2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
//===- PassManagerBuilder.cpp - Build Standard Pass -----------------------===//
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
|
|
|
|
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// This file defines the PassManagerBuilder class, which is used to set up a
|
|
|
|
// "standard" optimization sequence suitable for languages like C and C++.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Transforms/IPO/PassManagerBuilder.h"
|
2011-08-09 22:17:34 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "llvm-c/Transforms/PassManagerBuilder.h"
|
2012-12-03 16:50:05 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h"
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/Passes.h"
|
2014-08-21 20:03:44 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/DataLayout.h"
|
2014-01-13 09:26:24 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/Verifier.h"
|
2015-02-13 10:01:29 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/LegacyPassManager.h"
|
2012-02-01 03:51:43 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Support/CommandLine.h"
|
2012-12-03 16:50:05 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Support/ManagedStatic.h"
|
2015-01-15 02:16:27 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/TargetLibraryInfo.h"
|
2014-08-21 20:03:44 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Target/TargetMachine.h"
|
2012-12-03 16:50:05 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Transforms/IPO.h"
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar.h"
|
2012-02-01 03:51:43 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Transforms/Vectorize.h"
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
using namespace llvm;
|
|
|
|
|
2012-02-01 03:51:43 +00:00
|
|
|
static cl::opt<bool>
|
2013-10-18 23:38:13 +00:00
|
|
|
RunLoopVectorization("vectorize-loops", cl::Hidden,
|
2012-10-30 18:37:43 +00:00
|
|
|
cl::desc("Run the Loop vectorization passes"));
|
2012-10-29 16:36:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static cl::opt<bool>
|
2013-10-18 23:38:13 +00:00
|
|
|
RunSLPVectorization("vectorize-slp", cl::Hidden,
|
2013-04-15 05:39:58 +00:00
|
|
|
cl::desc("Run the SLP vectorization passes"));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static cl::opt<bool>
|
2013-10-18 23:38:13 +00:00
|
|
|
RunBBVectorization("vectorize-slp-aggressive", cl::Hidden,
|
2013-04-15 05:39:58 +00:00
|
|
|
cl::desc("Run the BB vectorization passes"));
|
2012-02-01 03:51:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2012-04-13 17:15:33 +00:00
|
|
|
static cl::opt<bool>
|
|
|
|
UseGVNAfterVectorization("use-gvn-after-vectorization",
|
|
|
|
cl::init(false), cl::Hidden,
|
|
|
|
cl::desc("Run GVN instead of Early CSE after vectorization passes"));
|
|
|
|
|
2014-10-14 00:31:29 +00:00
|
|
|
static cl::opt<bool> ExtraVectorizerPasses(
|
|
|
|
"extra-vectorizer-passes", cl::init(false), cl::Hidden,
|
|
|
|
cl::desc("Run cleanup optimization passes after vectorization."));
|
|
|
|
|
Introduce a new SROA implementation.
This is essentially a ground up re-think of the SROA pass in LLVM. It
was initially inspired by a few problems with the existing pass:
- It is subject to the bane of my existence in optimizations: arbitrary
thresholds.
- It is overly conservative about which constructs can be split and
promoted.
- The vector value replacement aspect is separated from the splitting
logic, missing many opportunities where splitting and vector value
formation can work together.
- The splitting is entirely based around the underlying type of the
alloca, despite this type often having little to do with the reality
of how that memory is used. This is especially prevelant with unions
and base classes where we tail-pack derived members.
- When splitting fails (often due to the thresholds), the vector value
replacement (again because it is separate) can kick in for
preposterous cases where we simply should have split the value. This
results in forming i1024 and i2048 integer "bit vectors" that
tremendously slow down subsequnet IR optimizations (due to large
APInts) and impede the backend's lowering.
The new design takes an approach that fundamentally is not susceptible
to many of these problems. It is the result of a discusison between
myself and Duncan Sands over IRC about how to premptively avoid these
types of problems and how to do SROA in a more principled way. Since
then, it has evolved and grown, but this remains an important aspect: it
fixes real world problems with the SROA process today.
First, the transform of SROA actually has little to do with replacement.
It has more to do with splitting. The goal is to take an aggregate
alloca and form a composition of scalar allocas which can replace it and
will be most suitable to the eventual replacement by scalar SSA values.
The actual replacement is performed by mem2reg (and in the future
SSAUpdater).
The splitting is divided into four phases. The first phase is an
analysis of the uses of the alloca. This phase recursively walks uses,
building up a dense datastructure representing the ranges of the
alloca's memory actually used and checking for uses which inhibit any
aspects of the transform such as the escape of a pointer.
Once we have a mapping of the ranges of the alloca used by individual
operations, we compute a partitioning of the used ranges. Some uses are
inherently splittable (such as memcpy and memset), while scalar uses are
not splittable. The goal is to build a partitioning that has the minimum
number of splits while placing each unsplittable use in its own
partition. Overlapping unsplittable uses belong to the same partition.
This is the target split of the aggregate alloca, and it maximizes the
number of scalar accesses which become accesses to their own alloca and
candidates for promotion.
Third, we re-walk the uses of the alloca and assign each specific memory
access to all the partitions touched so that we have dense use-lists for
each partition.
Finally, we build a new, smaller alloca for each partition and rewrite
each use of that partition to use the new alloca. During this phase the
pass will also work very hard to transform uses of an alloca into a form
suitable for promotion, including forming vector operations, speculating
loads throguh PHI nodes and selects, etc.
After splitting is complete, each newly refined alloca that is
a candidate for promotion to a scalar SSA value is run through mem2reg.
There are lots of reasonably detailed comments in the source code about
the design and algorithms, and I'm going to be trying to improve them in
subsequent commits to ensure this is well documented, as the new pass is
in many ways more complex than the old one.
Some of this is still a WIP, but the current state is reasonbly stable.
It has passed bootstrap, the nightly test suite, and Duncan has run it
successfully through the ACATS and DragonEgg test suites. That said, it
remains behind a default-off flag until the last few pieces are in
place, and full testing can be done.
Specific areas I'm looking at next:
- Improved comments and some code cleanup from reviews.
- SSAUpdater and enabling this pass inside the CGSCC pass manager.
- Some datastructure tuning and compile-time measurements.
- More aggressive FCA splitting and vector formation.
Many thanks to Duncan Sands for the thorough final review, as well as
Benjamin Kramer for lots of review during the process of writing this
pass, and Daniel Berlin for reviewing the data structures and algorithms
and general theory of the pass. Also, several other people on IRC, over
lunch tables, etc for lots of feedback and advice.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@163883 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2012-09-14 09:22:59 +00:00
|
|
|
static cl::opt<bool> UseNewSROA("use-new-sroa",
|
2012-10-02 04:24:01 +00:00
|
|
|
cl::init(true), cl::Hidden,
|
Introduce a new SROA implementation.
This is essentially a ground up re-think of the SROA pass in LLVM. It
was initially inspired by a few problems with the existing pass:
- It is subject to the bane of my existence in optimizations: arbitrary
thresholds.
- It is overly conservative about which constructs can be split and
promoted.
- The vector value replacement aspect is separated from the splitting
logic, missing many opportunities where splitting and vector value
formation can work together.
- The splitting is entirely based around the underlying type of the
alloca, despite this type often having little to do with the reality
of how that memory is used. This is especially prevelant with unions
and base classes where we tail-pack derived members.
- When splitting fails (often due to the thresholds), the vector value
replacement (again because it is separate) can kick in for
preposterous cases where we simply should have split the value. This
results in forming i1024 and i2048 integer "bit vectors" that
tremendously slow down subsequnet IR optimizations (due to large
APInts) and impede the backend's lowering.
The new design takes an approach that fundamentally is not susceptible
to many of these problems. It is the result of a discusison between
myself and Duncan Sands over IRC about how to premptively avoid these
types of problems and how to do SROA in a more principled way. Since
then, it has evolved and grown, but this remains an important aspect: it
fixes real world problems with the SROA process today.
First, the transform of SROA actually has little to do with replacement.
It has more to do with splitting. The goal is to take an aggregate
alloca and form a composition of scalar allocas which can replace it and
will be most suitable to the eventual replacement by scalar SSA values.
The actual replacement is performed by mem2reg (and in the future
SSAUpdater).
The splitting is divided into four phases. The first phase is an
analysis of the uses of the alloca. This phase recursively walks uses,
building up a dense datastructure representing the ranges of the
alloca's memory actually used and checking for uses which inhibit any
aspects of the transform such as the escape of a pointer.
Once we have a mapping of the ranges of the alloca used by individual
operations, we compute a partitioning of the used ranges. Some uses are
inherently splittable (such as memcpy and memset), while scalar uses are
not splittable. The goal is to build a partitioning that has the minimum
number of splits while placing each unsplittable use in its own
partition. Overlapping unsplittable uses belong to the same partition.
This is the target split of the aggregate alloca, and it maximizes the
number of scalar accesses which become accesses to their own alloca and
candidates for promotion.
Third, we re-walk the uses of the alloca and assign each specific memory
access to all the partitions touched so that we have dense use-lists for
each partition.
Finally, we build a new, smaller alloca for each partition and rewrite
each use of that partition to use the new alloca. During this phase the
pass will also work very hard to transform uses of an alloca into a form
suitable for promotion, including forming vector operations, speculating
loads throguh PHI nodes and selects, etc.
After splitting is complete, each newly refined alloca that is
a candidate for promotion to a scalar SSA value is run through mem2reg.
There are lots of reasonably detailed comments in the source code about
the design and algorithms, and I'm going to be trying to improve them in
subsequent commits to ensure this is well documented, as the new pass is
in many ways more complex than the old one.
Some of this is still a WIP, but the current state is reasonbly stable.
It has passed bootstrap, the nightly test suite, and Duncan has run it
successfully through the ACATS and DragonEgg test suites. That said, it
remains behind a default-off flag until the last few pieces are in
place, and full testing can be done.
Specific areas I'm looking at next:
- Improved comments and some code cleanup from reviews.
- SSAUpdater and enabling this pass inside the CGSCC pass manager.
- Some datastructure tuning and compile-time measurements.
- More aggressive FCA splitting and vector formation.
Many thanks to Duncan Sands for the thorough final review, as well as
Benjamin Kramer for lots of review during the process of writing this
pass, and Daniel Berlin for reviewing the data structures and algorithms
and general theory of the pass. Also, several other people on IRC, over
lunch tables, etc for lots of feedback and advice.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@163883 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2012-09-14 09:22:59 +00:00
|
|
|
cl::desc("Enable the new, experimental SROA pass"));
|
|
|
|
|
2013-11-16 23:59:05 +00:00
|
|
|
static cl::opt<bool>
|
|
|
|
RunLoopRerolling("reroll-loops", cl::Hidden,
|
|
|
|
cl::desc("Run the loop rerolling pass"));
|
|
|
|
|
2014-05-29 01:55:07 +00:00
|
|
|
static cl::opt<bool> RunLoadCombine("combine-loads", cl::init(false),
|
|
|
|
cl::Hidden,
|
|
|
|
cl::desc("Run the load combining pass"));
|
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 12:56:19 +00:00
|
|
|
static cl::opt<bool>
|
|
|
|
RunSLPAfterLoopVectorization("run-slp-after-loop-vectorization",
|
2014-09-04 13:23:08 +00:00
|
|
|
cl::init(true), cl::Hidden,
|
2014-08-06 12:56:19 +00:00
|
|
|
cl::desc("Run the SLP vectorizer (and BB vectorizer) after the Loop "
|
|
|
|
"vectorizer instead of before"));
|
|
|
|
|
2014-09-02 22:12:54 +00:00
|
|
|
static cl::opt<bool> UseCFLAA("use-cfl-aa",
|
|
|
|
cl::init(false), cl::Hidden,
|
|
|
|
cl::desc("Enable the new, experimental CFL alias analysis"));
|
2014-08-06 12:56:19 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2014-09-10 19:55:29 +00:00
|
|
|
static cl::opt<bool>
|
2014-09-10 20:24:03 +00:00
|
|
|
EnableMLSM("mlsm", cl::init(true), cl::Hidden,
|
|
|
|
cl::desc("Enable motion of merged load and store"));
|
2014-09-10 19:55:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-03-06 10:11:25 +00:00
|
|
|
static cl::opt<bool> EnableLoopInterchange(
|
|
|
|
"enable-loopinterchange", cl::init(false), cl::Hidden,
|
|
|
|
cl::desc("Enable the new, experimental LoopInterchange Pass"));
|
|
|
|
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
PassManagerBuilder::PassManagerBuilder() {
|
|
|
|
OptLevel = 2;
|
|
|
|
SizeLevel = 0;
|
2014-04-25 05:29:35 +00:00
|
|
|
LibraryInfo = nullptr;
|
|
|
|
Inliner = nullptr;
|
2014-04-18 01:05:15 +00:00
|
|
|
DisableTailCalls = false;
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
DisableUnitAtATime = false;
|
|
|
|
DisableUnrollLoops = false;
|
2013-04-15 05:39:58 +00:00
|
|
|
BBVectorize = RunBBVectorization;
|
2013-04-15 04:54:42 +00:00
|
|
|
SLPVectorize = RunSLPVectorization;
|
2012-10-29 16:36:25 +00:00
|
|
|
LoopVectorize = RunLoopVectorization;
|
2013-11-17 16:02:50 +00:00
|
|
|
RerollLoops = RunLoopRerolling;
|
2014-05-29 01:55:07 +00:00
|
|
|
LoadCombine = RunLoadCombine;
|
2014-08-21 13:13:17 +00:00
|
|
|
DisableGVNLoadPRE = false;
|
2014-08-21 20:03:44 +00:00
|
|
|
VerifyInput = false;
|
|
|
|
VerifyOutput = false;
|
2014-09-13 21:46:00 +00:00
|
|
|
MergeFunctions = false;
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PassManagerBuilder::~PassManagerBuilder() {
|
|
|
|
delete LibraryInfo;
|
|
|
|
delete Inliner;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2011-08-16 13:58:41 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Set of global extensions, automatically added as part of the standard set.
|
|
|
|
static ManagedStatic<SmallVector<std::pair<PassManagerBuilder::ExtensionPointTy,
|
|
|
|
PassManagerBuilder::ExtensionFn>, 8> > GlobalExtensions;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void PassManagerBuilder::addGlobalExtension(
|
|
|
|
PassManagerBuilder::ExtensionPointTy Ty,
|
|
|
|
PassManagerBuilder::ExtensionFn Fn) {
|
|
|
|
GlobalExtensions->push_back(std::make_pair(Ty, Fn));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
void PassManagerBuilder::addExtension(ExtensionPointTy Ty, ExtensionFn Fn) {
|
|
|
|
Extensions.push_back(std::make_pair(Ty, Fn));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void PassManagerBuilder::addExtensionsToPM(ExtensionPointTy ETy,
|
2015-02-13 10:01:29 +00:00
|
|
|
legacy::PassManagerBase &PM) const {
|
2011-08-16 13:58:41 +00:00
|
|
|
for (unsigned i = 0, e = GlobalExtensions->size(); i != e; ++i)
|
|
|
|
if ((*GlobalExtensions)[i].first == ETy)
|
|
|
|
(*GlobalExtensions)[i].second(*this, PM);
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
for (unsigned i = 0, e = Extensions.size(); i != e; ++i)
|
|
|
|
if (Extensions[i].first == ETy)
|
|
|
|
Extensions[i].second(*this, PM);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-13 10:01:29 +00:00
|
|
|
void PassManagerBuilder::addInitialAliasAnalysisPasses(
|
|
|
|
legacy::PassManagerBase &PM) const {
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
// Add TypeBasedAliasAnalysis before BasicAliasAnalysis so that
|
|
|
|
// BasicAliasAnalysis wins if they disagree. This is intended to help
|
|
|
|
// support "obvious" type-punning idioms.
|
2014-09-02 22:12:54 +00:00
|
|
|
if (UseCFLAA)
|
|
|
|
PM.add(createCFLAliasAnalysisPass());
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
PM.add(createTypeBasedAliasAnalysisPass());
|
Add scoped-noalias metadata
This commit adds scoped noalias metadata. The primary motivations for this
feature are:
1. To preserve noalias function attribute information when inlining
2. To provide the ability to model block-scope C99 restrict pointers
Neither of these two abilities are added here, only the necessary
infrastructure. In fact, there should be no change to existing functionality,
only the addition of new features. The logic that converts noalias function
parameters into this metadata during inlining will come in a follow-up commit.
What is added here is the ability to generally specify noalias memory-access
sets. Regarding the metadata, alias-analysis scopes are defined similar to TBAA
nodes:
!scope0 = metadata !{ metadata !"scope of foo()" }
!scope1 = metadata !{ metadata !"scope 1", metadata !scope0 }
!scope2 = metadata !{ metadata !"scope 2", metadata !scope0 }
!scope3 = metadata !{ metadata !"scope 2.1", metadata !scope2 }
!scope4 = metadata !{ metadata !"scope 2.2", metadata !scope2 }
Loads and stores can be tagged with an alias-analysis scope, and also, with a
noalias tag for a specific scope:
... = load %ptr1, !alias.scope !{ !scope1 }
... = load %ptr2, !alias.scope !{ !scope1, !scope2 }, !noalias !{ !scope1 }
When evaluating an aliasing query, if one of the instructions is associated
with an alias.scope id that is identical to the noalias scope associated with
the other instruction, or is a descendant (in the scope hierarchy) of the
noalias scope associated with the other instruction, then the two memory
accesses are assumed not to alias.
Note that is the first element of the scope metadata is a string, then it can
be combined accross functions and translation units. The string can be replaced
by a self-reference to create globally unqiue scope identifiers.
[Note: This overview is slightly stylized, since the metadata nodes really need
to just be numbers (!0 instead of !scope0), and the scope lists are also global
unnamed metadata.]
Existing noalias metadata in a callee is "cloned" for use by the inlined code.
This is necessary because the aliasing scopes are unique to each call site
(because of possible control dependencies on the aliasing properties). For
example, consider a function: foo(noalias a, noalias b) { *a = *b; } that gets
inlined into bar() { ... if (...) foo(a1, b1); ... if (...) foo(a2, b2); } --
now just because we know that a1 does not alias with b1 at the first call site,
and a2 does not alias with b2 at the second call site, we cannot let inlining
these functons have the metadata imply that a1 does not alias with b2.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@213864 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-07-24 14:25:39 +00:00
|
|
|
PM.add(createScopedNoAliasAAPass());
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
PM.add(createBasicAliasAnalysisPass());
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-13 10:01:29 +00:00
|
|
|
void PassManagerBuilder::populateFunctionPassManager(
|
|
|
|
legacy::FunctionPassManager &FPM) {
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
addExtensionsToPM(EP_EarlyAsPossible, FPM);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Add LibraryInfo if we have some.
|
2015-01-15 10:41:28 +00:00
|
|
|
if (LibraryInfo)
|
|
|
|
FPM.add(new TargetLibraryInfoWrapperPass(*LibraryInfo));
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (OptLevel == 0) return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
addInitialAliasAnalysisPasses(FPM);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FPM.add(createCFGSimplificationPass());
|
Introduce a new SROA implementation.
This is essentially a ground up re-think of the SROA pass in LLVM. It
was initially inspired by a few problems with the existing pass:
- It is subject to the bane of my existence in optimizations: arbitrary
thresholds.
- It is overly conservative about which constructs can be split and
promoted.
- The vector value replacement aspect is separated from the splitting
logic, missing many opportunities where splitting and vector value
formation can work together.
- The splitting is entirely based around the underlying type of the
alloca, despite this type often having little to do with the reality
of how that memory is used. This is especially prevelant with unions
and base classes where we tail-pack derived members.
- When splitting fails (often due to the thresholds), the vector value
replacement (again because it is separate) can kick in for
preposterous cases where we simply should have split the value. This
results in forming i1024 and i2048 integer "bit vectors" that
tremendously slow down subsequnet IR optimizations (due to large
APInts) and impede the backend's lowering.
The new design takes an approach that fundamentally is not susceptible
to many of these problems. It is the result of a discusison between
myself and Duncan Sands over IRC about how to premptively avoid these
types of problems and how to do SROA in a more principled way. Since
then, it has evolved and grown, but this remains an important aspect: it
fixes real world problems with the SROA process today.
First, the transform of SROA actually has little to do with replacement.
It has more to do with splitting. The goal is to take an aggregate
alloca and form a composition of scalar allocas which can replace it and
will be most suitable to the eventual replacement by scalar SSA values.
The actual replacement is performed by mem2reg (and in the future
SSAUpdater).
The splitting is divided into four phases. The first phase is an
analysis of the uses of the alloca. This phase recursively walks uses,
building up a dense datastructure representing the ranges of the
alloca's memory actually used and checking for uses which inhibit any
aspects of the transform such as the escape of a pointer.
Once we have a mapping of the ranges of the alloca used by individual
operations, we compute a partitioning of the used ranges. Some uses are
inherently splittable (such as memcpy and memset), while scalar uses are
not splittable. The goal is to build a partitioning that has the minimum
number of splits while placing each unsplittable use in its own
partition. Overlapping unsplittable uses belong to the same partition.
This is the target split of the aggregate alloca, and it maximizes the
number of scalar accesses which become accesses to their own alloca and
candidates for promotion.
Third, we re-walk the uses of the alloca and assign each specific memory
access to all the partitions touched so that we have dense use-lists for
each partition.
Finally, we build a new, smaller alloca for each partition and rewrite
each use of that partition to use the new alloca. During this phase the
pass will also work very hard to transform uses of an alloca into a form
suitable for promotion, including forming vector operations, speculating
loads throguh PHI nodes and selects, etc.
After splitting is complete, each newly refined alloca that is
a candidate for promotion to a scalar SSA value is run through mem2reg.
There are lots of reasonably detailed comments in the source code about
the design and algorithms, and I'm going to be trying to improve them in
subsequent commits to ensure this is well documented, as the new pass is
in many ways more complex than the old one.
Some of this is still a WIP, but the current state is reasonbly stable.
It has passed bootstrap, the nightly test suite, and Duncan has run it
successfully through the ACATS and DragonEgg test suites. That said, it
remains behind a default-off flag until the last few pieces are in
place, and full testing can be done.
Specific areas I'm looking at next:
- Improved comments and some code cleanup from reviews.
- SSAUpdater and enabling this pass inside the CGSCC pass manager.
- Some datastructure tuning and compile-time measurements.
- More aggressive FCA splitting and vector formation.
Many thanks to Duncan Sands for the thorough final review, as well as
Benjamin Kramer for lots of review during the process of writing this
pass, and Daniel Berlin for reviewing the data structures and algorithms
and general theory of the pass. Also, several other people on IRC, over
lunch tables, etc for lots of feedback and advice.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@163883 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2012-09-14 09:22:59 +00:00
|
|
|
if (UseNewSROA)
|
|
|
|
FPM.add(createSROAPass());
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
FPM.add(createScalarReplAggregatesPass());
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
FPM.add(createEarlyCSEPass());
|
|
|
|
FPM.add(createLowerExpectIntrinsicPass());
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-13 10:01:29 +00:00
|
|
|
void PassManagerBuilder::populateModulePassManager(
|
|
|
|
legacy::PassManagerBase &MPM) {
|
2014-10-23 23:49:31 +00:00
|
|
|
// If all optimizations are disabled, just run the always-inline pass and,
|
|
|
|
// if enabled, the function merging pass.
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
if (OptLevel == 0) {
|
|
|
|
if (Inliner) {
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(Inliner);
|
2014-04-25 05:29:35 +00:00
|
|
|
Inliner = nullptr;
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
Introduce a BarrierNoop pass, a hack designed to allow *some* control
over the implicitly-formed-and-nesting CGSCC pass manager and function
pass managers, especially when using them on the opt commandline or
using extension points in the module builder. The '-barrier' opt flag
(or the pass itself) will create a no-op module pass in the pipeline,
resetting the pass manager stack, and allowing the creation of a new
pipeline of function passes or CGSCC passes to be created that is
independent from any previous pipelines.
For example, this can be used to test running two CGSCC passes in
independent CGSCC pass managers as opposed to in the same CGSCC pass
manager. It also allows us to introduce a further hack into the
PassManagerBuilder to separate the O0 pipeline extension passes from the
always-inliner's CGSCC pass manager, which they likely do not want to
participate in... At the very least none of the Sanitizer passes want
this behavior.
This fixes a bug with ASan at O0 currently, and I'll commit the ASan
test which covers this pass. I'm happy to add a test case that this pass
exists and works, but not sure how much time folks would like me to
spend adding test cases for the details of its behavior of partition
pass managers.... The whole thing is just vile, and mostly intended to
unblock ASan, so I'm hoping to rip this all out in a brave new pass
manager world.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@166172 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2012-10-18 08:05:46 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2014-10-23 23:49:31 +00:00
|
|
|
// FIXME: The BarrierNoopPass is a HACK! The inliner pass above implicitly
|
|
|
|
// creates a CGSCC pass manager, but we don't want to add extensions into
|
|
|
|
// that pass manager. To prevent this we insert a no-op module pass to reset
|
|
|
|
// the pass manager to get the same behavior as EP_OptimizerLast in non-O0
|
|
|
|
// builds. The function merging pass is
|
|
|
|
if (MergeFunctions)
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createMergeFunctionsPass());
|
|
|
|
else if (!GlobalExtensions->empty() || !Extensions.empty())
|
Introduce a BarrierNoop pass, a hack designed to allow *some* control
over the implicitly-formed-and-nesting CGSCC pass manager and function
pass managers, especially when using them on the opt commandline or
using extension points in the module builder. The '-barrier' opt flag
(or the pass itself) will create a no-op module pass in the pipeline,
resetting the pass manager stack, and allowing the creation of a new
pipeline of function passes or CGSCC passes to be created that is
independent from any previous pipelines.
For example, this can be used to test running two CGSCC passes in
independent CGSCC pass managers as opposed to in the same CGSCC pass
manager. It also allows us to introduce a further hack into the
PassManagerBuilder to separate the O0 pipeline extension passes from the
always-inliner's CGSCC pass manager, which they likely do not want to
participate in... At the very least none of the Sanitizer passes want
this behavior.
This fixes a bug with ASan at O0 currently, and I'll commit the ASan
test which covers this pass. I'm happy to add a test case that this pass
exists and works, but not sure how much time folks would like me to
spend adding test cases for the details of its behavior of partition
pass managers.... The whole thing is just vile, and mostly intended to
unblock ASan, so I'm hoping to rip this all out in a brave new pass
manager world.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@166172 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2012-10-18 08:05:46 +00:00
|
|
|
MPM.add(createBarrierNoopPass());
|
|
|
|
|
2011-11-30 22:19:26 +00:00
|
|
|
addExtensionsToPM(EP_EnabledOnOptLevel0, MPM);
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Add LibraryInfo if we have some.
|
2015-01-15 10:41:28 +00:00
|
|
|
if (LibraryInfo)
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(new TargetLibraryInfoWrapperPass(*LibraryInfo));
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
addInitialAliasAnalysisPasses(MPM);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!DisableUnitAtATime) {
|
2012-01-17 20:51:32 +00:00
|
|
|
addExtensionsToPM(EP_ModuleOptimizerEarly, MPM);
|
|
|
|
|
2014-07-03 19:28:15 +00:00
|
|
|
MPM.add(createIPSCCPPass()); // IP SCCP
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
MPM.add(createGlobalOptimizerPass()); // Optimize out global vars
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createDeadArgEliminationPass()); // Dead argument elimination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createInstructionCombiningPass());// Clean up after IPCP & DAE
|
2014-05-25 10:27:02 +00:00
|
|
|
addExtensionsToPM(EP_Peephole, MPM);
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
MPM.add(createCFGSimplificationPass()); // Clean up after IPCP & DAE
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Start of CallGraph SCC passes.
|
|
|
|
if (!DisableUnitAtATime)
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createPruneEHPass()); // Remove dead EH info
|
|
|
|
if (Inliner) {
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(Inliner);
|
2014-04-25 05:29:35 +00:00
|
|
|
Inliner = nullptr;
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (!DisableUnitAtATime)
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createFunctionAttrsPass()); // Set readonly/readnone attrs
|
|
|
|
if (OptLevel > 2)
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createArgumentPromotionPass()); // Scalarize uninlined fn args
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Start of function pass.
|
|
|
|
// Break up aggregate allocas, using SSAUpdater.
|
2012-09-15 11:43:14 +00:00
|
|
|
if (UseNewSROA)
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createSROAPass(/*RequiresDomTree*/ false));
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createScalarReplAggregatesPass(-1, false));
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
MPM.add(createEarlyCSEPass()); // Catch trivial redundancies
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createJumpThreadingPass()); // Thread jumps.
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createCorrelatedValuePropagationPass()); // Propagate conditionals
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createCFGSimplificationPass()); // Merge & remove BBs
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createInstructionCombiningPass()); // Combine silly seq's
|
2014-05-25 10:27:02 +00:00
|
|
|
addExtensionsToPM(EP_Peephole, MPM);
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2014-04-18 01:05:15 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!DisableTailCalls)
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createTailCallEliminationPass()); // Eliminate tail calls
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
MPM.add(createCFGSimplificationPass()); // Merge & remove BBs
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createReassociatePass()); // Reassociate expressions
|
2014-11-21 19:53:24 +00:00
|
|
|
// Rotate Loop - disable header duplication at -Oz
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createLoopRotatePass(SizeLevel == 2 ? 0 : -1));
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
MPM.add(createLICMPass()); // Hoist loop invariants
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createLoopUnswitchPass(SizeLevel || OptLevel < 3));
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createInstructionCombiningPass());
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createIndVarSimplifyPass()); // Canonicalize indvars
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createLoopIdiomPass()); // Recognize idioms like memset.
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createLoopDeletionPass()); // Delete dead loops
|
2015-03-06 10:11:25 +00:00
|
|
|
if (EnableLoopInterchange)
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createLoopInterchangePass()); // Interchange loops
|
2012-10-17 18:25:06 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!DisableUnrollLoops)
|
2014-03-31 23:23:51 +00:00
|
|
|
MPM.add(createSimpleLoopUnrollPass()); // Unroll small loops
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
addExtensionsToPM(EP_LoopOptimizerEnd, MPM);
|
|
|
|
|
2014-07-18 19:13:09 +00:00
|
|
|
if (OptLevel > 1) {
|
2014-09-10 19:55:29 +00:00
|
|
|
if (EnableMLSM)
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createMergedLoadStoreMotionPass()); // Merge ld/st in diamonds
|
2014-08-21 13:13:17 +00:00
|
|
|
MPM.add(createGVNPass(DisableGVNLoadPRE)); // Remove redundancies
|
2014-07-18 19:13:09 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
MPM.add(createMemCpyOptPass()); // Remove memcpy / form memset
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createSCCPPass()); // Constant prop with SCCP
|
|
|
|
|
[BDCE] Add a bit-tracking DCE pass
BDCE is a bit-tracking dead code elimination pass. It is based on ADCE (the
"aggressive DCE" pass), with the added capability to track dead bits of integer
valued instructions and remove those instructions when all of the bits are
dead.
Currently, it does not actually do this all-bits-dead removal, but rather
replaces the instruction's uses with a constant zero, and lets instcombine (and
the later run of ADCE) do the rest. Because we essentially get a run of ADCE
"for free" while tracking the dead bits, we also do what ADCE does and removes
actually-dead instructions as well (this includes instructions newly trivially
dead because all bits were dead, but not all such instructions can be removed).
The motivation for this is a case like:
int __attribute__((const)) foo(int i);
int bar(int x) {
x |= (4 & foo(5));
x |= (8 & foo(3));
x |= (16 & foo(2));
x |= (32 & foo(1));
x |= (64 & foo(0));
x |= (128& foo(4));
return x >> 4;
}
As it turns out, if you order the bit-field insertions so that all of the dead
ones come last, then instcombine will remove them. However, if you pick some
other order (such as the one above), the fact that some of the calls to foo()
are useless is not locally obvious, and we don't remove them (without this
pass).
I did a quick compile-time overhead check using sqlite from the test suite
(Release+Asserts). BDCE took ~0.4% of the compilation time (making it about
twice as expensive as ADCE).
I've not looked at why yet, but we eliminate instructions due to having
all-dead bits in:
External/SPEC/CFP2006/447.dealII/447.dealII
External/SPEC/CINT2006/400.perlbench/400.perlbench
External/SPEC/CINT2006/403.gcc/403.gcc
MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
MultiSource/Benchmarks/7zip/7zip-benchmark
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@229462 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-02-17 01:36:59 +00:00
|
|
|
// Delete dead bit computations (instcombine runs after to fold away the dead
|
|
|
|
// computations, and then ADCE will run later to exploit any new DCE
|
|
|
|
// opportunities that creates).
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createBitTrackingDCEPass()); // Delete dead bit computations
|
|
|
|
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
// Run instcombine after redundancy elimination to exploit opportunities
|
|
|
|
// opened up by them.
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createInstructionCombiningPass());
|
2014-05-25 10:27:02 +00:00
|
|
|
addExtensionsToPM(EP_Peephole, MPM);
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
MPM.add(createJumpThreadingPass()); // Thread jumps
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createCorrelatedValuePropagationPass());
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createDeadStoreEliminationPass()); // Delete dead stores
|
2015-02-16 18:59:54 +00:00
|
|
|
MPM.add(createLICMPass());
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
addExtensionsToPM(EP_ScalarOptimizerLate, MPM);
|
|
|
|
|
2013-11-17 16:02:50 +00:00
|
|
|
if (RerollLoops)
|
2013-11-16 23:59:05 +00:00
|
|
|
MPM.add(createLoopRerollPass());
|
2014-08-06 12:56:19 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!RunSLPAfterLoopVectorization) {
|
|
|
|
if (SLPVectorize)
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createSLPVectorizerPass()); // Vectorize parallel scalar chains.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (BBVectorize) {
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createBBVectorizePass());
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createInstructionCombiningPass());
|
|
|
|
addExtensionsToPM(EP_Peephole, MPM);
|
|
|
|
if (OptLevel > 1 && UseGVNAfterVectorization)
|
2014-08-21 13:13:17 +00:00
|
|
|
MPM.add(createGVNPass(DisableGVNLoadPRE)); // Remove redundancies
|
2014-08-06 12:56:19 +00:00
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createEarlyCSEPass()); // Catch trivial redundancies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// BBVectorize may have significantly shortened a loop body; unroll again.
|
|
|
|
if (!DisableUnrollLoops)
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createLoopUnrollPass());
|
|
|
|
}
|
2012-02-01 03:51:43 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-05-29 01:55:07 +00:00
|
|
|
if (LoadCombine)
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createLoadCombinePass());
|
|
|
|
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
MPM.add(createAggressiveDCEPass()); // Delete dead instructions
|
2013-08-06 02:43:45 +00:00
|
|
|
MPM.add(createCFGSimplificationPass()); // Merge & remove BBs
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
MPM.add(createInstructionCombiningPass()); // Clean up after everything.
|
2014-05-25 10:27:02 +00:00
|
|
|
addExtensionsToPM(EP_Peephole, MPM);
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2013-12-05 21:20:02 +00:00
|
|
|
// FIXME: This is a HACK! The inliner pass above implicitly creates a CGSCC
|
|
|
|
// pass manager that we are specifically trying to avoid. To prevent this
|
|
|
|
// we must insert a no-op module pass to reset the pass manager.
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createBarrierNoopPass());
|
2014-10-14 00:31:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Re-rotate loops in all our loop nests. These may have fallout out of
|
|
|
|
// rotated form due to GVN or other transformations, and the vectorizer relies
|
|
|
|
// on the rotated form.
|
2015-03-10 19:07:41 +00:00
|
|
|
MPM.add(createLoopRotatePass());
|
2014-10-14 00:31:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2013-12-05 21:20:02 +00:00
|
|
|
MPM.add(createLoopVectorizePass(DisableUnrollLoops, LoopVectorize));
|
|
|
|
// FIXME: Because of #pragma vectorize enable, the passes below are always
|
|
|
|
// inserted in the pipeline, even when the vectorizer doesn't run (ex. when
|
|
|
|
// on -O1 and no #pragma is found). Would be good to have these two passes
|
|
|
|
// as function calls, so that we can only pass them when the vectorizer
|
|
|
|
// changed the code.
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createInstructionCombiningPass());
|
2014-10-14 00:31:29 +00:00
|
|
|
if (OptLevel > 1 && ExtraVectorizerPasses) {
|
|
|
|
// At higher optimization levels, try to clean up any runtime overlap and
|
|
|
|
// alignment checks inserted by the vectorizer. We want to track correllated
|
|
|
|
// runtime checks for two inner loops in the same outer loop, fold any
|
|
|
|
// common computations, hoist loop-invariant aspects out of any outer loop,
|
|
|
|
// and unswitch the runtime checks if possible. Once hoisted, we may have
|
|
|
|
// dead (or speculatable) control flows or more combining opportunities.
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createEarlyCSEPass());
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createCorrelatedValuePropagationPass());
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createInstructionCombiningPass());
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createLICMPass());
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createLoopUnswitchPass(SizeLevel || OptLevel < 3));
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createCFGSimplificationPass());
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createInstructionCombiningPass());
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-08-06 12:56:19 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (RunSLPAfterLoopVectorization) {
|
2014-10-14 00:31:29 +00:00
|
|
|
if (SLPVectorize) {
|
2014-08-06 12:56:19 +00:00
|
|
|
MPM.add(createSLPVectorizerPass()); // Vectorize parallel scalar chains.
|
2014-10-14 00:31:29 +00:00
|
|
|
if (OptLevel > 1 && ExtraVectorizerPasses) {
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createEarlyCSEPass());
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-08-06 12:56:19 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (BBVectorize) {
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createBBVectorizePass());
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createInstructionCombiningPass());
|
|
|
|
addExtensionsToPM(EP_Peephole, MPM);
|
|
|
|
if (OptLevel > 1 && UseGVNAfterVectorization)
|
2014-08-21 13:13:17 +00:00
|
|
|
MPM.add(createGVNPass(DisableGVNLoadPRE)); // Remove redundancies
|
2014-08-06 12:56:19 +00:00
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createEarlyCSEPass()); // Catch trivial redundancies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// BBVectorize may have significantly shortened a loop body; unroll again.
|
|
|
|
if (!DisableUnrollLoops)
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createLoopUnrollPass());
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-05-25 10:27:02 +00:00
|
|
|
addExtensionsToPM(EP_Peephole, MPM);
|
2013-12-05 21:20:02 +00:00
|
|
|
MPM.add(createCFGSimplificationPass());
|
2014-10-14 00:31:29 +00:00
|
|
|
MPM.add(createInstructionCombiningPass());
|
2013-06-24 07:21:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-03-12 05:36:01 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!DisableUnrollLoops) {
|
2014-03-31 23:23:51 +00:00
|
|
|
MPM.add(createLoopUnrollPass()); // Unroll small loops
|
|
|
|
|
2015-03-12 05:36:01 +00:00
|
|
|
// This is a barrier pass to avoid combine LICM pass and loop unroll pass
|
|
|
|
// within same loop pass manager.
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createInstructionSimplifierPass());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Runtime unrolling will introduce runtime check in loop prologue. If the
|
|
|
|
// unrolled loop is a inner loop, then the prologue will be inside the
|
|
|
|
// outer loop. LICM pass can help to promote the runtime check out if the
|
|
|
|
// checked value is loop invariant.
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createLICMPass());
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-09-07 20:05:11 +00:00
|
|
|
// After vectorization and unrolling, assume intrinsics may tell us more
|
|
|
|
// about pointer alignments.
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createAlignmentFromAssumptionsPass());
|
|
|
|
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!DisableUnitAtATime) {
|
|
|
|
// FIXME: We shouldn't bother with this anymore.
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createStripDeadPrototypesPass()); // Get rid of dead prototypes
|
|
|
|
|
2012-09-28 21:23:26 +00:00
|
|
|
// GlobalOpt already deletes dead functions and globals, at -O2 try a
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
// late pass of GlobalDCE. It is capable of deleting dead cycles.
|
2012-09-28 21:23:26 +00:00
|
|
|
if (OptLevel > 1) {
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
MPM.add(createGlobalDCEPass()); // Remove dead fns and globals.
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createConstantMergePass()); // Merge dup global constants
|
2012-09-28 21:23:26 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2014-09-13 21:46:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (MergeFunctions)
|
|
|
|
MPM.add(createMergeFunctionsPass());
|
|
|
|
|
2012-03-23 23:22:59 +00:00
|
|
|
addExtensionsToPM(EP_OptimizerLast, MPM);
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-13 10:01:29 +00:00
|
|
|
void PassManagerBuilder::addLTOOptimizationPasses(legacy::PassManagerBase &PM) {
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
// Provide AliasAnalysis services for optimizations.
|
|
|
|
addInitialAliasAnalysisPasses(PM);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Propagate constants at call sites into the functions they call. This
|
|
|
|
// opens opportunities for globalopt (and inlining) by substituting function
|
|
|
|
// pointers passed as arguments to direct uses of functions.
|
|
|
|
PM.add(createIPSCCPPass());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now that we internalized some globals, see if we can hack on them!
|
|
|
|
PM.add(createGlobalOptimizerPass());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Linking modules together can lead to duplicated global constants, only
|
|
|
|
// keep one copy of each constant.
|
|
|
|
PM.add(createConstantMergePass());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Remove unused arguments from functions.
|
|
|
|
PM.add(createDeadArgEliminationPass());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Reduce the code after globalopt and ipsccp. Both can open up significant
|
|
|
|
// simplification opportunities, and both can propagate functions through
|
|
|
|
// function pointers. When this happens, we often have to resolve varargs
|
|
|
|
// calls, etc, so let instcombine do this.
|
|
|
|
PM.add(createInstructionCombiningPass());
|
2014-05-25 10:27:02 +00:00
|
|
|
addExtensionsToPM(EP_Peephole, PM);
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Inline small functions
|
2014-08-21 13:35:30 +00:00
|
|
|
bool RunInliner = Inliner;
|
|
|
|
if (RunInliner) {
|
|
|
|
PM.add(Inliner);
|
|
|
|
Inliner = nullptr;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PM.add(createPruneEHPass()); // Remove dead EH info.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Optimize globals again if we ran the inliner.
|
|
|
|
if (RunInliner)
|
|
|
|
PM.add(createGlobalOptimizerPass());
|
|
|
|
PM.add(createGlobalDCEPass()); // Remove dead functions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// If we didn't decide to inline a function, check to see if we can
|
|
|
|
// transform it to pass arguments by value instead of by reference.
|
|
|
|
PM.add(createArgumentPromotionPass());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// The IPO passes may leave cruft around. Clean up after them.
|
|
|
|
PM.add(createInstructionCombiningPass());
|
2014-05-25 10:27:02 +00:00
|
|
|
addExtensionsToPM(EP_Peephole, PM);
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
PM.add(createJumpThreadingPass());
|
2013-08-30 00:48:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
// Break up allocas
|
Introduce a new SROA implementation.
