Avoid revocations when possible.

This is a small targeted fix for pr20119. The code needs quiet a bit of
refactoring and I added some FIXMEs about it, but I want to get the testcase
passing first.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@212101 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Rafael Espindola
2014-07-01 14:34:30 +00:00
parent e9a4e0681e
commit 4551671908
2 changed files with 35 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -434,12 +434,27 @@ const MCSymbolData *MCAssembler::getAtom(const MCSymbolData *SD) const {
return SD->getFragment()->getAtom();
}
// Try to fully compute Expr to an absolute value and if that fails produce
// a relocatable expr.
// FIXME: Should this be the behavior of EvaluateAsRelocatable itself?
static bool evaluate(const MCExpr &Expr, const MCAsmLayout &Layout,
MCValue &Target) {
if (Expr.EvaluateAsValue(Target, &Layout))
if (Target.isAbsolute())
return true;
return Expr.EvaluateAsRelocatable(Target, &Layout);
}
bool MCAssembler::evaluateFixup(const MCAsmLayout &Layout,
const MCFixup &Fixup, const MCFragment *DF,
MCValue &Target, uint64_t &Value) const {
++stats::evaluateFixup;
if (!Fixup.getValue()->EvaluateAsRelocatable(Target, &Layout))
// FIXME: This code has some duplication with RecordRelocation. We should
// probably merge the two into a single callback that tries to evaluate a
// fixup and records a relocation if one is needed.
const MCExpr *Expr = Fixup.getValue();
if (!evaluate(*Expr, Layout, Target))
getContext().FatalError(Fixup.getLoc(), "expected relocatable expression");
bool IsPCRel = Backend.getFixupKindInfo(