From efe5a5ac26fab2d1d2568f391aed48435ce4c857 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Harte <thomas.harte@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 18:50:43 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Signal will_perform even for invalid instructions.

---
 .../68000Mk2/Implementation/68000Mk2Implementation.hpp | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Processors/68000Mk2/Implementation/68000Mk2Implementation.hpp b/Processors/68000Mk2/Implementation/68000Mk2Implementation.hpp
index 344214215..db975a5b3 100644
--- a/Processors/68000Mk2/Implementation/68000Mk2Implementation.hpp
+++ b/Processors/68000Mk2/Implementation/68000Mk2Implementation.hpp
@@ -301,6 +301,11 @@ void Processor<BusHandler, dtack_is_implicit, permit_overrun, signal_will_perfor
 			instruction_ = decoder_.decode(opcode_);
 			instruction_address_.l = program_counter_.l - 4;
 
+			// Signal the bus handler if requested.
+			if constexpr (signal_will_perform) {
+				bus_handler_.will_perform(instruction_address_.l, opcode_);
+			}
+
 			// Check for a privilege violation.
 			if(instruction_.requires_supervisor() && !status_.is_supervisor) {
 				exception_vector_ = InstructionSet::M68k::Exception::PrivilegeViolation;
@@ -323,11 +328,6 @@ void Processor<BusHandler, dtack_is_implicit, permit_overrun, signal_will_perfor
 				MoveToState(StandardException);
 			}
 
-			// Signal the bus handler if requested.
-			if constexpr (signal_will_perform) {
-				bus_handler_.will_perform(instruction_address_.l, opcode_);
-			}
-
 			// Ensure the first parameter is next fetched.
 			next_operand_ = 0;