Implement setcc op, -1 sequences

Remove dead setcc op, 0 sequences
Coming later: generalization of op, imm


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@21260 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Nate Begeman 2005-04-12 21:22:28 +00:00
parent 1c51c6ac13
commit 9765c25eb7

View File

@ -663,7 +663,8 @@ static bool NodeHasRecordingVariant(unsigned NodeOpcode) {
switch(NodeOpcode) {
default: return false;
case ISD::AND:
case ISD::OR: return true;
case ISD::OR:
case ISD::ZERO_EXTEND_INREG: return true;
}
}
@ -965,6 +966,7 @@ bool ISel::SelectBitfieldInsert(SDOperand OR, unsigned Result) {
unsigned ISel::SelectSetCR0(SDOperand CC) {
unsigned Opc, Tmp1, Tmp2;
bool AlreadySelected = false;
static const unsigned CompareOpcodes[] =
{ PPC::FCMPU, PPC::FCMPU, PPC::CMPW, PPC::CMPLW };
@ -973,7 +975,6 @@ unsigned ISel::SelectSetCR0(SDOperand CC) {
SetCCSDNode* SetCC = dyn_cast<SetCCSDNode>(CC.Val);
if (SetCC && CC.getOpcode() == ISD::SETCC) {
bool U;
bool AlreadySelected = false;
Opc = getBCCForSetCC(SetCC->getCondition(), U);
// Pass the optional argument U to getImmediateForOpcode for SETCC,
@ -984,7 +985,8 @@ unsigned ISel::SelectSetCR0(SDOperand CC) {
// variant (e.g. 'or.' instead of 'or') of the instruction that defines
// operand zero of the SetCC node is available.
if (0 == Tmp2 &&
NodeHasRecordingVariant(SetCC->getOperand(0).getOpcode())) {
NodeHasRecordingVariant(SetCC->getOperand(0).getOpcode()) &&
SetCC->getOperand(0).Val->hasOneUse()) {
RecordSuccess = false;
Tmp1 = SelectExpr(SetCC->getOperand(0), true);
if (RecordSuccess) {
@ -1008,9 +1010,9 @@ unsigned ISel::SelectSetCR0(SDOperand CC) {
BuildMI(BB, CompareOpc, 2, PPC::CR0).addReg(Tmp1).addReg(Tmp2);
}
} else {
Opc = PPC::BNE;
Tmp1 = SelectExpr(CC);
BuildMI(BB, PPC::CMPLWI, 2, PPC::CR0).addReg(Tmp1).addImm(0);
Opc = PPC::BNE;
}
return Opc;
}
@ -1643,8 +1645,9 @@ unsigned ISel::SelectExpr(SDOperand N, bool Recording) {
case MVT::i8: Tmp2 = 24; break;
case MVT::i1: Tmp2 = 31; break;
}
BuildMI(BB, PPC::RLWINM, 4, Result).addReg(Tmp1).addImm(0).addImm(Tmp2)
.addImm(31);
Opc = Recording ? PPC::RLWINMo : PPC::RLWINM;
RecordSuccess = true;
BuildMI(BB, Opc, 4, Result).addReg(Tmp1).addImm(0).addImm(Tmp2).addImm(31);
return Result;
case ISD::CopyFromReg:
@ -2017,42 +2020,30 @@ unsigned ISel::SelectExpr(SDOperand N, bool Recording) {
case ISD::SETCC:
if (SetCCSDNode *SetCC = dyn_cast<SetCCSDNode>(Node)) {
// We can codegen setcc op, 0 very efficiently compared to a conditional
// branch. Check for that here.
if (ConstantSDNode *CN =
dyn_cast<ConstantSDNode>(SetCC->getOperand(1).Val)) {
// We can codegen setcc op, imm very efficiently compared to a brcond.
// Check for those cases here.
// setcc op, 0
if (CN->getValue() == 0) {
Tmp1 = SelectExpr(SetCC->getOperand(0));
switch (SetCC->getCondition()) {
default: assert(0 && "Unhandled SetCC condition"); abort();
case ISD::SETEQ:
case ISD::SETULE:
Tmp2 = MakeReg(MVT::i32);
BuildMI(BB, PPC::CNTLZW, 1, Tmp2).addReg(Tmp1);
BuildMI(BB, PPC::RLWINM, 4, Result).addReg(Tmp2).addImm(27)
.addImm(5).addImm(31);
break;
case ISD::SETNE:
case ISD::SETUGT:
Tmp2 = MakeReg(MVT::i32);
BuildMI(BB, PPC::ADDIC, 2, Tmp2).addReg(Tmp1).addSImm(-1);
BuildMI(BB, PPC::SUBFE, 2, Result).addReg(Tmp2).addReg(Tmp1);
break;
case ISD::SETULT:
BuildMI(BB, PPC::LI, 1, Result).addSImm(0);
break;
case ISD::SETLT:
BuildMI(BB, PPC::RLWINM, 4, Result).addReg(Tmp1).addImm(1)
.addImm(31).addImm(31);
break;
case ISD::SETLE:
Tmp2 = MakeReg(MVT::i32);
Tmp3 = MakeReg(MVT::i32);
BuildMI(BB, PPC::NEG, 2, Tmp2).addReg(Tmp1);
BuildMI(BB, PPC::ORC, 2, Tmp3).addReg(Tmp1).addReg(Tmp2);
BuildMI(BB, PPC::RLWINM, 4, Result).addReg(Tmp3).addImm(1)
.addImm(31).addImm(31);
break;
case ISD::SETGT:
Tmp2 = MakeReg(MVT::i32);
Tmp3 = MakeReg(MVT::i32);
@ -2061,10 +2052,38 @@ unsigned ISel::SelectExpr(SDOperand N, bool Recording) {
BuildMI(BB, PPC::RLWINM, 4, Result).addReg(Tmp3).addImm(1)
.addImm(31).addImm(31);
break;
case ISD::SETUGE:
BuildMI(BB, PPC::LI, 1, Result).addSImm(1);
}
return Result;
}
// setcc op, -1
if (CN->isAllOnesValue()) {
Tmp1 = SelectExpr(SetCC->getOperand(0));
switch (SetCC->getCondition()) {
default: assert(0 && "Unhandled SetCC condition"); abort();
case ISD::SETEQ:
Tmp2 = MakeReg(MVT::i32);
Tmp3 = MakeReg(MVT::i32);
BuildMI(BB, PPC::ADDIC, 2, Tmp2).addReg(Tmp1).addSImm(1);
BuildMI(BB, PPC::LI, 1, Tmp3).addSImm(0);
BuildMI(BB, PPC::ADDZE, 1, Result).addReg(Tmp3);
break;
case ISD::SETGE:
case ISD::SETNE:
Tmp2 = MakeReg(MVT::i32);
Tmp3 = MakeReg(MVT::i32);
BuildMI(BB, PPC::NOR, 2, Tmp2).addReg(Tmp1).addReg(Tmp1);
BuildMI(BB, PPC::ADDIC, 2, Tmp3).addReg(Tmp2).addSImm(-1);
BuildMI(BB, PPC::SUBFE, 2, Result).addReg(Tmp3).addReg(Tmp2);
break;
case ISD::SETLT:
Tmp2 = MakeReg(MVT::i32);
Tmp3 = MakeReg(MVT::i32);
BuildMI(BB, PPC::ADDI, 2, Tmp2).addReg(Tmp1).addSImm(1);
BuildMI(BB, PPC::AND, 2, Tmp3).addReg(Tmp2).addReg(Tmp1);
BuildMI(BB, PPC::RLWINM, 4, Result).addReg(Tmp3).addImm(1)
.addImm(31).addImm(31);
break;
case ISD::SETGT:
Tmp2 = MakeReg(MVT::i32);
BuildMI(BB, PPC::RLWINM, 4, Tmp2).addReg(Tmp1).addImm(1)
.addImm(31).addImm(31);
BuildMI(BB, PPC::XORI, 2, Result).addReg(Tmp2).addImm(1);