From 53b344dcca9427de2f33ce2c8d7f300218fe49e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pekka Jaaskelainen Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 11:21:44 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Slight language tweak from Jonathan Humphreys. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@210327 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- docs/LangRef.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/LangRef.rst b/docs/LangRef.rst index 9bfd3ed2c49..d246e469fb2 100644 --- a/docs/LangRef.rst +++ b/docs/LangRef.rst @@ -2828,7 +2828,7 @@ with the same loop identifier. Precisely, given two instructions ``m1`` and ``m2`` that both have the ``llvm.mem.parallel_loop_access`` metadata, with ``L1`` and ``L2`` being the set of loops associated with that metadata, respectively, then there is no loop -carried dependence between ``m1`` and ``m2`` for loops ``L1`` or +carried dependence between ``m1`` and ``m2`` for loops in both ``L1`` and ``L2``. As a special case, if all memory accessing instructions in a loop have