[PM] Fix a contradiction in the comments noticed by Anders.

Have I mentioned that functions returning true on error and false on
success are confusing? They're more confusing when their name is
"verify". Anyways...

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@199622 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Chandler Carruth 2014-01-20 02:32:02 +00:00
parent 7582d8d76f
commit 3bbede5a24

View File

@ -34,14 +34,14 @@ class raw_ostream;
/// pass. /// pass.
/// ///
/// If there are no errors, the function returns false. If an error is found, /// If there are no errors, the function returns false. If an error is found,
/// a message describing the error is written to OS (if non-null) and false is /// a message describing the error is written to OS (if non-null) and true is
/// returned. /// returned.
bool verifyFunction(const Function &F, raw_ostream *OS = 0); bool verifyFunction(const Function &F, raw_ostream *OS = 0);
/// \brief Check a module for errors. /// \brief Check a module for errors.
/// ///
/// If there are no errors, the function returns false. If an error is found, /// If there are no errors, the function returns false. If an error is found,
/// a message describing the error is written to OS (if non-null) and false is /// a message describing the error is written to OS (if non-null) and true is
/// returned. /// returned.
bool verifyModule(const Module &M, raw_ostream *OS = 0); bool verifyModule(const Module &M, raw_ostream *OS = 0);