Unbreak the sanitizer buildbots after r209226 due to SROA issue described in http://reviews.llvm.org/D3714

Undecided whether this should include a test case - SROA produces bad
dbg.value metadata describing a value for a reference that is actually
the value of the thing the reference refers to. For now, loosening the
assert lets this not assert, but it's still bogus/wrong output...

If someone wants to tell me to add a test, I'm willing/able, just
undecided. Hopefully we'll get SROA fixed soon & we can tighten up this
assertion again.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209240 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
David Blaikie 2014-05-20 21:40:13 +00:00
parent 6a9366c0c6
commit e94103adcd

View File

@ -751,11 +751,14 @@ static bool isUnsignedDIType(DwarfDebug *DD, DIType Ty) {
if (DTy.isDerivedType()) {
dwarf::Tag T = (dwarf::Tag)Ty.getTag();
// Encode pointer constants as unsigned bytes. This is used at least for
// null pointer constant emission. Maybe DW_TAG_reference_type should be
// accepted here too, if there are ways to produce compile-time constant
// references.
// null pointer constant emission.
// FIXME: reference and rvalue_reference /probably/ shouldn't be allowed
// here, but accept them for now due to a bug in SROA producing bogus
// dbg.values.
if (T == dwarf::DW_TAG_pointer_type ||
T == dwarf::DW_TAG_ptr_to_member_type)
T == dwarf::DW_TAG_ptr_to_member_type ||
T == dwarf::DW_TAG_reference_type ||
T == dwarf::DW_TAG_rvalue_reference_type)
return true;
assert(T == dwarf::DW_TAG_typedef || T == dwarf::DW_TAG_const_type ||
T == dwarf::DW_TAG_volatile_type ||