6502/6502bench
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/fadden/6502bench.git synced 2024-12-10 21:49:27 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
0860a00a54
6502bench/SourceGen/SGTestData/20052-branches-and-banks.dis65

292 lines
4.0 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
### 6502bench SourceGen dis65 v1.0 ###
{
Fix 65816 code generation issues Code generated for 64tass was incorrect for JSR/JMP to a location outside the file bounds. A test added to 20052-branches-and-banks revealed an issue with cc65 generation as well.
2020-07-03 20:58:18 +00:00
"_ContentVersion":4,
"FileDataLength":224,
"FileDataCrc32":2055368095,
Regression test rework, part 4 Split 2005x-branches-and-banks into two parts, one that stays within the 64K bounds of the 6502, one that puts code in a separate bank.
2020-06-07 00:30:50 +00:00
"ProjectProps":{
"CpuName":"65816",
"IncludeUndocumentedInstr":false,
"TwoByteBrk":false,
"EntryFlags":32702671,
"AutoLabelStyle":"Simple",
"AnalysisParams":{
"AnalyzeUncategorizedData":true,
"DefaultTextScanMode":"LowHighAscii",
"MinCharsForString":4,
"SeekNearbyTargets":true,
Data Bank Register management, part 6 (of 6) Add 20222-data-bank to regression test suite. This exercises handling of 16-bit operands with inter- and intra-bank references, and tests the smartness in "smart PLB". Also, update a couple of older tests that broke because the DBR is no longer always the same as the PBR. This just required adding "B=K" in a few places to restore the original output.
2020-07-10 22:53:43 +00:00
"UseRelocData":false,
"SmartPlpHandling":true,
"SmartPlbHandling":false},
Regression test rework, part 4 Split 2005x-branches-and-banks into two parts, one that stays within the 64K bounds of the 6502, one that puts code in a separate bank.
2020-06-07 00:30:50 +00:00
"PlatformSymbolFileIdentifiers":["PROJ:20050-branches-and-banks.sym65"],
"ExtensionScriptFileIdentifiers":[],
"ProjectSyms":{
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
}},
Regression test rework, part 4 Split 2005x-branches-and-banks into two parts, one that stays within the 64K bounds of the 6502, one that puts code in a separate bank.
2020-06-07 00:30:50 +00:00
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
"AddressMap":[{
Regression test rework, part 4 Split 2005x-branches-and-banks into two parts, one that stays within the 64K bounds of the 6502, one that puts code in a separate bank.
2020-06-07 00:30:50 +00:00
"Offset":0,
"Addr":4096},
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
{
Regression test rework, part 4 Split 2005x-branches-and-banks into two parts, one that stays within the 64K bounds of the 6502, one that puts code in a separate bank.
2020-06-07 00:30:50 +00:00
"Offset":11,
"Addr":4456448},
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
{
Regression test rework, part 4 Split 2005x-branches-and-banks into two parts, one that stays within the 64K bounds of the 6502, one that puts code in a separate bank.
2020-06-07 00:30:50 +00:00
"Offset":39,
"Addr":4521920},
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
{
Regression test rework, part 4 Split 2005x-branches-and-banks into two parts, one that stays within the 64K bounds of the 6502, one that puts code in a separate bank.
2020-06-07 00:30:50 +00:00
"Offset":54,
Fix some 65816 code generation issues Two basic problems: (1) cc65, being a one-pass assembler, can't tell if a forward-referenced label is 16-bit or 24-bit. If the operand is potentially ambiguous, such as "LDA label", we need to add an operand width disambiguator. (The existing tests managed to only do backward references.) (2) 64tass wants the labels on JMP/JSR absolute operands to have 24-bit values that match the current program bank. This is the opposite of cc65, which requires 16-bit values. We need to distinguish PBR vs. DBR instructions (i.e. "LDA abs" vs. "JMP abs") and handle them differently when formatting for "Common". Merlin32 doesn't care, and ACME doesn't work at all, so neither of those needed updating. The 20052-branches-and-banks test was expanded to cover the problematic cases.
2020-07-02 00:59:12 +00:00
"Addr":8192},
{
"Offset":86,
"Addr":5517840}],
Regression test rework, part 4 Split 2005x-branches-and-banks into two parts, one that stays within the 64K bounds of the 6502, one that puts code in a separate bank.
2020-06-07 00:30:50 +00:00
"TypeHints":[{
"Low":0,
"High":0,
"Hint":"Code"}],
"StatusFlagOverrides":{
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
},
Regression test rework, part 4 Split 2005x-branches-and-banks into two parts, one that stays within the 64K bounds of the 6502, one that puts code in a separate bank.
2020-06-07 00:30:50 +00:00
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
"Comments":{
},
Regression test rework, part 4 Split 2005x-branches-and-banks into two parts, one that stays within the 64K bounds of the 6502, one that puts code in a separate bank.
2020-06-07 00:30:50 +00:00
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
"LongComments":{
},
Regression test rework, part 4 Split 2005x-branches-and-banks into two parts, one that stays within the 64K bounds of the 6502, one that puts code in a separate bank.
2020-06-07 00:30:50 +00:00
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
"Notes":{
},
Regression test rework, part 4 Split 2005x-branches-and-banks into two parts, one that stays within the 64K bounds of the 6502, one that puts code in a separate bank.
2020-06-07 00:30:50 +00:00
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
"UserLabels":{
Regression test rework, part 4 Split 2005x-branches-and-banks into two parts, one that stays within the 64K bounds of the 6502, one that puts code in a separate bank.
2020-06-07 00:30:50 +00:00
"8":{
"Label":"lodat",
"Value":4104,
"Source":"User",
"Type":"GlobalAddr",
"LabelAnno":"None"},
"34":{
"Label":"dat44",
"Value":4456471,
"Source":"User",
"Type":"GlobalAddr",
"LabelAnno":"None"},
"43":{
"Label":"high44",
"Value":4521924,
"Source":"User",
"Type":"GlobalAddr",
"LabelAnno":"None"},
"72":{
"Label":"j2",
"Value":8210,
"Source":"User",
"Type":"GlobalAddr",
Fix some 65816 code generation issues Two basic problems: (1) cc65, being a one-pass assembler, can't tell if a forward-referenced label is 16-bit or 24-bit. If the operand is potentially ambiguous, such as "LDA label", we need to add an operand width disambiguator. (The existing tests managed to only do backward references.) (2) 64tass wants the labels on JMP/JSR absolute operands to have 24-bit values that match the current program bank. This is the opposite of cc65, which requires 16-bit values. We need to distinguish PBR vs. DBR instructions (i.e. "LDA abs" vs. "JMP abs") and handle them differently when formatting for "Common". Merlin32 doesn't care, and ACME doesn't work at all, so neither of those needed updating. The 20052-branches-and-banks test was expanded to cover the problematic cases.
2020-07-02 00:59:12 +00:00
"LabelAnno":"None"},
"68":{
"Label":"skip",
"Value":8206,
"Source":"User",
"Type":"GlobalAddr",
"LabelAnno":"None"},
"86":{
"Label":"bank54",
"Value":5517840,
"Source":"User",
"Type":"GlobalAddr",
"LabelAnno":"None"},
"92":{
"Label":"backchk",
"Value":5517846,
"Source":"User",
"Type":"GlobalAddr",
"LabelAnno":"None"},
"195":{
"Label":"fwdchk",
"Value":5517949,
"Source":"User",
"Type":"GlobalAddr",
"LabelAnno":"None"},
"192":{
"Label":"fwdval",
"Value":5517946,
"Source":"User",
"Type":"GlobalAddr",
"LabelAnno":"None"},
"95":{
"Label":"backval",
"Value":5517849,
"Source":"User",
"Type":"GlobalAddr",
Regression test rework, part 4 Split 2005x-branches-and-banks into two parts, one that stays within the 64K bounds of the 6502, one that puts code in a separate bank.
2020-06-07 00:30:50 +00:00
"LabelAnno":"None"}},
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
"OperandFormats":{
Regression test rework, part 4 Split 2005x-branches-and-banks into two parts, one that stays within the 64K bounds of the 6502, one that puts code in a separate bank.
2020-06-07 00:30:50 +00:00
"34":{
"Length":2,
"Format":"NumericLE",
"SubFormat":"Address",
"SymbolRef":null},
"36":{
"Length":3,
"Format":"NumericLE",
"SubFormat":"Address",
"SymbolRef":null},
"57":{
"Length":3,
"Format":"NumericLE",
"SubFormat":"Symbol",
"SymbolRef":{
"Label":"dat44",
"Part":"Low"}},
"60":{
"Length":3,
"Format":"NumericLE",
"SubFormat":"Symbol",
"SymbolRef":{
"Label":"dat44",
"Part":"Bank"}},
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
"72":{
Regression test rework, part 4 Split 2005x-branches-and-banks into two parts, one that stays within the 64K bounds of the 6502, one that puts code in a separate bank.
2020-06-07 00:30:50 +00:00
"Length":3,
"Format":"NumericLE",
"SubFormat":"Symbol",
"SymbolRef":{
"Label":"j2",
"Part":"Low"}},
"75":{
"Length":3,
"Format":"NumericLE",
"SubFormat":"Symbol",
"SymbolRef":{
"Label":"j2",
Fix some 65816 code generation issues Two basic problems: (1) cc65, being a one-pass assembler, can't tell if a forward-referenced label is 16-bit or 24-bit. If the operand is potentially ambiguous, such as "LDA label", we need to add an operand width disambiguator. (The existing tests managed to only do backward references.) (2) 64tass wants the labels on JMP/JSR absolute operands to have 24-bit values that match the current program bank. This is the opposite of cc65, which requires 16-bit values. We need to distinguish PBR vs. DBR instructions (i.e. "LDA abs" vs. "JMP abs") and handle them differently when formatting for "Common". Merlin32 doesn't care, and ACME doesn't work at all, so neither of those needed updating. The 20052-branches-and-banks test was expanded to cover the problematic cases.
2020-07-02 00:59:12 +00:00
"Part":"Low"}},
"95":{
"Length":3,
"Format":"NumericLE",
"SubFormat":"Address",
"SymbolRef":null},
"106":{
"Length":4,
"Format":"NumericLE",
"SubFormat":"Hex",
"SymbolRef":null},
"110":{
"Length":4,
"Format":"NumericLE",
"SubFormat":"Hex",
"SymbolRef":null},
"114":{
"Length":3,
"Format":"NumericLE",
"SubFormat":"Symbol",
"SymbolRef":{
"Label":"backchk",
"Part":"Low"}},
"117":{
"Length":3,
"Format":"NumericLE",
"SubFormat":"Symbol",
"SymbolRef":{
"Label":"backchk",
"Part":"Low"}},
"120":{
"Length":3,
"Format":"NumericLE",
"SubFormat":"Symbol",
"SymbolRef":{
"Label":"fwdchk",
"Part":"Low"}},
"130":{
"Length":3,
"Format":"NumericLE",
"SubFormat":"Symbol",
"SymbolRef":{
"Label":"backchk",
"Part":"Low"}},
Fix 65816 code generation issues Code generated for 64tass was incorrect for JSR/JMP to a location outside the file bounds. A test added to 20052-branches-and-banks revealed an issue with cc65 generation as well.
2020-07-03 20:58:18 +00:00
"133":{
"Length":3,
"Format":"NumericLE",
"SubFormat":"Hex",
"SymbolRef":null},
Fix some 65816 code generation issues Two basic problems: (1) cc65, being a one-pass assembler, can't tell if a forward-referenced label is 16-bit or 24-bit. If the operand is potentially ambiguous, such as "LDA label", we need to add an operand width disambiguator. (The existing tests managed to only do backward references.) (2) 64tass wants the labels on JMP/JSR absolute operands to have 24-bit values that match the current program bank. This is the opposite of cc65, which requires 16-bit values. We need to distinguish PBR vs. DBR instructions (i.e. "LDA abs" vs. "JMP abs") and handle them differently when formatting for "Common". Merlin32 doesn't care, and ACME doesn't work at all, so neither of those needed updating. The 20052-branches-and-banks test was expanded to cover the problematic cases.
2020-07-02 00:59:12 +00:00
"139":{
"Length":3,
"Format":"NumericLE",
"SubFormat":"Symbol",
"SymbolRef":{
"Label":"fwdchk",
"Part":"Low"}},
Fix 65816 code generation issues Code generated for 64tass was incorrect for JSR/JMP to a location outside the file bounds. A test added to 20052-branches-and-banks revealed an issue with cc65 generation as well.
2020-07-03 20:58:18 +00:00
"142":{
"Length":3,
"Format":"NumericLE",
"SubFormat":"Hex",
"SymbolRef":null},
Fix some 65816 code generation issues Two basic problems: (1) cc65, being a one-pass assembler, can't tell if a forward-referenced label is 16-bit or 24-bit. If the operand is potentially ambiguous, such as "LDA label", we need to add an operand width disambiguator. (The existing tests managed to only do backward references.) (2) 64tass wants the labels on JMP/JSR absolute operands to have 24-bit values that match the current program bank. This is the opposite of cc65, which requires 16-bit values. We need to distinguish PBR vs. DBR instructions (i.e. "LDA abs" vs. "JMP abs") and handle them differently when formatting for "Common". Merlin32 doesn't care, and ACME doesn't work at all, so neither of those needed updating. The 20052-branches-and-banks test was expanded to cover the problematic cases.
2020-07-02 00:59:12 +00:00
"148":{
"Length":3,
"Format":"NumericLE",
"SubFormat":"Symbol",
"SymbolRef":{
"Label":"backval",
"Part":"Low"}},
"192":{
"Length":3,
"Format":"NumericLE",
"SubFormat":"Address",
"SymbolRef":null},
"198":{
"Length":3,
"Format":"NumericLE",
"SubFormat":"Symbol",
"SymbolRef":{
"Label":"skip",
Regression test rework, part 4 Split 2005x-branches-and-banks into two parts, one that stays within the 64K bounds of the 6502, one that puts code in a separate bank.
2020-06-07 00:30:50 +00:00
"Part":"Low"}}},
Add a blank line between constants and addresses In the assembler output, add a blank line between the constants and addresses in the long list of equates. The earlier change that corrected the BIT instruction caused test 2009-branches-and-banks to fail, because it was relying on the idea that BIT made the carry flag indeterminate. Changing a BCC to a BVS restored the desired behavior.
2019-10-23 05:43:10 +00:00
"LvTables":{
Regression test rework, part 4 Split 2005x-branches-and-banks into two parts, one that stays within the 64K bounds of the 6502, one that puts code in a separate bank.
2020-06-07 00:30:50 +00:00
},
"Visualizations":[],
"VisualizationAnimations":[],
"VisualizationSets":{
Fix 65816 code generation issues Code generated for 64tass was incorrect for JSR/JMP to a location outside the file bounds. A test added to 20052-branches-and-banks revealed an issue with cc65 generation as well.
2020-07-03 20:58:18 +00:00
},
Data Bank Register management, part 6 (of 6) Add 20222-data-bank to regression test suite. This exercises handling of 16-bit operands with inter- and intra-bank references, and tests the smartness in "smart PLB". Also, update a couple of older tests that broke because the DBR is no longer always the same as the PBR. This just required adding "B=K" in a few places to restore the original output.
2020-07-10 22:53:43 +00:00
"RelocList":{
},
"DbrValues":{
"86":{
"FollowPbr":true,
"Bank":0},
"11":{
"FollowPbr":true,
"Bank":0},
"54":{
"FollowPbr":true,
"Bank":0}}}
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink