X86: remove atomic instructions *after* we've iterated through them.

Otherwise they get freed and the implicit "isa<XYZ>" tests following
turn out badly (at least under sanitizers).

Also corrects the ordering of unordered atomic stores.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@212136 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Tim Northover 2014-07-01 22:10:30 +00:00
parent 75909261f0
commit 115f3667ce

View File

@ -90,6 +90,9 @@ bool X86AtomicExpandPass::runOnFunction(Function &F) {
MadeChange |= expandAtomicRMW(AI);
if (StoreInst *SI = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(Inst))
MadeChange |= expandAtomicStore(SI);
assert(MadeChange && "Atomic inst not expanded when it should be?");
Inst->eraseFromParent();
}
return MadeChange;
@ -259,7 +262,6 @@ bool X86AtomicExpandPass::expandAtomicRMW(AtomicRMWInst *AI) {
Builder.CreateCondBr(Success, ExitBB, LoopBB);
AI->replaceAllUsesWith(NewLoaded);
AI->eraseFromParent();
return true;
}
@ -268,10 +270,11 @@ bool X86AtomicExpandPass::expandAtomicStore(StoreInst *SI) {
// An atomic store might need cmpxchg16b (or 8b on x86) to execute. Express
// this in terms of the usual expansion to "atomicrmw xchg".
IRBuilder<> Builder(SI);
AtomicOrdering Order =
SI->getOrdering() == Unordered ? Monotonic : SI->getOrdering();
AtomicRMWInst *AI =
Builder.CreateAtomicRMW(AtomicRMWInst::Xchg, SI->getPointerOperand(),
SI->getValueOperand(), SI->getOrdering());
SI->eraseFromParent();
SI->getValueOperand(), Order);
// Now we have an appropriate swap instruction, lower it as usual.
if (shouldExpandAtomicRMW(AI))