For PR872:

Shrinkify LLVM's footprint by removing the analyze tool and moving its
functionality into the opt tool. THis eliminates one of the largest tools
from LLVM and doesn't make opt much bigger because it already included
most of the analysis passes.  To get the old analyze functionality pass
the -analyze option to opt. Note that the integeration here is dead
simple. The "main" of analyze was just copied to opt and invoked if the
-analyze option was given. There may be opportunities for further
integration such as removing the distinction between transform passes
and analysis passes.

To use the analysis functionality, if you previously did this:
  analyze $FNAME -domset -disable-verify
you would now do this:
  opt -analyze $FNAME -domset -disable-verify
Pretty simple.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@29762 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

test/Transforms/DSAnalysis/arraymerge.ll

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 ; folded completely away if possible.  This is a very common case, so it should
 ; be efficient.
 ;
-; RUN: analyze %s -tddatastructure
+; RUN: opt -analyze %s -tddatastructure
 ;
 implementation
 

test/Transforms/DSAnalysis/arraytest.ll

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 ;
-; RUN: analyze %s -tddatastructure
+; RUN: opt -analyze %s -tddatastructure
 %crazy = type [2 x { [2 x sbyte], short } ]
 
 implementation

test/Transforms/DSAnalysis/badcases.ll

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ; This file contains a list of situations where node folding should happen...
 ;
-; RUN: analyze %s -tddatastructure
+; RUN: opt -analyze %s -tddatastructure
 
 implementation
 

test/Transforms/DSAnalysis/basictest.ll

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ; very simple test
 ;
-; RUN: analyze %s -tddatastructure
+; RUN: opt -analyze %s -tddatastructure
 
 implementation
 

test/Transforms/DSAnalysis/fieldmerge.ll

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 ;
-; RUN: analyze %s -tddatastructure
+; RUN: opt -analyze %s -tddatastructure
 
 %str = type { int*, int* }
 

test/Transforms/DSAnalysis/goodcases.ll

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ; This file contains a list of cases where node folding should NOT happen
 ;
-; RUN: analyze %s -tddatastructure
+; RUN: opt -analyze %s -tddatastructure
 ;
 
 implementation

test/Transforms/DSAnalysis/indcalltest.ll

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 ;
-; RUN: analyze %s -tddatastructure
+; RUN: opt -analyze %s -tddatastructure
 
 %G = global int 2		; <int*> [#uses=1]
 %H = global int* null

test/Transforms/DSAnalysis/misctests.ll

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 ;
-; RUN: analyze %s -tddatastructure
+; RUN: opt -analyze %s -tddatastructure
 
 int* %test1(int *%A) {
 	%R = getelementptr int* %A, long 1

test/Transforms/DSAnalysis/physicalsubtype.ll

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ; A test for "physical subtyping" used in some C programs...
 ;
-; RUN: analyze %s -tddatastructure
+; RUN: opt -analyze %s -tddatastructure
 ;
 %ST = type { int, int* }            ; "Subtype"
 %DT = type { int, int*, int }       ; "derived type"

test/Transforms/DSAnalysis/recursion.ll

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-; RUN: analyze %s -tddatastructure
+; RUN: opt -analyze %s -tddatastructure
 
 implementation   ; Functions:
 

test/Transforms/DSAnalysis/simplest-test.ll

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-; RUN: analyze %s -tddatastructure
+; RUN: opt -analyze %s -tddatastructure
 
 void %foo(int* %X) {
 	store int 4, int* %X

test/Transforms/DSAnalysis/simpletest.ll

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-; RUN: analyze %s -tddatastructure
+; RUN: opt -analyze %s -tddatastructure
 
 implementation
 

test/Transforms/DSAnalysis/structpadding.ll

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-; RUN: analyze %s -tddatastructure
+; RUN: opt -analyze %s -tddatastructure
 
 %str = type { int, int* }