fix a fairly serious oversight with switch formation from
or'd conditions. Previously we'd compile something like this:
int crud (unsigned char c) {
return c == 62 || c == 34 || c == 92;
}
into:
switch i8 %c, label %lor.rhs [
i8 62, label %lor.end
i8 34, label %lor.end
]
lor.rhs: ; preds = %entry
%cmp8 = icmp eq i8 %c, 92
br label %lor.end
lor.end: ; preds = %entry, %entry, %lor.rhs
%0 = phi i1 [ true, %entry ], [ %cmp8, %lor.rhs ], [ true, %entry ]
%lor.ext = zext i1 %0 to i32
ret i32 %lor.ext
which failed to merge the compare-with-92 into the switch. With this patch
we simplify this all the way to:
switch i8 %c, label %lor.rhs [
i8 62, label %lor.end
i8 34, label %lor.end
i8 92, label %lor.end
]
lor.rhs: ; preds = %entry
br label %lor.end
lor.end: ; preds = %entry, %entry, %entry, %lor.rhs
%0 = phi i1 [ true, %entry ], [ false, %lor.rhs ], [ true, %entry ], [ true, %entry ]
%lor.ext = zext i1 %0 to i32
ret i32 %lor.ext
which is much better for codegen's switch lowering stuff. This kicks in 33 times
on 176.gcc (for example) cutting 103 instructions off the generated code.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@121671 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2010-12-13 03:18:54 +00:00
|
|
|
; RUN: opt < %s -simplifycfg -S | FileCheck %s
|
2008-03-18 03:45:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
declare void @foo1()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
declare void @foo2()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define void @test1(i32 %V) {
|
|
|
|
%C1 = icmp eq i32 %V, 4 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
|
|
|
|
%C2 = icmp eq i32 %V, 17 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
|
|
|
|
%CN = or i1 %C1, %C2 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
|
|
|
|
br i1 %CN, label %T, label %F
|
|
|
|
T: ; preds = %0
|
|
|
|
call void @foo1( )
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
F: ; preds = %0
|
|
|
|
call void @foo2( )
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
fix a fairly serious oversight with switch formation from
or'd conditions. Previously we'd compile something like this:
int crud (unsigned char c) {
return c == 62 || c == 34 || c == 92;
}
into:
switch i8 %c, label %lor.rhs [
i8 62, label %lor.end
i8 34, label %lor.end
]
lor.rhs: ; preds = %entry
%cmp8 = icmp eq i8 %c, 92
br label %lor.end
lor.end: ; preds = %entry, %entry, %lor.rhs
%0 = phi i1 [ true, %entry ], [ %cmp8, %lor.rhs ], [ true, %entry ]
%lor.ext = zext i1 %0 to i32
ret i32 %lor.ext
which failed to merge the compare-with-92 into the switch. With this patch
we simplify this all the way to:
switch i8 %c, label %lor.rhs [
i8 62, label %lor.end
i8 34, label %lor.end
i8 92, label %lor.end
]
lor.rhs: ; preds = %entry
br label %lor.end
lor.end: ; preds = %entry, %entry, %entry, %lor.rhs
%0 = phi i1 [ true, %entry ], [ false, %lor.rhs ], [ true, %entry ], [ true, %entry ]
%lor.ext = zext i1 %0 to i32
ret i32 %lor.ext
which is much better for codegen's switch lowering stuff. This kicks in 33 times
on 176.gcc (for example) cutting 103 instructions off the generated code.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@121671 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2010-12-13 03:18:54 +00:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: @test1
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: switch i32 %V, label %F [
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i32 17, label %T
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i32 4, label %T
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: ]
|
2004-02-24 05:34:44 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2008-03-18 03:45:45 +00:00
|
|
|
define void @test2(i32 %V) {
|
|
|
|
%C1 = icmp ne i32 %V, 4 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
|
|
|
|
%C2 = icmp ne i32 %V, 17 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
|
|
|
|
%CN = and i1 %C1, %C2 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
|
|
|
|
br i1 %CN, label %T, label %F
|
|
|
|
T: ; preds = %0
|
|
|
|
call void @foo1( )
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
F: ; preds = %0
|
|
|
|
call void @foo2( )
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
fix a fairly serious oversight with switch formation from
or'd conditions. Previously we'd compile something like this:
int crud (unsigned char c) {
return c == 62 || c == 34 || c == 92;
}
into:
switch i8 %c, label %lor.rhs [
i8 62, label %lor.end
i8 34, label %lor.end
]
lor.rhs: ; preds = %entry
%cmp8 = icmp eq i8 %c, 92
br label %lor.end
lor.end: ; preds = %entry, %entry, %lor.rhs
%0 = phi i1 [ true, %entry ], [ %cmp8, %lor.rhs ], [ true, %entry ]
%lor.ext = zext i1 %0 to i32
ret i32 %lor.ext
which failed to merge the compare-with-92 into the switch. With this patch
we simplify this all the way to:
switch i8 %c, label %lor.rhs [
i8 62, label %lor.end
i8 34, label %lor.end
i8 92, label %lor.end
]
lor.rhs: ; preds = %entry
br label %lor.end
lor.end: ; preds = %entry, %entry, %entry, %lor.rhs
%0 = phi i1 [ true, %entry ], [ false, %lor.rhs ], [ true, %entry ], [ true, %entry ]
%lor.ext = zext i1 %0 to i32
ret i32 %lor.ext
which is much better for codegen's switch lowering stuff. This kicks in 33 times
on 176.gcc (for example) cutting 103 instructions off the generated code.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@121671 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2010-12-13 03:18:54 +00:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: @test2
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: switch i32 %V, label %T [
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i32 17, label %F
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i32 4, label %F
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: ]
|
2004-02-24 05:34:44 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2008-03-18 03:45:45 +00:00
|
|
|
define void @test3(i32 %V) {
|
|
|
|
%C1 = icmp eq i32 %V, 4 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
|
|
|
|
br i1 %C1, label %T, label %N
|
|
|
|
N: ; preds = %0
|
|
|
|
%C2 = icmp eq i32 %V, 17 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
|
|
|
|
br i1 %C2, label %T, label %F
|
|
|
|
T: ; preds = %N, %0
|
|
|
|
call void @foo1( )
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
F: ; preds = %N
|
|
|
|
call void @foo2( )
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
fix a fairly serious oversight with switch formation from
or'd conditions. Previously we'd compile something like this:
int crud (unsigned char c) {
return c == 62 || c == 34 || c == 92;
}
into:
switch i8 %c, label %lor.rhs [
i8 62, label %lor.end
i8 34, label %lor.end
]
lor.rhs: ; preds = %entry
%cmp8 = icmp eq i8 %c, 92
br label %lor.end
lor.end: ; preds = %entry, %entry, %lor.rhs
%0 = phi i1 [ true, %entry ], [ %cmp8, %lor.rhs ], [ true, %entry ]
%lor.ext = zext i1 %0 to i32
ret i32 %lor.ext
which failed to merge the compare-with-92 into the switch. With this patch
we simplify this all the way to:
switch i8 %c, label %lor.rhs [
i8 62, label %lor.end
i8 34, label %lor.end
i8 92, label %lor.end
]
lor.rhs: ; preds = %entry
br label %lor.end
lor.end: ; preds = %entry, %entry, %entry, %lor.rhs
%0 = phi i1 [ true, %entry ], [ false, %lor.rhs ], [ true, %entry ], [ true, %entry ]
%lor.ext = zext i1 %0 to i32
ret i32 %lor.ext
which is much better for codegen's switch lowering stuff. This kicks in 33 times
on 176.gcc (for example) cutting 103 instructions off the generated code.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@121671 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2010-12-13 03:18:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: @test3
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: switch i32 %V, label %F [
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i32 4, label %T
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i32 17, label %T
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: ]
|
2005-02-24 02:13:50 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fix a fairly serious oversight with switch formation from
or'd conditions. Previously we'd compile something like this:
int crud (unsigned char c) {
return c == 62 || c == 34 || c == 92;
}
into:
switch i8 %c, label %lor.rhs [
i8 62, label %lor.end
i8 34, label %lor.end
]
lor.rhs: ; preds = %entry
%cmp8 = icmp eq i8 %c, 92
br label %lor.end
lor.end: ; preds = %entry, %entry, %lor.rhs
%0 = phi i1 [ true, %entry ], [ %cmp8, %lor.rhs ], [ true, %entry ]
%lor.ext = zext i1 %0 to i32
ret i32 %lor.ext
which failed to merge the compare-with-92 into the switch. With this patch
we simplify this all the way to:
switch i8 %c, label %lor.rhs [
i8 62, label %lor.end
i8 34, label %lor.end
i8 92, label %lor.end
]
lor.rhs: ; preds = %entry
br label %lor.end
lor.end: ; preds = %entry, %entry, %entry, %lor.rhs
%0 = phi i1 [ true, %entry ], [ false, %lor.rhs ], [ true, %entry ], [ true, %entry ]
%lor.ext = zext i1 %0 to i32
ret i32 %lor.ext
which is much better for codegen's switch lowering stuff. This kicks in 33 times
on 176.gcc (for example) cutting 103 instructions off the generated code.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@121671 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2010-12-13 03:18:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define i32 @test4(i8 zeroext %c) nounwind ssp noredzone {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%cmp = icmp eq i8 %c, 62
|
|
|
|
br i1 %cmp, label %lor.end, label %lor.lhs.false
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lor.lhs.false: ; preds = %entry
|
|
|
|
%cmp4 = icmp eq i8 %c, 34
|
|
|
|
br i1 %cmp4, label %lor.end, label %lor.rhs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lor.rhs: ; preds = %lor.lhs.false
|
|
|
|
%cmp8 = icmp eq i8 %c, 92
|
|
|
|
br label %lor.end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lor.end: ; preds = %lor.rhs, %lor.lhs.false, %entry
|
|
|
|
%0 = phi i1 [ true, %lor.lhs.false ], [ true, %entry ], [ %cmp8, %lor.rhs ]
|
|
|
|
%lor.ext = zext i1 %0 to i32
|
|
|
|
ret i32 %lor.ext
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: @test4
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: switch i8 %c, label %lor.rhs [
|
2012-07-02 13:02:18 +00:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: i8 62, label %lor.end
|
2012-07-02 23:22:21 +00:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: i8 34, label %lor.end
|
fix a fairly serious oversight with switch formation from
or'd conditions. Previously we'd compile something like this:
int crud (unsigned char c) {
return c == 62 || c == 34 || c == 92;
}
into:
switch i8 %c, label %lor.rhs [
i8 62, label %lor.end
i8 34, label %lor.end
]
lor.rhs: ; preds = %entry
%cmp8 = icmp eq i8 %c, 92
br label %lor.end
lor.end: ; preds = %entry, %entry, %lor.rhs
%0 = phi i1 [ true, %entry ], [ %cmp8, %lor.rhs ], [ true, %entry ]
%lor.ext = zext i1 %0 to i32
ret i32 %lor.ext
which failed to merge the compare-with-92 into the switch. With this patch
we simplify this all the way to:
switch i8 %c, label %lor.rhs [
i8 62, label %lor.end
i8 34, label %lor.end
i8 92, label %lor.end
]
lor.rhs: ; preds = %entry
br label %lor.end
lor.end: ; preds = %entry, %entry, %entry, %lor.rhs
%0 = phi i1 [ true, %entry ], [ false, %lor.rhs ], [ true, %entry ], [ true, %entry ]
%lor.ext = zext i1 %0 to i32
ret i32 %lor.ext
which is much better for codegen's switch lowering stuff. This kicks in 33 times
on 176.gcc (for example) cutting 103 instructions off the generated code.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@121671 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2010-12-13 03:18:54 +00:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: i8 92, label %lor.end
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: ]
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-13 03:43:57 +00:00
|
|
|
define i32 @test5(i8 zeroext %c) nounwind ssp noredzone {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
switch i8 %c, label %lor.rhs [
|
|
|
|
i8 62, label %lor.end
|
|
|
|
i8 34, label %lor.end
|
|
|
|
i8 92, label %lor.end
|
|
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lor.rhs: ; preds = %entry
|
|
|
|
%V = icmp eq i8 %c, 92
|
|
|
|
br label %lor.end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lor.end: ; preds = %entry, %entry, %entry, %lor.rhs
|
|
|
|
%0 = phi i1 [ true, %entry ], [ %V, %lor.rhs ], [ true, %entry ], [ true, %entry ]
|
|
|
|
%lor.ext = zext i1 %0 to i32
|
|
|
|
ret i32 %lor.ext
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: @test5
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: switch i8 %c, label %lor.rhs [
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i8 62, label %lor.end
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i8 34, label %lor.end
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i8 92, label %lor.end
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: ]
|
|
|
|
}
|
2010-12-13 04:45:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define i1 @test6({ i32, i32 }* %I) {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%tmp.1.i = getelementptr { i32, i32 }* %I, i64 0, i32 1 ; <i32*> [#uses=1]
|
|
|
|
%tmp.2.i = load i32* %tmp.1.i ; <i32> [#uses=6]
|
|
|
|
%tmp.2 = icmp eq i32 %tmp.2.i, 14 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
|
|
|
|
br i1 %tmp.2, label %shortcirc_done.4, label %shortcirc_next.0
|
|
|
|
shortcirc_next.0: ; preds = %entry
|
|
|
|
%tmp.6 = icmp eq i32 %tmp.2.i, 15 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
|
|
|
|
br i1 %tmp.6, label %shortcirc_done.4, label %shortcirc_next.1
|
|
|
|
shortcirc_next.1: ; preds = %shortcirc_next.0
|
|
|
|
%tmp.11 = icmp eq i32 %tmp.2.i, 16 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
|
|
|
|
br i1 %tmp.11, label %shortcirc_done.4, label %shortcirc_next.2
|
|
|
|
shortcirc_next.2: ; preds = %shortcirc_next.1
|
|
|
|
%tmp.16 = icmp eq i32 %tmp.2.i, 17 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
|
|
|
|
br i1 %tmp.16, label %shortcirc_done.4, label %shortcirc_next.3
|
|
|
|
shortcirc_next.3: ; preds = %shortcirc_next.2
|
|
|
|
%tmp.21 = icmp eq i32 %tmp.2.i, 18 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
|
|
|
|
br i1 %tmp.21, label %shortcirc_done.4, label %shortcirc_next.4
|
|
|
|
shortcirc_next.4: ; preds = %shortcirc_next.3
|
|
|
|
%tmp.26 = icmp eq i32 %tmp.2.i, 19 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
|
|
|
|
br label %UnifiedReturnBlock
|
|
|
|
shortcirc_done.4: ; preds = %shortcirc_next.3, %shortcirc_next.2, %shortcirc_next.1, %shortcirc_next.0, %entry
|
|
|
|
br label %UnifiedReturnBlock
|
|
|
|
UnifiedReturnBlock: ; preds = %shortcirc_done.4, %shortcirc_next.4
|
|
|
|
%UnifiedRetVal = phi i1 [ %tmp.26, %shortcirc_next.4 ], [ true, %shortcirc_done.4 ] ; <i1> [#uses=1]
|
|
|
|
ret i1 %UnifiedRetVal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: @test6
|
2012-11-07 21:35:12 +00:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: %tmp.2.i.off = add i32 %tmp.2.i, -14
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: %switch = icmp ult i32 %tmp.2.i.off, 6
|
2010-12-13 04:45:56 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
enhance the "change or icmp's into switch" xform to handle one value in an
'or sequence' that it doesn't understand. This allows us to optimize
something insane like this:
int crud (unsigned char c, unsigned x)
{
if(((((((((( (int) c <= 32 ||
(int) c == 46) || (int) c == 44)
|| (int) c == 58) || (int) c == 59) || (int) c == 60)
|| (int) c == 62) || (int) c == 34) || (int) c == 92)
|| (int) c == 39) != 0)
foo();
}
into:
define i32 @crud(i8 zeroext %c, i32 %x) nounwind ssp noredzone {
entry:
%cmp = icmp ult i8 %c, 33
br i1 %cmp, label %if.then, label %switch.early.test
switch.early.test: ; preds = %entry
switch i8 %c, label %if.end [
i8 39, label %if.then
i8 44, label %if.then
i8 58, label %if.then
i8 59, label %if.then
i8 60, label %if.then
i8 62, label %if.then
i8 46, label %if.then
i8 92, label %if.then
i8 34, label %if.then
]
by pulling the < comparison out ahead of the newly formed switch.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@121680 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2010-12-13 04:50:38 +00:00
|
|
|
define void @test7(i8 zeroext %c, i32 %x) nounwind ssp noredzone {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%cmp = icmp ult i32 %x, 32
|
|
|
|
%cmp4 = icmp eq i8 %c, 97
|
|
|
|
%or.cond = or i1 %cmp, %cmp4
|
|
|
|
%cmp9 = icmp eq i8 %c, 99
|
|
|
|
%or.cond11 = or i1 %or.cond, %cmp9
|
|
|
|
br i1 %or.cond11, label %if.then, label %if.end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if.then: ; preds = %entry
|
|
|
|
tail call void @foo1() nounwind noredzone
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if.end: ; preds = %entry
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: @test7
|
2010-12-13 08:12:19 +00:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: %cmp = icmp ult i32 %x, 32
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: br i1 %cmp, label %if.then, label %switch.early.test
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: switch.early.test:
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: switch i8 %c, label %if.end [
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i8 99, label %if.then
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i8 97, label %if.then
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: ]
|
enhance the "change or icmp's into switch" xform to handle one value in an
'or sequence' that it doesn't understand. This allows us to optimize
something insane like this:
int crud (unsigned char c, unsigned x)
{
if(((((((((( (int) c <= 32 ||
(int) c == 46) || (int) c == 44)
|| (int) c == 58) || (int) c == 59) || (int) c == 60)
|| (int) c == 62) || (int) c == 34) || (int) c == 92)
|| (int) c == 39) != 0)
foo();
}
into:
define i32 @crud(i8 zeroext %c, i32 %x) nounwind ssp noredzone {
entry:
%cmp = icmp ult i8 %c, 33
br i1 %cmp, label %if.then, label %switch.early.test
switch.early.test: ; preds = %entry
switch i8 %c, label %if.end [
i8 39, label %if.then
i8 44, label %if.then
i8 58, label %if.then
i8 59, label %if.then
i8 60, label %if.then
i8 62, label %if.then
i8 46, label %if.then
i8 92, label %if.then
i8 34, label %if.then
]
by pulling the < comparison out ahead of the newly formed switch.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@121680 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2010-12-13 04:50:38 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2010-12-13 05:34:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define i32 @test8(i8 zeroext %c, i32 %x, i1 %C) nounwind ssp noredzone {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
br i1 %C, label %N, label %if.then
|
|
|
|
N:
|
|
|
|
%cmp = icmp ult i32 %x, 32
|
|
|
|
%cmp4 = icmp eq i8 %c, 97
|
|
|
|
%or.cond = or i1 %cmp, %cmp4
|
|
|
|
%cmp9 = icmp eq i8 %c, 99
|
|
|
|
%or.cond11 = or i1 %or.cond, %cmp9
|
|
|
|
br i1 %or.cond11, label %if.then, label %if.end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if.then: ; preds = %entry
|
|
|
|
%A = phi i32 [0, %entry], [42, %N]
|
|
|
|
tail call void @foo1() nounwind noredzone
|
|
|
|
ret i32 %A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if.end: ; preds = %entry
|
|
|
|
ret i32 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: @test8
|
2010-12-13 08:12:19 +00:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: switch.early.test:
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: switch i8 %c, label %if.end [
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i8 99, label %if.then
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i8 97, label %if.then
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: ]
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: %A = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ 42, %switch.early.test ], [ 42, %N ], [ 42, %switch.early.test ]
|
Make simplifycfg reprocess newly formed "br (cond1 | cond2)" conditions
when simplifying, allowing them to be eagerly turned into switches. This
is the last step required to get "Example 7" from this blog post:
http://blog.regehr.org/archives/320
On X86, we now generate this machine code, which (to my eye) seems better
than the ICC generated code:
_crud: ## @crud
## BB#0: ## %entry
cmpb $33, %dil
jb LBB0_4
## BB#1: ## %switch.early.test
addb $-34, %dil
cmpb $58, %dil
ja LBB0_3
## BB#2: ## %switch.early.test
movzbl %dil, %eax
movabsq $288230376537592865, %rcx ## imm = 0x400000017001421
btq %rax, %rcx
jb LBB0_4
LBB0_3: ## %lor.rhs
xorl %eax, %eax
ret
LBB0_4: ## %lor.end
movl $1, %eax
ret
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@121690 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2010-12-13 07:00:06 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-13 07:41:29 +00:00
|
|
|
;; This is "Example 7" from http://blog.regehr.org/archives/320
|
Make simplifycfg reprocess newly formed "br (cond1 | cond2)" conditions
when simplifying, allowing them to be eagerly turned into switches. This
is the last step required to get "Example 7" from this blog post:
http://blog.regehr.org/archives/320
On X86, we now generate this machine code, which (to my eye) seems better
than the ICC generated code:
_crud: ## @crud
## BB#0: ## %entry
cmpb $33, %dil
jb LBB0_4
## BB#1: ## %switch.early.test
addb $-34, %dil
cmpb $58, %dil
ja LBB0_3
## BB#2: ## %switch.early.test
movzbl %dil, %eax
movabsq $288230376537592865, %rcx ## imm = 0x400000017001421
btq %rax, %rcx
jb LBB0_4
LBB0_3: ## %lor.rhs
xorl %eax, %eax
ret
LBB0_4: ## %lor.end
movl $1, %eax
ret
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@121690 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2010-12-13 07:00:06 +00:00
|
|
|
define i32 @test9(i8 zeroext %c) nounwind ssp noredzone {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%cmp = icmp ult i8 %c, 33
|
|
|
|
br i1 %cmp, label %lor.end, label %lor.lhs.false
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lor.lhs.false: ; preds = %entry
|
|
|
|
%cmp4 = icmp eq i8 %c, 46
|
|
|
|
br i1 %cmp4, label %lor.end, label %lor.lhs.false6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lor.lhs.false6: ; preds = %lor.lhs.false
|
|
|
|
%cmp9 = icmp eq i8 %c, 44
|
|
|
|
br i1 %cmp9, label %lor.end, label %lor.lhs.false11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lor.lhs.false11: ; preds = %lor.lhs.false6
|
|
|
|
%cmp14 = icmp eq i8 %c, 58
|
|
|
|
br i1 %cmp14, label %lor.end, label %lor.lhs.false16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lor.lhs.false16: ; preds = %lor.lhs.false11
|
|
|
|
%cmp19 = icmp eq i8 %c, 59
|
|
|
|
br i1 %cmp19, label %lor.end, label %lor.lhs.false21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lor.lhs.false21: ; preds = %lor.lhs.false16
|
|
|
|
%cmp24 = icmp eq i8 %c, 60
|
|
|
|
br i1 %cmp24, label %lor.end, label %lor.lhs.false26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lor.lhs.false26: ; preds = %lor.lhs.false21
|
|
|
|
%cmp29 = icmp eq i8 %c, 62
|
|
|
|
br i1 %cmp29, label %lor.end, label %lor.lhs.false31
|
2010-12-13 05:34:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Make simplifycfg reprocess newly formed "br (cond1 | cond2)" conditions
when simplifying, allowing them to be eagerly turned into switches. This
