Give SmallPtrSet move semantics when we have R-value references.

Somehow, this ADT got missed which is moderately terrifying considering
the efficiency of move for it.

The code to implement move semantics for it is pretty horrible
currently but was written to reasonably closely match the rest of the
code. Unittests that cover both copying and moving (at a basic level)
added.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@195239 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Chandler Carruth
2013-11-20 11:14:33 +00:00
parent 56b09220a3
commit 46198164b3
3 changed files with 115 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@@ -71,6 +71,55 @@ TEST(SmallPtrSetTest, GrowthTest) {
EXPECT_EQ(1,buf[i]);
}
TEST(SmallPtrSetTest, CopyAndMoveTest) {
int buf[8];
for (int i = 0; i < 8; ++i)
buf[i] = 0;
SmallPtrSet<int *, 4> s1;
s1.insert(&buf[0]);
s1.insert(&buf[1]);
s1.insert(&buf[2]);
s1.insert(&buf[3]);
EXPECT_EQ(4U, s1.size());
for (int i = 0; i < 8; ++i)
if (i < 4)
EXPECT_TRUE(s1.count(&buf[i]));
else
EXPECT_FALSE(s1.count(&buf[i]));
SmallPtrSet<int *, 4> s2(s1);
EXPECT_EQ(4U, s2.size());
for (int i = 0; i < 8; ++i)
if (i < 4)
EXPECT_TRUE(s2.count(&buf[i]));
else
EXPECT_FALSE(s2.count(&buf[i]));
s1 = s2;
EXPECT_EQ(4U, s1.size());
for (int i = 0; i < 8; ++i)
if (i < 4)
EXPECT_TRUE(s1.count(&buf[i]));
else
EXPECT_FALSE(s1.count(&buf[i]));
SmallPtrSet<int *, 4> s3(llvm_move(s1));
EXPECT_EQ(4U, s3.size());
for (int i = 0; i < 8; ++i)
if (i < 4)
EXPECT_TRUE(s3.count(&buf[i]));
else
EXPECT_FALSE(s3.count(&buf[i]));
s1 = llvm_move(s3);
EXPECT_EQ(4U, s1.size());
for (int i = 0; i < 8; ++i)
if (i < 4)
EXPECT_TRUE(s1.count(&buf[i]));
else
EXPECT_FALSE(s1.count(&buf[i]));
}
TEST(SmallPtrSetTest, SwapTest) {
int buf[10];