print_annotated_source') uses basic-block information,
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
if present, to label each line of code with call counts, otherwise only
|
|
|
|
|
the function call counts are presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The function ordering code is marginally well documented in the
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
source code itself ('cg_print.c'). Basically, the functions with the
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
most use and the most parents are placed first, followed by other
|
|
|
|
|
functions with the most use, followed by lower use functions, followed
|
|
|
|
|
by unused functions at the end.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
File: gprof.info, Node: Debugging, Prev: Internals, Up: Details
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
9.4 Debugging 'gprof'
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
=====================
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
If 'gprof' was compiled with debugging enabled, the '-d' option triggers
|
|
|
|
|
debugging output (to stdout) which can be helpful in understanding its
|
|
|
|
|
operation. The debugging number specified is interpreted as a sum of
|
|
|
|
|
the following options:
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 - Topological sort
|
|
|
|
|
Monitor depth-first numbering of symbols during call graph analysis
|
|
|
|
|
4 - Cycles
|
|
|
|
|
Shows symbols as they are identified as cycle heads
|
|
|
|
|
16 - Tallying
|
|
|
|
|
As the call graph arcs are read, show each arc and how the total
|
|
|
|
|
calls to each function are tallied
|
|
|
|
|
32 - Call graph arc sorting
|
|
|
|
|
Details sorting individual parents/children within each call graph
|
|
|
|
|
entry
|
|
|
|
|
64 - Reading histogram and call graph records
|
|
|
|
|
Shows address ranges of histograms as they are read, and each call
|
|
|
|
|
graph arc
|
|
|
|
|
128 - Symbol table
|
|
|
|
|
Reading, classifying, and sorting the symbol table from the object
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
file. For line-by-line profiling ('-l' option), also shows line
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
numbers being assigned to memory addresses.
|
|
|
|
|
256 - Static call graph
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Trace operation of '-c' option
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
512 - Symbol table and arc table lookups
|
|
|
|
|
Detail operation of lookup routines
|
|
|
|
|
1024 - Call graph propagation
|
|
|
|
|
Shows how function times are propagated along the call graph
|
|
|
|
|
2048 - Basic-blocks
|
|
|
|
|
Shows basic-block records as they are read from profile data (only
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
meaningful with '-l' option)
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
4096 - Symspecs
|
|
|
|
|
Shows symspec-to-symbol pattern matching operation
|
|
|
|
|
8192 - Annotate source
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Tracks operation of '-A' option
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
File: gprof.info, Node: GNU Free Documentation License, Prev: Details, Up: Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appendix A GNU Free Documentation License
|
|
|
|
|
*****************************************
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Version 1.3, 3 November 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright (C) 2000, 2001, 2002, 2007, 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
<http://fsf.org/>
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies
|
|
|
|
|
of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0. PREAMBLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The purpose of this License is to make a manual, textbook, or other
|
|
|
|
|
functional and useful document "free" in the sense of freedom: to
|
|
|
|
|
assure everyone the effective freedom to copy and redistribute it,
|
|
|
|
|
with or without modifying it, either commercially or
|
|
|
|
|
noncommercially. Secondarily, this License preserves for the
|
|
|
|
|
author and publisher a way to get credit for their work, while not
|
|
|
|
|
being considered responsible for modifications made by others.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This License is a kind of "copyleft", which means that derivative
|
|
|
|
|
works of the document must themselves be free in the same sense.
