6502/llvm-6502
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/c64scene-ar/llvm-6502.git synced 2024-08-18 12:29:21 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Rework post dominator information so that we do not have to

Browse Source 
unify all exit nodes of a function to compute post-dominance information.
This does not work with functions that have both unwind and return nodes,
because we cannot unify these blocks.  The new implementation is better
anyway. :)


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@8460 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Chris Lattner 2003-09-10 20:37:08 +00:00
parent 420a8bf2b2
commit 706e61ead9
1 changed files with 95 additions and 86 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

181
lib/Analysis/PostDominators.cpp
View File

@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "llvm/Analysis/PostDominators.h"
#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/UnifyFunctionExitNodes.h"
#include "llvm/iTerminators.h"
#include "llvm/Support/CFG.h"
#include "Support/DepthFirstIterator.h"
#include "Support/SetOperations.h"
@ -23,75 +23,77 @@ B("postdomset", "Post-Dominator Set Construction", true);
//
bool PostDominatorSet::runOnFunction(Function &F) {
Doms.clear(); // Reset from the last time we were run...
// Since we require that the unify all exit nodes pass has been run, we know
// that there can be at most one return instruction in the function left.
// Get it.
//
Root = getAnalysis<UnifyFunctionExitNodes>().getExitNode();
if (Root == 0) { // No exit node for the function? Postdomsets are all empty
for (Function::iterator FI = F.begin(), FE = F.end(); FI != FE; ++FI)
Doms[FI] = DomSetType();
return false;
// Scan the function looking for the root nodes of the post-dominance
// relationships. These blocks end with return and unwind instructions.
// While we are iterating over the function, we also initialize all of the
// domsets to empty.
Roots.clear();
for (Function::iterator I = F.begin(), E = F.end(); I != E; ++I) {
Doms[I]; // Initialize to empty
if (isa<ReturnInst>(I->getTerminator()) ||
isa<UnwindInst>(I->getTerminator()))
Roots.push_back(I);
}
// If there are no exit nodes for the function, postdomsets are all empty.
// This can happen if the function just contains an infinite loop, for
// example.
if (Roots.empty()) return false;
// If we have more than one root, we insert an artificial "null" exit, which
// has "virtual edges" to each of the real exit nodes.
if (Roots.size() > 1)
Doms[0].insert(0);
bool Changed;
do {
Changed = false;
std::set<const BasicBlock*> Visited;
DomSetType WorkingSet;
idf_iterator<BasicBlock*> It = idf_begin(Root), End = idf_end(Root);
for ( ; It != End; ++It) {
BasicBlock *BB = *It;
succ_iterator PI = succ_begin(BB), PEnd = succ_end(BB);
if (PI != PEnd) { // Is there SOME predecessor?
// Loop until we get to a successor that has had it's dom set filled
// in at least once. We are guaranteed to have this because we are
// traversing the graph in DFO and have handled start nodes specially.
//
while (Doms[*PI].size() == 0) ++PI;
WorkingSet = Doms[*PI];
for (++PI; PI != PEnd; ++PI) { // Intersect all of the successor sets
DomSetType &PredSet = Doms[*PI];
if (PredSet.size())
set_intersect(WorkingSet, PredSet);
}
} else if (BB != Root) {
// If this isn't the root basic block and it has no successors, it must
// be an non-returning block. Fib a bit by saying that the root node
// postdominates this unreachable node. This isn't exactly true,
// because there is no path from this node to the root node, but it is
// sorta true because any paths to the exit node would have to go
// through this node.
//
// This allows for postdominator properties to be built for code that
// doesn't return in a reasonable manner.
//
WorkingSet = Doms[Root];
}
for (unsigned i = 0, e = Roots.size(); i != e; ++i)
for (idf_iterator<BasicBlock*> It = idf_begin(Roots[i]),
E = idf_end(Roots[i]); It != E; ++It) {
BasicBlock *BB = *It;
succ_iterator SI = succ_begin(BB), SE = succ_end(BB);
if (SI != SE) { // Is there SOME successor?
// Loop until we get to a successor that has had it's dom set filled
// in at least once. We are guaranteed to have this because we are
// traversing the graph in DFO and have handled start nodes specially.
//
while (Doms[*SI].size() == 0) ++SI;
WorkingSet = Doms[*SI];
for (++SI; SI != SE; ++SI) { // Intersect all of the successor sets
DomSetType &SuccSet = Doms[*SI];
if (SuccSet.size())
set_intersect(WorkingSet, SuccSet);
}
} else {
// If this node has no successors, it must be one of the root nodes.
// We will already take care of the notion that the node
// post-dominates itself. The only thing we have to add is that if
// there are multiple root nodes, we want to insert a special "null"
// exit node which dominates the roots as well.
if (Roots.size() > 1)
WorkingSet.insert(0);
}
WorkingSet.insert(BB); // A block always dominates itself
DomSetType &BBSet = Doms[BB];
if (BBSet != WorkingSet) {
BBSet.swap(WorkingSet); // Constant time operation!
Changed = true; // The sets changed.
WorkingSet.insert(BB); // A block always dominates itself
DomSetType &BBSet = Doms[BB];
if (BBSet != WorkingSet) {
BBSet.swap(WorkingSet); // Constant time operation!
Changed = true; // The sets changed.
}
WorkingSet.clear(); // Clear out the set for next iteration
}
WorkingSet.clear(); // Clear out the set for next iteration
}
} while (Changed);
return false;
}
// getAnalysisUsage - This obviously provides a post-dominator set, but it also
// requires the UnifyFunctionExitNodes pass.
//
void PostDominatorSet::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
AU.setPreservesAll();
AU.addRequired<UnifyFunctionExitNodes>();
}
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// ImmediatePostDominators Implementation
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
@ -107,17 +109,25 @@ static RegisterAnalysis<PostDominatorTree>
F("postdomtree", "Post-Dominator Tree Construction", true);
void PostDominatorTree::calculate(const PostDominatorSet &DS) {
Nodes[Root] = new Node(Root, 0); // Add a node for the root...
if (Roots.empty()) return;
BasicBlock *Root = Roots.size() == 1 ? Roots[0] : 0;
if (Root) {
// Iterate over all nodes in depth first order...
for (idf_iterator<BasicBlock*> I = idf_begin(Root), E = idf_end(Root);
I != E; ++I) {
Nodes[Root] = RootNode = new Node(Root, 0); // Add a node for the root...
// Iterate over all nodes in depth first order...
for (unsigned i = 0, e = Roots.size(); i != e; ++i)
for (idf_iterator<BasicBlock*> I = idf_begin(Roots[i]),
E = idf_end(Roots[i]); I != E; ++I) {
BasicBlock *BB = *I;
const DominatorSet::DomSetType &Dominators = DS.getDominators(BB);
unsigned DomSetSize = Dominators.size();
if (DomSetSize == 1) continue; // Root node... IDom = null
// If we have already computed the immediate dominator for this node,
// don't revisit. This can happen due to nodes reachable from multiple
// roots, but which the idf_iterator doesn't know about.
if (Nodes.find(BB) != Nodes.end()) continue;
// Loop over all dominators of this node. This corresponds to looping
// over nodes in the dominator chain, looking for a node whose dominator
// set is equal to the current nodes, except that the current node does
@ -130,28 +140,27 @@ void PostDominatorTree::calculate(const PostDominatorSet &DS) {
DominatorSet::DomSetType::const_iterator I = Dominators.begin();
DominatorSet::DomSetType::const_iterator End = Dominators.end();
for (; I != End; ++I) { // Iterate over dominators...
// All of our dominators should form a chain, where the number
// of elements in the dominator set indicates what level the
// node is at in the chain. We want the node immediately
// above us, so it will have an identical dominator set,
// except that BB will not dominate it... therefore it's
// dominator set size will be one less than BB's...
//
if (DS.getDominators(*I).size() == DomSetSize - 1) {
// We know that the immediate dominator should already have a node,
// because we are traversing the CFG in depth first order!
//
Node *IDomNode = Nodes[*I];
assert(IDomNode && "No node for IDOM?");
// All of our dominators should form a chain, where the number
// of elements in the dominator set indicates what level the
// node is at in the chain. We want the node immediately
// above us, so it will have an identical dominator set,
// except that BB will not dominate it... therefore it's
// dominator set size will be one less than BB's...
//
if (DS.getDominators(*I).size() == DomSetSize - 1) {
// We know that the immediate dominator should already have a node,
// because we are traversing the CFG in depth first order!
//
Node *IDomNode = Nodes[*I];
assert(IDomNode && "No node for IDOM?");
// Add a new tree node for this BasicBlock, and link it as a child of
// IDomNode
Nodes[BB] = IDomNode->addChild(new Node(BB, IDomNode));
break;
}
// Add a new tree node for this BasicBlock, and link it as a child of
// IDomNode
Nodes[BB] = IDomNode->addChild(new Node(BB, IDomNode));
break;
}
}
}
}
}
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
@ -167,14 +176,14 @@ PostDominanceFrontier::calculate(const PostDominatorTree &DT,
// Loop over CFG successors to calculate DFlocal[Node]
BasicBlock *BB = Node->getNode();
DomSetType &S = Frontiers[BB]; // The new set to fill in...
if (!Root) return S;
if (getRoots().empty()) return S;
for (pred_iterator SI = pred_begin(BB), SE = pred_end(BB);
SI != SE; ++SI) {
// Does Node immediately dominate this predeccessor?
if (DT[*SI]->getIDom() != Node)
S.insert(*SI);
}
if (BB)
for (pred_iterator SI = pred_begin(BB), SE = pred_end(BB);
SI != SE; ++SI)
// Does Node immediately dominate this predeccessor?
if (DT[*SI]->getIDom() != Node)
S.insert(*SI);
// At this point, S is DFlocal. Now we union in DFup's of our children...
// Loop through and visit the nodes that Node immediately dominates (Node's