6502/llvm-6502
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/c64scene-ar/llvm-6502.git synced 2024-11-01 00:11:00 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
137c475805
llvm-6502/test/MC/SystemZ/regs-bad.s

268 lines
6.1 KiB
ArmAsm
Raw Normal View History

[SystemZ] Consolidate assembler tests into 4 big tests git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-15 09:58:19 +00:00
# RUN: not llvm-mc -triple s390x-linux-gnu < %s 2> %t
# RUN: FileCheck < %t %s
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
# Test GR32 operands
#
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
[SystemZ] Consolidate assembler tests into 4 big tests git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-15 09:58:19 +00:00
#CHECK: lr %f0,%r1
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
[SystemZ] Consolidate assembler tests into 4 big tests git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-15 09:58:19 +00:00
#CHECK: lr %a0,%r1
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
#CHECK: lr %r0,%f1
[SystemZ] Consolidate assembler tests into 4 big tests git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-15 09:58:19 +00:00
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
#CHECK: lr %r0,%a1
[SystemZ] Consolidate assembler tests into 4 big tests git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-15 09:58:19 +00:00
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
#CHECK: lr %r0,0
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser handling of invalid instructions Previously, an invalid instruction like: foo %r1, %r0 would generate the rather odd error message: ....: error: unknown token in expression foo %r1, %r0 ^ We now get the more informative: ....: error: invalid instruction foo %r1, %r0 ^ The same would happen if an address were used where a register was expected. We now get "invalid operand for instruction" instead. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182644 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:26:46 +00:00
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
#CHECK: lr %r0,0(%r1)
[SystemZ] Consolidate assembler tests into 4 big tests git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-15 09:58:19 +00:00
lr %f0,%r1
lr %a0,%r1
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
lr %r0,%f1
lr %r0,%a1
lr %r0,0
lr %r0,0(%r1)
[SystemZ] Consolidate assembler tests into 4 big tests git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-15 09:58:19 +00:00
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
# Test GR64 operands
#
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
[SystemZ] Consolidate assembler tests into 4 big tests git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-15 09:58:19 +00:00
#CHECK: lgr %f0,%r1
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
[SystemZ] Consolidate assembler tests into 4 big tests git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-15 09:58:19 +00:00
#CHECK: lgr %a0,%r1
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
#CHECK: lgr %r0,%f1
[SystemZ] Consolidate assembler tests into 4 big tests git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-15 09:58:19 +00:00
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
#CHECK: lgr %r0,%a1
[SystemZ] Consolidate assembler tests into 4 big tests git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-15 09:58:19 +00:00
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
#CHECK: lgr %r0,0
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser handling of invalid instructions Previously, an invalid instruction like: foo %r1, %r0 would generate the rather odd error message: ....: error: unknown token in expression foo %r1, %r0 ^ We now get the more informative: ....: error: invalid instruction foo %r1, %r0 ^ The same would happen if an address were used where a register was expected. We now get "invalid operand for instruction" instead. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182644 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:26:46 +00:00
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
#CHECK: lgr %r0,0(%r1)
[SystemZ] Consolidate assembler tests into 4 big tests git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-15 09:58:19 +00:00
lgr %f0,%r1
lgr %a0,%r1
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
lgr %r0,%f1
lgr %r0,%a1
lgr %r0,0
lgr %r0,0(%r1)
[SystemZ] Consolidate assembler tests into 4 big tests git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-15 09:58:19 +00:00
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
# Test GR128 operands
#
#CHECK: error: invalid register pair
#CHECK: dlr %r1,%r0
#CHECK: error: invalid register pair
#CHECK: dlr %r3,%r0
#CHECK: error: invalid register pair
#CHECK: dlr %r5,%r0
#CHECK: error: invalid register pair
#CHECK: dlr %r7,%r0
#CHECK: error: invalid register pair
#CHECK: dlr %r9,%r0
#CHECK: error: invalid register pair
#CHECK: dlr %r11,%r0
#CHECK: error: invalid register pair
#CHECK: dlr %r13,%r0
#CHECK: error: invalid register pair
#CHECK: dlr %r15,%r0
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
[SystemZ] Consolidate assembler tests into 4 big tests git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-15 09:58:19 +00:00
#CHECK: dlr %f0,%r1
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
[SystemZ] Consolidate assembler tests into 4 big tests git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-15 09:58:19 +00:00
#CHECK: dlr %a0,%r1
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
#CHECK: dlr %r0,%f1
[SystemZ] Consolidate assembler tests into 4 big tests git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-15 09:58:19 +00:00
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
#CHECK: dlr %r0,%a1
[SystemZ] Consolidate assembler tests into 4 big tests git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-15 09:58:19 +00:00
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
#CHECK: dlr %r0,0
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser handling of invalid instructions Previously, an invalid instruction like: foo %r1, %r0 would generate the rather odd error message: ....: error: unknown token in expression foo %r1, %r0 ^ We now get the more informative: ....: error: invalid instruction foo %r1, %r0 ^ The same would happen if an address were used where a register was expected. We now get "invalid operand for instruction" instead. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182644 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:26:46 +00:00
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
#CHECK: dlr %r0,0(%r1)
[SystemZ] Consolidate assembler tests into 4 big tests git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-15 09:58:19 +00:00
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
dlr %r1,%r0
dlr %r3,%r0
dlr %r5,%r0
dlr %r7,%r0
dlr %r9,%r0
dlr %r11,%r0
dlr %r13,%r0
dlr %r15,%r0
[SystemZ] Consolidate assembler tests into 4 big tests git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-15 09:58:19 +00:00
dlr %f0,%r1
dlr %a0,%r1
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
dlr %r0,%f1
dlr %r0,%a1
dlr %r0,0
dlr %r0,0(%r1)
[SystemZ] Consolidate assembler tests into 4 big tests git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-15 09:58:19 +00:00
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
# Test FP32 operands
#
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
#CHECK: ler %r0,%f1
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
#CHECK: ler %a0,%f1
[SystemZ] Consolidate assembler tests into 4 big tests git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-15 09:58:19 +00:00
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
#CHECK: ler %f0,%r1
[SystemZ] Consolidate assembler tests into 4 big tests git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-15 09:58:19 +00:00
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
#CHECK: ler %f0,%a1
[SystemZ] Consolidate assembler tests into 4 big tests git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-15 09:58:19 +00:00
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
#CHECK: ler %f0,0
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser handling of invalid instructions Previously, an invalid instruction like: foo %r1, %r0 would generate the rather odd error message: ....: error: unknown token in expression foo %r1, %r0 ^ We now get the more informative: ....: error: invalid instruction foo %r1, %r0 ^ The same would happen if an address were used where a register was expected. We now get "invalid operand for instruction" instead. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182644 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:26:46 +00:00
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
#CHECK: ler %f0,0(%r1)
[SystemZ] Consolidate assembler tests into 4 big tests git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-15 09:58:19 +00:00
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
ler %r0,%f1
ler %a0,%f1
ler %f0,%r1
ler %f0,%a1
ler %f0,0
ler %f0,0(%r1)
[SystemZ] Consolidate assembler tests into 4 big tests git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-15 09:58:19 +00:00
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
# Test FP64 operands
#
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
#CHECK: ldr %r0,%f1
[SystemZ] Consolidate assembler tests into 4 big tests git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-15 09:58:19 +00:00
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
#CHECK: ldr %a0,%f1
[SystemZ] Consolidate assembler tests into 4 big tests git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-15 09:58:19 +00:00
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
#CHECK: ldr %f0,%r1
[SystemZ] Consolidate assembler tests into 4 big tests git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-15 09:58:19 +00:00
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
#CHECK: ldr %f0,%a1
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
#CHECK: ldr %f0,0
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser handling of invalid instructions Previously, an invalid instruction like: foo %r1, %r0 would generate the rather odd error message: ....: error: unknown token in expression foo %r1, %r0 ^ We now get the more informative: ....: error: invalid instruction foo %r1, %r0 ^ The same would happen if an address were used where a register was expected. We now get "invalid operand for instruction" instead. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182644 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:26:46 +00:00
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
#CHECK: ldr %f0,0(%r1)
[SystemZ] Consolidate assembler tests into 4 big tests git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-15 09:58:19 +00:00
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
ldr %r0,%f1
ldr %a0,%f1
ldr %f0,%r1
ldr %f0,%a1
ldr %f0,0
ldr %f0,0(%r1)
[SystemZ] Consolidate assembler tests into 4 big tests git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-15 09:58:19 +00:00
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
# Test FP128 operands
#
#CHECK: error: invalid register pair
#CHECK: lxr %f2,%f0
#CHECK: error: invalid register pair
#CHECK: lxr %f0,%f3
#CHECK: error: invalid register pair
#CHECK: lxr %f6,%f0
#CHECK: error: invalid register pair
#CHECK: lxr %f0,%f7
#CHECK: error: invalid register pair
#CHECK: lxr %f10,%f0
#CHECK: error: invalid register pair
#CHECK: lxr %f0,%f11
#CHECK: error: invalid register pair
#CHECK: lxr %f14,%f0
#CHECK: error: invalid register pair
#CHECK: lxr %f0,%f15
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
#CHECK: lxr %r0,%f1
[SystemZ] Consolidate assembler tests into 4 big tests git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-15 09:58:19 +00:00
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
#CHECK: lxr %a0,%f1
[SystemZ] Consolidate assembler tests into 4 big tests git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-15 09:58:19 +00:00
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
#CHECK: lxr %f0,%r1
[SystemZ] Consolidate assembler tests into 4 big tests git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-15 09:58:19 +00:00
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
#CHECK: lxr %f0,%a1
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
#CHECK: lxr %f0,0
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser handling of invalid instructions Previously, an invalid instruction like: foo %r1, %r0 would generate the rather odd error message: ....: error: unknown token in expression foo %r1, %r0 ^ We now get the more informative: ....: error: invalid instruction foo %r1, %r0 ^ The same would happen if an address were used where a register was expected. We now get "invalid operand for instruction" instead. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182644 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:26:46 +00:00
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
#CHECK: lxr %f0,0(%r1)
[SystemZ] Consolidate assembler tests into 4 big tests git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-15 09:58:19 +00:00
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
lxr %f2,%f0
lxr %f0,%f3
lxr %f6,%f0
lxr %f0,%f7
lxr %f10,%f0
lxr %f0,%f11
lxr %f14,%f0
lxr %f0,%f15
lxr %r0,%f1
lxr %a0,%f1
lxr %f0,%r1
lxr %f0,%a1
lxr %f0,0
lxr %f0,0(%r1)
[SystemZ] Consolidate assembler tests into 4 big tests git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-15 09:58:19 +00:00
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
# Test access register operands
#
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
#CHECK: ear %r0,%r0
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
#CHECK: ear %r0,%f0
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
#CHECK: ear %r0,0
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser handling of invalid instructions Previously, an invalid instruction like: foo %r1, %r0 would generate the rather odd error message: ....: error: unknown token in expression foo %r1, %r0 ^ We now get the more informative: ....: error: invalid instruction foo %r1, %r0 ^ The same would happen if an address were used where a register was expected. We now get "invalid operand for instruction" instead. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182644 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:26:46 +00:00
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
#CHECK: ear %r0,0(%r1)
ear %r0,%r0
ear %r0,%f0
ear %r0,0
ear %r0,0(%r1)
.cfi_startproc
# Test general register parsing, with no predetermined class in mind.
#
[SystemZ] Consolidate assembler tests into 4 big tests git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-15 09:58:19 +00:00
#CHECK: error: register expected
#CHECK: .cfi_offset r0,0
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
#CHECK: error: invalid register
#CHECK: .cfi_offset %,0
#CHECK: error: invalid register
#CHECK: .cfi_offset %r,0
#CHECK: error: invalid register
#CHECK: .cfi_offset %f,0
#CHECK: error: invalid register
#CHECK: .cfi_offset %a,0
#CHECK: error: invalid register
#CHECK: .cfi_offset %0,0
#CHECK: error: invalid register
#CHECK: .cfi_offset %c0,0
#CHECK: error: invalid register
#CHECK: .cfi_offset %r16,0
#CHECK: error: invalid register
#CHECK: .cfi_offset %f16,0
#CHECK: error: invalid register
#CHECK: .cfi_offset %a16,0
#CHECK: error: invalid register
#CHECK: .cfi_offset %reef,0
#CHECK: error: invalid register
#CHECK: .cfi_offset %arid,0
[SystemZ] Consolidate assembler tests into 4 big tests git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-15 09:58:19 +00:00
.cfi_offset r0,0
[SystemZ] Improve AsmParser register parsing The idea is to make sure that: (1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister() is called and the token obviously isn't a register. (2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..." sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense. (3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.). (4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type, but is not a valid register pair. Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from that class are accepted. (4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs) and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that requires a pair). While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the operand class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-24 14:14:38 +00:00
.cfi_offset %,0
.cfi_offset %r,0
.cfi_offset %f,0
.cfi_offset %a,0
.cfi_offset %0,0
.cfi_offset %c0,0
.cfi_offset %r16,0
.cfi_offset %f16,0
.cfi_offset %a16,0
.cfi_offset %reef,0
.cfi_offset %arid,0
# Test invalid CFI registers. Will need to be updated once access
# registers are modelled as LLVM registers.
#
#CHECK: error: invalid operand for instruction
#CHECK: .cfi_offset %a0,0
.cfi_offset %a0,0
[SystemZ] Consolidate assembler tests into 4 big tests git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-05-15 09:58:19 +00:00
.cfi_endproc
#CHECK: error: %r0 used in an address
#CHECK: sll %r2,8(%r0)
#CHECK: error: %r0 used in an address
#CHECK: br %r0
#CHECK: error: %r0 used in an address
#CHECK: l %r1,8(%r0)
#CHECK: error: %r0 used in an address
#CHECK: l %r1,8(%r0,%r15)
#CHECK: error: %r0 used in an address
#CHECK: l %r1,8(%r15,%r0)
sll %r2,8(%r0)
br %r0
l %r1,8(%r0)
l %r1,8(%r0,%r15)
l %r1,8(%r15,%r0)
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink