6502/llvm-6502
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/c64scene-ar/llvm-6502.git synced 2024-08-21 03:29:40 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
d539147834
llvm-6502/test/DebugInfo/inline-scopes.ll

131 lines
6.6 KiB
LLVM
Raw Normal View History

Recommit r208506: DebugInfo: Include lexical scopes in inlined subroutines. This was reverted in r208642 due to regressions surrounding file changes within lexical scopes causing inlining information to be lost. The issue was in LexicalScopes::getOrCreateInlinedScope, where I was previously testing "isLexicalBlock" which is false for "DILexicalBlockFile" (a scope used to represent changes in the current file name) and assuming it was then a function (breaking out of the inlined scope path and reaching for the parent non-inlined scopes). By inverting the condition and testing for "isSubprogram" the correct behavior is attained. (also found some weirdness in Clang, see r208742 when reducing this test case - the resulting test case doesn't apply with the Clang fix, but I've added a more realistic test case to inline-scopes.ll which does reproduce the issue and demonstrate the fix) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@208748 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-05-14 01:08:28 +00:00
; REQUIRES: object-emission
; RUN: %llc_dwarf -O0 -filetype=obj < %s | llvm-dwarfdump -debug-dump=info - | FileCheck %s
; bool f();
; inline __attribute__((always_inline)) int f1() {
; if (bool b = f())
; return 1;
; return 2;
; }
;
; inline __attribute__((always_inline)) int f2() {
; # 2 "y.cc"
; if (bool b = f())
; return 3;
; return 4;
; }
;
; int main() {
; f1();
; f2();
; }
; Ensure that lexical_blocks within inlined_subroutines are preserved/emitted.
; CHECK: DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine
; CHECK-NOT: DW_TAG
; CHECK-NOT: NULL
; CHECK: DW_TAG_lexical_block
; CHECK-NOT: DW_TAG
; CHECK-NOT: NULL
; CHECK: DW_TAG_variable
; Ensure that file changes don't interfere with creating inlined subroutines.
; (see the line directive inside 'f2' in thesource)
; CHECK: DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine
DebugInfo: Fix inlining with #file directives a little harder Seems my previous fix was insufficient - we were still not adding the inlined function to the abstract scope list. Which meant it wasn't flagged as inline, didn't have nested lexical scopes in the abstract definition, and didn't have abstract variables - so the inlined variable didn't reference an abstract variable, instead being described completely inline. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209602 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-05-25 18:11:35 +00:00
; CHECK: DW_TAG_variable
; CHECK-NOT: DW_TAG
; CHECK: DW_AT_abstract_origin
Recommit r208506: DebugInfo: Include lexical scopes in inlined subroutines. This was reverted in r208642 due to regressions surrounding file changes within lexical scopes causing inlining information to be lost. The issue was in LexicalScopes::getOrCreateInlinedScope, where I was previously testing "isLexicalBlock" which is false for "DILexicalBlockFile" (a scope used to represent changes in the current file name) and assuming it was then a function (breaking out of the inlined scope path and reaching for the parent non-inlined scopes). By inverting the condition and testing for "isSubprogram" the correct behavior is attained. (also found some weirdness in Clang, see r208742 when reducing this test case - the resulting test case doesn't apply with the Clang fix, but I've added a more realistic test case to inline-scopes.ll which does reproduce the issue and demonstrate the fix) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@208748 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-05-14 01:08:28 +00:00
; Function Attrs: uwtable
define i32 @main() #0 {
entry:
%retval.i2 = alloca i32, align 4
%b.i3 = alloca i8, align 1
%retval.i = alloca i32, align 4
%b.i = alloca i8, align 1
Revert "Revert "DI: Fold constant arguments into a single MDString"" This reverts commit r218918, effectively reapplying r218914 after fixing an Ocaml bindings test and an Asan crash. The root cause of the latter was a tightened-up check in `DILexicalBlock::Verify()`, so I'll file a PR to investigate who requires the loose check (and why). Original commit message follows. -- This patch addresses the first stage of PR17891 by folding constant arguments together into a single MDString. Integers are stringified and a `\0` character is used as a separator. Part of PR17891. Note: I've attached my testcases upgrade scripts to the PR. If I've just broken your out-of-tree testcases, they might help. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219010 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-10-03 20:01:09 +00:00
call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata !{i8* %b.i}, metadata !16, metadata !{metadata !"0x102"}), !dbg !19
Recommit r208506: DebugInfo: Include lexical scopes in inlined subroutines. This was reverted in r208642 due to regressions surrounding file changes within lexical scopes causing inlining information to be lost. The issue was in LexicalScopes::getOrCreateInlinedScope, where I was previously testing "isLexicalBlock" which is false for "DILexicalBlockFile" (a scope used to represent changes in the current file name) and assuming it was then a function (breaking out of the inlined scope path and reaching for the parent non-inlined scopes). By inverting the condition and testing for "isSubprogram" the correct behavior is attained. (also found some weirdness in Clang, see r208742 when reducing this test case - the resulting test case doesn't apply with the Clang fix, but I've added a more realistic test case to inline-scopes.ll which does reproduce the issue and demonstrate the fix) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@208748 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-05-14 01:08:28 +00:00
%call.i = call zeroext i1 @_Z1fv(), !dbg !19
%frombool.i = zext i1 %call.i to i8, !dbg !19
store i8 %frombool.i, i8* %b.i, align 1, !dbg !19
%0 = load i8* %b.i, align 1, !dbg !19
%tobool.i = trunc i8 %0 to i1, !dbg !19
br i1 %tobool.i, label %if.then.i, label %if.end.i, !dbg !19
if.then.i: ; preds = %entry
store i32 1, i32* %retval.i, !dbg !21
br label %_Z2f1v.exit, !dbg !21
if.end.i: ; preds = %entry
store i32 2, i32* %retval.i, !dbg !22
br label %_Z2f1v.exit, !dbg !22
_Z2f1v.exit: ; preds = %if.then.i, %if.end.i
%1 = load i32* %retval.i, !dbg !23
Revert "Revert "DI: Fold constant arguments into a single MDString"" This reverts commit r218918, effectively reapplying r218914 after fixing an Ocaml bindings test and an Asan crash. The root cause of the latter was a tightened-up check in `DILexicalBlock::Verify()`, so I'll file a PR to investigate who requires the loose check (and why). Original commit message follows. -- This patch addresses the first stage of PR17891 by folding constant arguments together into a single MDString. Integers are stringified and a `\0` character is used as a separator. Part of PR17891. Note: I've attached my testcases upgrade scripts to the PR. If I've just broken your out-of-tree testcases, they might help. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219010 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-10-03 20:01:09 +00:00
call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata !{i8* %b.i3}, metadata !24, metadata !{metadata !"0x102"}), !dbg !27
Recommit r208506: DebugInfo: Include lexical scopes in inlined subroutines. This was reverted in r208642 due to regressions surrounding file changes within lexical scopes causing inlining information to be lost. The issue was in LexicalScopes::getOrCreateInlinedScope, where I was previously testing "isLexicalBlock" which is false for "DILexicalBlockFile" (a scope used to represent changes in the current file name) and assuming it was then a function (breaking out of the inlined scope path and reaching for the parent non-inlined scopes). By inverting the condition and testing for "isSubprogram" the correct behavior is attained. (also found some weirdness in Clang, see r208742 when reducing this test case - the resulting test case doesn't apply with the Clang fix, but I've added a more realistic test case to inline-scopes.ll which does reproduce the issue and demonstrate the fix) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@208748 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-05-14 01:08:28 +00:00
%call.i4 = call zeroext i1 @_Z1fv(), !dbg !27
%frombool.i5 = zext i1 %call.i4 to i8, !dbg !27
store i8 %frombool.i5, i8* %b.i3, align 1, !dbg !27
%2 = load i8* %b.i3, align 1, !dbg !27
%tobool.i6 = trunc i8 %2 to i1, !dbg !27
br i1 %tobool.i6, label %if.then.i7, label %if.end.i8, !dbg !27
if.then.i7: ; preds = %_Z2f1v.exit
store i32 3, i32* %retval.i2, !dbg !29
br label %_Z2f2v.exit, !dbg !29
if.end.i8: ; preds = %_Z2f1v.exit
store i32 4, i32* %retval.i2, !dbg !30
br label %_Z2f2v.exit, !dbg !30
_Z2f2v.exit: ; preds = %if.then.i7, %if.end.i8
%3 = load i32* %retval.i2, !dbg !31
ret i32 0, !dbg !32
}
; Function Attrs: nounwind readnone
Move the complex address expression out of DIVariable and into an extra argument of the llvm.dbg.declare/llvm.dbg.value intrinsics. Previously, DIVariable was a variable-length field that has an optional reference to a Metadata array consisting of a variable number of complex address expressions. In the case of OpPiece expressions this is wasting a lot of storage in IR, because when an aggregate type is, e.g., SROA'd into all of its n individual members, the IR will contain n copies of the DIVariable, all alike, only differing in the complex address reference at the end. By making the complex address into an extra argument of the dbg.value/dbg.declare intrinsics, all of the pieces can reference the same variable and the complex address expressions can be uniqued across the CU, too. Down the road, this will allow us to move other flags, such as "indirection" out of the DIVariable, too. The new intrinsics look like this: declare void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata %storage, metadata %var, metadata %expr) declare void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata %storage, i64 %offset, metadata %var, metadata %expr) This patch adds a new LLVM-local tag to DIExpressions, so we can detect and pretty-print DIExpression metadata nodes. What this patch doesn't do: This patch does not touch the "Indirect" field in DIVariable; but moving that into the expression would be a natural next step. http://reviews.llvm.org/D4919 rdar://problem/17994491 Thanks to dblaikie and dexonsmith for reviewing this patch! Note: I accidentally committed a bogus older version of this patch previously. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218787 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-10-01 18:55:02 +00:00
declare void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata, metadata, metadata) #1
Recommit r208506: DebugInfo: Include lexical scopes in inlined subroutines. This was reverted in r208642 due to regressions surrounding file changes within lexical scopes causing inlining information to be lost. The issue was in LexicalScopes::getOrCreateInlinedScope, where I was previously testing "isLexicalBlock" which is false for "DILexicalBlockFile" (a scope used to represent changes in the current file name) and assuming it was then a function (breaking out of the inlined scope path and reaching for the parent non-inlined scopes). By inverting the condition and testing for "isSubprogram" the correct behavior is attained. (also found some weirdness in Clang, see r208742 when reducing this test case - the resulting test case doesn't apply with the Clang fix, but I've added a more realistic test case to inline-scopes.ll which does reproduce the issue and demonstrate the fix) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@208748 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-05-14 01:08:28 +00:00
declare zeroext i1 @_Z1fv() #2
attributes #0 = { uwtable "less-precise-fpmad"="false" "no-frame-pointer-elim"="true" "no-frame-pointer-elim-non-leaf" "no-infs-fp-math"="false" "no-nans-fp-math"="false" "stack-protector-buffer-size"="8" "unsafe-fp-math"="false" "use-soft-float"="false" }
attributes #1 = { nounwind readnone }
attributes #2 = { "less-precise-fpmad"="false" "no-frame-pointer-elim"="true" "no-frame-pointer-elim-non-leaf" "no-infs-fp-math"="false" "no-nans-fp-math"="false" "stack-protector-buffer-size"="8" "unsafe-fp-math"="false" "use-soft-float"="false" }
!llvm.dbg.cu = !{!0}
!llvm.module.flags = !{!13, !14}
!llvm.ident = !{!15}
Revert "Revert "DI: Fold constant arguments into a single MDString"" This reverts commit r218918, effectively reapplying r218914 after fixing an Ocaml bindings test and an Asan crash. The root cause of the latter was a tightened-up check in `DILexicalBlock::Verify()`, so I'll file a PR to investigate who requires the loose check (and why). Original commit message follows. -- This patch addresses the first stage of PR17891 by folding constant arguments together into a single MDString. Integers are stringified and a `\0` character is used as a separator. Part of PR17891. Note: I've attached my testcases upgrade scripts to the PR. If I've just broken your out-of-tree testcases, they might help. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219010 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-10-03 20:01:09 +00:00
!0 = metadata !{metadata !"0x11\004\00clang version 3.5.0 \000\00\000\00\001", metadata !1, metadata !2, metadata !2, metadata !3, metadata !2, metadata !2} ; [ DW_TAG_compile_unit ] [/tmp/dbginfo/inline-scopes.cpp] [DW_LANG_C_plus_plus]
Recommit r208506: DebugInfo: Include lexical scopes in inlined subroutines. This was reverted in r208642 due to regressions surrounding file changes within lexical scopes causing inlining information to be lost. The issue was in LexicalScopes::getOrCreateInlinedScope, where I was previously testing "isLexicalBlock" which is false for "DILexicalBlockFile" (a scope used to represent changes in the current file name) and assuming it was then a function (breaking out of the inlined scope path and reaching for the parent non-inlined scopes). By inverting the condition and testing for "isSubprogram" the correct behavior is attained. (also found some weirdness in Clang, see r208742 when reducing this test case - the resulting test case doesn't apply with the Clang fix, but I've added a more realistic test case to inline-scopes.ll which does reproduce the issue and demonstrate the fix) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@208748 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-05-14 01:08:28 +00:00
!1 = metadata !{metadata !"inline-scopes.cpp", metadata !"/tmp/dbginfo"}
!2 = metadata !{}
!3 = metadata !{metadata !4, metadata !10, metadata !12}
Revert "Revert "DI: Fold constant arguments into a single MDString"" This reverts commit r218918, effectively reapplying r218914 after fixing an Ocaml bindings test and an Asan crash. The root cause of the latter was a tightened-up check in `DILexicalBlock::Verify()`, so I'll file a PR to investigate who requires the loose check (and why). Original commit message follows. -- This patch addresses the first stage of PR17891 by folding constant arguments together into a single MDString. Integers are stringified and a `\0` character is used as a separator. Part of PR17891. Note: I've attached my testcases upgrade scripts to the PR. If I've just broken your out-of-tree testcases, they might help. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219010 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-10-03 20:01:09 +00:00
!4 = metadata !{metadata !"0x2e\00main\00main\00\007\000\001\000\006\00256\000\007", metadata !5, metadata !6, metadata !7, null, i32 ()* @main, null, null, metadata !2} ; [ DW_TAG_subprogram ] [line 7] [def] [main]
Recommit r208506: DebugInfo: Include lexical scopes in inlined subroutines. This was reverted in r208642 due to regressions surrounding file changes within lexical scopes causing inlining information to be lost. The issue was in LexicalScopes::getOrCreateInlinedScope, where I was previously testing "isLexicalBlock" which is false for "DILexicalBlockFile" (a scope used to represent changes in the current file name) and assuming it was then a function (breaking out of the inlined scope path and reaching for the parent non-inlined scopes). By inverting the condition and testing for "isSubprogram" the correct behavior is attained. (also found some weirdness in Clang, see r208742 when reducing this test case - the resulting test case doesn't apply with the Clang fix, but I've added a more realistic test case to inline-scopes.ll which does reproduce the issue and demonstrate the fix) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@208748 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-05-14 01:08:28 +00:00
!5 = metadata !{metadata !"y.cc", metadata !"/tmp/dbginfo"}
Revert "Revert "DI: Fold constant arguments into a single MDString"" This reverts commit r218918, effectively reapplying r218914 after fixing an Ocaml bindings test and an Asan crash. The root cause of the latter was a tightened-up check in `DILexicalBlock::Verify()`, so I'll file a PR to investigate who requires the loose check (and why). Original commit message follows. -- This patch addresses the first stage of PR17891 by folding constant arguments together into a single MDString. Integers are stringified and a `\0` character is used as a separator. Part of PR17891. Note: I've attached my testcases upgrade scripts to the PR. If I've just broken your out-of-tree testcases, they might help. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219010 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-10-03 20:01:09 +00:00
!6 = metadata !{metadata !"0x29", metadata !5} ; [ DW_TAG_file_type ] [/tmp/dbginfo/y.cc]
!7 = metadata !{metadata !"0x15\00\000\000\000\000\000\000", i32 0, null, null, metadata !8, null, null, null} ; [ DW_TAG_subroutine_type ] [line 0, size 0, align 0, offset 0] [from ]
Recommit r208506: DebugInfo: Include lexical scopes in inlined subroutines. This was reverted in r208642 due to regressions surrounding file changes within lexical scopes causing inlining information to be lost. The issue was in LexicalScopes::getOrCreateInlinedScope, where I was previously testing "isLexicalBlock" which is false for "DILexicalBlockFile" (a scope used to represent changes in the current file name) and assuming it was then a function (breaking out of the inlined scope path and reaching for the parent non-inlined scopes). By inverting the condition and testing for "isSubprogram" the correct behavior is attained. (also found some weirdness in Clang, see r208742 when reducing this test case - the resulting test case doesn't apply with the Clang fix, but I've added a more realistic test case to inline-scopes.ll which does reproduce the issue and demonstrate the fix) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@208748 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-05-14 01:08:28 +00:00
!8 = metadata !{metadata !9}
Revert "Revert "DI: Fold constant arguments into a single MDString"" This reverts commit r218918, effectively reapplying r218914 after fixing an Ocaml bindings test and an Asan crash. The root cause of the latter was a tightened-up check in `DILexicalBlock::Verify()`, so I'll file a PR to investigate who requires the loose check (and why). Original commit message follows. -- This patch addresses the first stage of PR17891 by folding constant arguments together into a single MDString. Integers are stringified and a `\0` character is used as a separator. Part of PR17891. Note: I've attached my testcases upgrade scripts to the PR. If I've just broken your out-of-tree testcases, they might help. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219010 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-10-03 20:01:09 +00:00
!9 = metadata !{metadata !"0x24\00int\000\0032\0032\000\000\005", null, null} ; [ DW_TAG_base_type ] [int] [line 0, size 32, align 32, offset 0, enc DW_ATE_signed]
!10 = metadata !{metadata !"0x2e\00f2\00f2\00_Z2f2v\008\000\001\000\006\00256\000\008", metadata !1, metadata !11, metadata !7, null, null, null, null, metadata !2} ; [ DW_TAG_subprogram ] [line 8] [def] [f2]
!11 = metadata !{metadata !"0x29", metadata !1} ; [ DW_TAG_file_type ] [/tmp/dbginfo/inline-scopes.cpp]
!12 = metadata !{metadata !"0x2e\00f1\00f1\00_Z2f1v\002\000\001\000\006\00256\000\002", metadata !1, metadata !11, metadata !7, null, null, null, null, metadata !2} ; [ DW_TAG_subprogram ] [line 2] [def] [f1]
Recommit r208506: DebugInfo: Include lexical scopes in inlined subroutines. This was reverted in r208642 due to regressions surrounding file changes within lexical scopes causing inlining information to be lost. The issue was in LexicalScopes::getOrCreateInlinedScope, where I was previously testing "isLexicalBlock" which is false for "DILexicalBlockFile" (a scope used to represent changes in the current file name) and assuming it was then a function (breaking out of the inlined scope path and reaching for the parent non-inlined scopes). By inverting the condition and testing for "isSubprogram" the correct behavior is attained. (also found some weirdness in Clang, see r208742 when reducing this test case - the resulting test case doesn't apply with the Clang fix, but I've added a more realistic test case to inline-scopes.ll which does reproduce the issue and demonstrate the fix) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@208748 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-05-14 01:08:28 +00:00
!13 = metadata !{i32 2, metadata !"Dwarf Version", i32 4}
