Make code a bit less brittle by no hardcoding the number

of operands in an address in so many places.



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@67945 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Rafael Espindola 2009-03-28 17:03:24 +00:00
parent 11ff97801b
commit b449a68146
3 changed files with 15 additions and 8 deletions

View File

@ -32,6 +32,9 @@
#include "llvm/Target/TargetOptions.h"
using namespace llvm;
// FIXME: This should be some header
static const int X86AddrNumOperands = 4;
STATISTIC(NumEmitted, "Number of machine instructions emitted");
namespace {
@ -642,8 +645,10 @@ void Emitter::emitInstruction(const MachineInstr &MI,
}
case X86II::MRMDestMem: {
MCE.emitByte(BaseOpcode);
emitMemModRMByte(MI, CurOp, getX86RegNum(MI.getOperand(CurOp+4).getReg()));
CurOp += 5;
emitMemModRMByte(MI, CurOp,
getX86RegNum(MI.getOperand(CurOp + X86AddrNumOperands)
.getReg()));
CurOp += X86AddrNumOperands + 1;
if (CurOp != NumOps)
emitConstant(MI.getOperand(CurOp++).getImm(), X86InstrInfo::sizeOfImm(Desc));
break;
@ -659,12 +664,13 @@ void Emitter::emitInstruction(const MachineInstr &MI,
break;
case X86II::MRMSrcMem: {
intptr_t PCAdj = (CurOp+5 != NumOps) ? X86InstrInfo::sizeOfImm(Desc) : 0;
intptr_t PCAdj = (CurOp + X86AddrNumOperands + 1 != NumOps) ?
X86InstrInfo::sizeOfImm(Desc) : 0;
MCE.emitByte(BaseOpcode);
emitMemModRMByte(MI, CurOp+1, getX86RegNum(MI.getOperand(CurOp).getReg()),
PCAdj);
CurOp += 5;
CurOp += X86AddrNumOperands + 1;
if (CurOp != NumOps)
emitConstant(MI.getOperand(CurOp++).getImm(), X86InstrInfo::sizeOfImm(Desc));
break;
@ -714,13 +720,13 @@ void Emitter::emitInstruction(const MachineInstr &MI,
case X86II::MRM2m: case X86II::MRM3m:
case X86II::MRM4m: case X86II::MRM5m:
case X86II::MRM6m: case X86II::MRM7m: {
intptr_t PCAdj = (CurOp+4 != NumOps) ?
intptr_t PCAdj = (CurOp + X86AddrNumOperands != NumOps) ?
(MI.getOperand(CurOp+4).isImm() ? X86InstrInfo::sizeOfImm(Desc) : 4) : 0;
MCE.emitByte(BaseOpcode);
emitMemModRMByte(MI, CurOp, (Desc->TSFlags & X86II::FormMask)-X86II::MRM0m,
PCAdj);
CurOp += 4;
CurOp += X86AddrNumOperands;
if (CurOp != NumOps) {
const MachineOperand &MO = MI.getOperand(CurOp++);

View File

@ -616,9 +616,10 @@ void FPS::handleZeroArgFP(MachineBasicBlock::iterator &I) {
/// handleOneArgFP - fst <mem>, ST(0)
///
void FPS::handleOneArgFP(MachineBasicBlock::iterator &I) {
const int X86AddrNumOperands = 4;
MachineInstr *MI = I;
unsigned NumOps = MI->getDesc().getNumOperands();
assert((NumOps == 5 || NumOps == 1) &&
assert((NumOps == X86AddrNumOperands + 1 || NumOps == 1) &&
"Can only handle fst* & ftst instructions!");
// Is this the last use of the source register?

View File

@ -763,7 +763,7 @@ unsigned X86InstrInfo::isStoreToStackSlot(const MachineInstr *MI,
MI->getOperand(2).getReg() == 0 &&
MI->getOperand(3).getImm() == 0) {
FrameIndex = MI->getOperand(0).getIndex();
return MI->getOperand(4).getReg();
return MI->getOperand(X86AddrNumOperands).getReg();
}
break;
}