[PowerPC] Adjust load/store costs in PPCTTI

This provides more realistic costs for the insert/extractelement instructions
(which are load/store pairs), accounts for the cheap unaligned Altivec load
sequence, and for unaligned VSX load/stores.

Bad news:
MultiSource/Applications/sgefa/sgefa - 35% slowdown (this will require more investigation)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/queens - 20% slowdown (we no longer vectorize this, but it was a constant store that was scalarized)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/pcompress2/pcompress2 - 2% slowdown

Good news:
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/ary3 - 54% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ary - 40% speedup
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/ks/ks - 35% speedup
MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/neural/neural - 30% speedup
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Symbolics-flt/Symbolics-flt - 20% speedup

Unfortunately, estimating the costs of the stack-based scalarization sequences
is hard, and adjusting these costs is like a game of whac-a-mole :( I'll
revisit this again after we have better codegen for vector extloads and
truncstores and unaligned load/stores.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@205658 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

test/Analysis/CostModel/PowerPC/ext.ll

@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ define void @exts() {
   ; CHECK: cost of 1 {{.*}} sext
   %v3 = sext <4 x i16> undef to <4 x i32>
 
-  ; CHECK: cost of 216 {{.*}} sext
+  ; CHECK: cost of 112 {{.*}} sext
   %v4 = sext <8 x i16> undef to <8 x i32>
 
   ret void

test/Analysis/CostModel/PowerPC/insert_extract.ll

@@ -3,13 +3,13 @@ target datalayout = "E-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f3
 target triple = "powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu"
 
 define i32 @insert(i32 %arg) {
-  ; CHECK: cost of 13 {{.*}} insertelement
+  ; CHECK: cost of 10 {{.*}} insertelement
   %x = insertelement <4 x i32> undef, i32 %arg, i32 0
   ret i32 undef
 }
 
 define i32 @extract(<4 x i32> %arg) {
-  ; CHECK: cost of 13 {{.*}} extractelement
+  ; CHECK: cost of 3 {{.*}} extractelement
   %x = extractelement <4 x i32> %arg, i32 0
   ret i32 %x
 }

test/Analysis/CostModel/PowerPC/load_store.ll

@@ -31,9 +31,12 @@ define i32 @loads(i32 %arg) {
 
   ; FIXME: There actually are sub-vector Altivec loads, and so we could handle
   ; this with a small expense, but we don't currently.
-  ; CHECK: cost of 60 {{.*}} load
+  ; CHECK: cost of 48 {{.*}} load
   load <4 x i16>* undef, align 2
 
+  ; CHECK: cost of 1 {{.*}} load
+  load <4 x i32>* undef, align 4
+
   ret i32 undef
 }