Retro68/gcc/newlib/libc/reent/renamer.c

67 lines
1.3 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

2017-04-11 21:13:36 +00:00
/* Reentrant version of rename system call. */
#include <reent.h>
#include <stdio.h>
2017-04-11 21:13:36 +00:00
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <_syslist.h>
/* Some targets provides their own versions of these functions. Those
targets should define REENTRANT_SYSCALLS_PROVIDED in TARGET_CFLAGS. */
#ifdef _REENT_ONLY
#ifndef REENTRANT_SYSCALLS_PROVIDED
#define REENTRANT_SYSCALLS_PROVIDED
#endif
#endif
#ifndef REENTRANT_SYSCALLS_PROVIDED
/* We use the errno variable used by the system dependent layer. */
#undef errno
extern int errno;
/*
FUNCTION
<<_rename_r>>---Reentrant version of rename
INDEX
_rename_r
2018-12-28 15:30:48 +00:00
SYNOPSIS
2017-04-11 21:13:36 +00:00
#include <reent.h>
int _rename_r(struct _reent *<[ptr]>,
const char *<[old]>, const char *<[new]>);
DESCRIPTION
This is a reentrant version of <<rename>>. It
takes a pointer to the global data block, which holds
<<errno>>.
*/
int
2018-12-28 15:30:48 +00:00
_rename_r (struct _reent *ptr,
const char *old,
const char *new)
2017-04-11 21:13:36 +00:00
{
int ret = 0;
#ifdef HAVE_RENAME
errno = 0;
if ((ret = _rename (old, new)) == -1 && errno != 0)
ptr->_errno = errno;
#else
if (_link_r (ptr, old, new) == -1)
return -1;
if (_unlink_r (ptr, old) == -1)
{
/* ??? Should we unlink new? (rhetorical question) */
return -1;
}
#endif
return ret;
}
#endif /* ! defined (REENTRANT_SYSCALLS_PROVIDED) */