Use deque<T> rather than vector<T*> since it provides the same invalidation semantics (at least when removal is not needed) without the extra indirection/ownership complexity

Order matters for this container, it seems (using a forward_list and
replacing the original push_backs with emplace_fronts caused test
failures). I didn't look too deeply into why.

(& in retrospect, I might go back & change some of the forward_lists I
introduced to deques anyway - since most don't require removal, deque is
a more memory-friendly data structure (moderate locality while not
invalidating pointers))

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222950 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
David Blaikie
2014-11-29 07:04:51 +00:00
parent 71f69c81db
commit c7d3454376
3 changed files with 38 additions and 47 deletions

View File

@@ -931,7 +931,7 @@ CodeGenRegBank::CodeGenRegBank(RecordKeeper &Records) {
getSubRegIdx(SRIs[i]);
// Build composite maps from ComposedOf fields.
for (auto &Idx : SubRegIndices)
Idx->updateComponents(*this);
Idx.updateComponents(*this);
// Read in the register definitions.
std::vector<Record*> Regs = Records.getAllDerivedDefinitions("Register");
@@ -1017,24 +1017,16 @@ CodeGenRegBank::~CodeGenRegBank() {
// Create a synthetic CodeGenSubRegIndex without a corresponding Record.
CodeGenSubRegIndex*
CodeGenRegBank::createSubRegIndex(StringRef Name, StringRef Namespace) {
//auto SubRegIndicesSize = std::distance(SubRegIndices.begin(), SubRegIndices.end());
//SubRegIndices.emplace_front(Name, Namespace, SubRegIndicesSize + 1);
//return &SubRegIndices.front();
CodeGenSubRegIndex *Idx = new CodeGenSubRegIndex(Name, Namespace,
SubRegIndices.size() + 1);
SubRegIndices.push_back(Idx);
return Idx;
SubRegIndices.emplace_back(Name, Namespace, SubRegIndices.size() + 1);
return &SubRegIndices.back();
}
CodeGenSubRegIndex *CodeGenRegBank::getSubRegIdx(Record *Def) {
CodeGenSubRegIndex *&Idx = Def2SubRegIdx[Def];
if (Idx)
return Idx;
Idx = new CodeGenSubRegIndex(Def, SubRegIndices.size() + 1);
SubRegIndices.push_back(Idx);
//auto SubRegIndicesSize = std::distance(SubRegIndices.begin(), SubRegIndices.end());
//SubRegIndices.emplace_front(Def, SubRegIndicesSize + 1);
//Idx = &SubRegIndices.front();
SubRegIndices.emplace_back(Def, SubRegIndices.size() + 1);
Idx = &SubRegIndices.back();
return Idx;
}
@@ -1187,8 +1179,8 @@ void CodeGenRegBank::computeSubRegIndexLaneMasks() {
// Determine mask of lanes that cover their registers.
CoveringLanes = ~0u;
for (auto &Idx : SubRegIndices) {
if (Idx->getComposites().empty()) {
Idx->LaneMask = 1u << Bit;
if (Idx.getComposites().empty()) {
Idx.LaneMask = 1u << Bit;
// Share bit 31 in the unlikely case there are more than 32 leafs.
//
// Sharing bits is harmless; it allows graceful degradation in targets
@@ -1203,7 +1195,7 @@ void CodeGenRegBank::computeSubRegIndexLaneMasks() {
// is no longer covering its registers.
CoveringLanes &= ~(1u << Bit);
} else {
Idx->LaneMask = 0;
Idx.LaneMask = 0;
}
}
@@ -1212,10 +1204,10 @@ void CodeGenRegBank::computeSubRegIndexLaneMasks() {
// Inherit lanes from composites.
for (const auto &Idx : SubRegIndices) {
unsigned Mask = Idx->computeLaneMask();
unsigned Mask = Idx.computeLaneMask();
// If some super-registers without CoveredBySubRegs use this index, we can
// no longer assume that the lanes are covering their registers.
if (!Idx->AllSuperRegsCovered)
if (!Idx.AllSuperRegsCovered)
CoveringLanes &= ~Mask;
}
}
@@ -1804,20 +1796,20 @@ void CodeGenRegBank::inferSubClassWithSubReg(CodeGenRegisterClass *RC) {
// Find matching classes for all SRSets entries. Iterate in SubRegIndex
// numerical order to visit synthetic indices last.
for (const auto &SubIdx : SubRegIndices) {
SubReg2SetMap::const_iterator I = SRSets.find(SubIdx);
SubReg2SetMap::const_iterator I = SRSets.find(&SubIdx);
// Unsupported SubRegIndex. Skip it.
if (I == SRSets.end())
continue;
// In most cases, all RC registers support the SubRegIndex.
if (I->second.size() == RC->getMembers().size()) {
RC->setSubClassWithSubReg(SubIdx, RC);
RC->setSubClassWithSubReg(&SubIdx, RC);
continue;
}
// This is a real subset. See if we have a matching class.
CodeGenRegisterClass *SubRC =
getOrCreateSubClass(RC, &I->second,
RC->getName() + "_with_" + I->first->getName());
RC->setSubClassWithSubReg(SubIdx, SubRC);
RC->setSubClassWithSubReg(&SubIdx, SubRC);
}
}
@@ -1839,7 +1831,7 @@ void CodeGenRegBank::inferMatchingSuperRegClass(CodeGenRegisterClass *RC,
// Skip indexes that aren't fully supported by RC's registers. This was
// computed by inferSubClassWithSubReg() above which should have been
// called first.
if (RC->getSubClassWithSubReg(SubIdx) != RC)
if (RC->getSubClassWithSubReg(&SubIdx) != RC)
continue;
// Build list of (Super, Sub) pairs for this SubIdx.
@@ -1848,7 +1840,7 @@ void CodeGenRegBank::inferMatchingSuperRegClass(CodeGenRegisterClass *RC,
for (CodeGenRegister::Set::const_iterator RI = RC->getMembers().begin(),
RE = RC->getMembers().end(); RI != RE; ++RI) {
const CodeGenRegister *Super = *RI;
const CodeGenRegister *Sub = Super->getSubRegs().find(SubIdx)->second;
const CodeGenRegister *Sub = Super->getSubRegs().find(&SubIdx)->second;
assert(Sub && "Missing sub-register");
SSPairs.push_back(std::make_pair(Super, Sub));
TopoSigs.set(Sub->getTopoSig());
@@ -1871,14 +1863,14 @@ void CodeGenRegBank::inferMatchingSuperRegClass(CodeGenRegisterClass *RC,
continue;
// RC injects completely into SubRC.
if (SubSet.size() == SSPairs.size()) {
SubRC->addSuperRegClass(SubIdx, RC);
SubRC->addSuperRegClass(&SubIdx, RC);
continue;
}
// Only a subset of RC maps into SubRC. Make sure it is represented by a
// class.
getOrCreateSubClass(RC, &SubSet, RC->getName() +
"_with_" + SubIdx->getName() +
"_in_" + SubRC->getName());
getOrCreateSubClass(RC, &SubSet, RC->getName() + "_with_" +
SubIdx.getName() + "_in_" +
SubRC->getName());
}
}
}