testcases accordingly. Some are currently xfailed and will be filed
as bugs to be fixed or understood.
Performance results:
roughly neutral on SPEC
some micro benchmarks in the llvm suite are up between 100 and 150%, only
a pair of regressions that are due to be investigated
john-the-ripper saw:
10% improvement in traditional DES
8% improvement in BSDI DES
59% improvement in FreeBSD MD5
67% improvement in OpenBSD Blowfish
14% improvement in LM DES
Small compile time impact.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@127208 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
variable increment / decrement slighter high priority.
This has major impact on some micro-benchmarks. On MultiSource/Applications
and spec tests, it's a minor win. It also reduce 256.bzip instruction count
by 8%, 55 on 164.gzip on i386 / Darwin.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@82485 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
8 %reg1024<def> = IMPLICIT_DEF
12 %reg1024<def> = INSERT_SUBREG %reg1024<kill>, %reg1025, 2
The live range [12, 14) are not part of the r1024 live interval since it's defined by an implicit def. It will not conflicts with live interval of r1025. Now suppose both registers are spilled, you can easily see a situation where both registers are reloaded before the INSERT_SUBREG and both target registers that would overlap.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@53503 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
