[CodeGen][IfCvt] Don't re-ifcvt blocks with unanalyzable terminators.

If we couldn't analyze its terminator (i.e., it's an indirectbr, or some
other weirdness), we can't safely re-if-convert a predicated block,
because we can't tell whether the predicated terminator can
fallthrough (it does).

Currently, we would completely ignore the fallthrough successor. In
the added testcase, this means we used to generate:

    ...
  @ %entry:
    cmp   r5, #21
    ittt  ne
  @ %cc1f:
    cmpne r7, #42
  @ %cc2t:
    strne.w       r5, [r8]
    movne pc, r10
  @ %cc1t:
    ...

Whereas the successor of %cc1f was originally %bb1.
With the fix, we get the correct:

    ...
  @ %entry:
    cmp   r5, #21
    itt   eq
  @ %cc1t:
    streq.w       r5, [r11]
    moveq pc, r0
  @ %cc1f:
    cmp   r7, #42
    itt   ne
  @ %cc2t:
    strne.w       r5, [r8]
    movne pc, r10
  @ %bb1:
    ...

rdar://20192768
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8509


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232872 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Ahmed Bougacha
2015-03-21 01:23:15 +00:00
parent 165bd1733b
commit 995f4f8fd1
2 changed files with 62 additions and 0 deletions
+6
View File
@@ -726,6 +726,12 @@ bool IfConverter::FeasibilityAnalysis(BBInfo &BBI,
if (BBI.IsDone || BBI.IsUnpredicable)
return false;
// If it is already predicated but we couldn't analyze its terminator, the
// latter might fallthrough, but we can't determine where to.
// Conservatively avoid if-converting again.
if (BBI.Predicate.size() && !BBI.IsBrAnalyzable)
return false;
// If it is already predicated, check if the new predicate subsumes
// its predicate.
if (BBI.Predicate.size() && !TII->SubsumesPredicate(Pred, BBI.Predicate))