have their low bits set to zero. This allows us to optimize
out explicit stack alignment code like in stack-align.ll:test4 when
it is redundant.
Doing this causes the code generator to start turning FI+cst into
FI|cst all over the place, which is general goodness (that is the
canonical form) except that various pieces of the code generator
don't handle OR aggressively. Fix this by introducing a new
SelectionDAG::isBaseWithConstantOffset predicate, and using it
in places that are looking for ADD(X,CST). The ARM backend in
particular was missing a lot of addressing mode folding opportunities
around OR.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@125470 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
opportunities. For example, this lets it emit this:
movq (%rax), %rcx
addq %rdx, %rcx
instead of this:
movq %rdx, %rcx
addq (%rax), %rcx
in the case where %rdx has subsequent uses. It's the same number
of instructions, and usually the same encoding size on x86, but
it appears faster, and in general, it may allow better scheduling
for the load.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@106493 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
integer and floating-point opcodes, introducing
FAdd, FSub, and FMul.
For now, the AsmParser, BitcodeReader, and IRBuilder all preserve
backwards compatability, and the Core LLVM APIs preserve backwards
compatibility for IR producers. Most front-ends won't need to change
immediately.
This implements the first step of the plan outlined here:
http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/IntegerOverflow.txt
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@72897 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8