Assert that ValueHandleBase::ValueIsRAUWd doesn't change the tracked Value type.

This invariant is enforced in Value::replaceAllUsesWith, thus it seems
logical to apply it also to ValueHandles. This commit fixes InstCombine
to not trigger the assertion during the removal of constant bitcasts in
call instructions.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5828

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@220468 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Frederic Riss 2014-10-23 04:08:42 +00:00
parent 54d6b1b71e
commit 648728d4e4
2 changed files with 11 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -773,6 +773,8 @@ void ValueHandleBase::ValueIsDeleted(Value *V) {
void ValueHandleBase::ValueIsRAUWd(Value *Old, Value *New) {
assert(Old->HasValueHandle &&"Should only be called if ValueHandles present");
assert(Old != New && "Changing value into itself!");
assert(Old->getType() == New->getType() &&
"replaceAllUses of value with new value of different type!");
// Get the linked list base, which is guaranteed to exist since the
// HasValueHandle flag is set.

View File

@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ bool InstCombiner::transformConstExprCastCall(CallSite CS) {
if (!Caller->use_empty() &&
// void -> non-void is handled specially
!NewRetTy->isVoidTy())
return false; // Cannot transform this return value.
return false; // Cannot transform this return value.
}
if (!CallerPAL.isEmpty() && !Caller->use_empty()) {
@ -1589,8 +1589,14 @@ bool InstCombiner::transformConstExprCastCall(CallSite CS) {
if (!Caller->use_empty())
ReplaceInstUsesWith(*Caller, NV);
else if (Caller->hasValueHandle())
ValueHandleBase::ValueIsRAUWd(Caller, NV);
else if (Caller->hasValueHandle()) {
if (OldRetTy == NV->getType())
ValueHandleBase::ValueIsRAUWd(Caller, NV);
else
// We cannot call ValueIsRAUWd with a different type, and the
// actual tracked value will disappear.
ValueHandleBase::ValueIsDeleted(Caller);
}
EraseInstFromFunction(*Caller);
return true;