|
|
|
|
|
It complements the GNU General Public License, which is a copyleft
|
|
|
|
|
license designed for free software.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have designed this License in order to use it for manuals for
|
|
|
|
|
free software, because free software needs free documentation: a
|
|
|
|
|
free program should come with manuals providing the same freedoms
|
|
|
|
|
that the software does. But this License is not limited to
|
|
|
|
|
software manuals; it can be used for any textual work, regardless
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
of subject matter or whether it is published as a printed book. We
|
|
|
|
|
recommend this License principally for works whose purpose is
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
instruction or reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. APPLICABILITY AND DEFINITIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This License applies to any manual or other work, in any medium,
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
that contains a notice placed by the copyright holder saying it can
|
|
|
|
|
be distributed under the terms of this License. Such a notice
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
grants a world-wide, royalty-free license, unlimited in duration,
|
|
|
|
|
to use that work under the conditions stated herein. The
|
|
|
|
|
"Document", below, refers to any such manual or work. Any member
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
of the public is a licensee, and is addressed as "you". You accept
|
|
|
|
|
the license if you copy, modify or distribute the work in a way
|
|
|
|
|
requiring permission under copyright law.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A "Modified Version" of the Document means any work containing the
|
|
|
|
|
Document or a portion of it, either copied verbatim, or with
|
|
|
|
|
modifications and/or translated into another language.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A "Secondary Section" is a named appendix or a front-matter section
|
|
|
|
|
of the Document that deals exclusively with the relationship of the
|
|
|
|
|
publishers or authors of the Document to the Document's overall
|
|
|
|
|
subject (or to related matters) and contains nothing that could
|
|
|
|
|
fall directly within that overall subject. (Thus, if the Document
|
|
|
|
|
is in part a textbook of mathematics, a Secondary Section may not
|
|
|
|
|
explain any mathematics.) The relationship could be a matter of
|
|
|
|
|
historical connection with the subject or with related matters, or
|
|
|
|
|
of legal, commercial, philosophical, ethical or political position
|
|
|
|
|
regarding them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "Invariant Sections" are certain Secondary Sections whose
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
titles are designated, as being those of Invariant Sections, in the
|
|
|
|
|
notice that says that the Document is released under this License.
|
|
|
|
|
If a section does not fit the above definition of Secondary then it
|
|
|
|
|
is not allowed to be designated as Invariant. The Document may
|
|
|
|
|
contain zero Invariant Sections. If the Document does not identify
|
|
|
|
|
any Invariant Sections then there are none.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "Cover Texts" are certain short passages of text that are
|
|
|
|
|
listed, as Front-Cover Texts or Back-Cover Texts, in the notice
|
|
|
|
|
that says that the Document is released under this License. A
|
|
|
|
|
Front-Cover Text may be at most 5 words, and a Back-Cover Text may
|
|
|
|
|
be at most 25 words.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A "Transparent" copy of the Document means a machine-readable copy,
|
|
|
|
|
represented in a format whose specification is available to the
|
|
|
|
|
general public, that is suitable for revising the document
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
straightforwardly with generic text editors or (for images composed
|
|
|
|
|
of pixels) generic paint programs or (for drawings) some widely
|
|
|
|
|
available drawing editor, and that is suitable for input to text
|
|
|
|
|
formatters or for automatic translation to a variety of formats
|
|
|
|
|
suitable for input to text formatters. A copy made in an otherwise
|
|
|
|
|
Transparent file format whose markup, or absence of markup, has
|
|
|
|
|
been arranged to thwart or discourage subsequent modification by
|
|
|
|
|
readers is not Transparent. An image format is not Transparent if
|
|
|
|
|
used for any substantial amount of text. A copy that is not
|
|
|
|
|
"Transparent" is called "Opaque".
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Examples of suitable formats for Transparent copies include plain
|
|
|
|
|
ASCII without markup, Texinfo input format, LaTeX input format,
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
SGML or XML using a publicly available DTD, and standard-conforming
|
|
|
|
|
simple HTML, PostScript or PDF designed for human modification.
|
|
|
|
|
Examples of transparent image formats include PNG, XCF and JPG.
|
|
|
|
|
Opaque formats include proprietary formats that can be read and
|
|
|
|
|
edited only by proprietary word processors, SGML or XML for which
|
|
|
|
|
the DTD and/or processing tools are not generally available, and
|
|
|
|
|
the machine-generated HTML, PostScript or PDF produced by some word
|
|
|
|
|
processors for output purposes only.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "Title Page" means, for a printed book, the title page itself,
|
|
|
|
|
plus such following pages as are needed to hold, legibly, the
|
|
|
|
|
material this License requires to appear in the title page. For
|
|
|
|
|
works in formats which do not have any title page as such, "Title
|
|
|
|
|
Page" means the text near the most prominent appearance of the
|
|
|
|
|
work's title, preceding the beginning of the body of the text.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "publisher" means any person or entity that distributes copies
|
|
|
|
|
of the Document to the public.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A section "Entitled XYZ" means a named subunit of the Document
|
|
|
|
|
whose title either is precisely XYZ or contains XYZ in parentheses
|
|
|
|
|
following text that translates XYZ in another language. (Here XYZ
|
|
|
|
|
stands for a specific section name mentioned below, such as
|
|
|
|
|
"Acknowledgements", "Dedications", "Endorsements", or "History".)
|
|
|
|
|
To "Preserve the Title" of such a section when you modify the
|
|
|
|
|
Document means that it remains a section "Entitled XYZ" according
|
|
|
|
|
to this definition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Document may include Warranty Disclaimers next to the notice
|
|
|
|
|
which states that this License applies to the Document. These
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty Disclaimers are considered to be included by reference in
|
|
|
|
|
this License, but only as regards disclaiming warranties: any other
|
|
|
|
|
implication that these Warranty Disclaimers may have is void and
|
|
|
|
|
has no effect on the meaning of this License.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. VERBATIM COPYING
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You may copy and distribute the Document in any medium, either
|
|
|
|
|
commercially or noncommercially, provided that this License, the
|
|
|
|
|
copyright notices, and the license notice saying this License
|
|
|
|
|
applies to the Document are reproduced in all copies, and that you
|
|
|
|
|
add no other conditions whatsoever to those of this License. You
|
|
|
|
|
may not use technical measures to obstruct or control the reading
|
|
|
|
|
or further copying of the copies you make or distribute. However,
|
|
|
|
|
you may accept compensation in exchange for copies. If you
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
distribute a large enough number of copies you must also follow the
|
|
|
|
|
conditions in section 3.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You may also lend copies, under the same conditions stated above,
|
|
|
|
|
and you may publicly display copies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. COPYING IN QUANTITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you publish printed copies (or copies in media that commonly
|
|
|
|
|
have printed covers) of the Document, numbering more than 100, and
|
|
|
|
|
the Document's license notice requires Cover Texts, you must
|
|
|
|
|
enclose the copies in covers that carry, clearly and legibly, all
|
|
|
|
|
these Cover Texts: Front-Cover Texts on the front cover, and
|
|
|
|
|
Back-Cover Texts on the back cover. Both covers must also clearly
|
|
|
|
|
and legibly identify you as the publisher of these copies. The
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
front cover must present the full title with all words of the title
|
|
|
|
|
equally prominent and visible. You may add other material on the
|
|
|
|
|
covers in addition. Copying with changes limited to the covers, as
|
|
|
|
|
long as they preserve the title of the Document and satisfy these
|
|
|
|
|
conditions, can be treated as verbatim copying in other respects.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the required texts for either cover are too voluminous to fit
|
|
|
|
|
legibly, you should put the first ones listed (as many as fit
|
|
|
|
|
reasonably) on the actual cover, and continue the rest onto
|
|
|
|
|
adjacent pages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you publish or distribute Opaque copies of the Document
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
numbering more than 100, you must either include a machine-readable
|
|
|
|
|
Transparent copy along with each Opaque copy, or state in or with
|
|
|
|
|
each Opaque copy a computer-network location from which the general
|
|
|
|
|
network-using public has access to download using public-standard
|
|
|
|
|
network protocols a complete Transparent copy of the Document, free
|
|
|
|
|
of added material. If you use the latter option, you must take
|
|
|
|
|
reasonably prudent steps, when you begin distribution of Opaque
|
|
|
|
|
copies in quantity, to ensure that this Transparent copy will
|
|
|
|
|
remain thus accessible at the stated location until at least one
|
|
|
|
|
year after the last time you distribute an Opaque copy (directly or
|
|
|
|
|
through your agents or retailers) of that edition to the public.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is requested, but not required, that you contact the authors of
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
the Document well before redistributing any large number of copies,
|
|
|
|
|
to give them a chance to provide you with an updated version of the
|
|
|
|
|
Document.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. MODIFICATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You may copy and distribute a Modified Version of the Document
|
|
|
|
|
under the conditions of sections 2 and 3 above, provided that you
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
release the Modified Version under precisely this License, with the
|
|
|
|
|
Modified Version filling the role of the Document, thus licensing
|
|
|
|
|
distribution and modification of the Modified Version to whoever
|
|
|
|
|
possesses a copy of it. In addition, you must do these things in
|
|
|
|
|
the Modified Version:
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Use in the Title Page (and on the covers, if any) a title
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
distinct from that of the Document, and from those of previous
|
|
|
|
|
versions (which should, if there were any, be listed in the
|
|
|
|
|
History section of the Document). You may use the same title
|
|
|
|
|
as a previous version if the original publisher of that
|
|
|
|
|
version gives permission.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. List on the Title Page, as authors, one or more persons or
|
|
|
|
|
entities responsible for authorship of the modifications in
|
|
|
|
|
the Modified Version, together with at least five of the
|
|
|
|
|
principal authors of the Document (all of its principal
|
|
|
|
|
authors, if it has fewer than five), unless they release you
|
|
|
|
|
from this requirement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. State on the Title page the name of the publisher of the
|
|
|
|
|
Modified Version, as the publisher.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Preserve all the copyright notices of the Document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Add an appropriate copyright notice for your modifications
|
|
|
|
|
adjacent to the other copyright notices.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Include, immediately after the copyright notices, a license
|
|
|
|
|
notice giving the public permission to use the Modified
|
|
|
|
|
Version under the terms of this License, in the form shown in
|
|
|
|
|
the Addendum below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Preserve in that license notice the full lists of Invariant
|
|
|
|
|
Sections and required Cover Texts given in the Document's
|
|
|
|
|
license notice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Include an unaltered copy of this License.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Preserve the section Entitled "History", Preserve its Title,
|
|
|
|
|
and add to it an item stating at least the title, year, new
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
authors, and publisher of the Modified Version as given on the
|
|
|
|
|
Title Page. If there is no section Entitled "History" in the
|
|
|
|
|
Document, create one stating the title, year, authors, and
|
|
|
|
|
publisher of the Document as given on its Title Page, then add
|
|
|
|
|
an item describing the Modified Version as stated in the
|
|
|
|
|
previous sentence.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Preserve the network location, if any, given in the Document
|
|
|
|
|
for public access to a Transparent copy of the Document, and
|
|
|
|
|
likewise the network locations given in the Document for
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
previous versions it was based on. These may be placed in the
|
|
|
|
|
"History" section. You may omit a network location for a work
|
|
|
|
|
that was published at least four years before the Document
|
|
|
|
|
itself, or if the original publisher of the version it refers
|
|
|
|
|
to gives permission.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. For any section Entitled "Acknowledgements" or "Dedications",
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Preserve the Title of the section, and preserve in the section
|
|
|
|
|
all the substance and tone of each of the contributor
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
acknowledgements and/or dedications given therein.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
L. Preserve all the Invariant Sections of the Document, unaltered
|
|
|
|
|
in their text and in their titles. Section numbers or the
|
|
|
|
|
equivalent are not considered part of the section titles.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Delete any section Entitled "Endorsements". Such a section
|
|
|
|
|
may not be included in the Modified Version.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Do not retitle any existing section to be Entitled
|
|
|
|
|
"Endorsements" or to conflict in title with any Invariant
|
|
|
|
|
Section.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. Preserve any Warranty Disclaimers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the Modified Version includes new front-matter sections or
|
|
|
|
|
appendices that qualify as Secondary Sections and contain no
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
