Follow-up to r219534 to make symbolization more robust.

1) Explicitly provide important arguments to llvm-symbolizer,
not relying on defaults.
2) Be more defensive about symbolizer output.

This might fix weird failures on ninja-x64-msvc-RA-centos6 buildbot.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219541 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Alexey Samsonov 2014-10-10 22:58:26 +00:00
parent fc9fda5443
commit fab0a999d7

View File

@ -363,9 +363,10 @@ static bool printSymbolizedStackTrace(void **StackTrace, int Depth, FILE *FD) {
}
}
const char *args[] = {"llvm-symbolizer", nullptr};
const char *Args[] = {"llvm-symbolizer", "--functions=linkage", "--inlining",
"--demangle", nullptr};
int RunResult =
sys::ExecuteAndWait(LLVMSymbolizerPath, args, nullptr, Redirects.data());
sys::ExecuteAndWait(LLVMSymbolizerPath, Args, nullptr, Redirects.data());
if (RunResult != 0)
return false;
@ -385,12 +386,16 @@ static bool printSymbolizedStackTrace(void **StackTrace, int Depth, FILE *FD) {
// Read pairs of lines (function name and file/line info) until we
// encounter empty line.
for (;;) {
if (CurLine == Lines.end())
return false;
StringRef FunctionName = *CurLine++;
if (FunctionName.empty())
break;
fprintf(FD, "#%d %p ", frame_no++, StackTrace[i]);
if (!FunctionName.startswith("??"))
fprintf(FD, "%s ", FunctionName.str().c_str());
if (CurLine == Lines.end())
return false;
StringRef FileLineInfo = *CurLine++;
if (!FileLineInfo.startswith("??"))
fprintf(FD, "%s", FileLineInfo.str().c_str());