Finally implement correct ordered comparisons for PPC, even though

the code generated is not wonderful.  This turns a miscompilation into
a code quality bug (noted in the ppc readme).  This fixes PR642, which
is over 2 years old (!).  Nate, please review this.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@45742 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Chris Lattner 2008-01-08 06:46:30 +00:00
parent 83d760ba8e
commit fe39edde27
3 changed files with 99 additions and 24 deletions

View File

@ -624,29 +624,34 @@ static PPC::Predicate getPredicateForSetCC(ISD::CondCode CC) {
/// getCRIdxForSetCC - Return the index of the condition register field
/// associated with the SetCC condition, and whether or not the field is
/// treated as inverted. That is, lt = 0; ge = 0 inverted.
static unsigned getCRIdxForSetCC(ISD::CondCode CC, bool& Inv) {
///
/// If this returns with Other != -1, then the returned comparison is an or of
/// two simpler comparisons. In this case, Invert is guaranteed to be false.
static unsigned getCRIdxForSetCC(ISD::CondCode CC, bool &Invert, int &Other) {
Invert = false;
Other = -1;
switch (CC) {
default: assert(0 && "Unknown condition!"); abort();
case ISD::SETOLT: // FIXME: This is incorrect see PR642.
case ISD::SETULT:
case ISD::SETLT: Inv = false; return 0;
case ISD::SETOGE: // FIXME: This is incorrect see PR642.
case ISD::SETOLT:
case ISD::SETLT: return 0; // Bit #0 = SETOLT
case ISD::SETOGT:
case ISD::SETGT: return 1; // Bit #1 = SETOGT
case ISD::SETOEQ:
case ISD::SETEQ: return 2; // Bit #2 = SETOEQ
case ISD::SETUO: return 3; // Bit #3 = SETUO
case ISD::SETUGE:
case ISD::SETGE: Inv = true; return 0;
case ISD::SETOGT: // FIXME: This is incorrect see PR642.
case ISD::SETUGT:
case ISD::SETGT: Inv = false; return 1;
case ISD::SETOLE: // FIXME: This is incorrect see PR642.
case ISD::SETGE: Invert = true; return 0; // !Bit #0 = SETUGE
case ISD::SETULE:
case ISD::SETLE: Inv = true; return 1;
case ISD::SETOEQ: // FIXME: This is incorrect see PR642.
case ISD::SETUEQ:
case ISD::SETEQ: Inv = false; return 2;
case ISD::SETONE: // FIXME: This is incorrect see PR642.
case ISD::SETLE: Invert = true; return 1; // !Bit #1 = SETULE
case ISD::SETUNE:
case ISD::SETNE: Inv = true; return 2;
case ISD::SETO: Inv = true; return 3;
case ISD::SETUO: Inv = false; return 3;
case ISD::SETNE: Invert = true; return 2; // !Bit #2 = SETUNE
case ISD::SETO: Invert = true; return 3; // !Bit #3 = SETO
case ISD::SETULT: Other = 0; return 3; // SETOLT | SETUO
case ISD::SETUGT: Other = 1; return 3; // SETOGT | SETUO
case ISD::SETUEQ: Other = 2; return 3; // SETOEQ | SETUO
case ISD::SETOGE: Other = 1; return 2; // SETOGT | SETOEQ
case ISD::SETOLE: Other = 0; return 2; // SETOLT | SETOEQ
case ISD::SETONE: Other = 0; return 1; // SETOLT | SETOGT
}
return 0;
}
@ -726,7 +731,8 @@ SDNode *PPCDAGToDAGISel::SelectSETCC(SDOperand Op) {
}
bool Inv;
unsigned Idx = getCRIdxForSetCC(CC, Inv);
int OtherCondIdx;
unsigned Idx = getCRIdxForSetCC(CC, Inv, OtherCondIdx);
SDOperand CCReg = SelectCC(N->getOperand(0), N->getOperand(1), CC);
SDOperand IntCR;
@ -737,7 +743,7 @@ SDNode *PPCDAGToDAGISel::SelectSETCC(SDOperand Op) {
CCReg = CurDAG->getCopyToReg(CurDAG->getEntryNode(), CR7Reg, CCReg,
InFlag).getValue(1);
if (PPCSubTarget.isGigaProcessor())
if (PPCSubTarget.isGigaProcessor() && OtherCondIdx == -1)
IntCR = SDOperand(CurDAG->getTargetNode(PPC::MFOCRF, MVT::i32, CR7Reg,
CCReg), 0);
else
@ -745,13 +751,26 @@ SDNode *PPCDAGToDAGISel::SelectSETCC(SDOperand Op) {
SDOperand Ops[] = { IntCR, getI32Imm((32-(3-Idx)) & 31),
getI32Imm(31), getI32Imm(31) };
if (!Inv) {
if (OtherCondIdx == -1 && !Inv)
return CurDAG->SelectNodeTo(N, PPC::RLWINM, MVT::i32, Ops, 4);
} else {
SDOperand Tmp =
SDOperand(CurDAG->getTargetNode(PPC::RLWINM, MVT::i32, Ops, 4), 0);
// Get the specified bit.
SDOperand Tmp =
SDOperand(CurDAG->getTargetNode(PPC::RLWINM, MVT::i32, Ops, 4), 0);
if (Inv) {
assert(OtherCondIdx == -1 && "Can't have split plus negation");
return CurDAG->SelectNodeTo(N, PPC::XORI, MVT::i32, Tmp, getI32Imm(1));
}
// Otherwise, we have to turn an operation like SETONE -> SETOLT | SETOGT.
// We already got the bit for the first part of the comparison (e.g. SETULE).
// Get the other bit of the comparison.
Ops[1] = getI32Imm((32-(3-OtherCondIdx)) & 31);
SDOperand OtherCond =
SDOperand(CurDAG->getTargetNode(PPC::RLWINM, MVT::i32, Ops, 4), 0);
return CurDAG->SelectNodeTo(N, PPC::OR, MVT::i32, Tmp, OtherCond);
}

View File

@ -706,3 +706,32 @@ __Z11no_overflowjj:
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
We compile some FP comparisons into an mfcr with two rlwinms and an or. For
example:
#include <math.h>
int test(double x, double y) { return islessequal(x, y);}
int test2(double x, double y) { return islessgreater(x, y);}
int test3(double x, double y) { return !islessequal(x, y);}
Compiles into (all three are similar, but the bits differ):
_test:
fcmpu cr7, f1, f2
mfcr r2
rlwinm r3, r2, 29, 31, 31
rlwinm r2, r2, 31, 31, 31
or r3, r2, r3
blr
GCC compiles this into:
_test:
fcmpu cr7,f1,f2
cror 30,28,30
mfcr r3
rlwinm r3,r3,31,1
blr
which is more efficient and can use mfocr. See PR642 for some more context.
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

View File

@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -march=ppc32 | grep or | count 3
; This should produce one 'or' or 'cror' instruction per function.
target datalayout = "e-p:32:32:32-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:32:64-f32:32:32-f64:32:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-f80:128:128"
target triple = "i686-apple-darwin8"
define i32 @test(double %x, double %y) nounwind {
entry:
%tmp3 = fcmp ole double %x, %y ; <i1> [#uses=1]
%tmp345 = zext i1 %tmp3 to i32 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
ret i32 %tmp345
}
define i32 @test2(double %x, double %y) nounwind {
entry:
%tmp3 = fcmp one double %x, %y ; <i1> [#uses=1]
%tmp345 = zext i1 %tmp3 to i32 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
ret i32 %tmp345
}
define i32 @test3(double %x, double %y) nounwind {
entry:
%tmp3 = fcmp ugt double %x, %y ; <i1> [#uses=1]
%tmp34 = zext i1 %tmp3 to i32 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
ret i32 %tmp34
}