diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/MachineBlockPlacement.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/MachineBlockPlacement.cpp
index f5be01b0ca7..5de120eba88 100644
--- a/lib/CodeGen/MachineBlockPlacement.cpp
+++ b/lib/CodeGen/MachineBlockPlacement.cpp
@@ -585,12 +585,14 @@ void MachineBlockPlacement::rotateLoop(MachineLoop &L,
 
   // We need to analyze the branch and determine if rotating the loop will
   // completely remove a branch. We bail if the analysis fails or we don't find
-  // an unconditional backedge.
+  // an unconditional backedge. Note that this has to handle cases where the
+  // original order was rotated, and the chain has un-done it. As a result,
+  // there may not (yet) be the uncondiationl branch, but we can tell whether
+  // one will be added when updating the terminators.
   SmallVector<MachineOperand, 4> Cond;
   MachineBasicBlock *TBB = 0, *FBB = 0;
-  if (TII->AnalyzeBranch(*Latch, TBB, FBB, Cond) || !TBB || FBB || !Cond.empty())
+  if (TII->AnalyzeBranch(*Latch, TBB, FBB, Cond) || !Cond.empty())
     return;
-  assert(TBB == Header && "Found backedge that doesn't go to the header!");
 
   // Next we need to find a split point. This rotate algorithm is *very*
   // narrow, and it only tries to do the rotate when it can find a split point
@@ -604,27 +606,35 @@ void MachineBlockPlacement::rotateLoop(MachineLoop &L,
        I != E; ++I) {
     Cond.clear();
     TBB = FBB = 0;
-    if (TII->AnalyzeBranch(**I, TBB, FBB, Cond) || !TBB || Cond.empty())
+    // Ensure that this is a block with a conditional branch which we can
+    // analyze and re-form after rotating the loop. While it might be tempting
+    // to use the TBB or FBB output parameters from this, they will often be
+    // lies as they are only correct after the terminators have been updated,
+    // and we are mid-chain formation.
+    if (TII->AnalyzeBranch(**I, TBB, FBB, Cond) || Cond.empty())
       continue;
-    // Swap things so that the in-loop successor is always in FBB or is an
-    // implicit fallthrough.
-    if (FBB && !LoopBlockSet.count(FBB))
-      std::swap(TBB, FBB);
-    // Check that we actually have a loop exit branch.
-    // FIXME: We should probably just use the LoopInfo for this.
-    if (!LoopBlockSet.count(TBB) && (!FBB || !LoopBlockSet.count(FBB))) {
-      // This is a very arbitrary restriction, but it ensures we don't disrupt
-      // the existing chain layout. We insist that the in-loop successor is
-      // chained as a fallthrough successor (even if the branch hasn't been
-      // updated to reflect that yet).
-      if (FBB && FBB != *llvm::prior(I))
-        continue;
 
-      NewBottom = *I;
-      NewTop = *llvm::prior(I);
-      SplitIt = I.base();
-      break;
+    // See if this block is an exiting block from the loop. LoopInfo provides
+    // a nice API for this, but it's actuall N*M runtime where N is the number
+    // of blocks in the loop and M is the number of successors. We can
+    // eliminate the N by doing this ourselves.
+    // FIXME: The LoopInfo datastructure should be improved for these types of
+    // queries.
+    MachineBasicBlock *ExitB = 0;
+    for (MachineBasicBlock::succ_iterator SI = (*I)->succ_begin(), SE = (*I)->succ_end();
+         SI != SE; ++SI) {
+      if (!(*SI)->isLandingPad() && *SI != *I && !LoopBlockSet.count(*SI)) {
+        ExitB = *SI;
+        break;
+      }
     }
+    if (!ExitB)
+      continue;
+
+    NewBottom = *I;
+    NewTop = *llvm::prior(I);
+    SplitIt = I.base();
+    break;
   }
   if (!NewBottom || !NewTop ||
       SplitIt == LoopChain.end() || SplitIt == LoopChain.begin())
diff --git a/test/CodeGen/X86/block-placement.ll b/test/CodeGen/X86/block-placement.ll
index 66def49e4b4..52f7c3081ce 100644
--- a/test/CodeGen/X86/block-placement.ll
+++ b/test/CodeGen/X86/block-placement.ll
@@ -199,6 +199,44 @@ exit:
   ret i32 %base
 }
 
+define void @test_loop_rotate_reversed_blocks() {
+; This test case (greatly reduced from an Olden bencmark) ensures that the loop
+; rotate implementation doesn't assume that loops are laid out in a particular
+; order. The first loop will get split into two basic blocks, with the loop
+; header coming after the loop latch.
+;
+; CHECK: test_loop_rotate_reversed_blocks
+; CHECK: %entry
+; Look for a jump into the middle of the loop, and no branches mid-way.
+; CHECK: jmp
+; CHECK: %loop1
+; CHECK-NOT: j{{\w*}} .LBB{{.*}}
+; CHECK: %loop1
+; CHECK: je
+
+entry:
+  %cond1 = load volatile i1* undef
+  br i1 %cond1, label %loop2.preheader, label %loop1
+
+loop1:
+  call i32 @f()
+  %cond2 = load volatile i1* undef
+  br i1 %cond2, label %loop2.preheader, label %loop1
+
+loop2.preheader:
+  call i32 @f()
+  %cond3 = load volatile i1* undef
+  br i1 %cond3, label %exit, label %loop2
+
+loop2:
+  call i32 @f()
+  %cond4 = load volatile i1* undef
+  br i1 %cond4, label %exit, label %loop2
+
+exit:
+  ret void
+}
+
 define i32 @test_loop_align(i32 %i, i32* %a) {
 ; Check that we provide basic loop body alignment with the block placement
 ; pass.
@@ -567,8 +605,8 @@ define void @test_unnatural_cfg_backwards_inner_loop() {
 ; CHECK: test_unnatural_cfg_backwards_inner_loop
 ; CHECK: %entry
 ; CHECK: %body
-; CHECK: %loop1
 ; CHECK: %loop2b
+; CHECK: %loop1
 ; CHECK: %loop2a
 
 entry: