From cc966de237b760817653fc3261a1d25d0c72025b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:32:43 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Add a link from the LLVM release notes to the Clang release
 notes. I suspect we could profitably remove/move some of the bullet points
 under Clang here to the Clang notes in order to keep things clean on both
 sides. Unless I hear objections I'll start doing that once folks have read
 over the Clang notes a bit.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@145340 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
---
 docs/ReleaseNotes.html | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/docs/ReleaseNotes.html b/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
index ce6aa985dd3..82d2b175600 100644
--- a/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
+++ b/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
@@ -94,8 +94,7 @@ Release Notes</a>.</h1>
    production-quality compiler for C, Objective-C, C++ and Objective-C++ on x86
    (32- and 64-bit), and for Darwin/ARM targets.</p>
 
-<p>In the LLVM 3.0 time-frame, the Clang team has made many improvements:</p>
-
+<p>In the LLVM 3.0 time-frame, the Clang team has made many improvements:
 <ul>
   <li>Greatly improved support for building C++ applications, with greater
       stability and better diagnostics.</li>
@@ -141,6 +140,9 @@ Release Notes</a>.</h1>
       interface, to improve the performance of code completion and the mapping
       from source locations to abstract syntax tree nodes.</li>
 </ul>
+For more details about the changes to Clang since the 2.9 release, see the
+<a href="http://clang.llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html">Clang release notes</a>
+</p>
 
 
 <p>If Clang rejects your code but another compiler accepts it, please take a