Through the combination of static analysis and runtime analysis, CLK seeks to be able automatically to select and configure the appropriate machine to run any provided disk, tape or ROM; to issue any commands necessary to run the software contained on the disk, tape or ROM; and to provide accelerated loading where feasible.
Consider an ordinary, unmodified Commodore Vic-20. Its only video output is composite. Therefore the emulated machine's only video output is composite. In order to display the video output, your GPU then decodes composite video. Therefore all composite video artefacts are present and exactly correct, not because of a post hoc filter combining all the subjective effects that this author associates with composite video but because the real signal is really being processed.
Similar effort is put into audio generation. If the real machine normally generates audio at 192Khz then the emulator generates a 192Khz source signal and filters it down to whatever the host machine can output.
If your machine has a 4k monitor and a 96Khz audio output? Then you'll get a 4k rendering of a composite display and, assuming the emulated machine produces source audio at or above 96Khz, 96,000 individual distinct audio samples a second. Interlaced video also works and looks much as it always did on those machines that produce it.
|![The Electron start screen, with a classic 1:1 pixel emulation](READMEImages/NaiveElectron.png)|![The Electron start screen, decoded from an interlaced composite feed](READMEImages/CompositeElectron.png)|
|![Repton 3 in game, with a classic 1:1 pixel emulation](READMEImages/NaiveRepton3.png)|![Repton 3 in game, decoded from an interlaced composite feed](READMEImages/CompositeRepton3.png)|
|![Stormlord with a classic 1:1 pixel emulation](READMEImages/NaiveStormlord.png)|![Stormlord decoded from an interlaced composite feed](READMEImages/CompositeStormlord.png)|
|![Amstrad text, with a classic 1:1 pixel emulation](READMEImages/NaiveCPC.png)|![Amstrad text, with correct aspect ratio and subject to a lowpass filter](READMEImages/FilteredCPC.png)|
|![The Amstrad CPC version of Stormlord, with a classic 1:1 pixel emulation](READMEImages/NaiveCPCStormlord.png)|![The Amstrad CPC version of Stormlord, with correct aspect ratio and subject to a lowpass filter](READMEImages/CPCStormlord.png)|
The display produced is an emulated CRT, with phosphor decay. Therefore if you have a 140Hz monitor it can produce 140 distinct frames per second. Latency is dictated by the output hardware, not the emulated machine.
The machine update mechanism is influenced separately by both screen refresh and audio stream processing; audio latency is therefore generally restrained to 5–10ms regardless of your screen's refresh rate.
A corollary of emulating the continuous nature CRT, not merely performing end-of-frame transcriptions, is that the most common motion aliasing effects of displaying 50Hz video on a 60Hz display are minimised; you don't have to own niche equipment to benefit.
Cycle-accurate emulation for the supported target machines is fairly trite; this emulator seeks to follow that precedent. All emulation logic is written in C++ for explicit control over costs but, where a conflict arises, the presumption is towards clarity and simplicity of code. This emulator is willing to spend the processing resources available on modern hardware.
Self-ratings:
* the Electron, Oric and Vic-20 are pretty much perfect;
* the ZX80 and ZX81 are very strong;
* the Amstrad CPC has known accuracy deficiencies in its 8272 and 6845;
* the Atari 2600 has some known accuracy deficiencies in its TIA;
* the C-1540(/1) is locked in reading mode and doesn't yet support writing.