Revert "Revert "DI: Fold constant arguments into a single MDString"" This reverts commit r218918, effectively reapplying r218914 after fixing an Ocaml bindings test and an Asan crash. The root cause of the latter was a tightened-up check in `DILexicalBlock::Verify()`, so I'll file a PR to investigate who requires the loose check (and why). Original commit message follows. -- This patch addresses the first stage of PR17891 by folding constant arguments together into a single MDString. Integers are stringified and a `\0` character is used as a separator. Part of PR17891. Note: I've attached my testcases upgrade scripts to the PR. If I've just broken your out-of-tree testcases, they might help. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219010 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-10-03 20:01:09 +00:00
!14 = metadata !{i32 1, metadata !"Debug Info Version", i32 2}
Recommit r208506: DebugInfo: Include lexical scopes in inlined subroutines. This was reverted in r208642 due to regressions surrounding file changes within lexical scopes causing inlining information to be lost. The issue was in LexicalScopes::getOrCreateInlinedScope, where I was previously testing "isLexicalBlock" which is false for "DILexicalBlockFile" (a scope used to represent changes in the current file name) and assuming it was then a function (breaking out of the inlined scope path and reaching for the parent non-inlined scopes). By inverting the condition and testing for "isSubprogram" the correct behavior is attained. (also found some weirdness in Clang, see r208742 when reducing this test case - the resulting test case doesn't apply with the Clang fix, but I've added a more realistic test case to inline-scopes.ll which does reproduce the issue and demonstrate the fix) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@208748 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-05-14 01:08:28 +00:00
!15 = metadata !{metadata !"clang version 3.5.0 "}
Revert "Revert "DI: Fold constant arguments into a single MDString"" This reverts commit r218918, effectively reapplying r218914 after fixing an Ocaml bindings test and an Asan crash. The root cause of the latter was a tightened-up check in `DILexicalBlock::Verify()`, so I'll file a PR to investigate who requires the loose check (and why). Original commit message follows. -- This patch addresses the first stage of PR17891 by folding constant arguments together into a single MDString. Integers are stringified and a `\0` character is used as a separator. Part of PR17891. Note: I've attached my testcases upgrade scripts to the PR. If I've just broken your out-of-tree testcases, they might help. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219010 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-10-03 20:01:09 +00:00
!16 = metadata !{metadata !"0x100\00b\003\000", metadata !17, metadata !11, metadata !18} ; [ DW_TAG_auto_variable ] [b] [line 3]
!17 = metadata !{metadata !"0xb\003\000\001", metadata !1, metadata !12} ; [ DW_TAG_lexical_block ] [/tmp/dbginfo/inline-scopes.cpp]
!18 = metadata !{metadata !"0x24\00bool\000\008\008\000\000\002", null, null} ; [ DW_TAG_base_type ] [bool] [line 0, size 8, align 8, offset 0, enc DW_ATE_boolean]
Recommit r208506: DebugInfo: Include lexical scopes in inlined subroutines. This was reverted in r208642 due to regressions surrounding file changes within lexical scopes causing inlining information to be lost. The issue was in LexicalScopes::getOrCreateInlinedScope, where I was previously testing "isLexicalBlock" which is false for "DILexicalBlockFile" (a scope used to represent changes in the current file name) and assuming it was then a function (breaking out of the inlined scope path and reaching for the parent non-inlined scopes). By inverting the condition and testing for "isSubprogram" the correct behavior is attained. (also found some weirdness in Clang, see r208742 when reducing this test case - the resulting test case doesn't apply with the Clang fix, but I've added a more realistic test case to inline-scopes.ll which does reproduce the issue and demonstrate the fix) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@208748 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-05-14 01:08:28 +00:00
!19 = metadata !{i32 3, i32 0, metadata !17, metadata !20}
