mirror of
https://github.com/c64scene-ar/llvm-6502.git
synced 2026-04-24 13:18:17 +00:00
Generalize my hack to use SDNodeInfo to find out when a
node is always guaranteed to have a particular type instead of hacking in ISD::STORE explicitly. This allows us to use implied types for a broad range of nodes, even target specific ones. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@97355 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
@@ -260,25 +260,6 @@ unsigned CompleteMatchMatcher::getHashImpl() const {
|
||||
|
||||
// isContradictoryImpl Implementations.
|
||||
|
||||
bool CheckOpcodeMatcher::isContradictoryImpl(const Matcher *M) const {
|
||||
if (const CheckOpcodeMatcher *COM = dyn_cast<CheckOpcodeMatcher>(M)) {
|
||||
// One node can't have two different opcodes!
|
||||
return &COM->getOpcode() != &getOpcode();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: CheckMultiOpcodeMatcher?
|
||||
|
||||
// This is a special common case we see a lot in the X86 backend, we know that
|
||||
// ISD::STORE nodes can't have non-void type.
|
||||
if (const CheckTypeMatcher *CT = dyn_cast<CheckTypeMatcher>(M))
|
||||
// FIXME: This sucks, get void nodes from type constraints.
|
||||
return (getOpcode().getEnumName() == "ISD::STORE" ||
|
||||
getOpcode().getEnumName() == "ISD::INTRINSIC_VOID") &&
|
||||
CT->getType() != MVT::isVoid;
|
||||
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static bool TypesAreContradictory(MVT::SimpleValueType T1,
|
||||
MVT::SimpleValueType T2) {
|
||||
// If the two types are the same, then they are the same, so they don't
|
||||
@@ -297,6 +278,32 @@ static bool TypesAreContradictory(MVT::SimpleValueType T1,
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool CheckOpcodeMatcher::isContradictoryImpl(const Matcher *M) const {
|
||||
if (const CheckOpcodeMatcher *COM = dyn_cast<CheckOpcodeMatcher>(M)) {
|
||||
// One node can't have two different opcodes!
|
||||
return &COM->getOpcode() != &getOpcode();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: CheckMultiOpcodeMatcher?
|
||||
|
||||
// If the node has a known type, and if the type we're checking for is
|
||||
// different, then we know they contradict. For example, a check for
|
||||
// ISD::STORE will never be true at the same time a check for Type i32 is.
|
||||
if (const CheckTypeMatcher *CT = dyn_cast<CheckTypeMatcher>(M)) {
|
||||
// FIXME: What result is this referring to?
|
||||
unsigned NodeType;
|
||||
if (getOpcode().getNumResults() == 0)
|
||||
NodeType = MVT::isVoid;
|
||||
else
|
||||
NodeType = getOpcode().getKnownType();
|
||||
if (NodeType != EEVT::isUnknown)
|
||||
return TypesAreContradictory((MVT::SimpleValueType)NodeType,
|
||||
CT->getType());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool CheckTypeMatcher::isContradictoryImpl(const Matcher *M) const {
|
||||
if (const CheckTypeMatcher *CT = dyn_cast<CheckTypeMatcher>(M))
|
||||
return TypesAreContradictory(getType(), CT->getType());
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user