material copied from the Document, you may at your option designate
|
|
|
|
|
some or all of these sections as invariant. To do this, add their
|
|
|
|
|
titles to the list of Invariant Sections in the Modified Version's
|
|
|
|
|
license notice. These titles must be distinct from any other
|
|
|
|
|
section titles.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You may add a section Entitled "Endorsements", provided it contains
|
|
|
|
|
nothing but endorsements of your Modified Version by various
|
|
|
|
|
parties--for example, statements of peer review or that the text
|
|
|
|
|
has been approved by an organization as the authoritative
|
|
|
|
|
definition of a standard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You may add a passage of up to five words as a Front-Cover Text,
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
and a passage of up to 25 words as a Back-Cover Text, to the end of
|
|
|
|
|
the list of Cover Texts in the Modified Version. Only one passage
|
|
|
|
|
of Front-Cover Text and one of Back-Cover Text may be added by (or
|
|
|
|
|
through arrangements made by) any one entity. If the Document
|
|
|
|
|
already includes a cover text for the same cover, previously added
|
|
|
|
|
by you or by arrangement made by the same entity you are acting on
|
|
|
|
|
behalf of, you may not add another; but you may replace the old
|
|
|
|
|
one, on explicit permission from the previous publisher that added
|
|
|
|
|
the old one.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The author(s) and publisher(s) of the Document do not by this
|
|
|
|
|
License give permission to use their names for publicity for or to
|
|
|
|
|
assert or imply endorsement of any Modified Version.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. COMBINING DOCUMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You may combine the Document with other documents released under
|
|
|
|
|
this License, under the terms defined in section 4 above for
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
modified versions, provided that you include in the combination all
|
|
|
|
|
of the Invariant Sections of all of the original documents,
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
unmodified, and list them all as Invariant Sections of your
|
|
|
|
|
combined work in its license notice, and that you preserve all
|
|
|
|
|
their Warranty Disclaimers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The combined work need only contain one copy of this License, and
|
|
|
|
|
multiple identical Invariant Sections may be replaced with a single
|
|
|
|
|
copy. If there are multiple Invariant Sections with the same name
|
|
|
|
|
but different contents, make the title of each such section unique
|
|
|
|
|
by adding at the end of it, in parentheses, the name of the
|
|
|
|
|
original author or publisher of that section if known, or else a
|
|
|
|
|
unique number. Make the same adjustment to the section titles in
|
|
|
|
|
the list of Invariant Sections in the license notice of the
|
|
|
|
|
combined work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the combination, you must combine any sections Entitled
|
|
|
|
|
"History" in the various original documents, forming one section
|
|
|
|
|
Entitled "History"; likewise combine any sections Entitled
|
|
|
|
|
"Acknowledgements", and any sections Entitled "Dedications". You
|
|
|
|
|
must delete all sections Entitled "Endorsements."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. COLLECTIONS OF DOCUMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You may make a collection consisting of the Document and other
|
|
|
|
|
documents released under this License, and replace the individual
|
|
|
|
|
copies of this License in the various documents with a single copy
|
|
|
|
|
that is included in the collection, provided that you follow the
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
rules of this License for verbatim copying of each of the documents
|
|
|
|
|
in all other respects.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You may extract a single document from such a collection, and
|
|
|
|
|
distribute it individually under this License, provided you insert
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
a copy of this License into the extracted document, and follow this
|
|
|
|
|
License in all other respects regarding verbatim copying of that
|
|
|
|
|
document.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. AGGREGATION WITH INDEPENDENT WORKS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A compilation of the Document or its derivatives with other
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
separate and independent documents or works, in or on a volume of a
|
|
|
|
|
storage or distribution medium, is called an "aggregate" if the
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
copyright resulting from the compilation is not used to limit the
|
|
|
|
|
legal rights of the compilation's users beyond what the individual
|
|
|
|
|
works permit. When the Document is included in an aggregate, this
|
|
|
|
|
License does not apply to the other works in the aggregate which
|
|
|
|
|
are not themselves derivative works of the Document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the Cover Text requirement of section 3 is applicable to these
|
|
|
|
|
copies of the Document, then if the Document is less than one half
|
|
|
|
|
of the entire aggregate, the Document's Cover Texts may be placed
|
|
|
|
|
on covers that bracket the Document within the aggregate, or the
|
|
|
|
|
electronic equivalent of covers if the Document is in electronic
|
|
|
|
|
form. Otherwise they must appear on printed covers that bracket
|
|
|
|
|
the whole aggregate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. TRANSLATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation is considered a kind of modification, so you may
|
|
|
|
|
distribute translations of the Document under the terms of section
|
|
|
|
|
4. Replacing Invariant Sections with translations requires special
|
|
|
|
|
permission from their copyright holders, but you may include
|
|
|
|
|
translations of some or all Invariant Sections in addition to the
|
|
|
|
|
original versions of these Invariant Sections. You may include a
|
|
|
|
|
translation of this License, and all the license notices in the
|
|
|
|
|
Document, and any Warranty Disclaimers, provided that you also
|
|
|
|
|
include the original English version of this License and the
|
|
|
|
|
original versions of those notices and disclaimers. In case of a
|
|
|
|
|
disagreement between the translation and the original version of
|
|
|
|
|
this License or a notice or disclaimer, the original version will
|
|
|
|
|
prevail.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If a section in the Document is Entitled "Acknowledgements",
|
|
|
|
|
"Dedications", or "History", the requirement (section 4) to
|
|
|
|
|
Preserve its Title (section 1) will typically require changing the
|
|
|
|
|
actual title.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. TERMINATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You may not copy, modify, sublicense, or distribute the Document
|
|
|
|
|
except as expressly provided under this License. Any attempt
|
|
|
|
|
otherwise to copy, modify, sublicense, or distribute it is void,
|
|
|
|
|
and will automatically terminate your rights under this License.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
However, if you cease all violation of this License, then your
|
|
|
|
|
license from a particular copyright holder is reinstated (a)
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
provisionally, unless and until the copyright holder explicitly and
|
|
|
|
|
finally terminates your license, and (b) permanently, if the
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
copyright holder fails to notify you of the violation by some
|
|
|
|
|
reasonable means prior to 60 days after the cessation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moreover, your license from a particular copyright holder is
|
|
|
|
|
reinstated permanently if the copyright holder notifies you of the
|
|
|
|
|
violation by some reasonable means, this is the first time you have
|
|
|
|
|
received notice of violation of this License (for any work) from
|
|
|
|
|
that copyright holder, and you cure the violation prior to 30 days
|
|
|
|
|
after your receipt of the notice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination of your rights under this section does not terminate
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
the licenses of parties who have received copies or rights from you
|
|
|
|
|
under this License. If your rights have been terminated and not
|
|
|
|
|
permanently reinstated, receipt of a copy of some or all of the
|
|
|
|
|
same material does not give you any rights to use it.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
10. FUTURE REVISIONS OF THIS LICENSE
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Free Software Foundation may publish new, revised versions of
|
|
|
|
|
the GNU Free Documentation License from time to time. Such new
|
|
|
|
|
versions will be similar in spirit to the present version, but may
|
|
|
|
|
differ in detail to address new problems or concerns. See
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
<http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/>.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each version of the License is given a distinguishing version
|
|
|
|
|
number. If the Document specifies that a particular numbered
|
|
|
|
|
version of this License "or any later version" applies to it, you
|
|
|
|
|
have the option of following the terms and conditions either of
|
|
|
|
|
that specified version or of any later version that has been
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
published (not as a draft) by the Free Software Foundation. If the
|
|
|
|
|
Document does not specify a version number of this License, you may
|
|
|
|
|
choose any version ever published (not as a draft) by the Free
|
|
|
|
|
Software Foundation. If the Document specifies that a proxy can
|
|
|
|
|
decide which future versions of this License can be used, that
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
proxy's public statement of acceptance of a version permanently
|
|
|
|
|
authorizes you to choose that version for the Document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
11. RELICENSING
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Massive Multiauthor Collaboration Site" (or "MMC Site") means any
|
|
|
|
|
World Wide Web server that publishes copyrightable works and also
|
|
|
|
|
provides prominent facilities for anybody to edit those works. A
|
|
|
|
|
public wiki that anybody can edit is an example of such a server.
