This survived a bootstrap, so let's try 98104 again.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@98137 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Dale Johannesen 2010-03-10 05:45:47 +00:00
parent fac4f1f181
commit c5cf227f3d

View File

@ -347,15 +347,29 @@ static unsigned ComputeCommonTailLength(MachineBasicBlock *MBB1,
--I1; --I2;
// Skip debugging pseudos; necessary to avoid changing the code.
while (I1->isDebugValue()) {
if (I1==MBB1->begin())
if (I1==MBB1->begin()) {
while (I2->isDebugValue()) {
if (I2==MBB2->begin())
// I1==DBG at begin; I2==DBG at begin
return TailLen;
--I2;
}
++I2;
// I1==DBG at begin; I2==non-DBG, or first of DBGs not at begin
return TailLen;
}
--I1;
}
// I1==first (untested) non-DBG preceding known match
while (I2->isDebugValue()) {
if (I2==MBB2->begin())
if (I2==MBB2->begin()) {
++I1;
// I1==non-DBG, or first of DBGs not at begin; I2==DBG at begin
return TailLen;
}
--I2;
}
// I1, I2==first (untested) non-DBGs preceding known match
if (!I1->isIdenticalTo(I2) ||
// FIXME: This check is dubious. It's used to get around a problem where
// people incorrectly expect inline asm directives to remain in the same
@ -368,6 +382,29 @@ static unsigned ComputeCommonTailLength(MachineBasicBlock *MBB1,
}
++TailLen;
}
// Back past possible debugging pseudos at beginning of block. This matters
// when one block differs from the other only by whether debugging pseudos
// are present at the beginning. (This way, the various checks later for
// I1==MBB1->begin() work as expected.)
if (I1 == MBB1->begin() && I2 != MBB2->begin()) {
--I2;
while (I2->isDebugValue()) {
if (I2 == MBB2->begin()) {
return TailLen;
}
--I2;
}
++I2;
}
if (I2 == MBB2->begin() && I1 != MBB1->begin()) {
--I1;
while (I1->isDebugValue()) {
if (I1 == MBB1->begin())
return TailLen;
--I1;
}
++I1;
}
return TailLen;
}
@ -934,6 +971,18 @@ bool BranchFolder::OptimizeBranches(MachineFunction &MF) {
return MadeChange;
}
// Blocks should be considered empty if they contain only debug info;
// else the debug info would affect codegen.
static bool IsEmptyBlock(MachineBasicBlock *MBB) {
if (MBB->empty())
return true;
for (MachineBasicBlock::iterator MBBI = MBB->begin(), MBBE = MBB->end();
MBBI!=MBBE; ++MBBI) {
if (!MBBI->isDebugValue())
return false;
}
return true;
}
/// IsBetterFallthrough - Return true if it would be clearly better to
/// fall-through to MBB1 than to fall through into MBB2. This has to return
@ -971,7 +1020,7 @@ ReoptimizeBlock:
// explicitly. Landing pads should not do this since the landing-pad table
// points to this block. Blocks with their addresses taken shouldn't be
// optimized away.
if (MBB->empty() && !MBB->isLandingPad() && !MBB->hasAddressTaken()) {
if (IsEmptyBlock(MBB) && !MBB->isLandingPad() && !MBB->hasAddressTaken()) {
// Dead block? Leave for cleanup later.
if (MBB->pred_empty()) return MadeChange;
@ -1163,7 +1212,23 @@ ReoptimizeBlock:
// be 'non-branch terminators' in the block, try removing the branch and
// then seeing if the block is empty.
TII->RemoveBranch(*MBB);
// If the only things remaining in the block are debug info, remove these
// as well, so this will behave the same as an empty block in non-debug
// mode.
if (!MBB->empty()) {
bool NonDebugInfoFound = false;
for (MachineBasicBlock::iterator I = MBB->begin(), E = MBB->end();
I != E; ++I) {
if (!I->isDebugValue()) {
NonDebugInfoFound = true;
break;
}
}
if (!NonDebugInfoFound)
// Make the block empty, losing the debug info (we could probably
// improve this in some cases.)
MBB->erase(MBB->begin(), MBB->end());
}
// If this block is just an unconditional branch to CurTBB, we can
// usually completely eliminate the block. The only case we cannot
// completely eliminate the block is when the block before this one