From c0547f6e14dd21271126e29836b43a49bc4f4f1e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Harte Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2023 15:58:13 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Tidy up; forward construction arguments. --- ClockReceiver/Dispatcher.hpp | 27 ++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/ClockReceiver/Dispatcher.hpp b/ClockReceiver/Dispatcher.hpp index e96ac97b7..299b87816 100644 --- a/ClockReceiver/Dispatcher.hpp +++ b/ClockReceiver/Dispatcher.hpp @@ -23,20 +23,21 @@ struct Dispatcher { /// Perform @c target.perform() for the input range `start <= n < end`; /// @c ConverterT()(n) will be applied to each individual step before it becomes the relevant template argument. - void dispatch(SequencerT &target, int start, int end) { + template + void dispatch(SequencerT &target, int start, int end, Args&&... args) { // Minor optimisation: do a comparison with end once outside the loop and if it implies so // then do no further comparisons within the loop. This is somewhat targetted at expected // use cases. if(end < max) { - dispatch(target, start, end); + dispatch(target, start, end, args...); } else { - dispatch(target, start, end); + dispatch(target, start, end, args...); } } private: - template void dispatch(SequencerT &target, int start, int end) { + template void dispatch(SequencerT &target, int start, int end, Args&&... args) { static_assert(max < 2048); // Yes, macros, yuck. But I want an actual switch statement for the dispatch to start @@ -45,15 +46,15 @@ private: // // Sensible choices by the optimiser are assumed. -#define index(n) \ - case n: \ - if constexpr (n <= max) { \ - if constexpr (n == max) return; \ - if constexpr (n < max) { \ - if(use_end && end == n) return; \ - } \ - target.template perform(); \ - } \ +#define index(n) \ + case n: \ + if constexpr (n <= max) { \ + if constexpr (n == max) return; \ + if constexpr (n < max) { \ + if(use_end && end == n) return; \ + } \ + target.template perform(args...); \ + } \ [[fallthrough]]; #define index2(n) index(n); index(n+1);