6502/6502bench
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/fadden/6502bench.git synced 2024-12-11 13:50:13 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
1ad9caa783
6502bench/SourceGen/SGTestData/Expected/2009-branches-and-banks_cc65.S

79 lines
1.5 KiB
ArmAsm
Raw Normal View History

Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
.setcpu "65816"
longsym = $123456
Attempt to generate segment names for cc65 This worked, sort of. The problem is that SourceGen will revert to hex output in certain situations, such as a broken symbolic reference. There happens to be one in the ZIPPY example, and it's on a relative branch. The goal with the segment stuff is to allow cc65 to treat the source as relocatable code. In that context, a relative branch to an absolute address doesn't make any sense, so the assembler reports a range error. We don't currently have a mechanism that guarantees no references are broken (and no affordance for finding them), so we can't make this mode the default yet. Instead, we continue to use the generic config, but generate the correct set of lines as comments. (issue #39)
2018-11-18 22:36:03 +00:00
; .segment "SEG000"
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
.org $1000
.a8
.i8
clc
xce
sep #$30
jmp L0000
Attempt to generate segment names for cc65 This worked, sort of. The problem is that SourceGen will revert to hex output in certain situations, such as a broken symbolic reference. There happens to be one in the ZIPPY example, and it's on a relative branch. The goal with the segment stuff is to allow cc65 to treat the source as relocatable code. In that context, a relative branch to an absolute address doesn't make any sense, so the assembler reports a range error. We don't currently have a mechanism that guarantees no references are broken (and no affordance for finding them), so we can't make this mode the default yet. Instead, we continue to use the generic config, but generate the correct set of lines as comments. (issue #39)
2018-11-18 22:36:03 +00:00
; .segment "SEG001"
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
.org $0000
L0000: bit a:L0000
L0003: lda L0000
lda L0003
.byte $d0,$ba
.byte $30,$b8
.byte $62,$b5,$ff
bcc L0016
brl L0080
lodat: .byte $00
.byte $01
.byte $02
L0016: lda lodat+1
.byte $82,$a5,$ff
Attempt to generate segment names for cc65 This worked, sort of. The problem is that SourceGen will revert to hex output in certain situations, such as a broken symbolic reference. There happens to be one in the ZIPPY example, and it's on a relative branch. The goal with the segment stuff is to allow cc65 to treat the source as relocatable code. In that context, a relative branch to an absolute address doesn't make any sense, so the assembler reports a range error. We don't currently have a mechanism that guarantees no references are broken (and no affordance for finding them), so we can't make this mode the default yet. Instead, we continue to use the generic config, but generate the correct set of lines as comments. (issue #39)
2018-11-18 22:36:03 +00:00
; .segment "SEG002"
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
.org $0080
L0080: bit a:L0080
jml L440000
Attempt to generate segment names for cc65 This worked, sort of. The problem is that SourceGen will revert to hex output in certain situations, such as a broken symbolic reference. There happens to be one in the ZIPPY example, and it's on a relative branch. The goal with the segment stuff is to allow cc65 to treat the source as relocatable code. In that context, a relative branch to an absolute address doesn't make any sense, so the assembler reports a range error. We don't currently have a mechanism that guarantees no references are broken (and no affordance for finding them), so we can't make this mode the default yet. Instead, we continue to use the generic config, but generate the correct set of lines as comments. (issue #39)
2018-11-18 22:36:03 +00:00
; .segment "SEG003"
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
.org $ffc0
LFFC0: bit LFFC0
LFFC3: .byte $82,$3d,$00
Attempt to generate segment names for cc65 This worked, sort of. The problem is that SourceGen will revert to hex output in certain situations, such as a broken symbolic reference. There happens to be one in the ZIPPY example, and it's on a relative branch. The goal with the segment stuff is to allow cc65 to treat the source as relocatable code. In that context, a relative branch to an absolute address doesn't make any sense, so the assembler reports a range error. We don't currently have a mechanism that guarantees no references are broken (and no affordance for finding them), so we can't make this mode the default yet. Instead, we continue to use the generic config, but generate the correct set of lines as comments. (issue #39)
2018-11-18 22:36:03 +00:00
; .segment "SEG004"
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
.org $440000
L440000: cmp L440000
L440004: lda L440000
lda a:L440000 & $ffff
lda L0000
bmi L440004
.byte $62,$b2,$ff
.byte $d0,$b0
.byte $82,$a9,$ff
dat44: .word dat44 & $ffff
.faraddr dat44
Attempt to generate segment names for cc65 This worked, sort of. The problem is that SourceGen will revert to hex output in certain situations, such as a broken symbolic reference. There happens to be one in the ZIPPY example, and it's on a relative branch. The goal with the segment stuff is to allow cc65 to treat the source as relocatable code. In that context, a relative branch to an absolute address doesn't make any sense, so the assembler reports a range error. We don't currently have a mechanism that guarantees no references are broken (and no affordance for finding them), so we can't make this mode the default yet. Instead, we continue to use the generic config, but generate the correct set of lines as comments. (issue #39)
2018-11-18 22:36:03 +00:00
; .segment "SEG005"
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
.org $44ffc0
L44FFC0: cmp L44FFC0
high44: beq L44FFCB
.byte $30,$3c
.byte $82,$39,$00
L44FFCB: jml L2000
Attempt to generate segment names for cc65 This worked, sort of. The problem is that SourceGen will revert to hex output in certain situations, such as a broken symbolic reference. There happens to be one in the ZIPPY example, and it's on a relative branch. The goal with the segment stuff is to allow cc65 to treat the source as relocatable code. In that context, a relative branch to an absolute address doesn't make any sense, so the assembler reports a range error. We don't currently have a mechanism that guarantees no references are broken (and no affordance for finding them), so we can't make this mode the default yet. Instead, we continue to use the generic config, but generate the correct set of lines as comments. (issue #39)
2018-11-18 22:36:03 +00:00
; .segment "SEG006"
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
.org $2000
L2000: bit L2000
pea dat44 & $ffff
pea dat44 >> 16
bne L200E
jml [lodat]
L200E: nop
jsr j2
j2: jsr j2+3
jsr j2-3
jsl longsym
rts
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink