mirror of
https://github.com/c64scene-ar/llvm-6502.git
synced 2025-07-25 13:24:46 +00:00
API change for {BinaryOperator|CmpInst|CastInst}::create*() --> Create. Legacy interfaces will be in place for some time. (Merge from use-diet branch.)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@51200 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ static BinaryOperator *isReassociableOp(Value *V, unsigned Opcode) {
|
||||
static Instruction *LowerNegateToMultiply(Instruction *Neg) {
|
||||
Constant *Cst = ConstantInt::getAllOnesValue(Neg->getType());
|
||||
|
||||
Instruction *Res = BinaryOperator::createMul(Neg->getOperand(1), Cst, "",Neg);
|
||||
Instruction *Res = BinaryOperator::CreateMul(Neg->getOperand(1), Cst, "",Neg);
|
||||
Res->takeName(Neg);
|
||||
Neg->replaceAllUsesWith(Res);
|
||||
Neg->eraseFromParent();
|
||||
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ static Value *NegateValue(Value *V, Instruction *BI) {
|
||||
// Insert a 'neg' instruction that subtracts the value from zero to get the
|
||||
// negation.
|
||||
//
|
||||
return BinaryOperator::createNeg(V, V->getName() + ".neg", BI);
|
||||
return BinaryOperator::CreateNeg(V, V->getName() + ".neg", BI);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// ShouldBreakUpSubtract - Return true if we should break up this subtract of
|
||||
@@ -427,7 +427,7 @@ static Instruction *BreakUpSubtract(Instruction *Sub) {
|
||||
//
|
||||
Value *NegVal = NegateValue(Sub->getOperand(1), Sub);
|
||||
Instruction *New =
|
||||
BinaryOperator::createAdd(Sub->getOperand(0), NegVal, "", Sub);
|
||||
BinaryOperator::CreateAdd(Sub->getOperand(0), NegVal, "", Sub);
|
||||
New->takeName(Sub);
|
||||
|
||||
// Everyone now refers to the add instruction.
|
||||
@@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ static Instruction *ConvertShiftToMul(Instruction *Shl) {
|
||||
Constant *MulCst = ConstantInt::get(Shl->getType(), 1);
|
||||
MulCst = ConstantExpr::getShl(MulCst, cast<Constant>(Shl->getOperand(1)));
|
||||
|
||||
Instruction *Mul = BinaryOperator::createMul(Shl->getOperand(0), MulCst,
|
||||
Instruction *Mul = BinaryOperator::CreateMul(Shl->getOperand(0), MulCst,
|
||||
"", Shl);
|
||||
Mul->takeName(Shl);
|
||||
Shl->replaceAllUsesWith(Mul);
|
||||
@@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ static Value *EmitAddTreeOfValues(Instruction *I, std::vector<Value*> &Ops) {
|
||||
Value *V1 = Ops.back();
|
||||
Ops.pop_back();
|
||||
Value *V2 = EmitAddTreeOfValues(I, Ops);
|
||||
return BinaryOperator::createAdd(V2, V1, "tmp", I);
|
||||
return BinaryOperator::CreateAdd(V2, V1, "tmp", I);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// RemoveFactorFromExpression - If V is an expression tree that is a
|
||||
@@ -714,7 +714,7 @@ Value *Reassociate::OptimizeExpression(BinaryOperator *I,
|
||||
// this, we could otherwise run into situations where removing a factor
|
||||
// from an expression will drop a use of maxocc, and this can cause
|
||||
// RemoveFactorFromExpression on successive values to behave differently.
|
||||
Instruction *DummyInst = BinaryOperator::createAdd(MaxOccVal, MaxOccVal);
|
||||
Instruction *DummyInst = BinaryOperator::CreateAdd(MaxOccVal, MaxOccVal);
|
||||
std::vector<Value*> NewMulOps;
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0, e = Ops.size(); i != e; ++i) {
|
||||
if (Value *V = RemoveFactorFromExpression(Ops[i].Op, MaxOccVal)) {
|
||||
@@ -729,7 +729,7 @@ Value *Reassociate::OptimizeExpression(BinaryOperator *I,
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned NumAddedValues = NewMulOps.size();
|
||||
Value *V = EmitAddTreeOfValues(I, NewMulOps);
|
||||
Value *V2 = BinaryOperator::createMul(V, MaxOccVal, "tmp", I);
|
||||
Value *V2 = BinaryOperator::CreateMul(V, MaxOccVal, "tmp", I);
|
||||
|
||||
// Now that we have inserted V and its sole use, optimize it. This allows
|
||||
// us to handle cases that require multiple factoring steps, such as this:
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user