This is essentially a ground up re-think of the SROA pass in LLVM. It
was initially inspired by a few problems with the existing pass:
- It is subject to the bane of my existence in optimizations: arbitrary
thresholds.
- It is overly conservative about which constructs can be split and
promoted.
- The vector value replacement aspect is separated from the splitting
logic, missing many opportunities where splitting and vector value
formation can work together.
- The splitting is entirely based around the underlying type of the
alloca, despite this type often having little to do with the reality
of how that memory is used. This is especially prevelant with unions
and base classes where we tail-pack derived members.
- When splitting fails (often due to the thresholds), the vector value
replacement (again because it is separate) can kick in for
preposterous cases where we simply should have split the value. This
results in forming i1024 and i2048 integer "bit vectors" that
tremendously slow down subsequnet IR optimizations (due to large
APInts) and impede the backend's lowering.
The new design takes an approach that fundamentally is not susceptible
to many of these problems. It is the result of a discusison between
myself and Duncan Sands over IRC about how to premptively avoid these
types of problems and how to do SROA in a more principled way. Since
then, it has evolved and grown, but this remains an important aspect: it
fixes real world problems with the SROA process today.
First, the transform of SROA actually has little to do with replacement.
It has more to do with splitting. The goal is to take an aggregate
alloca and form a composition of scalar allocas which can replace it and
will be most suitable to the eventual replacement by scalar SSA values.
The actual replacement is performed by mem2reg (and in the future
SSAUpdater).
The splitting is divided into four phases. The first phase is an
analysis of the uses of the alloca. This phase recursively walks uses,
building up a dense datastructure representing the ranges of the
alloca's memory actually used and checking for uses which inhibit any
aspects of the transform such as the escape of a pointer.
Once we have a mapping of the ranges of the alloca used by individual
operations, we compute a partitioning of the used ranges. Some uses are
inherently splittable (such as memcpy and memset), while scalar uses are
not splittable. The goal is to build a partitioning that has the minimum
number of splits while placing each unsplittable use in its own
partition. Overlapping unsplittable uses belong to the same partition.
This is the target split of the aggregate alloca, and it maximizes the
number of scalar accesses which become accesses to their own alloca and
candidates for promotion.
Third, we re-walk the uses of the alloca and assign each specific memory
access to all the partitions touched so that we have dense use-lists for
each partition.
Finally, we build a new, smaller alloca for each partition and rewrite
each use of that partition to use the new alloca. During this phase the
pass will also work very hard to transform uses of an alloca into a form
suitable for promotion, including forming vector operations, speculating
loads throguh PHI nodes and selects, etc.
After splitting is complete, each newly refined alloca that is
a candidate for promotion to a scalar SSA value is run through mem2reg.
There are lots of reasonably detailed comments in the source code about
the design and algorithms, and I'm going to be trying to improve them in
subsequent commits to ensure this is well documented, as the new pass is
in many ways more complex than the old one.
Some of this is still a WIP, but the current state is reasonbly stable.
It has passed bootstrap, the nightly test suite, and Duncan has run it
successfully through the ACATS and DragonEgg test suites. That said, it
remains behind a default-off flag until the last few pieces are in
place, and full testing can be done.
Specific areas I'm looking at next:
- Improved comments and some code cleanup from reviews.
- SSAUpdater and enabling this pass inside the CGSCC pass manager.
- Some datastructure tuning and compile-time measurements.
- More aggressive FCA splitting and vector formation.
Many thanks to Duncan Sands for the thorough final review, as well as
Benjamin Kramer for lots of review during the process of writing this
pass, and Daniel Berlin for reviewing the data structures and algorithms
and general theory of the pass. Also, several other people on IRC, over
lunch tables, etc for lots of feedback and advice.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@163883 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2012-09-14 09:22:59 +00:00
|
|
|
if (UseNewSROA)
|
|
|
|
PM.add(createSROAPass());
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
PM.add(createScalarReplAggregatesPass());
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Run a few AA driven optimizations here and now, to cleanup the code.
|
|
|
|
PM.add(createFunctionAttrsPass()); // Add nocapture.
|
|
|
|
PM.add(createGlobalsModRefPass()); // IP alias analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
2012-04-02 22:16:50 +00:00
|
|
|
PM.add(createLICMPass()); // Hoist loop invariants.
|
2014-09-10 19:55:29 +00:00
|
|
|
if (EnableMLSM)
|
|
|
|
PM.add(createMergedLoadStoreMotionPass()); // Merge ld/st in diamonds.
|
2012-04-02 22:16:50 +00:00
|
|
|
PM.add(createGVNPass(DisableGVNLoadPRE)); // Remove redundancies.
|
|
|
|
PM.add(createMemCpyOptPass()); // Remove dead memcpys.
|
2013-08-30 00:48:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
// Nuke dead stores.
|
|
|
|
PM.add(createDeadStoreEliminationPass());
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-15 17:48:15 +00:00
|
|
|
// More loops are countable; try to optimize them.
|
|
|
|
PM.add(createIndVarSimplifyPass());
|
|
|
|
PM.add(createLoopDeletionPass());
|
2015-03-06 10:11:25 +00:00
|
|
|
if (EnableLoopInterchange)
|
|
|
|
PM.add(createLoopInterchangePass());
|
|
|
|
|
2014-10-26 21:50:58 +00:00
|
|
|
PM.add(createLoopVectorizePass(true, LoopVectorize));
|
2014-02-24 18:19:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2014-05-05 23:14:46 +00:00
|
|
|
// More scalar chains could be vectorized due to more alias information
|
2014-10-21 23:18:21 +00:00
|
|
|
if (RunSLPAfterLoopVectorization)
|
|
|
|
if (SLPVectorize)
|
|
|
|
PM.add(createSLPVectorizerPass()); // Vectorize parallel scalar chains.
|
2014-05-05 23:14:46 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2014-09-07 20:05:11 +00:00
|
|
|
// After vectorization, assume intrinsics may tell us more about pointer
|
|
|
|
// alignments.
|
|
|
|
PM.add(createAlignmentFromAssumptionsPass());
|
|
|
|
|
2014-05-29 01:55:07 +00:00
|
|
|
if (LoadCombine)
|
|
|
|
PM.add(createLoadCombinePass());
|
|
|
|
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
// Cleanup and simplify the code after the scalar optimizations.
|
|
|
|
PM.add(createInstructionCombiningPass());
|
2014-05-25 10:27:02 +00:00
|
|
|
addExtensionsToPM(EP_Peephole, PM);
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PM.add(createJumpThreadingPass());
|
2015-03-19 22:01:00 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-03-19 22:01:00 +00:00
|
|
|
void PassManagerBuilder::addLateLTOOptimizationPasses(
|
|
|
|
legacy::PassManagerBase &PM) {
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
// Delete basic blocks, which optimization passes may have killed.
|
2013-08-06 02:43:45 +00:00
|
|
|
PM.add(createCFGSimplificationPass());
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now that we have optimized the program, discard unreachable functions.
|
|
|
|
PM.add(createGlobalDCEPass());
|
2014-09-13 21:46:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// FIXME: this is profitable (for compiler time) to do at -O0 too, but
|
|
|
|
// currently it damages debug info.
|
|
|
|
if (MergeFunctions)
|
|
|
|
PM.add(createMergeFunctionsPass());
|
2011-08-02 21:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2011-08-09 22:17:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-13 10:01:29 +00:00
|
|
|
void PassManagerBuilder::populateLTOPassManager(legacy::PassManagerBase &PM) {
|
2014-08-21 20:03:44 +00:00
|
|
|
if (LibraryInfo)
|
2015-01-15 10:41:28 +00:00
|
|
|
PM.add(new TargetLibraryInfoWrapperPass(*LibraryInfo));
|
2014-08-21 20:03:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-03-19 22:24:17 +00:00
|
|
|
if (VerifyInput)
|
2014-08-21 20:03:44 +00:00
|
|
|
PM.add(createVerifierPass());
|
|
|
|
|
2015-03-19 22:01:00 +00:00
|
|
|
if (OptLevel > 1)
|
2014-08-21 20:03:44 +00:00
|
|
|
addLTOOptimizationPasses(PM);
|
|
|
|
|
2015-03-19 22:01:00 +00:00
|
|
|
// Lower bit sets to globals. This pass supports Clang's control flow
|
|
|
|
// integrity mechanisms (-fsanitize=cfi*) and needs to run at link time if CFI
|
|
|
|
// is enabled. The pass does nothing if CFI is disabled.
|
|
|
|
PM.add(createLowerBitSetsPass());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (OptLevel != 0)
|
|
|
|
addLateLTOOptimizationPasses(PM);
|
|
|
|
|
2015-03-19 22:24:17 +00:00
|
|
|
if (VerifyOutput)
|
2014-08-21 20:03:44 +00:00
|
|
|
PM.add(createVerifierPass());
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-04-22 22:47:22 +00:00
|
|
|
inline PassManagerBuilder *unwrap(LLVMPassManagerBuilderRef P) {
|
|
|
|
return reinterpret_cast<PassManagerBuilder*>(P);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
inline LLVMPassManagerBuilderRef wrap(PassManagerBuilder *P) {
|
|
|
|
return reinterpret_cast<LLVMPassManagerBuilderRef>(P);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-15 16:51:49 +00:00
|
|
|
LLVMPassManagerBuilderRef LLVMPassManagerBuilderCreate() {
|
2011-08-09 22:17:34 +00:00
|
|
|
PassManagerBuilder *PMB = new PassManagerBuilder();
|
|
|
|
return wrap(PMB);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void LLVMPassManagerBuilderDispose(LLVMPassManagerBuilderRef PMB) {
|
|
|
|
PassManagerBuilder *Builder = unwrap(PMB);
|
|
|
|
delete Builder;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
LLVMPassManagerBuilderSetOptLevel(LLVMPassManagerBuilderRef PMB,
|
|
|
|
unsigned OptLevel) {
|
|
|
|
PassManagerBuilder *Builder = unwrap(PMB);
|
|
|
|
Builder->OptLevel = OptLevel;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
LLVMPassManagerBuilderSetSizeLevel(LLVMPassManagerBuilderRef PMB,
|
|
|
|
unsigned SizeLevel) {
|
|
|
|
PassManagerBuilder *Builder = unwrap(PMB);
|
|
|
|
Builder->SizeLevel = SizeLevel;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
LLVMPassManagerBuilderSetDisableUnitAtATime(LLVMPassManagerBuilderRef PMB,
|
|
|
|
LLVMBool Value) {
|
|
|
|
PassManagerBuilder *Builder = unwrap(PMB);
|
|
|
|
Builder->DisableUnitAtATime = Value;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
LLVMPassManagerBuilderSetDisableUnrollLoops(LLVMPassManagerBuilderRef PMB,
|
|
|
|
LLVMBool Value) {
|
|
|
|
PassManagerBuilder *Builder = unwrap(PMB);
|
|
|
|
Builder->DisableUnrollLoops = Value;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
LLVMPassManagerBuilderSetDisableSimplifyLibCalls(LLVMPassManagerBuilderRef PMB,
|
|
|
|
LLVMBool Value) {
|
2013-06-20 19:48:07 +00:00
|
|
|
// NOTE: The simplify-libcalls pass has been removed.
|
2011-08-09 22:17:34 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
LLVMPassManagerBuilderUseInlinerWithThreshold(LLVMPassManagerBuilderRef PMB,
|
|
|
|
unsigned Threshold) {
|
|
|
|
PassManagerBuilder *Builder = unwrap(PMB);
|
|
|
|
Builder->Inliner = createFunctionInliningPass(Threshold);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
LLVMPassManagerBuilderPopulateFunctionPassManager(LLVMPassManagerBuilderRef PMB,
|
|
|
|
LLVMPassManagerRef PM) {
|
|
|
|
PassManagerBuilder *Builder = unwrap(PMB);
|
2015-02-13 10:01:29 +00:00
|
|
|
legacy::FunctionPassManager *FPM = unwrap<legacy::FunctionPassManager>(PM);
|
2011-08-09 22:17:34 +00:00
|
|
|
Builder->populateFunctionPassManager(*FPM);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
LLVMPassManagerBuilderPopulateModulePassManager(LLVMPassManagerBuilderRef PMB,
|
|
|
|
LLVMPassManagerRef PM) {
|
|
|
|
PassManagerBuilder *Builder = unwrap(PMB);
|
2015-02-13 10:01:29 +00:00
|
|
|
legacy::PassManagerBase *MPM = unwrap(PM);
|
2011-08-09 22:17:34 +00:00
|
|
|
Builder->populateModulePassManager(*MPM);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void LLVMPassManagerBuilderPopulateLTOPassManager(LLVMPassManagerBuilderRef PMB,
|
|
|
|
LLVMPassManagerRef PM,
|
2013-03-10 21:58:22 +00:00
|
|
|
LLVMBool Internalize,
|
|
|
|
LLVMBool RunInliner) {
|
2011-08-09 22:17:34 +00:00
|
|
|
PassManagerBuilder *Builder = unwrap(PMB);
|
2015-02-13 10:01:29 +00:00
|
|
|
legacy::PassManagerBase *LPM = unwrap(PM);
|
2014-08-21 13:35:30 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// A small backwards compatibility hack. populateLTOPassManager used to take
|
|
|
|
// an RunInliner option.
|
|
|
|
if (RunInliner && !Builder->Inliner)
|
|
|
|
Builder->Inliner = createFunctionInliningPass();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Builder->populateLTOPassManager(*LPM);
|
2011-08-09 22:17:34 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|