Now that we know if we had a total fail on the instruction mnemonic,

give a more detailed error.  Before:

t.s:11:4: error: unrecognized instruction
   addl $1, $1
   ^
t.s:12:4: error: unrecognized instruction
   f2efqefa $1
   ^

After:

t.s:11:4: error: invalid operand for instruction
   addl $1, $1
   ^
t.s:12:4: error: invalid instruction mnemonic 'f2efqefa'
   f2efqefa $1
   ^

This fixes rdar://8017912 - llvm-mc says "unrecognized instruction" when it means "invalid operands"


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@113176 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Chris Lattner 2010-09-06 21:54:15 +00:00
parent fa0d74d58e
commit a008e8ac73
2 changed files with 36 additions and 11 deletions

View File

@ -862,6 +862,8 @@ X86ATTAsmParser::MatchInstruction(SMLoc IDLoc,
MCInst &Inst) {
assert(!Operands.empty() && "Unexpect empty operand list!");
bool WasOriginallyInvalidOperand = false;
// First, try a direct match.
switch (MatchInstructionImpl(Operands, Inst)) {
case Match_Success:
@ -869,7 +871,10 @@ X86ATTAsmParser::MatchInstruction(SMLoc IDLoc,
case Match_MissingFeature:
Error(IDLoc, "instruction requires a CPU feature not currently enabled");
return true;
default:
case Match_InvalidOperand:
WasOriginallyInvalidOperand = true;
break;
case Match_MnemonicFail:
break;
}
@ -941,23 +946,38 @@ X86ATTAsmParser::MatchInstruction(SMLoc IDLoc,
return true;
}
unsigned NumMatchFailures =
(MatchB == Match_Fail) + (MatchW == Match_Fail) +
(MatchL == Match_Fail) + (MatchQ == Match_Fail);
// Okay, we know that none of the variants matched successfully.
// If all of the instructions reported an invalid mnemonic, then the original
// mnemonic was invalid.
if ((MatchB == Match_MnemonicFail) && (MatchW == Match_MnemonicFail) &&
(MatchL == Match_MnemonicFail) && (MatchQ == Match_MnemonicFail)) {
if (WasOriginallyInvalidOperand)
Error(IDLoc, "invalid operand for instruction");
else
Error(IDLoc, "invalid instruction mnemonic '" + Base + "'");
return true;
}
// If one instruction matched with a missing feature, report this as a
// missing feature.
if ((MatchB == Match_MissingFeature) + (MatchW == Match_MissingFeature) +
(MatchL == Match_MissingFeature) + (MatchQ == Match_MissingFeature) == 1&&
NumMatchFailures == 3) {
(MatchL == Match_MissingFeature) + (MatchQ == Match_MissingFeature) == 1){
Error(IDLoc, "instruction requires a CPU feature not currently enabled");
return true;
}
// If one instruction matched with an invalid operand, report this as an
// operand failure.
if ((MatchB == Match_InvalidOperand) + (MatchW == Match_InvalidOperand) +
(MatchL == Match_InvalidOperand) + (MatchQ == Match_InvalidOperand) == 1){
Error(IDLoc, "invalid operand for instruction");
return true;
}
// If all of these were an outright failure, report it in a useless way.
// FIXME: We should give nicer diagnostics about the exact failure.
Error(IDLoc, "unrecognized instruction");
Error(IDLoc, "unknown use of instruction mnemonic without a size suffix");
return true;
}

View File

@ -1559,7 +1559,8 @@ void AsmMatcherEmitter::run(raw_ostream &OS) {
OS << " unsigned ComputeAvailableFeatures(const " <<
Target.getName() << "Subtarget *Subtarget) const;\n";
OS << " enum MatchResultTy {\n";
OS << " Match_Success, Match_Fail, Match_MissingFeature\n";
OS << " Match_Success, Match_MnemonicFail, Match_InvalidOperand,\n";
OS << " Match_MissingFeature\n";
OS << " };\n";
OS << " MatchResultTy MatchInstructionImpl(const SmallVectorImpl<MCParsedAsmOperand*>"
<< " &Operands, MCInst &Inst);\n\n";
@ -1687,7 +1688,7 @@ void AsmMatcherEmitter::run(raw_ostream &OS) {
// Emit code to compute the class list for this operand vector.
OS << " // Eliminate obvious mismatches.\n";
OS << " if (Operands.size() > " << MaxNumOperands << "+1)\n";
OS << " return Match_Fail;\n\n";
OS << " return Match_InvalidOperand;\n\n";
OS << " // Compute the class list for this operand vector.\n";
OS << " MatchClassKind Classes[" << MaxNumOperands << "];\n";
@ -1696,7 +1697,7 @@ void AsmMatcherEmitter::run(raw_ostream &OS) {
OS << " // Check for invalid operands before matching.\n";
OS << " if (Classes[i-1] == InvalidMatchClass)\n";
OS << " return Match_Fail;\n";
OS << " return Match_InvalidOperand;\n";
OS << " }\n\n";
OS << " // Mark unused classes.\n";
@ -1716,6 +1717,10 @@ void AsmMatcherEmitter::run(raw_ostream &OS) {
OS << " std::equal_range(MatchTable, MatchTable+"
<< Info.Instructions.size() << ", Mnemonic, LessOpcode());\n\n";
OS << " // Return a more specific error code if no mnemonics match.\n";
OS << " if (MnemonicRange.first == MnemonicRange.second)\n";
OS << " return Match_MnemonicFail;\n\n";
OS << " for (const MatchEntry *it = MnemonicRange.first, "
<< "*ie = MnemonicRange.second;\n";
OS << " it != ie; ++it) {\n";
@ -1751,7 +1756,7 @@ void AsmMatcherEmitter::run(raw_ostream &OS) {
OS << " // Okay, we had no match. Try to return a useful error code.\n";
OS << " if (HadMatchOtherThanFeatures) return Match_MissingFeature;\n";
OS << " return Match_Fail;\n";
OS << " return Match_InvalidOperand;\n";
OS << "}\n\n";
OS << "#endif // GET_MATCHER_IMPLEMENTATION\n\n";