mirror of
https://github.com/c64scene-ar/llvm-6502.git
synced 2024-12-14 11:32:34 +00:00
Revert "Add support for combining GEPs across PHI nodes"
This reverts commit r209755. it was the real cause of the libc++ build failure. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209775 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
parent
e8d18694cb
commit
836475b2e2
@ -1220,85 +1220,6 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitGetElementPtrInst(GetElementPtrInst &GEP) {
|
||||
if (MadeChange) return &GEP;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Check to see if the inputs to the PHI node are getelementptr instructions.
|
||||
if (PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(PtrOp)) {
|
||||
GetElementPtrInst *Op1 = dyn_cast<GetElementPtrInst>(PN->getOperand(0));
|
||||
if (!Op1)
|
||||
return nullptr;
|
||||
|
||||
signed DI = -1;
|
||||
|
||||
for (auto I = PN->op_begin()+1, E = PN->op_end(); I !=E; ++I) {
|
||||
GetElementPtrInst *Op2 = dyn_cast<GetElementPtrInst>(*I);
|
||||
if (!Op2 || Op1->getNumOperands() != Op2->getNumOperands())
|
||||
return nullptr;
|
||||
|
||||
for (unsigned J = 0, F = Op1->getNumOperands(); J != F; ++J) {
|
||||
if (Op1->getOperand(J)->getType() != Op2->getOperand(J)->getType())
|
||||
return nullptr;
|
||||
|
||||
if (Op1->getOperand(J) != Op2->getOperand(J)) {
|
||||
if (DI == -1) {
|
||||
// We have not seen any differences yet in the GEPs feeding the
|
||||
// PHI yet, so we record this one if it is allowed to be a
|
||||
// variable.
|
||||
|
||||
// The first two arguments can vary for any GEP, the rest have to be
|
||||
// static for struct slots
|
||||
if (J > 1) {
|
||||
SmallVector<Value*, 8> Idxs(GEP.idx_begin(), GEP.idx_begin()+J);
|
||||
Type *Ty =
|
||||
GetElementPtrInst::getIndexedType(Op1->getOperand(0)->getType(),
|
||||
Idxs);
|
||||
if (Ty->isStructTy())
|
||||
return nullptr;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
DI = J;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// The GEP is different by more than one input. While this could be
|
||||
// extended to support GEPs that vary by more than one variable it
|
||||
// doesn't make sense since it greatly increases the complexity and
|
||||
// would result in an R+R+R addressing mode which no backend
|
||||
// directly supports and would need to be broken into several
|
||||
// simpler instructions anyway.
|
||||
return nullptr;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
GetElementPtrInst *NewGEP = cast<GetElementPtrInst>(Op1->clone());
|
||||
|
||||
if (DI == -1) {
|
||||
// All the GEPs feeding the PHI are identical. Clone one down into our
|
||||
// BB so that it can be merged with the current GEP.
|
||||
GEP.getParent()->getInstList().insert(GEP.getParent()->getFirstNonPHI(),
|
||||
NewGEP);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// All the GEPs feeding the PHI differ at a single offset. Clone a GEP
|
||||
// into the current block so it can be merged, and create a new PHI to
|
||||
// set that index.
|
||||
Instruction *InsertPt = Builder->GetInsertPoint();
|
||||
Builder->SetInsertPoint(PN);
|
||||
PHINode *NewPN = Builder->CreatePHI(Op1->getOperand(DI)->getType(),
|
||||
PN->getNumOperands());
|
||||
Builder->SetInsertPoint(InsertPt);
|
||||
|
||||
for (auto &I : PN->operands())
|
||||
NewPN->addIncoming(cast<GEPOperator>(I)->getOperand(DI),
|
||||
PN->getIncomingBlock(I));
|
||||
|
||||
NewGEP->setOperand(DI, NewPN);
|
||||
GEP.getParent()->getInstList().insert(GEP.getParent()->getFirstNonPHI(),
|
||||
NewGEP);
|
||||
NewGEP->setOperand(DI, NewPN);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
GEP.setOperand(0, NewGEP);
|
||||
PtrOp = NewGEP;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Combine Indices - If the source pointer to this getelementptr instruction
|
||||
// is a getelementptr instruction, combine the indices of the two
|
||||
// getelementptr instructions into a single instruction.
|
||||
|
@ -1,56 +0,0 @@
|
||||
; RUN: opt -instcombine -S < %s | FileCheck %s
|
||||
|
||||
%struct1 = type { %struct2*, i32, i32, i32 }
|
||||
%struct2 = type { i32, i32 }
|
||||
|
||||
define i32 @test1(%struct1* %dm, i1 %tmp4, i64 %tmp9, i64 %tmp19) {
|
||||
bb:
|
||||
%tmp = getelementptr inbounds %struct1* %dm, i64 0, i32 0
|
||||
%tmp1 = load %struct2** %tmp, align 8
|
||||
br i1 %tmp4, label %bb1, label %bb2
|
||||
|
||||
bb1:
|
||||
%tmp10 = getelementptr inbounds %struct2* %tmp1, i64 %tmp9
|
||||
%tmp11 = getelementptr inbounds %struct2* %tmp10, i64 0, i32 0
|
||||
store i32 0, i32* %tmp11, align 4
|
||||
br label %bb3
|
||||
|
||||
bb2:
|
||||
%tmp20 = getelementptr inbounds %struct2* %tmp1, i64 %tmp19
|
||||
%tmp21 = getelementptr inbounds %struct2* %tmp20, i64 0, i32 0
|
||||
store i32 0, i32* %tmp21, align 4
|
||||
br label %bb3
|
||||
|
||||
bb3:
|
||||
%phi = phi %struct2* [ %tmp10, %bb1 ], [ %tmp20, %bb2 ]
|
||||
%tmp24 = getelementptr inbounds %struct2* %phi, i64 0, i32 1
|
||||
%tmp25 = load i32* %tmp24, align 4
|
||||
ret i32 %tmp25
|
||||
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: @test1(
|
||||
; CHECK: getelementptr inbounds %struct2* %tmp1, i64 %tmp9, i32 0
|
||||
; CHECK: getelementptr inbounds %struct2* %tmp1, i64 %tmp19, i32 0
|
||||
; CHECK: %[[PHI:[0-9A-Za-z]+]] = phi i64 [ %tmp9, %bb1 ], [ %tmp19, %bb2 ]
|
||||
; CHECK: getelementptr inbounds %struct2* %tmp1, i64 %[[PHI]], i32 1
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
define i32 @test2(%struct1* %dm, i1 %tmp4, i64 %tmp9, i64 %tmp19) {
|
||||
bb:
|
||||
%tmp = getelementptr inbounds %struct1* %dm, i64 0, i32 0
|
||||
%tmp1 = load %struct2** %tmp, align 8
|
||||
%tmp10 = getelementptr inbounds %struct2* %tmp1, i64 %tmp9
|
||||
%tmp11 = getelementptr inbounds %struct2* %tmp10, i64 0, i32 0
|
||||
store i32 0, i32* %tmp11, align 4
|
||||
%tmp20 = getelementptr inbounds %struct2* %tmp1, i64 %tmp19
|
||||
%tmp21 = getelementptr inbounds %struct2* %tmp20, i64 0, i32 0
|
||||
store i32 0, i32* %tmp21, align 4
|
||||
%tmp24 = getelementptr inbounds %struct2* %tmp10, i64 0, i32 1
|
||||
%tmp25 = load i32* %tmp24, align 4
|
||||
ret i32 %tmp25
|
||||
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: @test2(
|
||||
; CHECK: getelementptr inbounds %struct2* %tmp1, i64 %tmp9, i32 0
|
||||
; CHECK: getelementptr inbounds %struct2* %tmp1, i64 %tmp19, i32 0
|
||||
; CHECK: getelementptr inbounds %struct2* %tmp1, i64 %tmp9, i32 1
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user