is the last step required to get "Example 7" from this blog post:
http://blog.regehr.org/archives/320
On X86, we now generate this machine code, which (to my eye) seems better
than the ICC generated code:
_crud: ## @crud
## BB#0: ## %entry
cmpb $33, %dil
jb LBB0_4
## BB#1: ## %switch.early.test
addb $-34, %dil
cmpb $58, %dil
ja LBB0_3
## BB#2: ## %switch.early.test
movzbl %dil, %eax
movabsq $288230376537592865, %rcx ## imm = 0x400000017001421
btq %rax, %rcx
jb LBB0_4
LBB0_3: ## %lor.rhs
xorl %eax, %eax
ret
LBB0_4: ## %lor.end
movl $1, %eax
ret
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@121690 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2010-12-13 07:00:06 +00:00
|
|
|
lor.lhs.false31: ; preds = %lor.lhs.false26
|
|
|
|
%cmp34 = icmp eq i8 %c, 34
|
|
|
|
br i1 %cmp34, label %lor.end, label %lor.lhs.false36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lor.lhs.false36: ; preds = %lor.lhs.false31
|
|
|
|
%cmp39 = icmp eq i8 %c, 92
|
|
|
|
br i1 %cmp39, label %lor.end, label %lor.rhs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lor.rhs: ; preds = %lor.lhs.false36
|
|
|
|
%cmp43 = icmp eq i8 %c, 39
|
|
|
|
br label %lor.end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lor.end: ; preds = %lor.rhs, %lor.lhs.false36, %lor.lhs.false31, %lor.lhs.false26, %lor.lhs.false21, %lor.lhs.false16, %lor.lhs.false11, %lor.lhs.false6, %lor.lhs.false, %entry
|
|
|
|
%0 = phi i1 [ true, %lor.lhs.false36 ], [ true, %lor.lhs.false31 ], [ true, %lor.lhs.false26 ], [ true, %lor.lhs.false21 ], [ true, %lor.lhs.false16 ], [ true, %lor.lhs.false11 ], [ true, %lor.lhs.false6 ], [ true, %lor.lhs.false ], [ true, %entry ], [ %cmp43, %lor.rhs ]
|
|
|
|
%conv46 = zext i1 %0 to i32
|
|
|
|
ret i32 %conv46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: @test9
|
2010-12-14 08:46:09 +00:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: %cmp = icmp ult i8 %c, 33
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: br i1 %cmp, label %lor.end, label %switch.early.test
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: switch.early.test:
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: switch i8 %c, label %lor.rhs [
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i8 92, label %lor.end
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i8 62, label %lor.end
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i8 60, label %lor.end
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i8 59, label %lor.end
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i8 58, label %lor.end
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i8 46, label %lor.end
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i8 44, label %lor.end
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i8 34, label %lor.end
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i8 39, label %lor.end
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: ]
|
2010-12-13 05:34:18 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
Make simplifycfg reprocess newly formed "br (cond1 | cond2)" conditions
when simplifying, allowing them to be eagerly turned into switches. This
is the last step required to get "Example 7" from this blog post:
http://blog.regehr.org/archives/320
On X86, we now generate this machine code, which (to my eye) seems better
than the ICC generated code:
_crud: ## @crud
## BB#0: ## %entry
cmpb $33, %dil
jb LBB0_4
## BB#1: ## %switch.early.test
addb $-34, %dil
cmpb $58, %dil
ja LBB0_3
## BB#2: ## %switch.early.test
movzbl %dil, %eax
movabsq $288230376537592865, %rcx ## imm = 0x400000017001421
btq %rax, %rcx
jb LBB0_4
LBB0_3: ## %lor.rhs
xorl %eax, %eax
ret
LBB0_4: ## %lor.end
movl $1, %eax
ret
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@121690 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2010-12-13 07:00:06 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-13 08:12:19 +00:00
|
|
|
define i32 @test10(i32 %mode, i1 %Cond) {
|
|
|
|
%A = icmp ne i32 %mode, 0
|
|
|
|
%B = icmp ne i32 %mode, 51
|
|
|
|
%C = and i1 %A, %B
|
|
|
|
%D = and i1 %C, %Cond
|
|
|
|
br i1 %D, label %T, label %F
|
|
|
|
T:
|
|
|
|
ret i32 123
|
|
|
|
F:
|
|
|
|
ret i32 324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: @test10
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: br i1 %Cond, label %switch.early.test, label %F
|
|
|
|
; CHECK:switch.early.test:
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: switch i32 %mode, label %T [
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i32 51, label %F
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i32 0, label %F
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: ]
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-13 18:20:38 +00:00
|
|
|
; PR8780
|
|
|
|
define i32 @test11(i32 %bar) nounwind {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%cmp = icmp eq i32 %bar, 4
|
|
|
|
%cmp2 = icmp eq i32 %bar, 35
|
|
|
|
%or.cond = or i1 %cmp, %cmp2
|
|
|
|
%cmp5 = icmp eq i32 %bar, 53
|
|
|
|
%or.cond1 = or i1 %or.cond, %cmp5
|
|
|
|
%cmp8 = icmp eq i32 %bar, 24
|
|
|
|
%or.cond2 = or i1 %or.cond1, %cmp8
|
|
|
|
%cmp11 = icmp eq i32 %bar, 23
|
|
|
|
%or.cond3 = or i1 %or.cond2, %cmp11
|
|
|
|
%cmp14 = icmp eq i32 %bar, 55
|
|
|
|
%or.cond4 = or i1 %or.cond3, %cmp14
|
|
|
|
%cmp17 = icmp eq i32 %bar, 12
|
|
|
|
%or.cond5 = or i1 %or.cond4, %cmp17
|
|
|
|
%cmp20 = icmp eq i32 %bar, 35
|
|
|
|
%or.cond6 = or i1 %or.cond5, %cmp20
|
|
|
|
br i1 %or.cond6, label %if.then, label %if.end
|
2010-12-13 08:12:19 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-13 18:20:38 +00:00
|
|
|
if.then: ; preds = %entry
|
|
|
|
br label %return
|
Make simplifycfg reprocess newly formed "br (cond1 | cond2)" conditions
when simplifying, allowing them to be eagerly turned into switches. This
is the last step required to get "Example 7" from this blog post:
http://blog.regehr.org/archives/320
On X86, we now generate this machine code, which (to my eye) seems better
than the ICC generated code:
_crud: ## @crud
## BB#0: ## %entry
cmpb $33, %dil
jb LBB0_4
## BB#1: ## %switch.early.test
addb $-34, %dil
cmpb $58, %dil
ja LBB0_3
## BB#2: ## %switch.early.test
movzbl %dil, %eax
movabsq $288230376537592865, %rcx ## imm = 0x400000017001421
btq %rax, %rcx
jb LBB0_4
LBB0_3: ## %lor.rhs
xorl %eax, %eax
ret
LBB0_4: ## %lor.end
movl $1, %eax
ret
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@121690 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2010-12-13 07:00:06 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-13 18:20:38 +00:00
|
|
|
if.end: ; preds = %entry
|
|
|
|
br label %return
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return: ; preds = %if.end, %if.then
|
|
|
|
%retval.0 = phi i32 [ 1, %if.then ], [ 0, %if.end ]
|
|
|
|
ret i32 %retval.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: @test11
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: switch i32 %bar, label %if.end [
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i32 55, label %return
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i32 53, label %return
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i32 35, label %return
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i32 24, label %return
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i32 23, label %return
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i32 12, label %return
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i32 4, label %return
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: ]
|
|
|
|
}
|
2010-12-13 23:02:19 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define void @test12() nounwind {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
br label %bb49.us.us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bb49.us.us:
|
|
|
|
%A = icmp eq i32 undef, undef
|
|
|
|
br i1 %A, label %bb55.us.us, label %malformed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bb48.us.us:
|
|
|
|
%B = icmp ugt i32 undef, undef
|
|
|
|
br i1 %B, label %bb55.us.us, label %bb49.us.us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bb55.us.us:
|
|
|
|
br label %bb48.us.us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
malformed:
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: @test12
|
|
|
|
|
improve switch formation to handle small range
comparisons formed by comparisons. For example,
this:
void foo(unsigned x) {
if (x == 0 || x == 1 || x == 3 || x == 4 || x == 6)
bar();
}
compiles into:
_foo: ## @foo
## BB#0: ## %entry
cmpl $6, %edi
ja LBB0_2
## BB#1: ## %entry
movl %edi, %eax
movl $91, %ecx
btq %rax, %rcx
jb LBB0_3
instead of:
_foo: ## @foo
## BB#0: ## %entry
cmpl $2, %edi
jb LBB0_4
## BB#1: ## %switch.early.test
cmpl $6, %edi
ja LBB0_3
## BB#2: ## %switch.early.test
movl %edi, %eax
movl $88, %ecx
btq %rax, %rcx
jb LBB0_4
This catches a bunch of cases in GCC, which look like this:
%804 = load i32* @which_alternative, align 4, !tbaa !0
%805 = icmp ult i32 %804, 2
%806 = icmp eq i32 %804, 3
%or.cond121 = or i1 %805, %806
%807 = icmp eq i32 %804, 4
%or.cond124 = or i1 %or.cond121, %807
br i1 %or.cond124, label %.thread, label %808
turning this into a range comparison.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122045 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2010-12-17 06:20:15 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; test13 - handle switch formation with ult.
|
|
|
|
define void @test13(i32 %x) nounwind ssp noredzone {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%cmp = icmp ult i32 %x, 2
|
|
|
|
br i1 %cmp, label %if.then, label %lor.lhs.false3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lor.lhs.false3: ; preds = %lor.lhs.false
|
|
|
|
%cmp5 = icmp eq i32 %x, 3
|
|
|
|
br i1 %cmp5, label %if.then, label %lor.lhs.false6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lor.lhs.false6: ; preds = %lor.lhs.false3
|
|
|
|
%cmp8 = icmp eq i32 %x, 4
|
|
|
|
br i1 %cmp8, label %if.then, label %lor.lhs.false9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lor.lhs.false9: ; preds = %lor.lhs.false6
|
|
|
|
%cmp11 = icmp eq i32 %x, 6
|
|
|
|
br i1 %cmp11, label %if.then, label %if.end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if.then: ; preds = %lor.lhs.false9, %lor.lhs.false6, %lor.lhs.false3, %lor.lhs.false, %entry
|
|
|
|
call void @foo1() noredzone
|
|
|
|
br label %if.end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if.end: ; preds = %if.then, %lor.lhs.false9
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: @test13
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: switch i32 %x, label %if.end [
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i32 6, label %if.then
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i32 4, label %if.then
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i32 3, label %if.then
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i32 1, label %if.then
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i32 0, label %if.then
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: ]
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; test14 - handle switch formation with ult.
|
|
|
|
define void @test14(i32 %x) nounwind ssp noredzone {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%cmp = icmp ugt i32 %x, 2
|
|
|
|
br i1 %cmp, label %lor.lhs.false3, label %if.then
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lor.lhs.false3: ; preds = %lor.lhs.false
|
|
|
|
%cmp5 = icmp ne i32 %x, 3
|
|
|
|
br i1 %cmp5, label %lor.lhs.false6, label %if.then
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lor.lhs.false6: ; preds = %lor.lhs.false3
|
|
|
|
%cmp8 = icmp ne i32 %x, 4
|
|
|
|
br i1 %cmp8, label %lor.lhs.false9, label %if.then
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lor.lhs.false9: ; preds = %lor.lhs.false6
|
|
|
|
%cmp11 = icmp ne i32 %x, 6
|
|
|
|
br i1 %cmp11, label %if.end, label %if.then
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if.then: ; preds = %lor.lhs.false9, %lor.lhs.false6, %lor.lhs.false3, %lor.lhs.false, %entry
|
|
|
|
call void @foo1() noredzone
|
|
|
|
br label %if.end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if.end: ; preds = %if.then, %lor.lhs.false9
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: @test14
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: switch i32 %x, label %if.end [
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i32 6, label %if.then
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i32 4, label %if.then
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i32 3, label %if.then
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i32 1, label %if.then
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: i32 0, label %if.then
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: ]
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-17 10:48:14 +00:00
|
|
|
; Don't crash on ginormous ranges.
|
|
|
|
define void @test15(i128 %x) nounwind {
|
|
|
|
%cmp = icmp ugt i128 %x, 2
|
|
|
|
br i1 %cmp, label %if.end, label %lor.false
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lor.false:
|
|
|
|
%cmp2 = icmp ne i128 %x, 100000000000000000000
|
|
|
|
br i1 %cmp2, label %if.end, label %if.then
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if.then:
|
|
|
|
call void @foo1() noredzone
|
|
|
|
br label %if.end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if.end:
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: @test15
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NOT: switch
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
2011-01-29 04:46:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; PR8675
|
|
|
|
; rdar://5134905
|
|
|
|
define zeroext i1 @test16(i32 %x) nounwind {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: @test16
|
2011-02-07 22:37:28 +00:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: %x.off = add i32 %x, -1
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: %switch = icmp ult i32 %x.off, 3
|
2011-01-29 04:46:23 +00:00
|
|
|
%cmp.i = icmp eq i32 %x, 1
|
|
|
|
br i1 %cmp.i, label %lor.end, label %lor.lhs.false
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lor.lhs.false:
|
|
|
|
%cmp.i2 = icmp eq i32 %x, 2
|
|
|
|
br i1 %cmp.i2, label %lor.end, label %lor.rhs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lor.rhs:
|
|
|
|
%cmp.i1 = icmp eq i32 %x, 3
|
|
|
|
br label %lor.end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lor.end:
|
|
|
|
%0 = phi i1 [ true, %lor.lhs.false ], [ true, %entry ], [ %cmp.i1, %lor.rhs ]
|
|
|
|
ret i1 %0
|
|
|
|
}
|
2011-02-07 22:37:28 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; Check that we don't turn an icmp into a switch where it's not useful.
|
|
|
|
define void @test17(i32 %x, i32 %y) {
|
|
|
|
%cmp = icmp ult i32 %x, 3
|
|
|
|
%switch = icmp ult i32 %y, 2
|
|
|
|
%or.cond775 = or i1 %cmp, %switch
|
|
|
|
br i1 %or.cond775, label %lor.lhs.false8, label %return
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lor.lhs.false8:
|
|
|
|
tail call void @foo1()
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return:
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: @test17
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NOT: switch.early.test
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NOT: switch i32
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|