llvm-6502/docs/ExceptionHandling.html

590 lines
25 KiB
HTML
Raw Normal View History

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<title>Exception Handling in LLVM</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="description"
content="Exception Handling in LLVM.">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="llvm.css" type="text/css">
</head>
<body>
<div class="doc_title">Exception Handling in LLVM</div>
<table class="layout" style="width:100%">
<tr class="layout">
<td class="left">
<ul>
<li><a href="#introduction">Introduction</a>
<ol>
<li><a href="#itanium">Itanium ABI Zero-cost Exception Handling</a></li>
<li><a href="#sjlj">Setjmp/Longjmp Exception Handling</a></li>
<li><a href="#overview">Overview</a></li>
</ol></li>
<li><a href="#codegen">LLVM Code Generation</a>
<ol>
<li><a href="#throw">Throw</a></li>
<li><a href="#try_catch">Try/Catch</a></li>
There is an impedance matching problem between LLVM and gcc exception handling: if an exception unwinds through an invoke, then execution must branch to the invoke's unwind target. We previously tried to enforce this by appending a cleanup action to every selector, however this does not always work correctly due to an optimization in the C++ unwinding runtime: if only cleanups would be run while unwinding an exception, then the program just terminates without actually executing the cleanups, as invoke semantics would require. I was hoping this wouldn't be a problem, but in fact it turns out to be the cause of all the remaining failures in the LLVM testsuite (these also fail with -enable-correct-eh-support, so turning on -enable-eh didn't make things worse!). Instead we need to append a full-blown catch-all to the end of each selector. The correct way of doing this depends on the personality function, i.e. it is language dependent, so can only be done by gcc. Thus this patch which generalizes the eh.selector intrinsic so that it can handle all possible kinds of action table entries (before it didn't accomodate cleanups): now 0 indicates a cleanup, and filters have to be specified using the number of type infos plus one rather than the number of type infos. Related gcc patches will cause Ada to pass a cleanup (0) to force the selector to always fire, while C++ will use a C++ catch-all (null). git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@41484 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2007-08-27 15:47:50 +00:00
<li><a href="#cleanups">Cleanups</a></li>
<li><a href="#throw_filters">Throw Filters</a></li>
There is an impedance matching problem between LLVM and gcc exception handling: if an exception unwinds through an invoke, then execution must branch to the invoke's unwind target. We previously tried to enforce this by appending a cleanup action to every selector, however this does not always work correctly due to an optimization in the C++ unwinding runtime: if only cleanups would be run while unwinding an exception, then the program just terminates without actually executing the cleanups, as invoke semantics would require. I was hoping this wouldn't be a problem, but in fact it turns out to be the cause of all the remaining failures in the LLVM testsuite (these also fail with -enable-correct-eh-support, so turning on -enable-eh didn't make things worse!). Instead we need to append a full-blown catch-all to the end of each selector. The correct way of doing this depends on the personality function, i.e. it is language dependent, so can only be done by gcc. Thus this patch which generalizes the eh.selector intrinsic so that it can handle all possible kinds of action table entries (before it didn't accomodate cleanups): now 0 indicates a cleanup, and filters have to be specified using the number of type infos plus one rather than the number of type infos. Related gcc patches will cause Ada to pass a cleanup (0) to force the selector to always fire, while C++ will use a C++ catch-all (null). git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@41484 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2007-08-27 15:47:50 +00:00
<li><a href="#restrictions">Restrictions</a></li>
</ol></li>
<li><a href="#format_common_intrinsics">Exception Handling Intrinsics</a>
<ol>
<li><a href="#llvm_eh_exception"><tt>llvm.eh.exception</tt></a></li>
<li><a href="#llvm_eh_selector"><tt>llvm.eh.selector</tt></a></li>
<li><a href="#llvm_eh_typeid_for"><tt>llvm.eh.typeid.for</tt></a></li>
<li><a href="#llvm_eh_sjlj_setjmp"><tt>llvm.eh.sjlj.setjmp</tt></a></li>
<li><a href="#llvm_eh_sjlj_longjmp"><tt>llvm.eh.sjlj.longjmp</tt></a></li>
<li><a href="#llvm_eh_sjlj_lsda"><tt>llvm.eh.sjlj.lsda</tt></a></li>
</ol></li>
<li><a href="#asm">Asm Table Formats</a>
<ol>
<li><a href="#unwind_tables">Exception Handling Frame</a></li>
<li><a href="#exception_tables">Exception Tables</a></li>
</ol></li>
<li><a href="#todo">ToDo</a></li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr></table>
<div class="doc_author">
<p>Written by <a href="mailto:jlaskey@mac.com">Jim Laskey</a></p>
</div>
<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
<div class="doc_section"><a name="introduction">Introduction</a></div>
<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
<div class="doc_text">
<p>This document is the central repository for all information pertaining to
exception handling in LLVM. It describes the format that LLVM exception
handling information takes, which is useful for those interested in creating
front-ends or dealing directly with the information. Further, this document
provides specific examples of what exception handling information is used for
in C/C++.</p>
</div>
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
<div class="doc_subsection">
<a name="itanium">Itanium ABI Zero-cost Exception Handling</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
<p>Exception handling for most programming languages is designed to recover from
conditions that rarely occur during general use of an application. To that
end, exception handling should not interfere with the main flow of an
application's algorithm by performing checkpointing tasks, such as saving the
current pc or register state.</p>
<p>The Itanium ABI Exception Handling Specification defines a methodology for
providing outlying data in the form of exception tables without inlining
speculative exception handling code in the flow of an application's main
algorithm. Thus, the specification is said to add "zero-cost" to the normal
execution of an application.</p>
<p>A more complete description of the Itanium ABI exception handling runtime
support of can be found at
<a href="http://www.codesourcery.com/cxx-abi/abi-eh.html">Itanium C++ ABI:
Exception Handling</a>. A description of the exception frame format can be
found at
<a href="http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_3.0.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/ehframechpt.html">Exception
Frames</a>, with details of the DWARF 3 specification at
<a href="http://www.eagercon.com/dwarf/dwarf3std.htm">DWARF 3 Standard</a>.
A description for the C++ exception table formats can be found at
<a href="http://www.codesourcery.com/cxx-abi/exceptions.pdf">Exception Handling
Tables</a>.</p>
</div>
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
<div class="doc_subsection">
<a name="sjlj">Setjmp/Longjmp Exception Handling</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
<p>Setjmp/Longjmp (SJLJ) based exception handling uses LLVM intrinsics
<a href="#llvm_eh_sjlj_setjmp"><tt>llvm.eh.sjlj.setjmp</tt></a> and
<a href="#llvm_eh_sjlj_longjmp"><tt>llvm.eh.sjlj.longjmp</tt></a> to
handle control flow for exception handling.</p>
<p>For each function which does exception processing, be it try/catch blocks
or cleanups, that function registers itself on a global frame list. When
exceptions are being unwound, the runtime uses this list to identify which
functions need processing.<p>
<p>Landing pad selection is encoded in the call site entry of the function
context. The runtime returns to the function via
<a href="#llvm_eh_sjlj_longjmp"><tt>llvm.eh.sjlj.longjmp</tt></a>, where
a switch table transfers control to the appropriate landing pad based on
the index stored in the function context.</p>
<p>In contrast to DWARF exception handling, which encodes exception regions
and frame information in out-of-line tables, SJLJ exception handling
builds and removes the unwind frame context at runtime. This results in
faster exception handling at the expense of slower execution when no
exceptions are thrown. As exceptions are, by their nature, intended for
uncommon code paths, DWARF exception handling is generally preferred to
SJLJ.</p>
</div>
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
<div class="doc_subsection">
<a name="overview">Overview</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
<p>When an exception is thrown in LLVM code, the runtime does its best to find a
handler suited to processing the circumstance.</p>
<p>The runtime first attempts to find an <i>exception frame</i> corresponding to
the function where the exception was thrown. If the programming language
(e.g. C++) supports exception handling, the exception frame contains a
reference to an exception table describing how to process the exception. If
the language (e.g. C) does not support exception handling, or if the
exception needs to be forwarded to a prior activation, the exception frame
contains information about how to unwind the current activation and restore
the state of the prior activation. This process is repeated until the
exception is handled. If the exception is not handled and no activations
remain, then the application is terminated with an appropriate error
message.</p>
<p>Because different programming languages have different behaviors when
handling exceptions, the exception handling ABI provides a mechanism for
supplying <i>personalities.</i> An exception handling personality is defined
by way of a <i>personality function</i> (e.g. <tt>__gxx_personality_v0</tt>
in C++), which receives the context of the exception, an <i>exception
structure</i> containing the exception object type and value, and a reference
to the exception table for the current function. The personality function
for the current compile unit is specified in a <i>common exception
frame</i>.</p>
<p>The organization of an exception table is language dependent. For C++, an
exception table is organized as a series of code ranges defining what to do
if an exception occurs in that range. Typically, the information associated
with a range defines which types of exception objects (using C++ <i>type
info</i>) that are handled in that range, and an associated action that
should take place. Actions typically pass control to a <i>landing
pad</i>.</p>
<p>A landing pad corresponds to the code found in the <i>catch</i> portion of
a <i>try</i>/<i>catch</i> sequence. When execution resumes at a landing
pad, it receives the exception structure and a selector corresponding to
the <i>type</i> of exception thrown. The selector is then used to determine
which <i>catch</i> should actually process the exception.</p>
</div>
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
<div class="doc_section">
<a name="codegen">LLVM Code Generation</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
<p>At the time of this writing, only C++ exception handling support is available
in LLVM. So the remainder of this document will be somewhat C++-centric.</p>
<p>From the C++ developers perspective, exceptions are defined in terms of the
<tt>throw</tt> and <tt>try</tt>/<tt>catch</tt> statements. In this section
we will describe the implementation of LLVM exception handling in terms of
C++ examples.</p>
</div>
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
<div class="doc_subsection">
<a name="throw">Throw</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
<p>Languages that support exception handling typically provide a <tt>throw</tt>
operation to initiate the exception process. Internally, a throw operation
breaks down into two steps. First, a request is made to allocate exception
space for an exception structure. This structure needs to survive beyond the
current activation. This structure will contain the type and value of the
object being thrown. Second, a call is made to the runtime to raise the
exception, passing the exception structure as an argument.</p>
<p>In C++, the allocation of the exception structure is done by
the <tt>__cxa_allocate_exception</tt> runtime function. The exception
raising is handled by <tt>__cxa_throw</tt>. The type of the exception is
represented using a C++ RTTI structure.</p>
</div>
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
<div class="doc_subsection">
<a name="try_catch">Try/Catch</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
<p>A call within the scope of a <i>try</i> statement can potentially raise an
exception. In those circumstances, the LLVM C++ front-end replaces the call
with an <tt>invoke</tt> instruction. Unlike a call, the <tt>invoke</tt> has
two potential continuation points: where to continue when the call succeeds
as per normal; and where to continue if the call raises an exception, either
by a throw or the unwinding of a throw.</p>
<p>The term used to define a the place where an <tt>invoke</tt> continues after
an exception is called a <i>landing pad</i>. LLVM landing pads are
conceptually alternative function entry points where an exception structure
reference and a type info index are passed in as arguments. The landing pad
saves the exception structure reference and then proceeds to select the catch
block that corresponds to the type info of the exception object.</p>
<p>Two LLVM intrinsic functions are used to convey information about the landing
pad to the back end.</p>
<ol>
<li><a href="#llvm_eh_exception"><tt>llvm.eh.exception</tt></a> takes no
arguments and returns a pointer to the exception structure. This only
returns a sensible value if called after an <tt>invoke</tt> has branched
to a landing pad. Due to code generation limitations, it must currently
be called in the landing pad itself.</li>
<li><a href="#llvm_eh_selector"><tt>llvm.eh.selector</tt></a> takes a minimum
of three arguments. The first argument is the reference to the exception
structure. The second argument is a reference to the personality function
to be used for this <tt>try</tt>/<tt>catch</tt> sequence. Each of the
remaining arguments is either a reference to the type info for
a <tt>catch</tt> statement, a <a href="#throw_filters">filter</a>
expression, or the number zero (<tt>0</tt>) representing
a <a href="#cleanups">cleanup</a>. The exception is tested against the
arguments sequentially from first to last. The result of
the <a href="#llvm_eh_selector"><tt>llvm.eh.selector</tt></a> is a
positive number if the exception matched a type info, a negative number if
it matched a filter, and zero if it matched a cleanup. If nothing is
matched, the behaviour of the program
is <a href="#restrictions">undefined</a>. This only returns a sensible
value if called after an <tt>invoke</tt> has branched to a landing pad.
Due to codegen limitations, it must currently be called in the landing pad
itself. If a type info matched, then the selector value is the index of
the type info in the exception table, which can be obtained using the
<a href="#llvm_eh_typeid_for"><tt>llvm.eh.typeid.for</tt></a>
intrinsic.</li>
</ol>
<p>Once the landing pad has the type info selector, the code branches to the
code for the first catch. The catch then checks the value of the type info
selector against the index of type info for that catch. Since the type info
index is not known until all the type info have been gathered in the backend,
the catch code will call the
<a href="#llvm_eh_typeid_for"><tt>llvm.eh.typeid.for</tt></a> intrinsic
to determine the index for a given type info. If the catch fails to match
the selector then control is passed on to the next catch. Note: Since the
landing pad will not be used if there is no match in the list of type info on
the call to <a href="#llvm_eh_selector"><tt>llvm.eh.selector</tt></a>, then
neither the last catch nor <i>catch all</i> need to perform the check
against the selector.</p>
<p>Finally, the entry and exit of catch code is bracketed with calls
to <tt>__cxa_begin_catch</tt> and <tt>__cxa_end_catch</tt>.</p>
<ul>
<li><tt>__cxa_begin_catch</tt> takes a exception structure reference as an
argument and returns the value of the exception object.</li>
<li><tt>__cxa_end_catch</tt> takes no arguments. This function:<br><br>
<ol>
<li>Locates the most recently caught exception and decrements its handler
count,</li>
<li>Removes the exception from the "caught" stack if the handler count
goes to zero, and</li>
<li>Destroys the exception if the handler count goes to zero, and the
exception was not re-thrown by throw.</li>
</ol>
<p>Note: a rethrow from within the catch may replace this call with
a <tt>__cxa_rethrow</tt>.</p></li>
</ul>
</div>
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
<div class="doc_subsection">
There is an impedance matching problem between LLVM and gcc exception handling: if an exception unwinds through an invoke, then execution must branch to the invoke's unwind target. We previously tried to enforce this by appending a cleanup action to every selector, however this does not always work correctly due to an optimization in the C++ unwinding runtime: if only cleanups would be run while unwinding an exception, then the program just terminates without actually executing the cleanups, as invoke semantics would require. I was hoping this wouldn't be a problem, but in fact it turns out to be the cause of all the remaining failures in the LLVM testsuite (these also fail with -enable-correct-eh-support, so turning on -enable-eh didn't make things worse!). Instead we need to append a full-blown catch-all to the end of each selector. The correct way of doing this depends on the personality function, i.e. it is language dependent, so can only be done by gcc. Thus this patch which generalizes the eh.selector intrinsic so that it can handle all possible kinds of action table entries (before it didn't accomodate cleanups): now 0 indicates a cleanup, and filters have to be specified using the number of type infos plus one rather than the number of type infos. Related gcc patches will cause Ada to pass a cleanup (0) to force the selector to always fire, while C++ will use a C++ catch-all (null). git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@41484 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2007-08-27 15:47:50 +00:00
<a name="cleanups">Cleanups</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
<p>To handle destructors and cleanups in <tt>try</tt> code, control may not run
directly from a landing pad to the first catch. Control may actually flow
from the landing pad to clean up code and then to the first catch. Since the
required clean up for each <tt>invoke</tt> in a <tt>try</tt> may be different
(e.g. intervening constructor), there may be several landing pads for a given
try. If cleanups need to be run, an <tt>i32 0</tt> should be passed as the
last <a href="#llvm_eh_selector"><tt>llvm.eh.selector</tt></a> argument.
However, when using DWARF exception handling with C++, a <tt>i8* null</tt>
<a href="#restrictions">must</a> be passed instead.</p>
</div>
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
<div class="doc_subsection">
<a name="throw_filters">Throw Filters</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
<p>C++ allows the specification of which exception types can be thrown from a
function. To represent this a top level landing pad may exist to filter out
invalid types. To express this in LLVM code the landing pad will
call <a href="#llvm_eh_selector"><tt>llvm.eh.selector</tt></a>. The
arguments are a reference to the exception structure, a reference to the
personality function, the length of the filter expression (the number of type
infos plus one), followed by the type infos themselves.
<a href="#llvm_eh_selector"><tt>llvm.eh.selector</tt></a> will return a
negative value if the exception does not match any of the type infos. If no
match is found then a call to <tt>__cxa_call_unexpected</tt> should be made,
otherwise <tt>_Unwind_Resume</tt>. Each of these functions requires a
reference to the exception structure. Note that the most general form of an
<a href="#llvm_eh_selector"><tt>llvm.eh.selector</tt></a> call can contain
any number of type infos, filter expressions and cleanups (though having more
than one cleanup is pointless). The LLVM C++ front-end can generate such
<a href="#llvm_eh_selector"><tt>llvm.eh.selector</tt></a> calls due to
inlining creating nested exception handling scopes.</p>
</div>
There is an impedance matching problem between LLVM and gcc exception handling: if an exception unwinds through an invoke, then execution must branch to the invoke's unwind target. We previously tried to enforce this by appending a cleanup action to every selector, however this does not always work correctly due to an optimization in the C++ unwinding runtime: if only cleanups would be run while unwinding an exception, then the program just terminates without actually executing the cleanups, as invoke semantics would require. I was hoping this wouldn't be a problem, but in fact it turns out to be the cause of all the remaining failures in the LLVM testsuite (these also fail with -enable-correct-eh-support, so turning on -enable-eh didn't make things worse!). Instead we need to append a full-blown catch-all to the end of each selector. The correct way of doing this depends on the personality function, i.e. it is language dependent, so can only be done by gcc. Thus this patch which generalizes the eh.selector intrinsic so that it can handle all possible kinds of action table entries (before it didn't accomodate cleanups): now 0 indicates a cleanup, and filters have to be specified using the number of type infos plus one rather than the number of type infos. Related gcc patches will cause Ada to pass a cleanup (0) to force the selector to always fire, while C++ will use a C++ catch-all (null). git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@41484 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2007-08-27 15:47:50 +00:00
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
<div class="doc_subsection">
<a name="restrictions">Restrictions</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
<p>The semantics of the invoke instruction require that any exception that
unwinds through an invoke call should result in a branch to the invoke's
unwind label. However such a branch will only happen if the
<a href="#llvm_eh_selector"><tt>llvm.eh.selector</tt></a> matches. Thus in
order to ensure correct operation, the front-end must only generate
<a href="#llvm_eh_selector"><tt>llvm.eh.selector</tt></a> calls that are
guaranteed to always match whatever exception unwinds through the invoke.
For most languages it is enough to pass zero, indicating the presence of
a <a href="#cleanups">cleanup</a>, as the
last <a href="#llvm_eh_selector"><tt>llvm.eh.selector</tt></a> argument.
However for C++ this is not sufficient, because the C++ personality function
will terminate the program if it detects that unwinding the exception only
results in matches with cleanups. For C++ a <tt>null i8*</tt> should be
passed as the last <a href="#llvm_eh_selector"><tt>llvm.eh.selector</tt></a>
argument instead. This is interpreted as a catch-all by the C++ personality
function, and will always match.</p>
There is an impedance matching problem between LLVM and gcc exception handling: if an exception unwinds through an invoke, then execution must branch to the invoke's unwind target. We previously tried to enforce this by appending a cleanup action to every selector, however this does not always work correctly due to an optimization in the C++ unwinding runtime: if only cleanups would be run while unwinding an exception, then the program just terminates without actually executing the cleanups, as invoke semantics would require. I was hoping this wouldn't be a problem, but in fact it turns out to be the cause of all the remaining failures in the LLVM testsuite (these also fail with -enable-correct-eh-support, so turning on -enable-eh didn't make things worse!). Instead we need to append a full-blown catch-all to the end of each selector. The correct way of doing this depends on the personality function, i.e. it is language dependent, so can only be done by gcc. Thus this patch which generalizes the eh.selector intrinsic so that it can handle all possible kinds of action table entries (before it didn't accomodate cleanups): now 0 indicates a cleanup, and filters have to be specified using the number of type infos plus one rather than the number of type infos. Related gcc patches will cause Ada to pass a cleanup (0) to force the selector to always fire, while C++ will use a C++ catch-all (null). git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@41484 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2007-08-27 15:47:50 +00:00
</div>
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
<div class="doc_section">
<a name="format_common_intrinsics">Exception Handling Intrinsics</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
<p>LLVM uses several intrinsic functions (name prefixed with "llvm.eh") to
provide exception handling information at various points in generated
code.</p>
</div>
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
<div class="doc_subsubsection">
<a name="llvm_eh_exception">llvm.eh.exception</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
<pre>
i8* %<a href="#llvm_eh_exception">llvm.eh.exception</a>( )
</pre>
<p>This intrinsic returns a pointer to the exception structure.</p>
</div>
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
<div class="doc_subsubsection">
<a name="llvm_eh_selector">llvm.eh.selector</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
<pre>
i32 %<a href="#llvm_eh_selector">llvm.eh.selector.i32</a>(i8*, i8*, i8*, ...)
i64 %<a href="#llvm_eh_selector">llvm.eh.selector.i64</a>(i8*, i8*, i8*, ...)