|
|
|
|
|
A "Massive Multiauthor Collaboration" (or "MMC") contained in the
|
|
|
|
|
site means any set of copyrightable works thus published on the MMC
|
|
|
|
|
site.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"CC-BY-SA" means the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0
|
|
|
|
|
license published by Creative Commons Corporation, a not-for-profit
|
|
|
|
|
corporation with a principal place of business in San Francisco,
|
|
|
|
|
California, as well as future copyleft versions of that license
|
|
|
|
|
published by that same organization.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Incorporate" means to publish or republish a Document, in whole or
|
|
|
|
|
in part, as part of another Document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An MMC is "eligible for relicensing" if it is licensed under this
|
|
|
|
|
License, and if all works that were first published under this
|
|
|
|
|
License somewhere other than this MMC, and subsequently
|
|
|
|
|
incorporated in whole or in part into the MMC, (1) had no cover
|
|
|
|
|
texts or invariant sections, and (2) were thus incorporated prior
|
|
|
|
|
to November 1, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The operator of an MMC Site may republish an MMC contained in the
|
|
|
|
|
site under CC-BY-SA on the same site at any time before August 1,
|
|
|
|
|
2009, provided the MMC is eligible for relicensing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ADDENDUM: How to use this License for your documents
|
|
|
|
|
====================================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To use this License in a document you have written, include a copy of
|
|
|
|
|
the License in the document and put the following copyright and license
|
|
|
|
|
notices just after the title page:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright (C) YEAR YOUR NAME.
|
|
|
|
|
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
|
|
|
|
|
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3
|
|
|
|
|
or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation;
|
|
|
|
|
with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover
|
|
|
|
|
Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled ``GNU
|
|
|
|
|
Free Documentation License''.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you have Invariant Sections, Front-Cover Texts and Back-Cover
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Texts, replace the "with...Texts." line with this:
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with the Invariant Sections being LIST THEIR TITLES, with
|
|
|
|
|
the Front-Cover Texts being LIST, and with the Back-Cover Texts
|
|
|
|
|
being LIST.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you have Invariant Sections without Cover Texts, or some other
|
|
|
|
|
combination of the three, merge those two alternatives to suit the
|
|
|
|
|
situation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If your document contains nontrivial examples of program code, we
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
recommend releasing these examples in parallel under your choice of free
|
|
|
|
|
software license, such as the GNU General Public License, to permit
|
|
|
|
|
their use in free software.
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tag Table:
|
2017-10-07 00:16:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Node: Top719
|
2018-12-28 15:25:28 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Node: Introduction2045
|
|
|
|
|
Node: Compiling4536
|
|
|
|
|
Node: Executing8592
|
|
|
|
|
Node: Invoking11380
|
|
|
|
|
Node: Output Options12795
|
|
|
|
|
Node: Analysis Options19887
|
|
|
|
|
Node: Miscellaneous Options23807
|
|
|
|
|
Node: Deprecated Options25061
|
|
|
|
|
Node: Symspecs27124
|
|
|
|
|
Node: Output28950
|
|
|
|
|
Node: Flat Profile29990
|
|
|
|
|
Node: Call Graph34943
|
|
|
|
|
Node: Primary38175
|
|
|
|
|
Node: Callers40763
|
|
|
|
|
Node: Subroutines42881
|
|
|
|
|
Node: Cycles44722
|
|
|
|
|
Node: Line-by-line51499
|
|
|
|
|
Node: Annotated Source55575
|
|
|
|
|
Node: Inaccuracy58573
|
|
|
|
|
Node: Sampling Error58831
|
|
|
|
|
Node: Assumptions61735
|
|
|
|
|
Node: How do I?63205
|
|
|
|
|
Node: Incompatibilities64762
|
|
|
|
|
Node: Details66256
|
|
|
|
|
Node: Implementation66649
|
|
|
|
|
Node: File Format72548
|
|
|
|
|
Node: Internals76836
|
|
|
|
|
Node: Debugging85326
|
|
|
|
|
Node: GNU Free Documentation License86916
|
2012-03-26 19:18:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End Tag Table
|