llvm-6502/test/Assembler/2002-01-24-BadSymbolTableAssert.ll

; RUN: llvm-as < %s -o /dev/null -f

; This testcase failed due to a bad assertion in SymbolTable.cpp, removed in the 1.20 revision
; Basically the symbol table assumed that if there was an abstract type in the symbol table,
; [in this case for the entry %foo of type void(opaque)* ], that there should have also been
; named types by now.  This was obviously not the case here, and this is valid.  Assertion
; disabled.

declare void "foo"(%bb)
%bb = type int 

implementation
Adding RUN lines. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@17528 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 2004-11-06 22:07:09 +00:00			`; RUN: llvm-as < %s -o /dev/null -f`

Testcase for SymbolTable.cpp bug git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@1584 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 2002-01-25 03:58:05 +00:00			`; This testcase failed due to a bad assertion in SymbolTable.cpp, removed in the 1.20 revision`
			`; Basically the symbol table assumed that if there was an abstract type in the symbol table,`
			`; [in this case for the entry %foo of type void(opaque)* ], that there should have also been`
			`; named types by now. This was obviously not the case here, and this is valid. Assertion`
			`; disabled.`

			`declare void "foo"(%bb)`
			`%bb = type int`

			`implementation`