mirror of
https://github.com/c64scene-ar/llvm-6502.git
synced 2025-06-20 10:24:12 +00:00
Teach ScalarEvolution to exploit min and max expressions when proving
isKnownPredicate. The motivation for this change is to optimize away checks in loops like this: limit = min(t, len) for (i = 0 to limit) if (i >= len || i < 0) throw_array_of_of_bounds(); a[i] = ... Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6635 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224285 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
@ -6886,6 +6886,85 @@ bool ScalarEvolution::isImpliedCondOperands(ICmpInst::Predicate Pred,
|
||||
getNotSCEV(FoundLHS));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/// If Expr computes ~A, return A else return nullptr
|
||||
static const SCEV *MatchNotExpr(const SCEV *Expr) {
|
||||
const SCEVAddExpr *Add = dyn_cast<SCEVAddExpr>(Expr);
|
||||
if (!Add || Add->getNumOperands() != 2) return nullptr;
|
||||
|
||||
const SCEVConstant *AddLHS = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(Add->getOperand(0));
|
||||
if (!(AddLHS && AddLHS->getValue()->getValue().isAllOnesValue()))
|
||||
return nullptr;
|
||||
|
||||
const SCEVMulExpr *AddRHS = dyn_cast<SCEVMulExpr>(Add->getOperand(1));
|
||||
if (!AddRHS || AddRHS->getNumOperands() != 2) return nullptr;
|
||||
|
||||
const SCEVConstant *MulLHS = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(AddRHS->getOperand(0));
|
||||
if (!(MulLHS && MulLHS->getValue()->getValue().isAllOnesValue()))
|
||||
return nullptr;
|
||||
|
||||
return AddRHS->getOperand(1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/// Is MaybeMaxExpr an SMax or UMax of Candidate and some other values?
|
||||
template<typename MaxExprType>
|
||||
static bool IsMaxConsistingOf(const SCEV *MaybeMaxExpr,
|
||||
const SCEV *Candidate) {
|
||||
const MaxExprType *MaxExpr = dyn_cast<MaxExprType>(MaybeMaxExpr);
|
||||
if (!MaxExpr) return false;
|
||||
|
||||
auto It = std::find(MaxExpr->op_begin(), MaxExpr->op_end(), Candidate);
|
||||
return It != MaxExpr->op_end();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/// Is MaybeMinExpr an SMin or UMin of Candidate and some other values?
|
||||
template<typename MaxExprType>
|
||||
static bool IsMinConsistingOf(ScalarEvolution &SE,
|
||||
const SCEV *MaybeMinExpr,
|
||||
const SCEV *Candidate) {
|
||||
const SCEV *MaybeMaxExpr = MatchNotExpr(MaybeMinExpr);
|
||||
if (!MaybeMaxExpr)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
return IsMaxConsistingOf<MaxExprType>(MaybeMaxExpr, SE.getNotSCEV(Candidate));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/// Is LHS `Pred` RHS true on the virtue of LHS or RHS being a Min or Max
|
||||
/// expression?
|
||||
static bool IsKnownPredicateViaMinOrMax(ScalarEvolution &SE,
|
||||
ICmpInst::Predicate Pred,
|
||||
const SCEV *LHS, const SCEV *RHS) {
|
||||
switch (Pred) {
|
||||
default:
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE:
|
||||
std::swap(LHS, RHS);
|
||||
// fall through
|
||||
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE:
|
||||
return
|
||||
// min(A, ...) <= A
|
||||
IsMinConsistingOf<SCEVSMaxExpr>(SE, LHS, RHS) ||
|
||||
// A <= max(A, ...)
|
||||
IsMaxConsistingOf<SCEVSMaxExpr>(RHS, LHS);
|
||||
|
||||
case ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE:
|
||||
std::swap(LHS, RHS);
|
||||
// fall through
|
||||
case ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE:
|
||||
return
|
||||
// min(A, ...) <= A
|
||||
IsMinConsistingOf<SCEVUMaxExpr>(SE, LHS, RHS) ||
|
||||
// A <= max(A, ...)
|
||||
IsMaxConsistingOf<SCEVUMaxExpr>(RHS, LHS);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
llvm_unreachable("covered switch fell through?!");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// isImpliedCondOperandsHelper - Test whether the condition described by
|
||||
/// Pred, LHS, and RHS is true whenever the condition described by Pred,
|
||||
/// FoundLHS, and FoundRHS is true.
|
||||
@ -6894,6 +6973,12 @@ ScalarEvolution::isImpliedCondOperandsHelper(ICmpInst::Predicate Pred,
|
||||
const SCEV *LHS, const SCEV *RHS,
|
||||
const SCEV *FoundLHS,
|
||||
const SCEV *FoundRHS) {
|
||||
auto IsKnownPredicateFull =
|
||||
[this](ICmpInst::Predicate Pred, const SCEV *LHS, const SCEV *RHS) {
|
||||
return isKnownPredicateWithRanges(Pred, LHS, RHS) ||
|
||||
IsKnownPredicateViaMinOrMax(*this, Pred, LHS, RHS);
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
switch (Pred) {
|
||||
default: llvm_unreachable("Unexpected ICmpInst::Predicate value!");
|
||||
case ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ:
|
||||
@ -6903,26 +6988,26 @@ ScalarEvolution::isImpliedCondOperandsHelper(ICmpInst::Predicate Pred,
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT:
|
||||
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE:
|
||||
if (isKnownPredicateWithRanges(ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE, LHS, FoundLHS) &&
|
||||
isKnownPredicateWithRanges(ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE, RHS, FoundRHS))
|
||||
if (IsKnownPredicateFull(ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE, LHS, FoundLHS) &&
|
||||
IsKnownPredicateFull(ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE, RHS, FoundRHS))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT:
|
||||
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE:
|
||||
if (isKnownPredicateWithRanges(ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE, LHS, FoundLHS) &&
|
||||
isKnownPredicateWithRanges(ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE, RHS, FoundRHS))
|
||||
if (IsKnownPredicateFull(ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE, LHS, FoundLHS) &&
|
||||
IsKnownPredicateFull(ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE, RHS, FoundRHS))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT:
|
||||
case ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE:
|
||||
if (isKnownPredicateWithRanges(ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE, LHS, FoundLHS) &&
|
||||
isKnownPredicateWithRanges(ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE, RHS, FoundRHS))
|
||||
if (IsKnownPredicateFull(ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE, LHS, FoundLHS) &&
|
||||
IsKnownPredicateFull(ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE, RHS, FoundRHS))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT:
|
||||
case ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE:
|
||||
if (isKnownPredicateWithRanges(ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE, LHS, FoundLHS) &&
|
||||
isKnownPredicateWithRanges(ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE, RHS, FoundRHS))
|
||||
if (IsKnownPredicateFull(ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE, LHS, FoundLHS) &&
|
||||
IsKnownPredicateFull(ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE, RHS, FoundRHS))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user