6502/6502bench
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/fadden/6502bench.git synced 2024-12-02 13:51:36 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
7ca11b0889
6502bench/SourceGen/SGTestData/Expected/20081-label-localizer_64tass.S

73 lines
1.2 KiB
ArmAsm
Raw Normal View History

Remap labels that use opcode mnemonics In a recent survey, three out of four cross assemblers surveyed recommended not using opcode mnemonics to their patients who use labels. We now remap labels like "AND" and "jmp", using the label map that's part of the label localizer. We skip the step for Merlin 32, which is perfectly happy to assemble "JMP JMP JMP". Also, fixed a bug in MaskLeadingUnderscores that could hang the source generator thread.
2019-09-20 22:29:34 +00:00
.cpu "65c02"
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
REALLYLONGLABELNAME = $8888 ;that's a long name
* = $1000
nop
Finish the underscore handling in the label localizer Correctly handle pre-existing underscores and avoidance of "reserved" labels. Also, add more underscores to 2012-label-localizer to exercise the code. (issue #16)
2018-10-24 03:29:24 +00:00
X_start lda _start
lda X_start1
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
lda pastglob
Finish the underscore handling in the label localizer Correctly handle pre-existing underscores and avoidance of "reserved" labels. Also, add more underscores to 2012-label-localizer to exercise the code. (issue #16)
2018-10-24 03:29:24 +00:00
lda _X__nopped
_start nop
_X__nopped
nop
X_start1
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
nop
pastglob
nop
lda nlocal
nlocal lda #$11
reach1G nop
lda reach1G+1
lda _reach2+2
_reach2 nop
reach3G nop
Finish the underscore handling in the label localizer Correctly handle pre-existing underscores and avoidance of "reserved" labels. Also, add more underscores to 2012-label-localizer to exercise the code. (issue #16)
2018-10-24 03:29:24 +00:00
_X_reach4
nop
lda _X_reach4-2
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
lda $00
beq _L102D
Finish the underscore handling in the label localizer Correctly handle pre-existing underscores and avoidance of "reserved" labels. Also, add more underscores to 2012-label-localizer to exercise the code. (issue #16)
2018-10-24 03:29:24 +00:00
jsr _X_reach4
jsr X_start
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
_L102D lda #$22
lda gtest2
gtest1 nop
lda gtest3
gtest2 nop
gtest3 nop
lda #$33
lda $1041
topglob nop
lda _L1043
nop
nop
_L1043 nop
lda #$44
Finish the underscore handling in the label localizer Correctly handle pre-existing underscores and avoidance of "reserved" labels. Also, add more underscores to 2012-label-localizer to exercise the code. (issue #16)
2018-10-24 03:29:24 +00:00
globalnm
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
jsr _L104A
nop
_L104A nop
nop
nglobal nop
globlat jsr nglobal
Don't use "not" as a label in ACME output The ACME assembler gets upset if you use "not" as a label. We now avoid doing so, using a generalized implementation of the opcode mnemonic rename code. (Issue #112.) Renamed a label to "not" in the 20081-label-localizer test.
2021-10-18 20:01:06 +00:00
bra NOT
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
Don't use "not" as a label in ACME output The ACME assembler gets upset if you use "not" as a label. We now avoid doing so, using a generalized implementation of the opcode mnemonic rename code. (Issue #112.) Renamed a label to "not" in the 20081-label-localizer test.
2021-10-18 20:01:06 +00:00
NOT nop
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
EXCESSIVELY_LONG_LABEL
lda REALLYLONGLABELNAME
Remap labels that use opcode mnemonics In a recent survey, three out of four cross assemblers surveyed recommended not using opcode mnemonics to their patients who use labels. We now remap labels like "AND" and "jmp", using the label map that's part of the label localizer. We skip the step for Merlin 32, which is perfectly happy to assemble "JMP JMP JMP". Also, fixed a bug in MaskLeadingUnderscores that could hang the source generator thread.
2019-09-20 22:29:34 +00:00
_X_uname
nop
_X_uname11
nop
_X_uname1
nop
_X_uname2
nop
lda #$00
_AND bne _AND ;local
Label rework, part 5 Implemented assembly source generation of non-unique local labels. The new 2023-non-unique-labels test exercises various edge cases (though we're still missing local variable interaction). The format of uniquified labels changed slightly, so the expected output of 2012-label-localizer needed to be updated. This changes the "no opcode mnemonics" and "mask leading underscores" functions into integrated parts of the label localization process.
2019-11-18 00:05:51 +00:00
JMP1 bne JMP1 ;global
jmp1 bne jmp1
TSB1 bne TSB1
Remap labels that use opcode mnemonics In a recent survey, three out of four cross assemblers surveyed recommended not using opcode mnemonics to their patients who use labels. We now remap labels like "AND" and "jmp", using the label map that's part of the label localizer. We skip the step for Merlin 32, which is perfectly happy to assemble "JMP JMP JMP". Also, fixed a bug in MaskLeadingUnderscores that could hang the source generator thread.
2019-09-20 22:29:34 +00:00
XCE bne XCE
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
rts
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink