mirror of
https://github.com/c64scene-ar/llvm-6502.git
synced 2025-02-11 11:34:02 +00:00
Handle unreachable code in the dominates functions. This changes users when
needed for correctness, but still doesn't clean up code that now unnecessary checks for reachability. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@153755 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
parent
0e4fa5ff36
commit
092c5ccf5b
@ -359,8 +359,19 @@ public:
|
||||
|
||||
bool dominatedBySlowTreeWalk(const DomTreeNodeBase<NodeT> *A,
|
||||
const DomTreeNodeBase<NodeT> *B) const {
|
||||
// A node trivially dominates itself.
|
||||
if (B == A)
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
// An unreachable node is dominated by anything.
|
||||
if (!isReachableFromEntry(B))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
// And dominates nothing.
|
||||
if (!isReachableFromEntry(A))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
const DomTreeNodeBase<NodeT> *IDom;
|
||||
if (A == 0 || B == 0) return false;
|
||||
while ((IDom = B->getIDom()) != 0 && IDom != A && IDom != B)
|
||||
B = IDom; // Walk up the tree
|
||||
return IDom != 0;
|
||||
@ -369,10 +380,14 @@ public:
|
||||
|
||||
/// isReachableFromEntry - Return true if A is dominated by the entry
|
||||
/// block of the function containing it.
|
||||
bool isReachableFromEntry(const NodeT* A) {
|
||||
bool isReachableFromEntry(const NodeT* A) const {
|
||||
assert(!this->isPostDominator() &&
|
||||
"This is not implemented for post dominators");
|
||||
return dominates(&A->getParent()->front(), A);
|
||||
return isReachableFromEntry(getNode(const_cast<NodeT *>(A)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
inline bool isReachableFromEntry(const DomTreeNodeBase<NodeT> *A) const {
|
||||
return A;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// dominates - Returns true iff A dominates B. Note that this is not a
|
||||
@ -380,10 +395,16 @@ public:
|
||||
///
|
||||
inline bool dominates(const DomTreeNodeBase<NodeT> *A,
|
||||
const DomTreeNodeBase<NodeT> *B) {
|
||||
// A node trivially dominates itself.
|
||||
if (B == A)
|
||||
return true; // A node trivially dominates itself.
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
if (A == 0 || B == 0)
|
||||
// An unreachable node is dominated by anything.
|
||||
if (!isReachableFromEntry(B))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
// And dominates nothing.
|
||||
if (!isReachableFromEntry(A))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
// Compare the result of the tree walk and the dfs numbers, if expensive
|
||||
|
@ -762,7 +762,8 @@ public:
|
||||
InvBlockTraits::child_begin(BB), E = InvBlockTraits::child_end(BB);
|
||||
I != E; ++I) {
|
||||
typename InvBlockTraits::NodeType *N = *I;
|
||||
if (DT.dominates(BB, N)) // If BB dominates its predecessor...
|
||||
// If BB dominates its predecessor...
|
||||
if (DT.dominates(BB, N) && DT.isReachableFromEntry(N))
|
||||
TodoStack.push_back(N);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -88,8 +88,13 @@ bool DominatorTree::dominates(const Instruction *Def,
|
||||
const BasicBlock *UseBB = User->getParent();
|
||||
const BasicBlock *DefBB = Def->getParent();
|
||||
|
||||
assert(isReachableFromEntry(DefBB) && isReachableFromEntry(UseBB) &&
|
||||
"We only handle reachable blocks");
|
||||
// Any unreachable use is dominated, even if Def == User.
|
||||
if (!isReachableFromEntry(UseBB))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
// Unreachable definitions don't dominate anything.
|
||||
if (!isReachableFromEntry(DefBB))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
// An instruction doesn't dominate a use in itself.
|
||||
if (Def == User)
|
||||
@ -119,8 +124,13 @@ bool DominatorTree::dominates(const Instruction *Def,
|
||||
const BasicBlock *UseBB) const {
|
||||
const BasicBlock *DefBB = Def->getParent();
|
||||
|
||||
assert(isReachableFromEntry(DefBB) && isReachableFromEntry(UseBB) &&
|
||||
"We only handle reachable blocks");
|
||||
// Any unreachable use is dominated, even if DefBB == UseBB.
|
||||
if (!isReachableFromEntry(UseBB))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
// Unreachable definitions don't dominate anything.
|
||||
if (!isReachableFromEntry(DefBB))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
if (DefBB == UseBB)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ set(VMCoreSources
|
||||
VMCore/PassManagerTest.cpp
|
||||
VMCore/ValueMapTest.cpp
|
||||
VMCore/VerifierTest.cpp
|
||||
VMCore/DominatorTreeTest.cpp
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# MSVC9 and 8 cannot compile ValueMapTest.cpp due to their bug.
|
||||
|
195
unittests/VMCore/DominatorTreeTest.cpp
Normal file
195
unittests/VMCore/DominatorTreeTest.cpp
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,195 @@
|
||||
#include "llvm/Instructions.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/LLVMContext.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/Module.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/PassManager.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/Analysis/Dominators.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/Assembly/Parser.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/Support/SourceMgr.h"
|
||||
#include "gtest/gtest.h"
|
||||
|
||||
using namespace llvm;
|
||||
|
||||
namespace llvm {
|
||||
void initializeDPassPass(PassRegistry&);
|
||||
|
||||
namespace {
|
||||
struct DPass : public FunctionPass {
|
||||
static char ID;
|
||||
virtual bool runOnFunction(Function &F) {
|
||||
DominatorTree *DT = &getAnalysis<DominatorTree>();
|
||||
Function::iterator FI = F.begin();
|
||||
|
||||
BasicBlock *BB0 = FI++;
|
||||
BasicBlock::iterator BBI = BB0->begin();
|
||||
Instruction *Y1 = BBI++;
|
||||
Instruction *Y2 = BBI++;
|
||||
Instruction *Y3 = BBI++;
|
||||
|
||||
BasicBlock *BB1 = FI++;
|
||||
BBI = BB1->begin();
|
||||
Instruction *Y4 = BBI++;
|
||||
|
||||
BasicBlock *BB2 = FI++;
|
||||
BBI = BB2->begin();
|
||||
Instruction *Y5 = BBI++;
|
||||
|
||||
BasicBlock *BB3 = FI++;
|
||||
BBI = BB3->begin();
|
||||
Instruction *Y6 = BBI++;
|
||||
Instruction *Y7 = BBI++;
|
||||
|
||||
BasicBlock *BB4 = FI++;
|
||||
BBI = BB4->begin();
|
||||
Instruction *Y8 = BBI++;
|
||||
Instruction *Y9 = BBI++;
|
||||
|
||||
// Reachability
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->isReachableFromEntry(BB0));
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->isReachableFromEntry(BB1));
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->isReachableFromEntry(BB2));
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->isReachableFromEntry(BB3));
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->isReachableFromEntry(BB4));
|
||||
|
||||
// BB dominance
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(BB0, BB0));
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(BB0, BB1));
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(BB0, BB2));
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(BB0, BB3));
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(BB0, BB4));
|
||||
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(BB1, BB0));
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(BB1, BB1));
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(BB1, BB2));
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(BB1, BB3));
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(BB1, BB4));
|
||||
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(BB2, BB0));
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(BB2, BB1));
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(BB2, BB2));
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(BB2, BB3));
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(BB2, BB4));
|
||||
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(BB3, BB0));
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(BB3, BB1));
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(BB3, BB2));
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(BB3, BB3));
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(BB3, BB4));
|
||||
|
||||
// BB proper dominance
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->properlyDominates(BB0, BB0));
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->properlyDominates(BB0, BB1));
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->properlyDominates(BB0, BB2));
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->properlyDominates(BB0, BB3));
|
||||
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->properlyDominates(BB1, BB0));
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->properlyDominates(BB1, BB1));
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->properlyDominates(BB1, BB2));
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->properlyDominates(BB1, BB3));
|
||||
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->properlyDominates(BB2, BB0));
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->properlyDominates(BB2, BB1));
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->properlyDominates(BB2, BB2));
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->properlyDominates(BB2, BB3));
|
||||
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->properlyDominates(BB3, BB0));
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->properlyDominates(BB3, BB1));
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->properlyDominates(BB3, BB2));
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->properlyDominates(BB3, BB3));
|
||||
|
||||
// Instruction dominance in the same reachable BB
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(Y1, Y1));
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y1, Y2));
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(Y2, Y1));
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(Y2, Y2));
|
||||
|
||||
// Instruction dominance in the same unreachable BB
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y6, Y6));
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y6, Y7));
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y7, Y6));
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y7, Y7));
|
||||
|
||||
// Invoke
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y3, Y4));
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(Y3, Y5));
|
||||
|
||||
// Phi
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y2, Y9));
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(Y3, Y9));
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(Y8, Y9));
|
||||
|
||||
// Anything dominates unreachable
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y1, Y6));
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y3, Y6));
|
||||
|
||||
// Unreachable doesn't dominate reachable
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(Y6, Y1));
|
||||
|
||||
// Instruction, BB dominance
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(Y1, BB0));
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y1, BB1));
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y1, BB2));
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y1, BB3));
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y1, BB4));
|
||||
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(Y3, BB0));
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y3, BB1));
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(Y3, BB2));
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y3, BB3));
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(Y3, BB4));
|
||||
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y6, BB3));
|
||||
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
virtual void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
|
||||
AU.addRequired<DominatorTree>();
|
||||
}
|
||||
DPass() : FunctionPass(ID) {
|
||||
initializeDPassPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
char DPass::ID = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Module* makeLLVMModule(DPass *P) {
|
||||
const char *ModuleStrig =
|
||||
"declare i32 @g()\n" \
|
||||
"define void @f(i32 %x) {\n" \
|
||||
"bb0:\n" \
|
||||
" %y1 = add i32 %x, 1\n" \
|
||||
" %y2 = add i32 %x, 1\n" \
|
||||
" %y3 = invoke i32 @g() to label %bb1 unwind label %bb2\n" \
|
||||
"bb1:\n" \
|
||||
" %y4 = add i32 %x, 1\n" \
|
||||
" br label %bb4\n" \
|
||||
"bb2:\n" \
|
||||
" %y5 = landingpad i32 personality i32 ()* @g\n" \
|
||||
" cleanup\n" \
|
||||
" br label %bb4\n" \
|
||||
"bb3:\n" \
|
||||
" %y6 = add i32 %x, 1\n" \
|
||||
" %y7 = add i32 %x, 1\n" \
|
||||
" ret void\n" \
|
||||
"bb4:\n" \
|
||||
" %y8 = phi i32 [0, %bb2], [%y4, %bb1]\n"
|
||||
" %y9 = phi i32 [0, %bb2], [%y4, %bb1]\n"
|
||||
" ret void\n" \
|
||||
"}\n";
|
||||
LLVMContext &C = getGlobalContext();
|
||||
SMDiagnostic Err;
|
||||
return ParseAssemblyString(ModuleStrig, NULL, Err, C);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST(DominatorTree, Unreachable) {
|
||||
DPass *P = new DPass();
|
||||
Module *M = makeLLVMModule(P);
|
||||
PassManager Passes;
|
||||
Passes.add(P);
|
||||
Passes.run(*M);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(DPass, "dpass", "dpass", false, false)
|
||||
INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(DominatorTree)
|
||||
INITIALIZE_PASS_END(DPass, "dpass", "dpass", false, false)
|
@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
LEVEL = ../..
|
||||
TESTNAME = VMCore
|
||||
LINK_COMPONENTS := core support target ipa
|
||||
LINK_COMPONENTS := core support target ipa asmparser
|
||||
|
||||
include $(LEVEL)/Makefile.config
|
||||
include $(LLVM_SRC_ROOT)/unittests/Makefile.unittest
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user