Revert "Revert "DI: Fold constant arguments into a single MDString"" This reverts commit r218918, effectively reapplying r218914 after fixing an Ocaml bindings test and an Asan crash. The root cause of the latter was a tightened-up check in `DILexicalBlock::Verify()`, so I'll file a PR to investigate who requires the loose check (and why). Original commit message follows. -- This patch addresses the first stage of PR17891 by folding constant arguments together into a single MDString. Integers are stringified and a `\0` character is used as a separator. Part of PR17891. Note: I've attached my testcases upgrade scripts to the PR. If I've just broken your out-of-tree testcases, they might help. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219010 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-10-03 20:01:09 +00:00
!20 = metadata !{i32 8, i32 0, metadata !4, null}
Recommit r208506: DebugInfo: Include lexical scopes in inlined subroutines. This was reverted in r208642 due to regressions surrounding file changes within lexical scopes causing inlining information to be lost. The issue was in LexicalScopes::getOrCreateInlinedScope, where I was previously testing "isLexicalBlock" which is false for "DILexicalBlockFile" (a scope used to represent changes in the current file name) and assuming it was then a function (breaking out of the inlined scope path and reaching for the parent non-inlined scopes). By inverting the condition and testing for "isSubprogram" the correct behavior is attained. (also found some weirdness in Clang, see r208742 when reducing this test case - the resulting test case doesn't apply with the Clang fix, but I've added a more realistic test case to inline-scopes.ll which does reproduce the issue and demonstrate the fix) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@208748 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-05-14 01:08:28 +00:00
!21 = metadata !{i32 4, i32 0, metadata !17, metadata !20}
!22 = metadata !{i32 5, i32 0, metadata !12, metadata !20}
!23 = metadata !{i32 6, i32 0, metadata !12, metadata !20}
Revert "Revert "DI: Fold constant arguments into a single MDString"" This reverts commit r218918, effectively reapplying r218914 after fixing an Ocaml bindings test and an Asan crash. The root cause of the latter was a tightened-up check in `DILexicalBlock::Verify()`, so I'll file a PR to investigate who requires the loose check (and why). Original commit message follows. -- This patch addresses the first stage of PR17891 by folding constant arguments together into a single MDString. Integers are stringified and a `\0` character is used as a separator. Part of PR17891. Note: I've attached my testcases upgrade scripts to the PR. If I've just broken your out-of-tree testcases, they might help. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219010 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-10-03 20:01:09 +00:00
!24 = metadata !{metadata !"0x100\00b\002\000", metadata !25, metadata !6, metadata !18} ; [ DW_TAG_auto_variable ] [b] [line 2]
!25 = metadata !{metadata !"0xb\002\000\000", metadata !5, metadata !26} ; [ DW_TAG_lexical_block ] [/tmp/dbginfo/y.cc]
!26 = metadata !{metadata !"0xb\000", metadata !5, metadata !10} ; [ DW_TAG_lexical_block ] [/tmp/dbginfo/y.cc]
Recommit r208506: DebugInfo: Include lexical scopes in inlined subroutines. This was reverted in r208642 due to regressions surrounding file changes within lexical scopes causing inlining information to be lost. The issue was in LexicalScopes::getOrCreateInlinedScope, where I was previously testing "isLexicalBlock" which is false for "DILexicalBlockFile" (a scope used to represent changes in the current file name) and assuming it was then a function (breaking out of the inlined scope path and reaching for the parent non-inlined scopes). By inverting the condition and testing for "isSubprogram" the correct behavior is attained. (also found some weirdness in Clang, see r208742 when reducing this test case - the resulting test case doesn't apply with the Clang fix, but I've added a more realistic test case to inline-scopes.ll which does reproduce the issue and demonstrate the fix) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@208748 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-05-14 01:08:28 +00:00
!27 = metadata !{i32 2, i32 0, metadata !25, metadata !28}
!28 = metadata !{i32 9, i32 0, metadata !4, null}
!29 = metadata !{i32 3, i32 0, metadata !25, metadata !28}
!30 = metadata !{i32 4, i32 0, metadata !26, metadata !28}
!31 = metadata !{i32 5, i32 0, metadata !26, metadata !28}
!32 = metadata !{i32 10, i32 0, metadata !4, null}
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink