Add support for the notion of "hidden" relocations. On MachO, these are relocation entries that are used as additional information for other, real relocations, rather than being relocations themselves.

I'm not familiar enough with ELF or COFF to know if they should have any relocations marked hidden.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@142961 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Owen Anderson
2011-10-25 20:35:53 +00:00
parent f62333df5e
commit 0685e94895
4 changed files with 55 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -952,6 +952,38 @@ error_code MachOObjectFile::getRelocationValueString(DataRefImpl Rel,
return object_error::success;
}
error_code MachOObjectFile::getRelocationHidden(DataRefImpl Rel,
bool &Result) const {
InMemoryStruct<macho::RelocationEntry> RE;
getRelocation(Rel, RE);
unsigned Type = (RE->Word1 >> 28) & 0xF;
unsigned Arch = getArch();
Result = false;
// On arches that use the generic relocations, GENERIC_RELOC_PAIR
// is always hidden.
if (Arch == Triple::x86 || Arch == Triple::arm) {
if (Type == 1) Result = true;
} else if (Arch == Triple::x86_64) {
// On x86_64, X86_64_RELOC_UNSIGNED is hidden only when it follows
// an X864_64_RELOC_SUBTRACTOR.
if (Type == 0 && Rel.d.a > 0) {
DataRefImpl RelPrev = Rel;
RelPrev.d.a--;
InMemoryStruct<macho::RelocationEntry> REPrev;
getRelocation(RelPrev, REPrev);
unsigned PrevType = (REPrev->Word1 >> 28) & 0xF;
if (PrevType == 5) Result = true;
}
}
return object_error::success;
}
/*===-- Miscellaneous -----------------------------------------------------===*/
uint8_t MachOObjectFile::getBytesInAddress() const {