Fix register subclass handling in PPCInstrInfo::insertSelect
PPCInstrInfo::insertSelect and PPCInstrInfo::canInsertSelect were computing the
common subclass of the true and false inputs, and then selecting either the
32-bit or the 64-bit isel variant based on the result of calling
PPC::GPRCRegClass.hasSubClassEq(RC) and PPC::G8RCRegClass.hasSubClassEq(RC)
(where RC is the common subclass). Unfortunately, this is not quite right: if
we have something like this:
%vreg8<def> = SELECT_CC_I8 %vreg4<kill>, %vreg7<kill>, %vreg6<kill>, 76;
G8RC_and_G8RC_NOX0:%vreg8 CRRC:%vreg4 G8RC_NOX0:%vreg7,%vreg6
then the common subclass of G8RC_and_G8RC_NOX0 and G8RC_NOX0 is G8RC_NOX0, and
G8RC_NOX0 is not a subclass of G8RC (because it also contains the ZERO8
pseudo-register). As a result, we also need to check the common subclass
against GPRC_NOR0 and G8RC_NOX0 explicitly.
This had not been a problem for clients of insertSelect that called
canInsertSelect first (because it had a compensating mistake), but insertSelect
is also used by the PPC pseudo-instruction expander, and this error was causing
a problem in that context.
This problem was found by csmith.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186343 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-07-15 20:22:58 +00:00
|
|
|
; RUN: llc -mtriple=powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu -mcpu=pwr7 < %s
|
|
|
|
|
target datalayout = "E-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-f128:128:128-v128:128:128-n32:64"
|
|
|
|
|
target triple = "powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@g_62 = external global [1 x [9 x i32]], align 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; Function Attrs: nounwind
|
|
|
|
|
define void @main() #0 {
|
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
|
br i1 undef, label %cond.true, label %for.cond1.preheader.i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cond.true: ; preds = %entry
|
|
|
|
|
br label %for.cond1.preheader.i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for.cond1.preheader.i: ; preds = %for.cond1.preheader.i, %cond.true, %entry
|
|
|
|
|
br i1 undef, label %crc32_gentab.exit, label %for.cond1.preheader.i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crc32_gentab.exit: ; preds = %for.cond1.preheader.i
|
|
|
|
|
%tobool.i19.i.i = icmp eq i32 undef, 0
|
|
|
|
|
%retval.0.i.i.i = select i1 %tobool.i19.i.i, i32* getelementptr inbounds ([1 x [9 x i32]]* @g_62, i64 0, i64 0, i64 6), i32* getelementptr inbounds ([1 x [9 x i32]]* @g_62, i64 0, i64 0, i64 8)
|
|
|
|
|
br label %for.cond1.preheader.i2961.i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for.cond1.preheader.i2961.i: ; preds = %for.inc44.i2977.i, %crc32_gentab.exit
|
|
|
|
|
call void @llvm.memset.p0i8.i64(i8* bitcast ([1 x [9 x i32]]* @g_62 to i8*), i8 -1, i64 36, i32 4, i1 false) #1
|
2013-09-30 18:17:35 +00:00
|
|
|
%0 = load i32* %retval.0.i.i.i, align 4
|
Fix register subclass handling in PPCInstrInfo::insertSelect
PPCInstrInfo::insertSelect and PPCInstrInfo::canInsertSelect were computing the
common subclass of the true and false inputs, and then selecting either the
32-bit or the 64-bit isel variant based on the result of calling
PPC::GPRCRegClass.hasSubClassEq(RC) and PPC::G8RCRegClass.hasSubClassEq(RC)
(where RC is the common subclass). Unfortunately, this is not quite right: if
we have something like this:
%vreg8<def> = SELECT_CC_I8 %vreg4<kill>, %vreg7<kill>, %vreg6<kill>, 76;
G8RC_and_G8RC_NOX0:%vreg8 CRRC:%vreg4 G8RC_NOX0:%vreg7,%vreg6
then the common subclass of G8RC_and_G8RC_NOX0 and G8RC_NOX0 is G8RC_NOX0, and
G8RC_NOX0 is not a subclass of G8RC (because it also contains the ZERO8
pseudo-register). As a result, we also need to check the common subclass
against GPRC_NOR0 and G8RC_NOX0 explicitly.
This had not been a problem for clients of insertSelect that called
canInsertSelect first (because it had a compensating mistake), but insertSelect
is also used by the PPC pseudo-instruction expander, and this error was causing
a problem in that context.
This problem was found by csmith.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186343 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-07-15 20:22:58 +00:00
|
|
|
%tobool.i2967.i = icmp eq i32 %0, 0
|
|
|
|
|
br label %for.body21.i2968.i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for.body21.i2968.i: ; preds = %safe_mod_func_int32_t_s_s.exit.i2974.i, %for.cond1.preheader.i2961.i
|
|
|
|
|
br i1 %tobool.i2967.i, label %safe_mod_func_int32_t_s_s.exit.i2974.i, label %for.inc44.i2977.i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
safe_mod_func_int32_t_s_s.exit.i2974.i: ; preds = %for.body21.i2968.i
|
|
|
|
|
br i1 undef, label %for.body21.i2968.i, label %for.inc44.i2977.i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for.inc44.i2977.i: ; preds = %safe_mod_func_int32_t_s_s.exit.i2974.i, %for.body21.i2968.i
|
|
|
|
|
br i1 undef, label %func_80.exit2978.i, label %for.cond1.preheader.i2961.i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func_80.exit2978.i: ; preds = %for.inc44.i2977.i
|
|
|
|
|
unreachable
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; Function Attrs: nounwind
|
|
|
|
|
declare void @llvm.memset.p0i8.i64(i8* nocapture, i8, i64, i32, i1) #1
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-08-22 21:28:54 +00:00
|
|
|
attributes #0 = { nounwind "less-precise-fpmad"="false" "no-frame-pointer-elim"="true" "no-frame-pointer-elim-non-leaf" "no-infs-fp-math"="false" "no-nans-fp-math"="false" "ssp-buffer-size"="8" "unsafe-fp-math"="false" "use-soft-float"="false" }
|
Fix register subclass handling in PPCInstrInfo::insertSelect
PPCInstrInfo::insertSelect and PPCInstrInfo::canInsertSelect were computing the
common subclass of the true and false inputs, and then selecting either the
32-bit or the 64-bit isel variant based on the result of calling
PPC::GPRCRegClass.hasSubClassEq(RC) and PPC::G8RCRegClass.hasSubClassEq(RC)
(where RC is the common subclass). Unfortunately, this is not quite right: if
we have something like this:
%vreg8<def> = SELECT_CC_I8 %vreg4<kill>, %vreg7<kill>, %vreg6<kill>, 76;
G8RC_and_G8RC_NOX0:%vreg8 CRRC:%vreg4 G8RC_NOX0:%vreg7,%vreg6
then the common subclass of G8RC_and_G8RC_NOX0 and G8RC_NOX0 is G8RC_NOX0, and
G8RC_NOX0 is not a subclass of G8RC (because it also contains the ZERO8
pseudo-register). As a result, we also need to check the common subclass
against GPRC_NOR0 and G8RC_NOX0 explicitly.
This had not been a problem for clients of insertSelect that called
canInsertSelect first (because it had a compensating mistake), but insertSelect
is also used by the PPC pseudo-instruction expander, and this error was causing
a problem in that context.
This problem was found by csmith.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186343 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-07-15 20:22:58 +00:00
|
|
|
attributes #1 = { nounwind }
|
