eliminating a potentially quadratic data structure, this also gives a 17%
speedup when running -scalarrepl on test-suite + SPEC2000 + SPEC2006. My initial
experiment gave a greater speedup around 25%, but I moved the dominator tree
level computation from dominator tree construction to PromoteMemToReg.
Since this approach to computing IDFs has a much lower overhead than the old
code using precomputed DFs, it is worth looking at using this new code for the
second scalarrepl pass as well.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123609 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This fixes the original testcase in PR8927. It also causes a clang
binary built with a patched clang to increase in size by 0.21%.
We can probably get some of the size back by writing a pass that
detects that a global never has its pointer compared and adds
unnamed_addr to it (maybe extend global opt). It is also possible that
there are some other cases clang could add unnamed_addr to.
I will investigate extending globalopt next.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123584 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
into and/shift would cause nodes to move around and a dangling pointer
to happen. The code tried to avoid this with a HandleSDNode, but
got the details wrong.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123578 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
then don't try to decimate it into its individual pieces. This will just make a mess of the
IR and is pointless if none of the elements are individually accessed. This was generating
really terrible code for std::bitset (PR8980) because it happens to be lowered by clang
as an {[8 x i8]} structure instead of {i64}.
The testcase now is optimized to:
define i64 @test2(i64 %X) {
br label %L2
L2: ; preds = %0
ret i64 %X
}
before we generated:
define i64 @test2(i64 %X) {
%sroa.store.elt = lshr i64 %X, 56
%1 = trunc i64 %sroa.store.elt to i8
%sroa.store.elt8 = lshr i64 %X, 48
%2 = trunc i64 %sroa.store.elt8 to i8
%sroa.store.elt9 = lshr i64 %X, 40
%3 = trunc i64 %sroa.store.elt9 to i8
%sroa.store.elt10 = lshr i64 %X, 32
%4 = trunc i64 %sroa.store.elt10 to i8
%sroa.store.elt11 = lshr i64 %X, 24
%5 = trunc i64 %sroa.store.elt11 to i8
%sroa.store.elt12 = lshr i64 %X, 16
%6 = trunc i64 %sroa.store.elt12 to i8
%sroa.store.elt13 = lshr i64 %X, 8
%7 = trunc i64 %sroa.store.elt13 to i8
%8 = trunc i64 %X to i8
br label %L2
L2: ; preds = %0
%9 = zext i8 %1 to i64
%10 = shl i64 %9, 56
%11 = zext i8 %2 to i64
%12 = shl i64 %11, 48
%13 = or i64 %12, %10
%14 = zext i8 %3 to i64
%15 = shl i64 %14, 40
%16 = or i64 %15, %13
%17 = zext i8 %4 to i64
%18 = shl i64 %17, 32
%19 = or i64 %18, %16
%20 = zext i8 %5 to i64
%21 = shl i64 %20, 24
%22 = or i64 %21, %19
%23 = zext i8 %6 to i64
%24 = shl i64 %23, 16
%25 = or i64 %24, %22
%26 = zext i8 %7 to i64
%27 = shl i64 %26, 8
%28 = or i64 %27, %25
%29 = zext i8 %8 to i64
%30 = or i64 %29, %28
ret i64 %30
}
In this case, instcombine was able to eliminate the nonsense, but in PR8980 enough
PHIs are in play that instcombine backs off. It's better to not generate this stuff
in the first place.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123571 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
multiple uses. In some cases, all the uses are the same operation,
so instcombine can go ahead and promote the phi. In the testcase
this pushes an add out of the loop.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123568 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
http://graphics.stanford.edu/~seander/bithacks.html#CountBitsSetParallel
In a silly microbenchmark on a 65 nm core2 this is 1.5x faster than the old
code in 32 bit mode and about 2x faster in 64 bit mode. It's also a lot shorter,
especially when counting 64 bit population on a 32 bit target.
I hope this is fast enough to replace Kernighan-style counting loops even when
the input is rather sparse.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123547 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
