6502/llvm-6502
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/c64scene-ar/llvm-6502.git synced 2024-12-21 00:32:23 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Remove special cases for more opcodes.

Browse Source 
This is basically the end of this series of patches for LegalizeDAG; the 
remaining special cases can't be removed without more infrastructure 
work.  There's a FIXME for each relevant opcode near the beginning of
SelectionDAGLegalize::LegalizeOp.



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@72514 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Eli Friedman 2009-05-28 04:39:57 +00:00
parent c06441e5ea
commit 1c39965342
1 changed files with 42 additions and 65 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

107
lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp
View File

@ -1038,39 +1038,6 @@ SDValue SelectionDAGLegalize::LegalizeOp(SDValue Op) {
if (Node->getNumValues() == 2)
AddLegalizedOperand(SDValue(Node, 1), Result.getValue(1));
return Result.getValue(Op.getResNo());
case ISD::BR_CC:
Tmp1 = LegalizeOp(Node->getOperand(0)); // Legalize the chain.
// Ensure that libcalls are emitted before a branch.
Tmp1 = DAG.getNode(ISD::TokenFactor, dl, MVT::Other, Tmp1, LastCALLSEQ_END);
Tmp1 = LegalizeOp(Tmp1);
Tmp2 = Node->getOperand(2); // LHS
Tmp3 = Node->getOperand(3); // RHS
Tmp4 = Node->getOperand(1); // CC
LegalizeSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(Tmp2.getValueType()),
Tmp2, Tmp3, Tmp4, dl);
LastCALLSEQ_END = DAG.getEntryNode();
// If we didn't get both a LHS and RHS back from LegalizeSetCC,
// the LHS is a legal SETCC itself. In this case, we need to compare
// the result against zero to select between true and false values.
if (Tmp3.getNode() == 0) {
Tmp3 = DAG.getConstant(0, Tmp2.getValueType());
Tmp4 = DAG.getCondCode(ISD::SETNE);
}
Result = DAG.UpdateNodeOperands(Result, Tmp1, Tmp4, Tmp2, Tmp3,
Node->getOperand(4));
switch (TLI.getOperationAction(ISD::BR_CC, Tmp3.getValueType())) {
default: assert(0 && "Unexpected action for BR_CC!");
case TargetLowering::Legal: break;
case TargetLowering::Custom:
Tmp4 = TLI.LowerOperation(Result, DAG);
if (Tmp4.getNode()) Result = Tmp4;
break;
}
break;
case ISD::LOAD: {
LoadSDNode *LD = cast<LoadSDNode>(Node);
Tmp1 = LegalizeOp(LD->getChain()); // Legalize the chain.
@ -1512,38 +1479,7 @@ SDValue SelectionDAGLegalize::LegalizeOp(SDValue Op) {
}
break;
}
case ISD::SELECT_CC: {
Tmp1 = Node->getOperand(0); // LHS
Tmp2 = Node->getOperand(1); // RHS
Tmp3 = LegalizeOp(Node->getOperand(2)); // True
Tmp4 = LegalizeOp(Node->getOperand(3)); // False
SDValue CC = Node->getOperand(4);
LegalizeSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(Tmp1.getValueType()),
Tmp1, Tmp2, CC, dl);
// If we didn't get both a LHS and RHS back from LegalizeSetCC,
// the LHS is a legal SETCC itself. In this case, we need to compare
// the result against zero to select between true and false values.
if (Tmp2.getNode() == 0) {
Tmp2 = DAG.getConstant(0, Tmp1.getValueType());
CC = DAG.getCondCode(ISD::SETNE);
}
Result = DAG.UpdateNodeOperands(Result, Tmp1, Tmp2, Tmp3, Tmp4, CC);
// Everything is legal, see if we should expand this op or something.
switch (TLI.getOperationAction(ISD::SELECT_CC, Tmp3.getValueType())) {
default: assert(0 && "This action is not supported yet!");
case TargetLowering::Legal: break;
case TargetLowering::Custom:
Tmp1 = TLI.LowerOperation(Result, DAG);
if (Tmp1.getNode()) Result = Tmp1;
break;
}
break;
}
}
assert(Result.getValueType() == Op.getValueType() &&
"Bad legalization!");
@ -2355,7 +2291,7 @@ SDValue SelectionDAGLegalize::ExpandBitCount(unsigned Opc, SDValue Op,
void SelectionDAGLegalize::ExpandNode(SDNode *Node,
SmallVectorImpl<SDValue> &Results) {
DebugLoc dl = Node->getDebugLoc();
SDValue Tmp1, Tmp2, Tmp3;
SDValue Tmp1, Tmp2, Tmp3, Tmp4;
switch (Node->getOpcode()) {
case ISD::CTPOP:
case ISD::CTLZ:
@ -2977,6 +2913,47 @@ void SelectionDAGLegalize::ExpandNode(SDNode *Node,
Results.push_back(Tmp1);
break;
}
case ISD::SELECT_CC: {
Tmp1 = Node->getOperand(0); // LHS
Tmp2 = Node->getOperand(1); // RHS
Tmp3 = Node->getOperand(2); // True
Tmp4 = Node->getOperand(3); // False
SDValue CC = Node->getOperand(4);
LegalizeSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(Tmp1.getValueType()),
Tmp1, Tmp2, CC, dl);
assert(!Tmp2.getNode() && "Can't legalize SELECT_CC with legal condition!");
Tmp2 = DAG.getConstant(0, Tmp1.getValueType());
CC = DAG.getCondCode(ISD::SETNE);
Tmp1 = DAG.getNode(ISD::SELECT_CC, dl, Node->getValueType(0), Tmp1, Tmp2,
Tmp3, Tmp4, CC);
Results.push_back(Tmp1);
break;
}
case ISD::BR_CC: {
Tmp1 = Node->getOperand(0); // Chain
Tmp2 = Node->getOperand(2); // LHS
Tmp3 = Node->getOperand(3); // RHS
Tmp4 = Node->getOperand(1); // CC
LegalizeSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(Tmp2.getValueType()),
Tmp2, Tmp3, Tmp4, dl);
LastCALLSEQ_END = DAG.getEntryNode();
// If we didn't get both a LHS and RHS back from LegalizeSetCC,
// the LHS is a legal SETCC itself. In this case, we need to compare
// the result against zero to select between true and false values.
if (Tmp3.getNode() == 0) {
Tmp3 = DAG.getConstant(0, Tmp2.getValueType());
Tmp4 = DAG.getCondCode(ISD::SETNE);
}
Tmp1 = DAG.getNode(ISD::BR_CC, dl, Node->getValueType(0), Tmp1, Tmp4, Tmp2,
Tmp3, Node->getOperand(4));
Results.push_back(Tmp1);
break;
}
case ISD::GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE:
case ISD::GlobalAddress:
case ISD::GlobalTLSAddress: