[ARM64] Prevent bit extraction to be adjusted by following shift

For pattern like ((x >> C1) & Mask) << C2, DAG combiner may convert it
into (x >> (C1-C2)) & (Mask << C2), which makes pattern matching of ubfx
more difficult.
For example:
Given
  %shr = lshr i64 %x, 4
  %and = and i64 %shr, 15
  %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds [8 x [64 x i64]]* @arr, i64 0, %i64 2, i64 %and
  %0 = load i64* %arrayidx
With current shift folding, it takes 3 instrs to compute base address:
  lsr x8, x0, #1
  and x8, x8, #0x78
  add x8, x9, x8

If using ubfx, it only needs 2 instrs:
  ubfx  x8, x0, #4, #4
  add x8, x9, x8, lsl #3

This fixes bug 19589


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207702 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Weiming Zhao 2014-04-30 21:07:24 +00:00
parent 79844fc3d2
commit fa1cf8cd68
5 changed files with 43 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -2017,6 +2017,15 @@ public:
///
virtual SDValue PerformDAGCombine(SDNode *N, DAGCombinerInfo &DCI) const;
/// Return true if it is profitable to move a following shift through this
// node, adjusting any immediate operands as necessary to preserve semantics.
// This transformation may not be desirable if it disrupts a particularly
// auspicious target-specific tree (e.g. bitfield extractionon in AArch64).
// By default, it returns true.
virtual bool isDesirableToCommuteWithShift(const SDNode *N /*Op*/) const {
return true;
}
/// Return true if the target has native support for the specified value type
/// and it is 'desirable' to use the type for the given node type. e.g. On x86
/// i16 is legal, but undesirable since i16 instruction encodings are longer

View File

@ -3867,6 +3867,9 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::visitShiftByConstant(SDNode *N, ConstantSDNode *Amt) {
return SDValue();
}
if (!TLI.isDesirableToCommuteWithShift(LHS))
return SDValue();
// Fold the constants, shifting the binop RHS by the shift amount.
SDValue NewRHS = DAG.getNode(N->getOpcode(), SDLoc(LHS->getOperand(1)),
N->getValueType(0),

View File

@ -5931,6 +5931,21 @@ ARM64TargetLowering::getScratchRegisters(CallingConv::ID) const {
return ScratchRegs;
}
bool ARM64TargetLowering::isDesirableToCommuteWithShift(const SDNode *N) const {
EVT VT = N->getValueType(0);
// If N is unsigned bit extraction: ((x >> C) & mask), then do not combine
// it with shift to let it be lowered to UBFX.
if (N->getOpcode() == ISD::AND && (VT == MVT::i32 || VT == MVT::i64) &&
isa<ConstantSDNode>(N->getOperand(1))) {
uint64_t TruncMask = N->getConstantOperandVal(1);
if (isMask_64(TruncMask) &&
N->getOperand(0).getOpcode() == ISD::SRL &&
isa<ConstantSDNode>(N->getOperand(0)->getOperand(1)))
return false;
}
return true;
}
bool ARM64TargetLowering::shouldConvertConstantLoadToIntImm(const APInt &Imm,
Type *Ty) const {
assert(Ty->isIntegerTy());

View File

@ -284,6 +284,9 @@ public:
const MCPhysReg *getScratchRegisters(CallingConv::ID CC) const override;
/// \brief Returns false if N is a bit extraction pattern of (X >> C) & Mask.
bool isDesirableToCommuteWithShift(const SDNode *N) const override;
/// \brief Returns true if it is beneficial to convert a load of a constant
/// to just the constant itself.
bool shouldConvertConstantLoadToIntImm(const APInt &Imm,

View File

@ -501,6 +501,19 @@ end:
ret i80 %conv3
}
; Check if we can still catch UBFX when "AND" is used by SHL.
; CHECK-LABEL: fct21:
; CHECK: ubfx
@arr = external global [8 x [64 x i64]]
define i64 @fct21(i64 %x) {
entry:
%shr = lshr i64 %x, 4
%and = and i64 %shr, 15
%arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds [8 x [64 x i64]]* @arr, i64 0, i64 0, i64 %and
%0 = load i64* %arrayidx, align 8
ret i64 %0
}
define i16 @test_ignored_rightbits(i32 %dst, i32 %in) {
; CHECK-LABEL: test_ignored_rightbits: