Don't use isa<CallInst>(this) in the constructor for CallInst's base class.

This has undefined behavior, because the classof implementation attempts to
access parts of the not-yet-constructed derived class. Found by clang
-fsanitize=vptr.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@170658 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Richard Smith 2012-12-20 04:11:02 +00:00
parent c488901355
commit 488fdce982

View File

@ -46,10 +46,13 @@ Value::Value(Type *ty, unsigned scid)
SubclassOptionalData(0), SubclassData(0), VTy((Type*)checkType(ty)), SubclassOptionalData(0), SubclassData(0), VTy((Type*)checkType(ty)),
UseList(0), Name(0) { UseList(0), Name(0) {
// FIXME: Why isn't this in the subclass gunk?? // FIXME: Why isn't this in the subclass gunk??
if (isa<CallInst>(this) || isa<InvokeInst>(this)) // Note, we cannot call isa<CallInst> before the CallInst has been
// constructed.
if (SubclassID == Instruction::Call || SubclassID == Instruction::Invoke)
assert((VTy->isFirstClassType() || VTy->isVoidTy() || VTy->isStructTy()) && assert((VTy->isFirstClassType() || VTy->isVoidTy() || VTy->isStructTy()) &&
"invalid CallInst type!"); "invalid CallInst type!");
else if (!isa<Constant>(this) && !isa<BasicBlock>(this)) else if (SubclassID != BasicBlockVal &&
(SubclassID < ConstantFirstVal || SubclassID > ConstantLastVal))
assert((VTy->isFirstClassType() || VTy->isVoidTy()) && assert((VTy->isFirstClassType() || VTy->isVoidTy()) &&
"Cannot create non-first-class values except for constants!"); "Cannot create non-first-class values except for constants!");
} }