</pre>
<p>This intrinsic is used to compare the exception with the given type infos,
filters and cleanups.</p>
<p><a href="#llvm_eh_selector"><tt>llvm.eh.selector</tt></a> takes a minimum of
three arguments. The first argument is the reference to the exception
structure. The second argument is a reference to the personality function to
be used for this try catch sequence. Each of the remaining arguments is
either a reference to the type info for a catch statement,
a <a href="#throw_filters">filter</a> expression, or the number zero
representing a <a href="#cleanups">cleanup</a>. The exception is tested
against the arguments sequentially from first to last. The result of
the <a href="#llvm_eh_selector"><tt>llvm.eh.selector</tt></a> is a positive
number if the exception matched a type info, a negative number if it matched
a filter, and zero if it matched a cleanup. If nothing is matched, the
behaviour of the program is <a href="#restrictions">undefined</a>. If a type
info matched then the selector value is the index of the type info in the
exception table, which can be obtained using the
<a href="#llvm_eh_typeid_for"><tt>llvm.eh.typeid.for</tt></a> intrinsic.</p>
</div>
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
<div class="doc_subsubsection">
<a name="llvm_eh_typeid_for">llvm.eh.typeid.for</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
<pre>
i32 %<a href="#llvm_eh_typeid_for">llvm.eh.typeid.for.i32</a>(i8*)
i64 %<a href="#llvm_eh_typeid_for">llvm.eh.typeid.for.i64</a>(i8*)
</pre>
<p>This intrinsic returns the type info index in the exception table of the
current function. This value can be used to compare against the result
of <a href="#llvm_eh_selector"><tt>llvm.eh.selector</tt></a>. The single
argument is a reference to a type info.</p>
</div>
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
<div class="doc_subsubsection">
<a name="llvm_eh_sjlj_setjmp">llvm.eh.sjlj.setjmp</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
<pre>
i32 %<a href="#llvm_eh_sjlj_setjmp">llvm.eh.sjlj.setjmp</a>(i8*)
</pre>
<p>The SJLJ exception handling uses this intrinsic to force register saving for
the current function and to store the address of the following instruction
for use as a destination address by <a href="#llvm_eh_sjlj_longjmp">
<tt>llvm.eh.sjlj.longjmp</tt></a>. The buffer format and the overall
functioning of this intrinsic is compatible with the GCC
<tt>__builtin_setjmp</tt> implementation, allowing code built with the
two compilers to interoperate.</p>
<p>The single parameter is a pointer to a five word buffer in which the calling
context is saved. The front end places the frame pointer in the first word,
and the target implementation of this intrinsic should place the destination
address for a
<a href="#llvm_eh_sjlj_longjmp"><tt>llvm.eh.sjlj.longjmp</tt></a> in the
second word. The following three words are available for use in a
target-specific manner.</p>
</div>
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
<div class="doc_subsubsection">
<a name="llvm_eh_sjlj_lsda">llvm.eh.sjlj.lsda</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
<pre>
i8* %<a href="#llvm_eh_sjlj_lsda">llvm.eh.sjlj.lsda</a>( )
</pre>
<p>Used for SJLJ based exception handling, the <a href="#llvm_eh_sjlj_lsda">
<tt>llvm.eh.sjlj.lsda</tt></a> intrinsic returns the address of the Language
Specific Data Area (LSDA) for the current function. The SJLJ front-end code
stores this address in the exception handling function context for use by the
runtime.</p>
</div>
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
<div class="doc_section">
<a name="asm">Asm Table Formats</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
<p>There are two tables that are used by the exception handling runtime to
determine which actions should take place when an exception is thrown.</p>
</div>
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
<div class="doc_subsection">
<a name="unwind_tables">Exception Handling Frame</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
<p>An exception handling frame <tt>eh_frame</tt> is very similar to the unwind
frame used by dwarf debug info. The frame contains all the information
necessary to tear down the current frame and restore the state of the prior
frame. There is an exception handling frame for each function in a compile
unit, plus a common exception handling frame that defines information common
to all functions in the unit.</p>
<p>Todo - Table details here.</p>
</div>
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
<div class="doc_subsection">
<a name="exception_tables">Exception Tables</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
<p>An exception table contains information about what actions to take when an
exception is thrown in a particular part of a function's code. There is one
exception table per function except leaf routines and functions that have
only calls to non-throwing functions will not need an exception table.</p>
<p>Todo - Table details here.</p>
</div>
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
<div class="doc_section">
<a name="todo">ToDo</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
<ol>
<li>Testing/Testing/Testing.</li>
</ol>
</div>
<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
<hr>
<address>
<a href="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/check/referer"><img
src="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/images/vcss-blue" alt="Valid CSS"></a>
<a href="http://validator.w3.org/check/referer"><img
src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/valid-html401-blue" alt="Valid HTML 4.01"></a>
<a href="mailto:sabre@nondot.org">Chris Lattner</a><br>
<a href="http://llvm.org">LLVM Compiler Infrastructure</a><br>
Last modified: $Date$
</address>
</body>
</html>