6502/llvm-6502
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/c64scene-ar/llvm-6502.git synced 2024-12-12 13:30:51 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[X86][SSE] Avoid scalarization of v2i64 vector shifts

Browse Source 
Currently v2i64 vectors shifts (non-equal shift amounts) are scalarized, costing 4 x extract, 2 x x86-shifts and 2 x insert instructions - and it gets even more awkward on 32-bit targets.

This patch separately shifts the vector by both shift amounts and then shuffles the partial results back together, costing 2 x shuffles and 2 x sse-shifts instructions (+ 2 movs on pre-AVX hardware).

Note - this patch only improves the SHL / LSHR logical shifts as only these are supported in SSE hardware.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8416

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232660 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Simon Pilgrim 2015-03-18 19:35:31 +00:00
parent db4d401364
commit 0ee70a1554
3 changed files with 41 additions and 19 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

37
lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
View File

@ -5906,7 +5906,7 @@ static SDValue LowerCONCAT_VECTORSvXi1(SDValue Op,
return DAG.getNode(ISD::OR, dl, ResVT, V1, V2);
}
static SDValue LowerCONCAT_VECTORS(SDValue Op,
static SDValue LowerCONCAT_VECTORS(SDValue Op,
const X86Subtarget *Subtarget,
SelectionDAG &DAG) {
MVT VT = Op.getSimpleValueType();
@ -13255,11 +13255,11 @@ SDValue X86TargetLowering::LowerSELECT(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
// If we have AVX, we can use a variable vector select (VBLENDV) instead
// of 3 logic instructions for size savings and potentially speed.
// Unfortunately, there is no scalar form of VBLENDV.
// If either operand is a constant, don't try this. We can expect to
// optimize away at least one of the logic instructions later in that
// case, so that sequence would be faster than a variable blend.
// BLENDV was introduced with SSE 4.1, but the 2 register form implicitly
// uses XMM0 as the selection register. That may need just as many
// instructions as the AND/ANDN/OR sequence due to register moves, so
@ -13267,10 +13267,10 @@ SDValue X86TargetLowering::LowerSELECT(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
if (Subtarget->hasAVX() &&
!isa<ConstantFPSDNode>(Op1) && !isa<ConstantFPSDNode>(Op2)) {
// Convert to vectors, do a VSELECT, and convert back to scalar.
// All of the conversions should be optimized away.
EVT VecVT = VT == MVT::f32 ? MVT::v4f32 : MVT::v2f64;
SDValue VOp1 = DAG.getNode(ISD::SCALAR_TO_VECTOR, DL, VecVT, Op1);
SDValue VOp2 = DAG.getNode(ISD::SCALAR_TO_VECTOR, DL, VecVT, Op2);
@ -13278,9 +13278,9 @@ SDValue X86TargetLowering::LowerSELECT(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
EVT VCmpVT = VT == MVT::f32 ? MVT::v4i32 : MVT::v2i64;
VCmp = DAG.getNode(ISD::BITCAST, DL, VCmpVT, VCmp);
SDValue VSel = DAG.getNode(ISD::VSELECT, DL, VecVT, VCmp, VOp1, VOp2);
return DAG.getNode(ISD::EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT, DL, VT,
VSel, DAG.getIntPtrConstant(0));
}
@ -16189,6 +16189,17 @@ static SDValue LowerShift(SDValue Op, const X86Subtarget* Subtarget,
return Op;
}
// 2i64 vector logical shifts can efficiently avoid scalarization - do the
// shifts per-lane and then shuffle the partial results back together.
if (VT == MVT::v2i64 && Op.getOpcode() != ISD::SRA) {
// Splat the shift amounts so the scalar shifts above will catch it.
SDValue Amt0 = DAG.getVectorShuffle(VT, dl, Amt, Amt, {0, 0});
SDValue Amt1 = DAG.getVectorShuffle(VT, dl, Amt, Amt, {1, 1});
SDValue R0 = DAG.getNode(Op->getOpcode(), dl, VT, R, Amt0);
SDValue R1 = DAG.getNode(Op->getOpcode(), dl, VT, R, Amt1);
return DAG.getVectorShuffle(VT, dl, R0, R1, {0, 3});
}
// If possible, lower this packed shift into a vector multiply instead of
// expanding it into a sequence of scalar shifts.
// Do this only if the vector shift count is a constant build_vector.
@ -21960,7 +21971,7 @@ static SDValue VectorZextCombine(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
// an and with a mask.
// We'd like to try to combine that into a shuffle with zero
// plus a bitcast, removing the and.
if (N0.getOpcode() != ISD::BITCAST ||
if (N0.getOpcode() != ISD::BITCAST ||
N0.getOperand(0).getOpcode() != ISD::VECTOR_SHUFFLE)
return SDValue();
@ -21990,7 +22001,7 @@ static SDValue VectorZextCombine(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
unsigned ResSize = N1.getValueType().getScalarSizeInBits();
// Make sure the splat matches the mask we expect
if (SplatBitSize > ResSize ||
if (SplatBitSize > ResSize ||
(SplatValue + 1).exactLogBase2() != (int)SrcSize)
return SDValue();
@ -22948,7 +22959,7 @@ static SDValue PerformFANDCombine(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG) {
if (ConstantFPSDNode *C = dyn_cast<ConstantFPSDNode>(N->getOperand(1)))
if (C->getValueAPF().isPosZero())
return N->getOperand(1);
return SDValue();
}
@ -23222,7 +23233,7 @@ static SDValue PerformISDSETCCCombine(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
return DAG.getConstant(1, VT);
if (CC == ISD::SETEQ || CC == ISD::SETGE)
return DAG.getNOT(DL, LHS.getOperand(0), VT);
assert((CC == ISD::SETNE || CC == ISD::SETLT) &&
"Unexpected condition code!");
return LHS.getOperand(0);
@ -23264,7 +23275,7 @@ static SDValue PerformINSERTPSCombine(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
// countS and just gets an f32 from that address.
unsigned DestIndex =
cast<ConstantSDNode>(N->getOperand(2))->getZExtValue() >> 6;
Ld = NarrowVectorLoadToElement(cast<LoadSDNode>(Ld), DestIndex, DAG);
// Create this as a scalar to vector to match the instruction pattern.
@ -23288,7 +23299,7 @@ static SDValue PerformBLENDICombine(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG) {
// pattern-matching possibilities related to scalar math ops in SSE/AVX.
// x86InstrInfo knows how to commute this back after instruction selection
// if it would help register allocation.
// TODO: If optimizing for size or a processor that doesn't suffer from
// partial register update stalls, this should be transformed into a MOVSD
// instruction because a MOVSD is 1-2 bytes smaller than a BLENDPD.

9
test/CodeGen/X86/vshift-4.ll
View File

@ -13,11 +13,16 @@ entry:
ret void
}
; shift1b can't use a packed shift
; shift1b can't use a packed shift but can shift lanes separately and shuffle back together
define void @shift1b(<2 x i64> %val, <2 x i64>* %dst, <2 x i64> %sh) nounwind {
entry:
; CHECK-LABEL: shift1b:
; CHECK: shll
; CHECK: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm2 = xmm1[2,3,0,1]
; CHECK-NEXT: movdqa %xmm0, %xmm3
; CHECK-NEXT: psllq %xmm2, %xmm3
; CHECK-NEXT: movq {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[0],zero
; CHECK-NEXT: psllq %xmm1, %xmm0
; CHECK-NEXT: movsd {{.*#+}} xmm3 = xmm0[0],xmm3[1]
%shamt = shufflevector <2 x i64> %sh, <2 x i64> undef, <2 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1>
%shl = shl <2 x i64> %val, %shamt
store <2 x i64> %shl, <2 x i64>* %dst

14
test/CodeGen/X86/x86-shifts.ll
View File

@ -118,10 +118,16 @@ entry:
define <2 x i64> @shr2_nosplat(<2 x i64> %A) nounwind {
entry:
; CHECK: shr2_nosplat
; CHECK-NOT: psrlq
; CHECK-NOT: psrlq
; CHECK: ret
; CHECK-LABEL: shr2_nosplat
; CHECK: movdqa (%rcx), %xmm1
; CHECK-NEXT: movdqa %xmm1, %xmm2
; CHECK-NEXT: psrlq $8, %xmm2
; CHECK-NEXT: movdqa %xmm1, %xmm0
; CHECK-NEXT: psrlq $1, %xmm0
; CHECK-NEXT: movsd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm0[0],xmm1[1]
; CHECK-NEXT: movsd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm2[0],xmm0[1]
; CHECK-NEXT: xorpd %xmm1, %xmm0
; CHECK-NEXT: ret
%B = lshr <2 x i64> %A, < i64 8, i64 1>
%C = lshr <2 x i64> %A, < i64 1, i64 0>
%K = xor <2 x i64> %B, %C